Proof of angle addition formula for sine | Trigonometry | Khan Academy

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 23 ส.ค. 2024
  • Practice this lesson yourself on KhanAcademy.org right now:
    www.khanacadem...
    Watch the next lesson: www.khanacadem...
    Missed the previous lesson?
    www.khanacadem...
    Trigonometry on Khan Academy: Big, fancy word, right? Don't be fooled. Looking at the prefix, tri-, you could probably assume that trigonometry ("trig" as it's sometimes called) has something to do with triangles. You would be right! Trig is the study of the properties of triangles. Why is it important? It's used in measuring precise distances, particularly in industries like satellite systems and sciences like astronomy. It's not only space, however. Trig is present in architecture and music, too. Now you may wonder...how is knowing the measurement and properties of triangles relevant to music?? THAT is a great question. Maybe you'll learn the answer from us in these tutorials!
    About Khan Academy: Khan Academy offers practice exercises, instructional videos, and a personalized learning dashboard that empower learners to study at their own pace in and outside of the classroom. We tackle math, science, computer programming, history, art history, economics, and more. Our math missions guide learners from kindergarten to calculus using state-of-the-art, adaptive technology that identifies strengths and learning gaps. We've also partnered with institutions like NASA, The Museum of Modern Art, The California Academy of Sciences, and MIT to offer specialized content.
    For free. For everyone. Forever. #YouCanLearnAnything
    Subscribe to Khan Academy’s Trigonometry channel:
    / channel
    Subscribe to Khan Academy: www.youtube.co...

ความคิดเห็น • 98

  • @Ariana-rl9jr
    @Ariana-rl9jr 7 ปีที่แล้ว +59

    Loved every time he said you should be getting excited

  • @putzak
    @putzak 3 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    Thanks my friend, you're getting me through uni 👌

  • @MinhTran-wn1ri
    @MinhTran-wn1ri 10 ปีที่แล้ว +48

    Shouldn't you justify the construction of the diagram (@ 3:19) before going through the proof so that your reasoning doesn't appear to have come from observing the construction but rather from definitions?

    • @Zach-lg5ql
      @Zach-lg5ql 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Maybe someone can correct me if I'm misguided here, but I think Sal is attempting to illustrate the geometric reasoning behind it so people who are estranged from rigorous mathematical definitions can get an intuition for this. Though I'm not versed in math history, it's my understanding that the early pioneers of trigonometry were using physical objects as their sandbox to construct these ideas.

    • @urthogie
      @urthogie 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      You are correct, and I struggled with this for a while. The construction can be justified by the ability to create a right triangle of arbitrary hypotenuse. This can be thought of in terms of rays that can extend from an arbitrary angle, and then drop down a line to form a right triangle. So create one of these with hypotenuse 1, then one of them with hypotenuse equal to the base leg (cos b). Then you have the construction.
      Note that this proof only covers Acute angle addition. For Obtuse angle addition, you'd need something like Ptolmey's Theorem to prove it using Chords.

    • @karolissad.4270
      @karolissad.4270 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​​@@urthogie well couldn't you draw an equivalent diagram for obtuse angles?

  • @skeletonrowdie1768
    @skeletonrowdie1768 6 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    6:45 SO THAT'S WHY!
    hehe. Great video thanks! always wondered about this property

  • @datpham31415
    @datpham31415 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Love every time he said you might want to try it .

  • @amyb6255
    @amyb6255 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Literally all I saw in class was this irregular drawing and came here now I get it bless up

  • @asdrty258
    @asdrty258 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    From fig 0:17 trigonometrically >
    Sinxcosy + cosxsiny
    ( ed=sinxcosy and ef=cosysiny)

  • @adityaadit2004
    @adityaadit2004 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Oh mo gosh that was sooo easy thank you for enlightening my mind Mr. Sal

  • @OswaldGaming95
    @OswaldGaming95 5 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    sal is the best teacher like if you agree

  • @amyb6255
    @amyb6255 5 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    3:42 I thought he was gna say so assuming you gave up ...

  • @suhasthegreat8372
    @suhasthegreat8372 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    CAN anyone please tell me how AD is equal to 1, what if other values are taken??

  • @ramyhuber8392
    @ramyhuber8392 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Wonderful clear explanation, thank you!

  • @noebarajas6689
    @noebarajas6689 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Will sin(x+y) always form 90 degree triangles that are stacked on top of each other or could the two triangles rest on the x axis?

    • @uwu.-.5873
      @uwu.-.5873 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It doesn't matter literally. The 90 degree angle triangles is to help you visualize the relationship between
      Sin(x+y)
      And
      Sinxcosy + cosxsiny
      This is visualization but in actuality you're just using this expression to solve equations. It's like sin cos tan they tie in the relationship of the triangle sides, same to this. Just an identity

  • @BurabariBiibaloo
    @BurabariBiibaloo 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you sir,this video really opened my mind 😁

  • @thomasbates9189
    @thomasbates9189 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Oh no. I have only watched the first 30 seconds but I think this video is going to explain to me something I was trying to understand through hours of reading. I'll reply to myself with an update if this does in fact take place.

