Patreon: patreon.com/FrappaJacks What Do You Think Of The State Of Ark Dinos In 2025? Also Why Not Subscribe It's Free And Your Grandma Will Thank You!
Wild babies were really a game changer for some "bad" dinos because quite a few are much harder to tame than they're worth, so with wild babies bypassing the taming process they're not a bad deal, like the karkinos
@anguisrex9271 wrong and wrong, my friend. They reskinned a shadowmane, made it OP af, then charge people to use it. They spawned all over on Aberration at launch.
@thepool3974 it's very clearly not a shadowmane, it's closer to a blown up saber. And they're not even OP. I've had them since launch, they're solid midsize tames but anything bigger than a Carno can take one down if the levels are similar. They only thing they have going for them is their size changing and even that's kinda meh. Tbh i mostly just use them as mobile grills/insulation while i ride on an actual useful tame. Like a Yuty or a bird.
@@anguisrex9271 the problem is the fact that they are op in pvp and u have to pay to tame them otherwise ppl get an advantage when it comes to pve no1 cares cause its pve but pvp its unfair and stupid especially when it burns u which is 1 of the most op types of dmg in pvp as it goes through armor and does a % dmg
They spawn on center, aberration, and scorched, they can become a shoulder mounted flamethrower, they deal fire damage for 30 seconds, they have the same biting animations as the shadowmane, it cost 5$ for a single creature, in a remastered game that cost 40$, has a preinstalled 64 armor saddle, and is super easy to tame, thats why its hated, and thats all coming from a single player user.
Can we pls stop calling everything "dinos"? Dinosaurs are a specific group within the group of reptiles, calling a mammal dino is as wrong as saying fish are insects. Considering more than 2/3 of the creatures in Ark are NOT dinosaurs, its even more wrong, yes a bunch of people "dino" everything, but that doesn't make it right. As for the video's topic, a lot of *creatures* are in desperate need of a TLC, but that is not likely to happen, Wild Card don't have the time and money for that, and probably don't even care, instead, they'll continue to rush and dish out new content, combining the lowest effort and the highest profit they can get away with.. If anyone noticed, with the ASA DLCs, they're selling solutions to problems they created in the first place, ..not a good sign for the future.
It's A Shame About The Future Of Ark Tbh. I Know They're Not All Dinos But I Only Generalise Them When Talking About Ark. Everyone Knows What I Mean When I Say It So I Think It's Fine.
Patreon: patreon.com/FrappaJacks
What Do You Think Of The State Of Ark Dinos In 2025? Also Why Not Subscribe It's Free And Your Grandma Will Thank You!
So many forgotten Dino’s.
If it don’t boss, it usually gets ignored.
Pretty Much.
Wild babies were really a game changer for some "bad" dinos because quite a few are much harder to tame than they're worth, so with wild babies bypassing the taming process they're not a bad deal, like the karkinos
Yh Definitely!
I think the Therizinosaurus probably made more creatures irrelevant than any other added creature.
I love it to death. But still.
Yh
I don't really understand the pyromane shade... they don't detract from the game, and as far as i'm aware, they only show up one map.
@anguisrex9271 wrong and wrong, my friend. They reskinned a shadowmane, made it OP af, then charge people to use it. They spawned all over on Aberration at launch.
Ehh while at launch it was an issue, it's barely noticeable now
@thepool3974 it's very clearly not a shadowmane, it's closer to a blown up saber. And they're not even OP. I've had them since launch, they're solid midsize tames but anything bigger than a Carno can take one down if the levels are similar. They only thing they have going for them is their size changing and even that's kinda meh. Tbh i mostly just use them as mobile grills/insulation while i ride on an actual useful tame. Like a Yuty or a bird.
@@anguisrex9271 the problem is the fact that they are op in pvp and u have to pay to tame them otherwise ppl get an advantage when it comes to pve no1 cares cause its pve but pvp its unfair and stupid especially when it burns u which is 1 of the most op types of dmg in pvp as it goes through armor and does a % dmg
They spawn on center, aberration, and scorched, they can become a shoulder mounted flamethrower, they deal fire damage for 30 seconds, they have the same biting animations as the shadowmane, it cost 5$ for a single creature, in a remastered game that cost 40$, has a preinstalled 64 armor saddle, and is super easy to tame, thats why its hated, and thats all coming from a single player user.
Bro's out here complaining they about ASE dinos not getting updates... you do know wildcard are not supporting that game anymore?
Yes I Do. But ASA Hasn't Got Them Either.
Can we pls stop calling everything "dinos"? Dinosaurs are a specific group within the group of reptiles, calling a mammal dino is as wrong as saying fish are insects. Considering more than 2/3 of the creatures in Ark are NOT dinosaurs, its even more wrong, yes a bunch of people "dino" everything, but that doesn't make it right. As for the video's topic, a lot of *creatures* are in desperate need of a TLC, but that is not likely to happen, Wild Card don't have the time and money for that, and probably don't even care, instead, they'll continue to rush and dish out new content, combining the lowest effort and the highest profit they can get away with.. If anyone noticed, with the ASA DLCs, they're selling solutions to problems they created in the first place, ..not a good sign for the future.
They should be called dinner since all of them are food
XD
It's A Shame About The Future Of Ark Tbh. I Know They're Not All Dinos But I Only Generalise Them When Talking About Ark. Everyone Knows What I Mean When I Say It So I Think It's Fine.