Could you please clarify for the last part of the final question as to why we can infer that it is a Kopen because the stem doesn't say that they are the only type of fish?
Yes of course, this one is worded quite strangely. In this instance the term Kopen is more of an umbrella term, for example the term "Goldfish" can include many different species of individual fish. The stem says that pluders are kopens, it does not say that anything about pluders being nizens and so we can exlude nizens and the question itself excludes mooms and so the only other type of fish within this category is the Kopen. Have a look at the venn diagram I made in the video to help visualize this
![ทุกครั้งที่หลับตา (Lucid Dream) - AYLA's [ Official MV ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/4i1OBAQyv58/mqdefault.jpg)
brilliant jack mate
Great video!
Do you mind going over Quantative reasoning?
I don't like maths and I do find it quite tricky
haha sure, it'll be the next video, should be up by Monday
@@Jack5137 thanks a lot
Could you please clarify for the last part of the final question as to why we can infer that it is a Kopen because the stem doesn't say that they are the only type of fish?
Yes of course, this one is worded quite strangely. In this instance the term Kopen is more of an umbrella term, for example the term "Goldfish" can include many different species of individual fish. The stem says that pluders are kopens, it does not say that anything about pluders being nizens and so we can exlude nizens and the question itself excludes mooms and so the only other type of fish within this category is the Kopen. Have a look at the venn diagram I made in the video to help visualize this
@@Jack5137 Thank you!