What do you think about the ES-30? We think it's awesome! If you enjoyed this video, leave like and sub to the channel if you're new around here 🙌🏼 We have more exclusive content in the works... ✨
@@infiniteflight how it will sounds in flight simulator 🤔 i think not like ge 90😅yes?) But if serious i think it's all about how far(maximum range) it can fly and how stable it will be when fly in heavy rain or worser weather conditions.
I think it's a great product for its niche application which happens to have the largest energy use per km which is regional aviation, especially when most of the existing routes are heavily subsidized and/or money losing services that generally fly with low seat use... Here in Alberta most of them have disappeared entirely but there are certain high density corridors and regions where it makes sense and cents!
I saw this as a short, and the voice of the journalist was so captivating that I had to watch the longer version. Now I know things about electrical planes that I have no business knowing. Intriguing
That is such a great design having the Hybrid design as here in Canada, Harbour Air has been working on their all electric but the main issue is the FAA requiring additional range for emergency use and at the moment that reduces the passenger capacity until the FAA can work past the old specification of mechanical failure issues on the ICE design and allow for less stringent requirements for such an improved power train as far as reliability is concerned.
Amazing to see electric aviation moving from sci-fi to reality! The Heart X1 demonstrator shows just how far battery and motor technology has come. While range will be the big challenge for electric planes, these shorter regional routes are the perfect testing ground. Looking forward to the day when boarding an electric plane is as normal as hopping in an EV. The aviation industry needs this kind of innovation to tackle its carbon footprint. Hope you do more videos exploring other electric aircraft projects! 🛩⚡
@@PJWeyyeah, the energy density of batteries is far to low for planes, the answer for planes is hydrogen or biofuels as all efficiency losses are completely overthrown by the added weight
I think it is an interesting concept for the short haul market as you have to worry less about diverting to a field out of electrical range. The biggest questionmark and potential roadblock for success would of course be the cost.
Mixed feelings getting updates on this as an outsider now but it's good to see my former co-workers going at it! Bet Christian is looking forward to more drilling & tapping into that steel structure, hahaha. :)
While the challenges are daunting, it’s still fun to see them taking a step forward. I’m having trouble wrapping my head around the dual-power concept as presented. It seems like airline economics would stumble a bit at the extra costs, and as a pilot I can only think of the “what now?” if one of the outboard (cold-soaked) turbines declines to start. I know they’re smart people working hard to solve the issues, but it seems to me, from fuel-cell and railroads (diesel electric) that perhaps the gas turbine would be better employed as an onboard generator to drive the electric motors already in use. Dragging extra nacelles and feathered props seems weird, but then, I’m outside looking in, and don’t have the information they do. I’ll keep an eye on it. Thanks for a good story!
The answer to your question is redundancy. You have two types of engines working independently of one another and in total you have 4 engines. I am pretty sure that the aircraft would be able to safely glide and land even on 1 engine.
Very cool. I wish your company the best. Why not combine the electric and turboprop propulsion into a single nacelle on both sides? If you have the four nacelles with the outer two turboprop and are running on electric wouldn't the outer nacelles be a lot of drag?
I might have missed it, but was there a question about: 1) can a mobile Batterie pack extend the electrical capacity on a cargo flight ? 2) do the turbines recuperate? 3) what sequence of operating the hybrid turbines is more efficient , which is more environmental saving: a ) starting with electric + long distance in high altitude with gas + landing with Electric b) starting with gas + long distance with electric + landing whatsoever ??
Cool stuff… I can’t recall a video from a couple of years back of a similar high wing twin engine perhaps 20 seats that was manufactured as they are with basic gas engines. A firm was working on converting it to fully electric, but what concern me about that conversion was the fact that there aircraft structure has design stresses for the fuels weight to be in a typical wing tanks not in the fuselage as now that weight as batteries was placed in the fuselage. I wonder if your aircraft places the batteries in the wings.
