PrePoMax (CalculiX FEA) - Tutorial 35 - Modal dynamics - mass-spring-damper system

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 ส.ค. 2024
  • PrePoMax is an open-source pre- and postprocessor for (also open-source) finite element analysis solver CalculiX. It's extremely user friendly and doesn't even require installation. PrePoMax can be used only on Windows.
    In this tutorial I would like to show you how to perform a modal dynamics analysis of a mass-spring-damper system subjected to impulse force.
    Geometry in step format and Scilab script: drive.google.c...
    PrePoMax homepage: prepomax.fs.um...
    Scilab homepage: www.scilab.org/

ความคิดเห็น • 15

  • @MrRenatopepin
    @MrRenatopepin ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Amazing stuff as always, sir. Keep them coming

  • @Toni-yl4hc
    @Toni-yl4hc ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great tutorial of such a great feature of Prepomax 👏👏

  • @rogerbergua6268
    @rogerbergua6268 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Awesome tutorial! I'm wondering if instead of defining data points for the input load, you could use an input file with a time serie.

    • @FEAnalyst
      @FEAnalyst  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      There's no option to read the amplitude data directly from a file but you can just copy it and paste to the table if it's formatted properly.

  • @setsototitipana8433
    @setsototitipana8433 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Very great video, LOVE YOUR WORK
    By any chance you could make a video about wave propagation in structure like in ultra sonic test? you have a structural member like a rod for example. one end of the rod is excited and the energy propagates through the structure and the response of the other end of the structure is record. It seems like it could be done using modal superpositoon like in the video but am not sure

    • @FEAnalyst
      @FEAnalyst  4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks. I would use implicit or explicit dynamic analysis for that. This is a common benchmark for explicit solvers. I have a video about explicit dynamic analysis of a bar impacting a rigid wall but I will consider showing something like you described. It could be also used to show the concept of a stable time increment.

    • @setsototitipana8433
      @setsototitipana8433 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@FEAnalyst Thank you, I would really like to see that. Meanwhile I will look at the video about the explicit dynamics to get a sense of how I would go about setting up the problem using that technique.

  • @xzarrandiko
    @xzarrandiko ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Congratulations!

    • @jakubsobka2621
      @jakubsobka2621 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

      ...of "kurua" what?

    • @jakubsobka2621
      @jakubsobka2621 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

      there's no fuucking way to run solver with modal dynamic step steady dynamic step or freqency step wothour just dynamic step output...?
      isn't it?

  • @jakubsobka2621
    @jakubsobka2621 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Tymi razem grafika-montażyste oceniamy tylko na 2+ bo nawet czasu na zegarach nie skorygował u wszystko szybko rzuciło się w oczy 🥱

  • @marcobatisti5252
    @marcobatisti5252 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Very nice!!! Can you please share the .inp input file for calculix analysis? Thank you very much and keep pushing💪

    • @FEAnalyst
      @FEAnalyst  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You can find the input file here: drive.google.com/file/d/1yZ7j590tZK4TAzluo8rFRVqbZ78udRS-/view?usp=sharing

  • @toshibamaster2210
    @toshibamaster2210 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    to do the same for a 2D cantilever beam with delamination near the fastening?

    • @FEAnalyst
      @FEAnalyst  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Modal dynamics analyses are linear, they don't support changing contact conditions. You would need dynamic implicit step for that.