Why Syd Field's Paradigm Made Iron Man a Masterpiece

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 20 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 17

  • @Tysto
    @Tysto ปีที่แล้ว +9

    The midpoint is always a crisis that makes the heroes realize that resolving the conflict will be harder than they thought. In Iron Man, that's Obie telling Tony the board filed an injunction to lock him out. And he tries to use it to get the arc reactor. That ends exactly half way thru the film.

    • @HowStoriesWork
      @HowStoriesWork  ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Some people define it that way, but Syd Field (creator of the Paradigm, and thus the Midpoint), is not so restrictive to “always.” Here’s his definition: “An important scene in the middle of the script, often a reversal of fortune or revelation that changes the direction of the story.” But I think your selected Midpoint works as well. Although, to be sure I’d have to do a more detailed analysis. Thanks for watching!

  • @Boncomics
    @Boncomics 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Props for your STRANGER THINGS mise-en-scene in the background!

  • @boingomendoza8303
    @boingomendoza8303 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This was crazy comprehensive!

    • @HowStoriesWork
      @HowStoriesWork  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thank you! And thanks for watching and commenting!

  • @bramjurres1400
    @bramjurres1400 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    very good explaint!

  • @Boncomics
    @Boncomics 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

    8:35 A clunky and 'roughly' accurate adaptation of the MARK I Iron Man suit from AVENGERS #1!!! Glad they didn't skip over that one in the film.

  • @TheOnesimple
    @TheOnesimple 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Excellently Explained

  • @jayexcellence6898
    @jayexcellence6898 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Subscribed 🎉❤

  • @TheBluenyt09
    @TheBluenyt09 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Awzum! I learned plenty 😎👍

    • @HowStoriesWork
      @HowStoriesWork  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Awesome! Glad to hear it! - Jay

  • @chriswest8389
    @chriswest8389 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Yes. Non lineal story telling. Were now all disiples of Q.T

  • @Boncomics
    @Boncomics 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

    0:25 It's funny when you say "Original IRON MAN". We've had 3 (technically 4) Spider-Men in live-action, 9+ BATMEN, 3, yes 3 Wonder Women, 5 Reed Richards [Justice for Harvey Corman], and 1 WOLVERINE [not counting events in DP vs WOLVERINE]. RDJ is the Only IRON MAN; Tom Cruise wasn't available for his scene in DOCTOR STRANGE 2.

    • @HowStoriesWork
      @HowStoriesWork  17 วันที่ผ่านมา

      That’s a good point. The one and ONLY Iron Man!

  • @chriswest8389
    @chriswest8389 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Mordern films typically do this dont they? Theres two variations to this I belive . A scene is shown out of secquence, a preview in a way. Were intrigued. How did our protagonist get to this point were thinking. We now get a glimpse - the context , as the story unfolds. I prefer the latter opening concept. The films starts of with a dramatic incident but then in the scene that follows you get a nice slow build up in the bk( everyday) but with some nice forshadowing. Third person audience omniscent. Tension off the bat. Were fearing our pro is going to get blind sided.The second is when we establish the protagonists character in the opening scene,Frequency' comes to mind. The former, I really dislike. It treats the audiance like children. Theres usually a 5 to ten minute grace period the audenice gives the film makers anyway, isn't there?Whats the rush?. But, I supose, give the people what they want.Its just different strokes really. Personaly I dont like being on my bk foot from the opening scene.