Very promising, however one certainly hopes the battery never goes into thermal runaway as has been seen with some EV’s these days! Up in the air this would be non survivable. Some serious high temperature resistant but low weight shielding may be necessary? Ceramic fibre envelope perhaps surrounded by honeycombed high temp alloy shell?
I wonder what were the considerations for developing a parallel hybrid using two types of drive instead of series hybrid with only one type of drive (electric) with gas turbine for alternate electric generation that IMO seems much simpler?
I do see these aircraft operating on some potential routes that are less than 200 kph in distance. But the question is, how easy will they travel to some destinations that are far abroad from the main factory.
beautiful plane by heart nice step for aviation. with electric planes, it would be cheaper than taking Greyhound buses since these plane will be all electric, while greyhound bus will be diesel.
Once lithium deposits are mined, the area often becomes unsuitable for agriculture. While advocates for electric vehicles emphasize their lack of carbon emissions, it’s essential to consider the environmental impact at the root of the product. Before claiming to avoid carbon emissions, evaluate the entire lifecycle of the materials involved.
Interesting that Heart decided to go with two turbo jets rather than four electric motors and an internal turbo generator. Must be to do with power requirements.
Something I've wondered with these hybrid electric aircraft is why don't they make all the propulsion motors electric, then have a single, larger (which is more efficient than several smaller) turbine acting as a generator? Because electric motors are far simpler, with reduced maintenance and purchase cost in comparison to turbines.
What's the reason that it's not a Blended wing body design? I know little about aviation, but it's said that it could achieve fuel savings of over 20 percent?
This was my thought also. However there must be a trade-off calculation somewhere. With the "range extender" you are converting chemical to mechanical to electrical and back to mechanical. Each transition costs you energy. Maybe it is more efficient to just use the mechanical energy directly for propulsion even if there maybe extra drag from having 4 props instead of 2. Something similar is done in vehicles in that when cruising or using higher powers it is the ICE that is more directly powering the wheels. In the case of Honda hybrid system they switch from a "range-extender" type arrangement and will directly clutch the engine to the wheels at motorway speeds. Maybe it is also too much weight to put in the back of the aircraft (large battery + larger APU). Though surely you could arrange batteries to distribute the mass.
an ATR-42/72 concept design hybrid with CRJ nose section 😁just kidding, it's beatiful aircraft anyway... 😁 just wondering there will be XWB next generation, because obviously, airlines will demand more seats and more range with efficient seat per mile cost 😅
Don't we have enough market for electric aircrafts of 200 km range? I think its better to go for all electric with short haul markets and then increase the range as the batteries improve?
Landing an airliner in that simulator is harder than the real thing I expect. I once was given a brief opportunity to "fly" a USAF KC-10 in its six-axis simulator by my nephew, an Air Force pilot. He expected me to crash as all first time users tend to do, but I had practiced landings for a long time on Microsoft's Flight Simulator program at home so confronted with a realistic simulator that added actual physical sensations to the control inputs, I flew a quick pattern (under zero winds, but also the midnight conditions outside the lab) successfully to a landing. My only fault was not using the pedals to steer once on the runway, as my early version of the Microsoft FS had no way to do that. I drifted off the runway before coming to a stop.
Aviation and lithium batteries? If passenger planes aren't allowed to transport them as cargo due to the inherent risks they pose, how is this expected to get through certification?
I am curious on this, but moreso just the how, and what specifically you mean by 'air'. There are proposals about hydrogen powered aircraft, I think the CFM Rise is an example of this. But that requires specifically hydrogen that has to be prepared beforehand. You probably need some kind of store on the aircraft to react the air with in order to get energy out of it, that's what conventional fuel and hydrogen do. I am not sure you could get just the air from outside an aircraft and use that alone as a fuel.
Aviation must go electric, SAFs are just greenwashing. With batteries for short distances, and batteries and a hydrogen fuel cell for longer trips. Of course the hydrogen version will cost a lot to operate since green hydrogen is very expansive compared to tax free kerosene, so far less people will fly long distances.
