We found an Alternative to CPF SA Shielding! Don’t Worry!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 19 ก.พ. 2024
  • SA shielding was a minority implemented concept
    For today's Video, the Editor/Researcher/Slide Maker, with the help of Mr Loo, drank much coffee and lost much sleep to understand the Retirement Account and how to work around it
    Any questions? Direct them over to the 1M65 Tele Group :D
    Endowus Discount Code: endowus.com/r?code=LOOFEB24_C...
    1M65 Tele Group: t.me/Loo1M65
    1M65 Discord: bit.ly/1M65Discord
    Disclaimer: loo.money/disclaimer
    Helping Ordinary People lead Extraordinary Lives
  • บันเทิง

ความคิดเห็น • 153

  • @maleman67
    @maleman67 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for exploring and sharing one more option for us to understand and consider. We been told in the telegram group to just accept the new rule and move on. Glad that there's still options to explore rather than surrender and move on like nothing can be done.

  • @user-jc6fi6yg8r
    @user-jc6fi6yg8r 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    If you have FRS in RA, and intended to topup RA to ERS to earn 4% interest, and want to property pledge before 65 to withdraw max BRS amount, I was advised that the property pledge was subject to approval.

  • @chanmk28
    @chanmk28 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you very much Mr Loo

  • @guqin
    @guqin 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Kudos to the creative editing! Entertaining!

  • @purpletulip6499
    @purpletulip6499 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Thanks for staying close to our concerns and doing the research for us . Kam sia.

  • @jamesee3929
    @jamesee3929 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thanks Loo. Feel better now. Appreciate it

  • @abcxyz1242
    @abcxyz1242 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Thks Mr Loo and Ben. The solutions are helpful. 👍👍👍

  • @sallyyeo4129
    @sallyyeo4129 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks, Mr Loo amd Ben for the insights. What do you think is a good time to do your property pledge to maximise your interest and 1/2 of FRS withdrawals?

  • @annahuilang
    @annahuilang 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thank you very much ❤

    • @1m65
      @1m65  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      you are very welcome!

  • @leechoonyau
    @leechoonyau 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Good stuffs Mr Loo and Ben. The passion and vigor are most impressive

    • @ghostm551
      @ghostm551 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      For ppl like me in the 40S might face again more policy risk before we reach 55

  • @Mtaych69
    @Mtaych69 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can I check - based on the video, it was mentioned at 65, it's possible to pull out $41k - how will this affect the CPF payout thereafter on a FRS amount - the before amount and after amount? Will it be significantly difference if the person lives to a long life assuming standard plan?

  • @eeyonglin7889
    @eeyonglin7889 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Hi Mr Loo if i set aside ERS 426k at 55, how much can i withdraw if i pledge my property at 65? is it still half of FRS or ERS?

  • @investwithpete
    @investwithpete 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks Mr Loo! But just to highlight when you withdraw from CPF (such as property pledging) your CPF LIFE payout will drop quite significantly

  • @goldenretrieverboy
    @goldenretrieverboy 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Property pledging is a good navigator, and it has been around since last time.
    One thing to note is, you guys must execute the property pledge before your CPF payout either 65/70 years old.
    And your maximum withdrawable amount is limit to the BRS max ceiling.

    • @lukeeong
      @lukeeong 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      thanks... can I ask if the BRS amount is that year say when I am 64 years old?

    • @goldenretrieverboy
      @goldenretrieverboy 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@lukeeong it’s the year you turn 55 :)

    • @Fiona20238
      @Fiona20238 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It is possible that they rule change again then cannot withdraw the sum at 65/70.

  • @lynnc6155
    @lynnc6155 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Mr Loo, Applauding you and Ben and team for the great efforts to alley our fears and shock. Next could you continue to advise what we should do with the shield amount to make up for the "loss" opportunity to earn the 4% SA. Thanks once again!

  • @mjmf1430
    @mjmf1430 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    These are not loopholes, they were already in place as options for CPF members to choose for quite sometime now.

    • @1m65
      @1m65  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Exactly.

  • @hbu8012
    @hbu8012 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Mr Loo, BEFORE 55, CPF will send letter for us to pick BRS, FRS or ERS. If we pick BRS, we MUST pledge property. So, once pledged, RA created will have only BRS sum. Choosing FRS at 55 then pledge just before 65 to pull out half needs written approval.

