🚨 UPDATED VERSION OF THIS VIDEO: th-cam.com/video/0-GLtLJQE9o/w-d-xo.html We're in the process of updating our Civil Procedure video lecture series. The updated version of this video is now available here: th-cam.com/video/0-GLtLJQE9o/w-d-xo.html
I'd like to thank you and commend you for your explanations! You really helped me comprehend these concepts. I hope to see more videos from you! Sincerely, a lost 1L
Thank you for taking the time to make this! This will be very helpful for my exam. Out of all the videos I've watched, your way of explaining concepts makes the most sense to me. :)
thanks for the video!! Its amazing how different it is civil procedure in comon law!! im not familiar with comom law since I am from Brazil, and here the civil law is our primarily source of law, so instead, we have a big code of procedure law consists more than 2.000 articles divided in chapter, sections!!! So things here are lot more complicated!!! thanks for the video!!!
When challenged, the plaintiff must prove jurisdiction -- requires persistence, however, over attorneys bluffs. I'm still searching for how attorneys can prove jurisdiction outside the constitution -- because all Rules of Civil procedure are outside of the constitution.
So what if a state superior court judge denies a protective order per subject matter jurisdiction? But then validates it with reasoning being a separate county in the same state is where it should be heard ? Aka the venue ?
The federal government has no rights for violations in Religion and constitutional Conformity: Ex: A contentiousness objector refuse to comply with police to give blood: even with a warrant
Nevertheless, IF subject matter jurisdicrion is initially challenged, the court MUST then prove subject matter jurisdiction, on the record. Subject matter jurisdiction cannot be waived. If the court does not prove subject matter jurisdiction, once challenged, you automatically win the case. Let's not explain away our rights regarding this important issue, by omitting this legal and binding truth. 👍
@@cultusgti All good, you're welcome. Yet another trick to be VERY vigilent of once a case is filed, is the sneaky Court Clerk/Prothonatary. They will immeduately mail you a fake court document to dismiss your case, usually in an envelope marked "LEGAL MAIL", in red ink. You must NOT open the letter, but return to sender. If you choose to open their letter instead, you have then legally agreed to whatever bs court order they will definitely OFFER to dismiss your case. Return the unopened envelope to sender...see the TH-cam postings regarding "returning mail to sender to avoid unknowingly agreeing to a deathblow, however, legally binding contract agreement to immediately DISMISS your case".
![How to Analyze Personal Jurisdiction on a Civil Procedure Essay [SCOTUS UPDATE: See Description]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/OHNBLiemiLg/mqdefault.jpg)
Darrell Brooks brought me here!!!
🚨 UPDATED VERSION OF THIS VIDEO: th-cam.com/video/0-GLtLJQE9o/w-d-xo.html
We're in the process of updating our Civil Procedure video lecture series. The updated version of this video is now available here: th-cam.com/video/0-GLtLJQE9o/w-d-xo.html
Hear that, Darrel Brooks?🤦🏾♂️
HILARIOUS ! 😂😂😂😂😂
I'd like to thank you and commend you for your explanations! You really helped me comprehend these concepts. I hope to see more videos from you!
Sincerely,
a lost 1L
Thank you for taking the time to make this! This will be very helpful for my exam. Out of all the videos I've watched, your way of explaining concepts makes the most sense to me. :)
Awesome, glad it was helpful for you!
I like these focused videos that show you the macro and micro picture of the puzzle. Signing up for your lessons. Great job!
Were you mentoring Darrell Brooks?
Anything on venue and pleadings please?
These are golden! Thank you for the videos!
Would you happen to have any videos on preclusion? Claim and/or issue?
thanks for the video!! Its amazing how different it is civil procedure in comon law!! im not familiar with comom law since I am from Brazil, and here the civil law is our primarily source of law, so instead, we have a big code of procedure law consists more than 2.000 articles divided in chapter, sections!!! So things here are lot more complicated!!! thanks for the video!!!
Thank you so much for this video :)
So if you want to use case law then challenge jurisdiction in these state courts. Case law is the law of the land
When challenged, the plaintiff must prove jurisdiction -- requires persistence, however, over attorneys bluffs. I'm still searching for how attorneys can prove jurisdiction outside the constitution -- because all Rules of Civil procedure are outside of the constitution.
Seriously can you replace my Business law professor 😂😂😂
So what if a state superior court judge denies a protective order per subject matter jurisdiction? But then validates it with reasoning being a separate county in the same state is where it should be heard ? Aka the venue ?
Question for Studicata, have you ever heard of an express statutory grant of jurisdiction for federal courts?
Thank you
great thank you
Unless there is no fact in controversy, then there is no SMJ anywhere.
The federal government has no rights for violations in Religion and constitutional Conformity: Ex: A contentiousness objector refuse to comply with police to give blood: even with a warrant
Nevertheless, IF subject matter jurisdicrion is initially challenged, the court MUST then prove subject matter jurisdiction, on the record. Subject matter jurisdiction cannot be waived. If the court does not prove subject matter jurisdiction, once challenged, you automatically win the case. Let's not explain away our rights regarding this important issue, by omitting this legal and binding truth. 👍
@@cultusgti All good, you're welcome. Yet another trick to be VERY vigilent of once a case is filed, is the sneaky Court Clerk/Prothonatary. They will immeduately mail you a fake court document to dismiss your case, usually in an envelope marked "LEGAL MAIL", in red ink. You must NOT open the letter, but return to sender. If you choose to open their letter instead, you have then legally agreed to whatever bs court order they will definitely OFFER to dismiss your case. Return the unopened envelope to sender...see the TH-cam postings regarding "returning mail to sender to avoid unknowingly agreeing to a deathblow, however, legally binding contract agreement to immediately DISMISS your case".