Problem with electric planes is the sheer weight of the batteries. Take an EV and compare it to a similar size car in dimensions - then look at the weight. Planes also decrease fuel weight as they fly making take-off easier, infact the 737-MAX/specific Airbus models have advance takeoff profiles that makes them burn through enough fuel at a "middle" altitude to ease takeoff and improve range. Electric planes can't do this. Imo biofuels/sustainable fuels are probably a better option. Perhaps in the future we can see trijets that make use of 2 standard fueled engines for takeoff/emergency and one biofuel engine for cruise at altitude. Perhaps if the tech moves quick enough it'll just be twinjets (with propfans) with biofuel mixes for performance/sustainability. Either way, I really don't think there will be widespread proliferation of electric jets aside from niche cases with shorter-medium ranges and low noise requirements. Perhaps smaller private jets/charter jets out of more urban airports.
What could possibly go wrong? Obviously not relying on a gas turbines to enable a diversion. I noticed the cost of hauling the gas turbine engines, gearbox, fuel and batteries was never mentioned. I also didn’t see any anti-ice/de-ice on the aircraft - these will reduce the range enormously. Also not mentioned was the cost of pressurisation and air-conditioning. And the production aircraft’s range will be… This mob are going to need more luck the world actually has.
Why is it,that people has a problem with electric vehicles,come on ,you have electricity in your home,in your body from day one, it's all over, that's the way to go...!!
OK. Electric followed by Electric. Lots of Wow. Then HYBRID. It isn't an astonishing design - someone mentioned Dash 7. Hybrid in a car means commuting - engine to the ULEZ zone then turn Electric to avoid charges. As they don't exist in the air - why. You carry a battery and an engine - why not reduce weight and just use the engine, your still going to cause pollution anyway when the battery runs out and you turn the engine on.
So you have a more or less standard turboprop, but transporting the extra weight of electric engines and batteries... KUDOS... I totally fail to see the advantages. Maybe because there's none. I'll say, keep the electric motors if you want to, but use a turbine generator. You save the batterie's weight and maybe improve efficiency.
Electric planes are a bad concept just as electric cars. Batteries are heavy, have limited lifespans, and can pose safety risks, such as fire hazards if damaged or exposed to air. Additionally, their energy density is far lower than jet fuel, limiting range and making long-haul flights impractical. Unlike fuel, batteries don’t lighten as energy is consumed, keeping planes heavier throughout the flight. The production and disposal of batteries also have significant environmental impacts, and the required infrastructure upgrades at airports would be costly and challenging. Overall, electric planes are currently unfeasible for large-scale commercial aviation.
Pipe dreams. Far too niche and limited. Fight carbon emissions? Where do you think most electricity comes from? Fossil fuel plants. Renewable will never meet the demand. This is absurdity.
If developers read comments then can u add virtual joystick when u tryana to land on mobile it’s the real hell u can’t concentrate ur attention on speed level altitude whole time u will try to normolise balance of plane this is the worst in this game
What do you think about the ES-30? We think it's awesome!
If you enjoyed this video, leave like and sub to the channel if you're new around here 🙌🏼 We have more exclusive content in the works... ✨
@@infiniteflight how it will sounds in flight simulator 🤔 i think not like ge 90😅yes?)
But if serious i think it's all about how far(maximum range) it can fly and how stable it will be when fly in heavy rain or worser weather conditions.
Can I have a 737 900 pls
I think it's a great product for its niche application which happens to have the largest energy use per km which is regional aviation, especially when most of the existing routes are heavily subsidized and/or money losing services that generally fly with low seat use... Here in Alberta most of them have disappeared entirely but there are certain high density corridors and regions where it makes sense and cents!
Infinite flight: note I want to ask you one question how to unlock planes?
@@SyedNaqvi-nn1cn get pro sub, Man. That's simple! 🙂
I do love the introduction to electric & hybrid aircraft. I will admit, I really enjoy all aircraft as well.