    • @gohpb
      @gohpb 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hi, after 55, can we repick? Make changes?

  • @parody9930
    @parody9930 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Without taking out of RA, cpf life gives out a sum every month. My question is, if we pledge the property, and take out some money, will the amount given through cpf life be reduced?

  • @donykong1
    @donykong1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    When talked to cpf, the response was that if u do property pledge, yr cpf life payout will be reduced from 2.6k to 800. This amount is before cpf changes were announced. This is a serious downside to this option!

    • @warniu123
      @warniu123 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Yes, agree. This point you made is the glaring omission in this video.

  • @bernardwong913
    @bernardwong913 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I having been thinking over the past few days on the pledging of property approach and instead, will it be applicable to top up RA from FRS to ERS (max) from 55yo to 65yo. Thereafter at 65yo, withdraw ERS(max) to leave only 1/2 FRS through pledge of property. Then cash will be back on hand just like SA back then.

    • @hbu8012
      @hbu8012 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Benard, CPF will send letter BEFORE 55. You must inform of property pledge before RA creation. If we pick FRS/ERS at 55 then change our mind to pledge just before 65 .... need special written approval.

    • @Fiona20238
      @Fiona20238 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@hbu8012 do u know what is required for the special written approval? Is it just possible with just a property that qualify on all CPF criteria or there are other criteria to be fulfilled such as a medical emergencies etc? Honestly, I think many rich people will be exploring this which may cause them to tighten the "loophole" making it difficult for them to do so.

    • @hbu8012
      @hbu8012 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Fiona20238 better dont takeout a lump sum just before turning 65. The monthly payout will drop "relative" to how much withdrawn. I will do so IF terminally ill at 64 with short life expectancy. Also, CPF will not send another letter before 65 ... so u need to go to them to enquire.

  • @aloysiusleong7007
    @aloysiusleong7007 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    In the sprit of transparency, would like a video explaining post 65yo, the 4% interest RA earned no longer belongs to you and goes to the annuity pool. Therefore, topping up to 2x FRS only allows more of our CPF to pay for the annuity for ALL CPF holders. Would like to understand if there’s any real benefit since all we are getting back is our own $ back be it BRS, FRS or ERS.
    It is only about age 80yo where we so call “break-even” on our own contributions over our working life and if we passed on then, there’s no bequest (based on standard plan) since the 4% interest earned do not belong to us.
    The monthly payments thereafter, comes from the annuity pool and based on CPF LIFE estimator will exhaust around 88yo and we only start benefitting from CPF Life thereafter.

  • @raymondtay5184
    @raymondtay5184 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can only withdraw 1/2 of FRS but cannot withdraw the accrued interest , right?

  • @starbreath76
    @starbreath76 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Good find, 🎉, still have policy risk though, things ,may change from 55-70 age

    • @1m65
      @1m65  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes, I can’t do anything about policy risk

  • @geneee3168
    @geneee3168 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    Wife & I pledge our HDB 10 yrs ago. This option was in placed a long time ago.

    • @angelateo528
      @angelateo528 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      We did that when interest rate kept going higher & spoke with CPF officer on the procedure to ensure we are able to use that $ for property payment. It does helps a lot especially when interest rate is getting higher & want to have debt free at that age asap. I only hope our gov. doesn't remove that just to tackle those abusers for those who sincerely wanting to use for that purpose.

    • @bellachan2155
      @bellachan2155 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Cpf may change its policy again about pledging property for cash. Thus, the latest idea may not work in the future.

  • @liweiquek7382
    @liweiquek7382 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    But government rules change anytime. What if government change rule after you top up RA to maximum.

    • @christopherleng
      @christopherleng 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      The world is changing. We need to accept, adapt and evolve. Isn’t it true that there are so many great empires of the past but today they are falling. To be a winner we need to make sure SG is strong and win. If SG lose even if we have SA shield we are not going to survive.

  • @janiceleong3602
    @janiceleong3602 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    If I am not wrong, you can shield both SA and OA b4 age 55 if you only want BRS amount to go into RA (instead of deducting FRS amount)... btw, you cannot fully empty SA for investment, need to keep a balance of $40k.

