Conceptions of Normativity - Some Basic Philosophical Issues

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 6

  • @DaKoopaKing
    @DaKoopaKing ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I think the 2 biggest mistakes he makes are that 1) It doesn't make sense to say that there is a rational "obligation" to reason instrumentally and 2) The skeptical attitude he describes doesn't entail that there no correct reasons, just that there are no correct "stance independent" or-whatever-else-realist-phrase-here reasons.
    Re 1: The only way a conscious agent can act is with respect to its own goals and interests. Every conscious action is a result of your preferring to do 1 choice of action over another. There's no way to not reason instrumentally if you are a conscious agent, because that's just what reasoning instrumentally is.
    Re 2: Unless he was talking about adopting a globally skeptical attitude, it's absolutely fine to endorse an account of pragmatic, deflationary, instrumental, etc reasons. Skepticism about realist concepts isn't skepticism tout court.

  • @pectenmaximus231
    @pectenmaximus231 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi - where’d that video about utility in science go? :) I didn’t watch yet

    • @Philosophy_Overdose
      @Philosophy_Overdose  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      th-cam.com/video/gdUblLKzCos/w-d-xo.html

    • @pectenmaximus231
      @pectenmaximus231 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you. Don’t know why it’s not showing on your channel for me.

  • @jimsmid8229
    @jimsmid8229 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What the heck is "constitual"? He insists upon continually using this word and its forms. As far as I can look up, it's a translation of constitutional. Is that what he is trying to say? Why the f--- doesn't he just say constitutional. Anybody want to help me?

  • @marcvolpe8252
    @marcvolpe8252 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    HI WHERE'D THE LENA PAUL LESBIAN VIDEO GO I DIDN'T WATCH IT YET