Play your part in spreading the message of the Quran and Ahlulbayt by performing 3S: I) Share: Help us reach more hearts by sharing this content with your family and friends (especially those unaware of the School of Ahlulbayt). II) Subscribe: Connect with us on TH-cam & Social Media Platforms (links in description). Or join our WhatsApp list by clicking on this link: wa.me/message/TAR3C325Z5LYO1 III) Support: Producing content like this is impossible without your support. Be our patron and pledge your monthly contribution at thaqlain.org/support
Masha Allah Allah hu Akbar It's really pathetic still a group of muslims prefer to follow those cowards and pay respect to those who fled instead of divine virtuous and infallible family of prophet Muhammad s.a.w.w.s. Allahumma Salle ala Muhammad wa aale Muhammad
@@saadimadina1337 let me be specific The first three caliphs who shamelessly plotted at saqeefaa Denounced the prophet s.a.w.w.s. Usurped rights of maula Ali a.s. Angered the beloved daughter of Rasulullah s.a.w.w.s. Incorporated the currupt the hypocrites the vicious people like Khalid bin Waleed muawiyya marwaan amr bin aas etc. In the government for their own political and monetary gains Harmed the true essence of religion of islam and created nifaaq and fitna in the religion of Allah swt. May Allah swt curse them till eternity May Allah swt bless Rasulullah s.a.w.w.s. and his holy family May Allah swt always guide us to the righteous path and bless us all with intellect to see the truth which is so clear and obvious and give us all strength and courage to follow our righteous leader and guide and hasten his reappearance. Ya ilaahi aameen. Allahumma Salle ala Muhammad wa aale Muhammad
Lol. This verse is against you not us. In the hatred of sahaba, you fell into contradiction. If what you want to say that sahabah those who fled from uhud weren't adil and just because they commited a major sin, then even companions whom you respect are not not adil either. Ammar, miqdad, abu dharr, jabir, hudhayfah and all other sahaba whom shia highly revere also fled from uhud as per shi'i reports. According to shi'i reports no one stayed with messenger of allah except ali and abu dujanah. If ammar, miqdad and abu dhar can be wali of allah even after such major sins just because their sin was forgiven. The same will be said about all the companions. That will prove that sahabah can be adil even if they commited major sins.
@@Thaqlain read any shi'i biography of prophet. Hayat ul quloob is good. It says everyone fled except ali and abu dujanah. That means by default that ammar, abu dhar, miqdad fled.
1) Even if your accept your point for arguments sake, it is clear from the Quran that those who fled were of two categories. We will urge you to listen from 10:33 onwards. 2) In principle, Ammar, Miqdad, Abu Dharr, Jabir, Hudayfah are not required to be Adil. Unlike the Sunni Islam, the School of Ahlulbayt does not believe in Adalat as-Sahaba. The criteria is that those who followed Prophet's instructions and supported the progeny of the Prophet and those who usurped the rights of the progeny. Hope the matter is clear for you now :)
@@Thaqlain no no no. Not 'for the argument sect'. They fled and it is narrated in your books. And don't deflect the point. Were ammar, miqdad, salman, abu dharr wali or not. If yes then they fled two times, once in uhud and second in hunayn. Either ammar was just or he was a sinner. Chose one.
And that's exactly we said, that even if they did, we don't follow them. And neither do we expect them to be ones without mistake. The only reason we revere them is because they are revered by the Prophet and his progeny in proven and reliable narrations.
Did the Prophet command them to be buried next to him? Or did they get the benefit of being the caliph even though both were amongst those asked to go away in the incident of pen and paper 🙂
@@Thaqlain The character of Umar and Abu Bakr is often portrayed negatively in some Shia perspectives, labeling them as evil, hypocrites (munafiq), or even disbelievers (kafir). However, if they were truly as such, would Allah permit them to be buried with the Prophet? Wallahi, He would not allow that to happen unless they were righteous. 😊
For that, one has to prove that being buried next to a person of significance is divine significance. Because by your logic, as Uthman was not allowed to be buried next to the Prophet, it was a sign from Allah of his status?
@@Thaqlain Bihar al-Anwar by Allama Muhammad Baqir Majlisi Volume 101 Page 17 Hadith 1 Narrated from Imam Musa al-Kadhim (may Allah have mercy on him) Whoever is buried in a place near the grave of a prophet or a righteous person it is as if he has received intercession on the Day of Resurrection Wasa'il al-Shia by Sheikh al-Hurr al-Amili Vol 16 Page 150 Hadith 9 Narrated from Imam Jafar al-Sadiq (may Allah have mercy on his Soul) Whoever passes away and is buried near a prophet or a righteous person God will resurrect him with the prophets and righteous people and he will be given the reward of their followers.
Why are you wearing a black turban while other mullahs wear white? Can you prove that you are a descendant of our Holy Prophet (SAW)? Mind you, Rasullulah SAW did not have a male surviving descendant.
Yeah first go ahead and establish that you are not the descendant of hinda... As for Immaculate Prophet,go ahead and read Sura: 3 - aal-`Imraan (The Family of `Imraan) Ayat: 61.Why is 'sons' mentioned there?
Play your part in spreading the message of the Quran and Ahlulbayt by performing 3S:
I) Share: Help us reach more hearts by sharing this content with your family and friends (especially those unaware of the School of Ahlulbayt).
II) Subscribe: Connect with us on TH-cam & Social Media Platforms (links in description). Or join our WhatsApp list by clicking on this link: wa.me/message/TAR3C325Z5LYO1
III) Support: Producing content like this is impossible without your support. Be our patron and pledge your monthly contribution at thaqlain.org/support
Masha Allah
Allah hu Akbar
It's really pathetic still a group of muslims prefer to follow those cowards and pay respect to those who fled instead of divine virtuous and infallible family of prophet Muhammad s.a.w.w.s.