    • @stevenyip2631
      @stevenyip2631 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      That's right. He is wrong again.

    • @lukeeong
      @lukeeong 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      yes, but the point is not about moving money out. It's more about how to have a 4% zero risk return.

    • @janiceleong3602
      @janiceleong3602 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@lukeeongAgree with you. Can't find financial product which is highly liquid and giving a guaranteed 4.08% p.a.

  • @CalvinK-the_old_fogey
    @CalvinK-the_old_fogey 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    1:20 to answer your question: Lorna Tan, former ST journalist now working for DBS. She coined the term ‘CPF Shielding’ in an article she wrote when she was working as ST journalist. I’m not sure if it was her original idea though.

    • @1m65
      @1m65  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you! I did not know that

    • @peterlo7491
      @peterlo7491 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Lorna Tan was the one who wrote about it publicly in 2019, but she did not come up with this term because the real savvy pple already knew about it some years before that.

    • @CalvinK-the_old_fogey
      @CalvinK-the_old_fogey 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@peterlo7491 I won’t be surprised because there are many financially savvy Singaporeans but I’m pretty sure she coined the term ‘shielding’. Interestingly CPF has a short video explaining this hack and even credited Lorna Tan as such.

    • @tgfss4166
      @tgfss4166 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      "Shielding" is just a term used. In yr 1999 when HDB required flat buyer to empty CPF OA, many "shielded" OA to prevent HDB from emptying it. Same as SA "Shielding". It was done in 1990s. Not sure if was done earlier than 1990s. Currently think HDB allows 20K to remain in OA.

    • @CalvinK-the_old_fogey
      @CalvinK-the_old_fogey 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@tgfss4166 why would HDB require you to ‘empty’ your OA? You have the option of ‘shielding’ your OA by simply paying cash.

  • @napsenhasman6697
    @napsenhasman6697 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thanks Mr Loo & Ben, it feels like taking a panadol to relieve the headache...lol

  • @xykota6692
    @xykota6692 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is it true pledge property only available for BRS scheme ?

  • @lesliefoo838
    @lesliefoo838 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Wait cpf see this as loophole and want to cover again 😂. Anyway thanks for the idea. But between 55 to 65 many policy changes can happen to plug this “loophole”

  • @user-bg4lo3cn6y
    @user-bg4lo3cn6y 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hi Mr Loo. 1M65 dream to become a millionaire or multi millionaire was spoilt by new CPF SA scaling.

  • @MsCorydorus
    @MsCorydorus 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Is not new. If you withdraw 41k cash and also more through property pledged, then wouldn't your monthly cpf payment after 65 dropped ? significantly ?

  • @lowjiaming4586
    @lowjiaming4586 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    But pledge property means withdraw the amount from FRS, RA drops, CPF payout also drops? Where's the hack btw? And the property pledge I think existed for quite long already. Pls enlighten me 😮

    • @goldenretrieverboy
      @goldenretrieverboy 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Yes. FRS drop to BRS means monthly payout also drop. Also yes, this property pledging is around for a long time. This is TH-cam, he needs a “click bait” title

    • @Fiona20238
      @Fiona20238 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      it's for people who do not want FRS or ERS yet want to earn 4.08%p.a. until they reach 65/70 I guess.

  • @davidgan8060
    @davidgan8060 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Nothing new, this option was in placed a long long time ago. What new Discovery?

  • @stylerho6278
    @stylerho6278 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Yes, high risk high return and low risk low return. Don’t expect NO risk for high return, such as SA shielding at about 55, particularly for the (very) rich! Why should millions of taxpayers (ultimate losers) contribute to the rich in such manner?! Paying high interest rate to these SA balances and yet allowing for withdrawals at any time above 55 is a serious loophole - it is long overdue and must be plugged!! There is no free lunch in this world!!!

  • @Leaxiaoai
    @Leaxiaoai 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    H Mr Loo, curious to know if you are going to top up your RA to the new ERS of 426000 in 2025?

  • @Humorousguy64
    @Humorousguy64 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    GOV going to invite you for coffee and might give you a position help them plan policies for them to cover or really seal any loophole for policies that benefits .. hahaha

  • @Opswual
    @Opswual 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The property pledged must be funded by CPF before? If my property funded by Cash only can still pledge?