I saw this as a short, and the voice of the journalist was so captivating that I had to watch the longer version. Now I know things about electrical planes that I have no business knowing. Intriguing
LMAO so downbad...
The design is more than beautiful!
Can’t wait seeing the first flight 😊
Electric Aircraft are pretty interesting to be honest. I’m excited to see what the future beholds. Amazing footage.
I like that they give young people opportunities 😊
That is such a great design having the Hybrid design as here in Canada, Harbour Air has been working on their all electric but the main issue is the FAA requiring additional range for emergency use and at the moment that reduces the passenger capacity until the FAA can work past the old specification of mechanical failure issues on the ICE design and allow for less stringent requirements for such an improved power train as far as reliability is concerned.
Amazing to see electric aviation moving from sci-fi to reality! The Heart X1 demonstrator shows just how far battery and motor technology has come. While range will be the big challenge for electric planes, these shorter regional routes are the perfect testing ground. Looking forward to the day when boarding an electric plane is as normal as hopping in an EV. The aviation industry needs this kind of innovation to tackle its carbon footprint. Hope you do more videos exploring other electric aircraft projects! 🛩⚡
Electric Dash-7
Basically and that's a good thing! The Dash 8 far outshined the 7 however someone needed to update the concept!
More like a 4 engine Saab 340, only 30 seats. A dash 8 carries way more passengers!
The in flight battery fire is part of the fun. Your saving the planet by becoming a smoking hole in the ground.
This plane looks very nice! Can’t wait to see it in action eventually
small and will not be reliable as it gets big ...
This thing has less range than a tesla....
@@ST0RM4_ there’s a very good reason Tesla started with cars
Keep the battery on the ground….
@@PJWeyyeah, the energy density of batteries is far to low for planes, the answer for planes is hydrogen or biofuels as all efficiency losses are completely overthrown by the added weight
@@ST0RM4_ A Tesla has less range than a BYD. What's your point?
@@Goodkiwibloke most city's are too far apart for the plane..
Another great video Dan! Super cool to see an aircraft being built from an clean sheet design.
Glad you liked it!
I think it is an interesting concept for the short haul market as you have to worry less about diverting to a field out of electrical range. The biggest questionmark and potential roadblock for success would of course be the cost.
Fascinating technology and video, very well presented by your engineers. Best of luck while you get your Heart X1 up and flying. Heart has heart!
Interesting!, Rooting for them 🤠
konsa helicopter 70 km ki height pr udta hai ye btaega koi
I will follow, very interessant project.
Mixed feelings getting updates on this as an outsider now but it's good to see my former co-workers going at it! Bet Christian is looking forward to more drilling & tapping into that steel structure, hahaha. :)
Cool design.
While the challenges are daunting, it’s still fun to see them taking a step forward. I’m having trouble wrapping my head around the dual-power concept as presented. It seems like airline economics would stumble a bit at the extra costs, and as a pilot I can only think of the “what now?” if one of the outboard (cold-soaked) turbines declines to start.
I know they’re smart people working hard to solve the issues, but it seems to me, from fuel-cell and railroads (diesel electric) that perhaps the gas turbine would be better employed as an onboard generator to drive the electric motors already in use. Dragging extra nacelles and feathered props seems weird, but then, I’m outside looking in, and don’t have the information they do.
I’ll keep an eye on it. Thanks for a good story!
The answer to your question is redundancy. You have two types of engines working independently of one another and in total you have 4 engines. I am pretty sure that the aircraft would be able to safely glide and land even on 1 engine.
Great video!
Looks like a Dash 7
Wow Nice Plane X1
Exciting! Can only imagine the potencial as battery energy density increases the next decades.
Very cool. I wish your company the best. Why not combine the electric and turboprop propulsion into a single nacelle on both sides? If you have the four nacelles with the outer two turboprop and are running on electric wouldn't the outer nacelles be a lot of drag?