    • @thomasbates9189
      @thomasbates9189 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Wow, you did it! Thanks for the video! I understand now! I should have come here first! Thanks again!

    • @ramyhuber8392
      @ramyhuber8392 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yes, me too!!! Great explanation! It's so so wonderful when there is a clear explanation. A lot of math is like this, just needs a clear well presented explanation that doesn't leave any steps out. I had forgotten about the tranverse through two parallel lines and how angles are the same.

    • @thomasbates9189
      @thomasbates9189 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ramyhuber8392 that's awesome! I totally agree

  • @masicbemester
    @masicbemester 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I've been wondering how and why the formula works and now I know and I wonder what the complex number proof of this would be.

    • @aparnarai3708
      @aparnarai3708 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Yeah and the teachers never explain how the formula came
      They just say learn it, it is important

  • @matematikadarslari_YouTube
    @matematikadarslari_YouTube ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you man. I'm gonna show it to my students

  • @borbling
    @borbling 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I wish i could upvote this more than 1000 times

  • @vasu2109
    @vasu2109 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so much for your best explanation. ❤❤

  • @gosiajaneczko3361
    @gosiajaneczko3361 7 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    How woudl proof of x+y>90 degrees look like?

    • @sajaldeb329
      @sajaldeb329 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      That's my question

  • @boncelbincel4783
    @boncelbincel4783 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so much for the lesson

  • @dvanielwright3577
    @dvanielwright3577 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    this hypothenus from side AD, is that equal to 1 because it is on a unit circle?

    • @samuelbarham8483
      @samuelbarham8483 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      It's not 1 for any particular reason, really. It's an assumption that makes the ensuing proof easier. One could assume it's equal to any quantity; it's easiest to just set it equal to 1.

  • @abdelhakimlamnaouar9527
    @abdelhakimlamnaouar9527 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    but what if the length of AD was not 1?

  • @FootballJunky-r6h
    @FootballJunky-r6h ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you Sir 😍

  • @nilimakatyayani8953
    @nilimakatyayani8953 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you!!

  • @pedroafonso8384
    @pedroafonso8384 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you so much!

  • @user-os6ul1cg3e
    @user-os6ul1cg3e ปีที่แล้ว

    I have not understood how did you why you said to get triangle DCE is equal to 90_y

  • @user-bb7wx1rf6z
    @user-bb7wx1rf6z หลายเดือนก่อน

    สุดยอดครับ😊😊

  • @Kino-Imsureq
    @Kino-Imsureq 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    i have been trying to figure out how to multiply lengths so you get the length of the product and then trying to use euclidean geometrical proof to do this and then i see this proof.

  • @tarfaibrahim912
    @tarfaibrahim912 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you it was helpful

  • @withbirds
    @withbirds 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    not sure if anyone will get back to me in time-but why do we make this diagram

  • @kingamv107
    @kingamv107 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you sir

  • @jyothieswar5575
    @jyothieswar5575 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    If x/y are the angles of right angled triangle they should be always acute or equal to 90 degrees
    But why should we care about sin 160, sin 180, and all.....
    Please clear it quickly as i have paused their

  • @lwh7301
    @lwh7301 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    After 4 decades plus since trig, I still have not seen anyone explain why the 2 angles X and Y are not simply added together, and then find the sine from a trig table or calculator, instead of using this cumbersome formula.

    • @robonthecob5092
      @robonthecob5092 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Because the pioneers who developed those trig tables used these formulas to gain more values for their tables. The easy to extract information first was for degrees of 0,30,45,60,90. From here subtracting or adding these numbers up using the formulas will give an exact answer for sin(45+30) =sin45cos30+cos45sin30=sin(75)
      This formula and several other ingenious methods of approximating values of sin led to the huge tables of values of sin up to great precision

    • @lwh7301
      @lwh7301 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@robonthecob5092 Calculators are available. These formulas are simply a waste of time and brain power.

    • @cyberkiller4291
      @cyberkiller4291 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ik im late but its to find exact values for them@@lwh7301

  • @Abujar537
    @Abujar537 ปีที่แล้ว

    I am Bangladeshi . I am seeing your tech.

  • @xthomas7621
    @xthomas7621 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Managed to get up to sin(x+y)=DE + cosx siny, but couldn't figure out how to express DE. I'm a bit suspicious of the right triangle DCE, perhaps its angles have some relation to angle x, but i can't see it.. finished watching, now i get it. ha

  • @MikCish
    @MikCish 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    why is AC not equal to one? the hypo stays the stays the same on the unit circle are these triangles different ratio of lengths then?

