Hon'ble Justice Nariman on "Guardian Angel of Fundamental Rights"
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 22 ม.ค. 2019
- Hon'ble Mr Justice Rohinton F. Nariman, Judge, Supreme Court of India, speaks on 'Guardian Angel of Fundamental Rights' at the Sixteenth Nani A. Palkhivala Memorial Lecture on 15 December, 2018.
![Federalism: Legislative Relations between Centre and States [Justice J.S.Verma 2nd Memorial Lecture]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/aKDON8JuyLk/mqdefault.jpg)
What an articulate man! The careful depth the speech sought to achieve while summarising the rest, is beautiful!
Real tribute to Mr Nani Palkhiwala and his genious. We are enjoying fruits of Nani's labour even in 2019. Mr Nariman's lecture is a studied lecture, worth listening by students of law/others
Its a remarkable lecture and very humbly say that great tribute to Shri Nani Palkhiwala.
Being a law student I can't tell how significance Lectures like this . Literally With an hour of speech he has covered most important parts of UPSC Polity 😁.
Excellent, enthusiastic, academic,ever rememberable speech on constitution preferably it's conscience with regard to Basic Structure. It is a great boon conferred on us by the law Protecters Family.🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
Every word justifies the wisdom collected spread across years of experience. Such is brilliance of Judges of our nation, the legend of Justice Rohintan Fali Nariman.
Great legend Justice Nariman sir. India needs more Narimans because of the huge gap and acute shortage of Narimans to protect the Constitution of India.
Justice R.F.Nariman Always Excellent with Full of knowledge. Thank you very much Sir.
Very nice sir👏
Thank you so much🙏
WONDERFUL PRESENTATION AND EXPLANATION TO EXPLORE AND EXPERIENCE
Brilliant extempore speech! Thank you.
Masterclass 🌹🌹.. A Chief Justice who never was...
This video should be protected saved and handed down generations to protect the soul of our democracy.
This great lecture should at least have 10 million views.
Thanks for guidance on Constitution sir.
B VEERAPPA is a big CURROUPT Judge in Karnataka High court having connection with land developers and political leaders..
A great lecture.
Memorial lecture, relevant to the point. Dr.T.C.MOHANAM, Advocate PONDICHERRY
Great speech about a savior of democracy !!!!
Your lecture is equivalent to reading 1000 books on fundamental rights
Thank ing Js Meena of MPHHC for initiating me to family's court arbitrations dispute of the fact established not earlier than 1984
Very significant for our legal fraternity
Excellent
This man is genius
Nice speech
JaiMaharashtra
Jai hind bharat mata ki jai ho
Who was legal advisor to miss gandhi
P VISHVANATHA SHETTY is big CURROUPT Judge in Karnataka
And the faternity is missing now....
President of India MS Droupadi Murmur should revoke authorization granted temporarily in favor of Supreme Court and take actions against 90 officers found engaged to illicit activities by criminal misconduct by illicit agreement with some advocates agents of judges appointed by collegium system seditious conspiracy disloyality and disaffection to sovereignty of India anti India.
90 retired officers कानून मन्त्री के खिलाफ खत लिखे " आप का व्यान सुप्रिम कोर्ट पर हमले जैसे " जनता अधिकार हनन 5 backlog cases निलंबित क्यो?
1), सम्बन्धित अधिकारी बिट आफिसर तैनात कर अवैध धन्धे करवाते और माफिया दलाल आतातायी लोगो से साठगांठ कर उगाही खुलेआम करते है ब्रिटिश कोलोनियल निरंकुश कानून सञ्चालन सुप्रीम कोर्ट अस्थाई रूप से by officials permission authorization granted in favor of Supreme Court to deal with British colonial legislation protected by Supreme Court and Supreme Court is subject to recognition and control of guidelines of British colonialism legislation oppressive laws intended for domination over sovereignty of India lessened strength of preamble of constitution anti India.
Has preamble of constitution provision to add British colonialism judiciary Independency unbridled power unaccompanied by liability to be superseded by British colonialism judiciary now collegium system anti India.
President of India Supreme authority can revoke authorization granted in favor of Supreme to deal with British colonial legislation judiciary anti India Indian rule of democratic standards and judicial accountability subject to control of preamble of constitution to serve people. Outcome of deliberations of actions and reactions of opinions of delegates of people representing parliament. People need abolition of colonialism judiciary Independency unbridled power unaccompanied by liability anti India disloyality and disaffection dealt with Supreme Court alien rules of laws not acceptable to people and government of India.
Very poor lecture deficiency in declaring individual as supreme and not constitution because individual makes constitution
NHRC is there with SC Judges to understand their job as Human Rights experts which includes Fundamental Rights too. But they don't know their job. High Court & Supreme Court judges also have no idea what these rights are. Then what's all this law about ? U people in the legal profession have no idea whatsoever how criminal it is for u to choose a profession as explosive as law and get away with misinterpretation of this explosive profession with complete impunity. The whole judiciary has no idea that u have Terrorists sitting in the Bar & Benches with complete impunity making fun out of the law. How is the citizen (common-man) of a democratic country supposed to make out the head or tail of these lectures if he cannot get justice over a 5-Minute-Case for 25 Years ? At least u judicial people must understand ur own hypocracies. If u analyse the law like this - like a fragile piece of glass - an artwork, then how come ur judges & lawyers can operate freely like bulls in a glass-house ? It's really amazing how much difference there is between the Book & it's Interpreters in practical terms. There is Zero relation between the Book & the manner in which ur Judiciary is operating. How can u have lawyers who can't even write one sentence correct ly, who do even not respond to any basic application from a Litigant for years together & who join together on both sides of the rostrum in a wink-wink relationship to fool the hell out of the Law-Book & and get away for decades awaiting the death of their "Joint-Victim", & the courts fully co-operate in this Capital-Criminality ?? Pl let there be some relationship between ground realities & the teachings of eminent scholars .... Alternatively go in for AI Legal Profession whereby any Litigant who wants to stand in a court of law refers to the AI Lawyer & asks the AI Lawyer to spk for his basic 5 Minute-Problem & seal the fates of clever & corrupt lawyers forever in 5 Minutes rather than suffer a labyrinthine merry go round is trial, appeal, SLPs & back, & on & on till he dies ... I'm shocked by the utter mismatch between the fineness of the Law-Books & the Utter-Hypocricy of its operators - the bar-benches ...