I might have missed it, but was there a question about:
1) can a mobile Batterie pack extend the electrical capacity on a cargo flight ?
2) do the turbines recuperate?
3) what sequence of operating the hybrid turbines is more efficient , which is more environmental saving:
a ) starting with electric + long distance in high altitude with gas + landing with Electric
b) starting with gas + long distance with electric + landing whatsoever
??
漂亮的飞机 ，科技为保护地球提供了好的解决方案 👍 ❤
looking ! 🇮🇳🥳
Cool stuff… I can’t recall a video from a couple of years back of a similar high wing twin engine perhaps 20 seats that was manufactured as they are with basic gas engines. A firm was working on converting it to fully electric, but what concern me about that conversion was the fact that there aircraft structure has design stresses for the fuels weight to be in a typical wing tanks not in the fuselage as now that weight as batteries was placed in the fuselage. I wonder if your aircraft places the batteries in the wings.
Genuine question, can the plane regenerate electricity during the descent?
It probably can just like the RATs in airliners.
Question: will you add this in the next uptade? If yes will it be a pro aircraft or a free aircraft
msfs 2024 already has the plane but mostly in a broken state
its so tiny and .... useless and they are unable to reuse boosters
lovely video, I wonder how long it would take to charge one of this
They said it, 30 minutes
Very promising, however one certainly hopes the battery never goes into thermal runaway as has been seen with some EV’s these days!
Up in the air this would be non survivable.
Some serious high temperature resistant but low weight shielding may be necessary?
Ceramic fibre envelope perhaps surrounded by honeycombed high temp alloy shell?
Add this plane to infinite flight!🙏
Whoa nice
Cool
I wonder what were the considerations for developing a parallel hybrid using two types of drive instead of series hybrid with only one type of drive (electric) with gas turbine for alternate electric generation that IMO seems much simpler?
What is the ratio of wing area to fuselage longitudinal section?
Damnnnn
I do see these aircraft operating on some potential routes that are less than 200 kph in distance. But the question is, how easy will they travel to some destinations that are far abroad from the main factory.
beautiful plane by heart nice step for aviation. with electric planes, it would be cheaper than taking Greyhound buses since these plane will be all electric, while greyhound bus will be diesel.
Once lithium deposits are mined, the area often becomes unsuitable for agriculture. While advocates for electric vehicles emphasize their lack of carbon emissions, it’s essential to consider the environmental impact at the root of the product. Before claiming to avoid carbon emissions, evaluate the entire lifecycle of the materials involved.
When can we expect it in IF??
Literally never. FAA requires power reserve to fly to an alternate airport and 45 minutes thereafter. Not enough range on current battery technology.
@@paulo7200 Have you watched the video? It's a hybrid aircraft, not fully electric
I wonder how they are handling the pressurization.
What is the energy density in Wh/kg for a top modern battery and the Wh/kg for Diesel/JetA?
Google it?
Interesting that Heart decided to go with two turbo jets rather than four electric motors and an internal turbo generator. Must be to do with power requirements.
Something I've wondered with these hybrid electric aircraft is why don't they make all the propulsion motors electric, then have a single, larger (which is more efficient than several smaller) turbine acting as a generator? Because electric motors are far simpler, with reduced maintenance and purchase cost in comparison to turbines.
Question in infinite flight can you make united a321 and Chicago O’Hare free
I hope infinite flight adding ilyushin aircraft, fokker aircraft, beechcraft aircraft, tupolev aircraft, pilatus aircraft, dhc aircraft and learjet aircraft
Absolutely cool. Who is funding this? Can't be cheap.
⚡️✈️👍
What's the reason that it's not a Blended wing body design? I know little about aviation, but it's said that it could achieve fuel savings of over 20 percent?
cant wait till someone figures out how to double battery density so we can reduce the weight
Please add this aircraft in the new update
Wouldn’t it be better to have all electric propulsion with a larger APU generator.
Aka range extender.