    • @SomaliMaths
      @SomaliMaths 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Great question

    • @MathProofsable
      @MathProofsable 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      AC = 1 if and only if x=0. Otherwise AC=cos(x) by assuming AD=1

    • @iaexo
      @iaexo 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      MathProofsable Actually I think that’s only true if AB remains constant; AC an be 1 even if x>0 by increasing the length of AB

    • @MathProofsable
      @MathProofsable 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@iaexo AB is dependent on AC which is in turn dependent on AD. So once we fix AD=1, AC is determined by the construction of the right angle at C and then AB is determined by the construction of the right angle at B.

    • @iaexo
      @iaexo 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MathProofsable Ah yes I see now thanks

  • @markl3346
    @markl3346 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    this is great, thanks :)

  • @markmatthewr.ungriano9186
    @markmatthewr.ungriano9186 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is segment AD=AC because they are both hypothenuse

  • @NintenDrake
    @NintenDrake 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice!

  • @teded_2324
    @teded_2324 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Surprisingly, 1.25 times speed seems abnormally normal

  • @PCofficial93
    @PCofficial93 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    good

  • @aakashr8063
    @aakashr8063 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why isn't AC=1 since it is also a radius of a unit circle?

    • @jhameeh
      @jhameeh 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      he assumed only AD equal to 1

    • @malharnandurkar890
      @malharnandurkar890 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      because it isn't

  • @AaVictor
    @AaVictor 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Insane~~

  • @islamsaied4135
    @islamsaied4135 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    mind = blown

  • @callumvanheerden1530
    @callumvanheerden1530 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I love proofs

  • @T4l0nITA
    @T4l0nITA 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can someone explain me how he got that the angle EDC is y ?

    • @ryanyap6712
      @ryanyap6712 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      T4l0nITA total angle of a right angle triangle(or any triangle is 180°)
      The angles given on the triangle are 90 and 90-y.
      One more angle left so let's do the math.
      90 (first angle)
      90-y (second angle)
      (We don't know the third angle so let's just put 'm' into it and use the substitution method) ( to avoid confusion just draw out the triangle onto another piece of paper and fit it back in once you're done)
      m (third angle)
      180= 90+90-y+m
      180-90-90=-y+m
      0=-y+m
      y=m
      So, basically put the pieces together and you would get that it is y.

  • @danielcat5831
    @danielcat5831 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Radio

  • @lifewasalie6013
    @lifewasalie6013 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    can anyone tell me that why we have to assume that the hypotneuse would be 1 only.............. can anyone justify me we are taking one just to make calc esier...............................

    • @Supermario0727
      @Supermario0727 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      The hypotenuses don't have to be equal to one. They're arbitrarily equal to one for simplicity. If, however, you choose to have a hypotenuse of length "r", then you have to multiply the hypotenuse in every trig. ratio by its respective "r". For example, cos(θ)=x/r, where "r" is the hypotenuse. When "r" is equal to one, cos(θ)=x/r becomes cos(θ)=x. The reason why the value of "r" doesn't really matter is because we're dealing with ratios that don't change.

  • @khalidbornaparte6250
    @khalidbornaparte6250 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    how to remember this?

    • @tuncay4159
      @tuncay4159 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      unfortunately this doesn't help you to memorize the formula magically. I think it just clears the non-senseness of the rule

  • @mrlordsaif5708
    @mrlordsaif5708 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    If AD is 1 then why can't AC also 1?

    • @robonthecob5092
      @robonthecob5092 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Cause it ain’t bor cos x = 1 only when x=0

  • @dilenkhanal3784
    @dilenkhanal3784 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    population

  • @m18665
    @m18665 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    why is AD =1?

    • @reetasingh1679
      @reetasingh1679 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      It is just so that the calculation would look a bit cleaner... even if length of AD is given any arbitrary variable (for example, h), you would get the same result. Try it yourself!

    • @Alyssa-vf7sh
      @Alyssa-vf7sh 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      it's because of the unit circle, the radius is one. since AD is a radius as well, it is equal to one. hope that helps :)

    • @joelpozin5498
      @joelpozin5498 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      AC=cos(x)*AD and DC=sin(x)*AD, so letting AD lets the calculations be much cleaner.

  • @victorserras
    @victorserras 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    What i don't like about this proof is how DA is purposefuly = 1 to make the demonstration simpler. The real proof must involve a generic DA even though you get a lot of divisions.

    • @qbwkp
      @qbwkp 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Victor Serra since you can scale triangles proving it for 1 suffices

    • @monkeydog8681
      @monkeydog8681 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Too complex for you huh?

    • @Supermario0727
      @Supermario0727 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Victor Serra The real proof doesn't require radii greater than one. The trigonometric functions are based upon the the unit circle.

    • @thotslayer1114
      @thotslayer1114 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      all these are inside a unit circle

    • @thotslayer1114
      @thotslayer1114 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      ad is radius

  • @arushkashyap8416
    @arushkashyap8416 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    How is AD =1?

    • @MathProofsable
      @MathProofsable 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      By assumption.

    • @tuncay4159
      @tuncay4159 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      it doesn't change the result, eventually ratio would be still sin(x+y).

    • @ashwinsanthosh9154
      @ashwinsanthosh9154 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      The proof is done in a unit circle.