Regardless of how the bishops see it, the congregation is seeing contradictions in teachings. We are taught 'Let many of you become teachers' and evidently those who shouldn't teach keep doing so, keep causing confusion, and when some bishops respond in attempt to clarify, the clarification carries the risk of causing division, even if all they say is the truth. Why are those speaking confusing and sometimes blatantly incorrect teachings still allowed to keep teaching?
At 41:00, Anba Serapion says our church accepted the 2 agreements with the EOs. This is very important. We need to go back and read them carefully. If truly the Coptic Church accepted them, then there are some Coptic bishops and priests who teaching in ways as if these agreements never was accepted. This is the confusion.
You’re overestimating the importance and significance of these agreements. Our church saying that the EO aren’t Nestorians isn’t license to adopt and preach all their beliefs from a Coptic Orthodox pulpit.
@@ploopploop9569 then according to you, Anba Serapion is lying that “the Coptic Church already accept these agreements”, or we are “politely” lying to the EOs
Regardless of how the bishops see it, the congregation is seeing contradictions in teachings. We are taught 'Let many of you become teachers' and evidently those who shouldn't teach keep doing so, keep causing confusion, and when some bishops respond in attempt to clarify, the clarification carries the risk of causing division, even if all they say is the truth. Why are those speaking confusing and sometimes blatantly incorrect teachings still allowed to keep teaching?
True
سيرنا من فضلك هل نحن في أيام يضل لو امكن المختارين أيضا
At 41:00, Anba Serapion says our church accepted the 2 agreements with the EOs. This is very important. We need to go back and read them carefully. If truly the Coptic Church accepted them, then there are some Coptic bishops and priests who teaching in ways as if these agreements never was accepted. This is the confusion.
You’re overestimating the importance and significance of these agreements. Our church saying that the EO aren’t Nestorians isn’t license to adopt and preach all their beliefs from a Coptic Orthodox pulpit.
@ it’s not license also to say these agreements are null and void either and continue to spread the idea they’re still Nestorians.
@@minasolimanunless there is an actual council that restores communion, the agreements are nothing more than polite formalities.
@@ploopploop9569 then according to you, Anba Serapion is lying that “the Coptic Church already accept these agreements”, or we are “politely” lying to the EOs
@@minasoliman The EOs didn't accept those statements though, as a whole (neither did OO as a whole.) That surely says something, no?
Propaganda blablabla