This was my thought also. However there must be a trade-off calculation somewhere. With the "range extender" you are converting chemical to mechanical to electrical and back to mechanical. Each transition costs you energy. Maybe it is more efficient to just use the mechanical energy directly for propulsion even if there maybe extra drag from having 4 props instead of 2. Something similar is done in vehicles in that when cruising or using higher powers it is the ICE that is more directly powering the wheels. In the case of Honda hybrid system they switch from a "range-extender" type arrangement and will directly clutch the engine to the wheels at motorway speeds.
Maybe it is also too much weight to put in the back of the aircraft (large battery + larger APU). Though surely you could arrange batteries to distribute the mass.
Refueling time?
an ATR-42/72 concept design hybrid with CRJ nose section 😁just kidding, it's beatiful aircraft anyway... 😁 just wondering there will be XWB next generation, because obviously, airlines will demand more seats and more range with efficient seat per mile cost 😅
Don't we have enough market for electric aircrafts of 200 km range? I think its better to go for all electric with short haul markets and then increase the range as the batteries improve?
Add this to the game now.
Looks like an electric Dash7
Looks (and is size wise) more like a SAAB 340 but with a top wing design. The Dash7 fuselage looks really dated by now.
looks very Dash 8 ish for a clean sheet aircraft...
A APP STOLE YOUR APP ICON AND I FORGOT FIND THE APP
Landing an airliner in that simulator is harder than the real thing I expect. I once was given a brief opportunity to "fly" a USAF KC-10 in its six-axis simulator by my nephew, an Air Force pilot. He expected me to crash as all first time users tend to do, but I had practiced landings for a long time on Microsoft's Flight Simulator program at home so confronted with a realistic simulator that added actual physical sensations to the control inputs, I flew a quick pattern (under zero winds, but also the midnight conditions outside the lab) successfully to a landing. My only fault was not using the pedals to steer once on the runway, as my early version of the Microsoft FS had no way to do that. I drifted off the runway before coming to a stop.
Aviation and lithium batteries? If passenger planes aren't allowed to transport them as cargo due to the inherent risks they pose, how is this expected to get through certification?
Very good JOB GUY🔥 BUT ME D’ONT TRUST ELRCTRIC PLANE🙂↕️
I mean bad weather and it probably gone like thunder
I love jet fuel 😊
Guys, we need controler support. It works nicly for a good 30 mins and then nothing works.
Add jet zero plane for funny or add a blended wing plane
Hello infinite flight my turk's you game I love Gameplay 1st love game
If co2 really is an issue, then ban commercial flights.
I sure as hell will never fly on this
@stevem7508 good. I'll be there and you sound like the sort of person I don't want next to me.
This looks a lot like a Dash 8...
It would be really cool in the future if an aircraft could fly with air as fuel.
How did bro read my mind. I been thinking same thing.
yeah i was also thinking that something like because of the aerodynamics, air only gets accelerated backwards
I am curious on this, but moreso just the how, and what specifically you mean by 'air'.
There are proposals about hydrogen powered aircraft, I think the CFM Rise is an example of this. But that requires specifically hydrogen that has to be prepared beforehand. You probably need some kind of store on the aircraft to react the air with in order to get energy out of it, that's what conventional fuel and hydrogen do. I am not sure you could get just the air from outside an aircraft and use that alone as a fuel.
@@Klian-IF you are everywhere
@@Rarity06 yeah
Dhc 7 replacement
I Hope they add interior life to the free B747 Cuz you can‘t really fly it Well. The interior isn‘t working..
Aviation must go electric, SAFs are just greenwashing. With batteries for short distances, and batteries and a hydrogen fuel cell for longer trips. Of course the hydrogen version will cost a lot to operate since green hydrogen is very expansive compared to tax free kerosene, so far less people will fly long distances.
That's a hard no.
2mins ago
My biggest question would be, why is there a need for this?