Allahumma Salle ala Muhammad wa aale Muhammad
No Muslims follows the ones who abandoned and left the battle field. You gotta be specific in detail when you comment like that.
@@saadimadina1337 let me be specific
The first three caliphs who shamelessly plotted at saqeefaa
Denounced the prophet s.a.w.w.s.
Usurped rights of maula Ali a.s.
Angered the beloved daughter of Rasulullah s.a.w.w.s.
Incorporated the currupt the hypocrites the vicious people like Khalid bin Waleed muawiyya marwaan amr bin aas etc. In the government for their own political and monetary gains
Harmed the true essence of religion of islam and created nifaaq and fitna in the religion of Allah swt.
May Allah swt curse them till eternity
May Allah swt bless Rasulullah s.a.w.w.s. and his holy family
May Allah swt always guide us to the righteous path and bless us all with intellect to see the truth which is so clear and obvious and give us all strength and courage to follow our righteous leader and guide and hasten his reappearance.
Ya ilaahi aameen.
Allahumma Salle ala Muhammad wa aale Muhammad
Request for a Surah Fatihah for SYED ZAHEERUL HASAN ibne SYED ALI HASNAIN 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻
Lol. This verse is against you not us. In the hatred of sahaba, you fell into contradiction. If what you want to say that sahabah those who fled from uhud weren't adil and just because they commited a major sin, then even companions whom you respect are not not adil either. Ammar, miqdad, abu dharr, jabir, hudhayfah and all other sahaba whom shia highly revere also fled from uhud as per shi'i reports. According to shi'i reports no one stayed with messenger of allah except ali and abu dujanah.
If ammar, miqdad and abu dhar can be wali of allah even after such major sins just because their sin was forgiven. The same will be said about all the companions. That will prove that sahabah can be adil even if they commited major sins.
Please share proof that Ammar, Miqdad, Abu Dharr and Hudhayfah fled.
@@Thaqlain read any shi'i biography of prophet. Hayat ul quloob is good. It says everyone fled except ali and abu dujanah. That means by default that ammar, abu dhar, miqdad fled.
1) Even if your accept your point for arguments sake, it is clear from the Quran that those who fled were of two categories. We will urge you to listen from 10:33 onwards.
2) In principle, Ammar, Miqdad, Abu Dharr, Jabir, Hudayfah are not required to be Adil. Unlike the Sunni Islam, the School of Ahlulbayt does not believe in Adalat as-Sahaba. The criteria is that those who followed Prophet's instructions and supported the progeny of the Prophet and those who usurped the rights of the progeny.
Hope the matter is clear for you now :)
@@Thaqlain no no no. Not 'for the argument sect'. They fled and it is narrated in your books. And don't deflect the point. Were ammar, miqdad, salman, abu dharr wali or not. If yes then they fled two times, once in uhud and second in hunayn. Either ammar was just or he was a sinner. Chose one.
And that's exactly we said, that even if they did, we don't follow them. And neither do we expect them to be ones without mistake. The only reason we revere them is because they are revered by the Prophet and his progeny in proven and reliable narrations.
Usman ran so far that he returned after 3 days😅
Mashallah. Incredible analysis..
JazakAllah khayr 🤲🏻
Where was the first and the second Caliphs on that sedation😢😢😢😢😢
The same place they have always been.
@@Thaqlain i mean where were they on Ohud احد
They ran away.
❤️🤲🏻
Well 2 of them are resting along with who right now?
Did the Prophet command them to be buried next to him? Or did they get the benefit of being the caliph even though both were amongst those asked to go away in the incident of pen and paper 🙂
@@Thaqlain The character of Umar and Abu Bakr is often portrayed negatively in some Shia perspectives, labeling them as evil, hypocrites (munafiq), or even disbelievers (kafir). However, if they were truly as such, would Allah permit them to be buried with the Prophet? Wallahi, He would not allow that to happen unless they were righteous. 😊
For that, one has to prove that being buried next to a person of significance is divine significance. Because by your logic, as Uthman was not allowed to be buried next to the Prophet, it was a sign from Allah of his status?
@@Thaqlain Bihar al-Anwar by Allama Muhammad Baqir Majlisi
Volume 101 Page 17 Hadith 1
Narrated from Imam Musa al-Kadhim (may Allah have mercy on him) Whoever is buried in a place near the grave of a prophet or a righteous person it is as if he has received intercession on the Day of Resurrection
Wasa'il al-Shia by Sheikh al-Hurr al-Amili
Vol 16 Page 150 Hadith 9
Narrated from Imam Jafar al-Sadiq (may Allah have mercy on his Soul)
Whoever passes away and is buried near a prophet or a righteous person God will resurrect him with the prophets and righteous people and he will be given the reward of their followers.
No such narration exists on the provided reference. Neither in Bihar nor in Wasail :)
Who buried the Dead? They were tired after the war.
They’d return after the enemy left the field
Why are you wearing a black turban while other mullahs wear white? Can you prove that you are a descendant of our Holy Prophet (SAW)? Mind you, Rasullulah SAW did not have a male surviving descendant.
Yeah first go ahead and establish that you are not the descendant of hinda...
As for Immaculate Prophet,go ahead and read Sura: 3 - aal-`Imraan (The Family of `Imraan) Ayat: 61.Why is 'sons' mentioned there?
Was Fatima Zahra not the bloodline of the prophet pbuh and blessing.
He’s not the only one wearing black turban.