@@masmainster why not make something different
Why not use hydrogen instead
lower the prices of your pro version plans now
Great for saving the environment, but It's sad for old aircrafts to have to go❤
@@American247heavyYT
It may be that some of the older designs get converted ....like cars. That saves material and energy in construction.
Yup, them batteries sure are green!
Problem with electric planes is the sheer weight of the batteries. Take an EV and compare it to a similar size car in dimensions - then look at the weight. Planes also decrease fuel weight as they fly making take-off easier, infact the 737-MAX/specific Airbus models have advance takeoff profiles that makes them burn through enough fuel at a "middle" altitude to ease takeoff and improve range. Electric planes can't do this.
Imo biofuels/sustainable fuels are probably a better option. Perhaps in the future we can see trijets that make use of 2 standard fueled engines for takeoff/emergency and one biofuel engine for cruise at altitude. Perhaps if the tech moves quick enough it'll just be twinjets (with propfans) with biofuel mixes for performance/sustainability. Either way, I really don't think there will be widespread proliferation of electric jets aside from niche cases with shorter-medium ranges and low noise requirements. Perhaps smaller private jets/charter jets out of more urban airports.
I have more faith in a Liquid Hydrogen fuel commercial aircraft than electric for sustainability.
Im never getting in thet plane...
Heart Aerospace should sue Microsoft for making their in sim plane literally unusable lol
What could possibly go wrong? Obviously not relying on a gas turbines to enable a diversion. I noticed the cost of hauling the gas turbine engines, gearbox, fuel and batteries was never mentioned. I also didn’t see any anti-ice/de-ice on the aircraft - these will reduce the range enormously. Also not mentioned was the cost of pressurisation and air-conditioning. And the production aircraft’s range will be…
This mob are going to need more luck the world actually has.
Why is it,that people has a problem with electric vehicles,come on ,you have electricity in your home,in your body from day one, it's all over, that's the way to go...!!
OK. Electric followed by Electric. Lots of Wow. Then HYBRID. It isn't an astonishing design - someone mentioned Dash 7. Hybrid in a car means commuting - engine to the ULEZ zone then turn Electric to avoid charges. As they don't exist in the air - why. You carry a battery and an engine - why not reduce weight and just use the engine, your still going to cause pollution anyway when the battery runs out and you turn the engine on.
So you have a more or less standard turboprop, but transporting the extra weight of electric engines and batteries... KUDOS... I totally fail to see the advantages. Maybe because there's none. I'll say, keep the electric motors if you want to, but use a turbine generator. You save the batterie's weight and maybe improve efficiency.
As Elon Musk say,
Prototypes are easy, production is hard…
Thrust is a result of burning fuel and compressed air, please lecture me here
200 km 🤣🤣 is that a joke?
No and why would it be. Are you from 'flyover country' the inland USA? the rest of the world has plenty of sub 200km air journeys.
Gas motors make no sense. Gas backup generator makes more sense. Electric only motors.
Electric planes are a bad concept just as electric cars. Batteries are heavy, have limited lifespans, and can pose safety risks, such as fire hazards if damaged or exposed to air. Additionally, their energy density is far lower than jet fuel, limiting range and making long-haul flights impractical. Unlike fuel, batteries don’t lighten as energy is consumed, keeping planes heavier throughout the flight. The production and disposal of batteries also have significant environmental impacts, and the required infrastructure upgrades at airports would be costly and challenging. Overall, electric planes are currently unfeasible for large-scale commercial aviation.
Moan moan moan
We need more carbon dioxide in the environment, not less.
Less means, less life, fewer trees, less wildlife etc etc.
Pipe dreams. Far too niche and limited. Fight carbon emissions? Where do you think most electricity comes from? Fossil fuel plants. Renewable will never meet the demand. This is absurdity.
Lol, one very short flight a day and then it has to charge for 8 hours? Completely unworkable concept 😂
If developers read comments then can u add virtual joystick when u tryana to land on mobile it’s the real hell u can’t concentrate ur attention on speed level altitude whole time u will try to normolise balance of plane this is the worst in this game