  • @user-sf5bt8eb4y
    @user-sf5bt8eb4y 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    isnt those options already existing even way before the CPF shielding hack was closed?

    • @1m65
      @1m65  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes, that’s why we are still ok.

  • @yanhanchen7627
    @yanhanchen7627 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Don't jump into this without thinking critically: What if you top up to ERS and before you can pledge the property, government changes rules again (for property pledging) and your money is now stuck inside. Wont be surprised about this understanding that government changes rules so often. If everyone starts doing now, you might just be the one holding onto the timebomb when it explodes

  • @VictorHugozc
    @VictorHugozc 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What about interests incurred from RA? Is it visible to you and does it belong to you?

    • @goldenretrieverboy
      @goldenretrieverboy 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Interest incurred from RA is yours between 55-65, after that all goes into a common pool, for the government to look after the Aging population and people who live past their expected payout age

    • @CalvinK-the_old_fogey
      @CalvinK-the_old_fogey 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@goldenretrieverboyI’m not sure your interpretation is correct. My understanding is this (still researching this topic):
      (1) the RA and accrued interest are not pooled (meaning, can be bequeathed upon demise of CPF member).
      (2) Part of RA fund will be used to pay for CPF Life premiums (amount depending on Basic, Standard or Escalating).
      (3) Upon demise, remaining CPF Life premium (pro-rated from the annual payment) is returned to member’s nominees.
      (4) All accrued interest from the CPF Life premium will be pooled for the benefit of all remaining living CPF Life members.
      I am very certain about (1) & (4) but still researching (2) & (3). Anyone can help clarify? Thanks !

  • @fin788
    @fin788 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    As usual....still advocating topping up to cpf...lol. policy can change again and people never learn. Best advice i can give is max MA and stop there. Let ur job do the top up to cpf(which will be auto). Use extra money invest somewhere else instead of topping up to cpf.

  • @damyeuful
    @damyeuful 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Does this apply if our RA is maxed to ERS?

    • @goldenretrieverboy
      @goldenretrieverboy 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If your RA is max to ERS, you can still execute this as long as you haven’t started withdrawing monthly income from CPF LIFE. Since property pledge is capped at one full FRS, your ERS will become FRS and monthly income will change accordingly.

    • @damyeuful
      @damyeuful 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So this withdrawal has to be executed before they start monthly payments? Once payments are started, no longer able to withdraw this lump sum portion?@@goldenretrieverboy

    • @Fiona20238
      @Fiona20238 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@goldenretrieverboy with property pledge, isn't it capped at BRS instead of FRS?

    • @goldenretrieverboy
      @goldenretrieverboy 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Fiona20238 you can pledge 1 BRS worth of money. So means if you are in ERS, you pledge down to FRS

  • @rayng3948
    @rayng3948 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Yes, it is a good idea!

  • @taylt9497
    @taylt9497 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    There are advantages and disadvantages to move more money into RA.

  • @watchtowerv
    @watchtowerv 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    SA Shielding is also within the rules

  • @boonleongteo8683
    @boonleongteo8683 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Transfer all bal out ( 20k in OA) (40K in Sa)
    Top up 145K in cash for the RA account upon opening ..
    145k x20 % + 5k
    29K will be able withdrawn upon 65 or continued
    As All the Balances in OA are earning 2.5%
    Draw down from OA first..

  • @pinkublacku
    @pinkublacku 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Mr Loo, the Minister and policy makers and advisors must have watched your videos and learnt about hacks. And patched them.😂

  • @carnesir
    @carnesir 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    by the time u all find out any loopholes, in a few years govt is gonna do something abt it.
    you cannot run away from policy risks when talking about money in cpf.

  • @wynn8888
    @wynn8888 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    So ultimately you are going into property right? Which means you deem property as a safety net for Singaporean.
    This deviates from the original intent to earn high interest from cpf and ultimately drawing higher mthly payout which you advocates all along. Hmmm….

  • @MrElfblade
    @MrElfblade 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It will never be the same again compared to CPF Shielding. 😢

  • @pewpew6936
    @pewpew6936 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I rather use money to invest earn more income in a few years. compound interest wait 20-30 years can beat inflation but still won't be a big amount the time you withdraw. Hold stocks but can't liquidate and money lock up in cpf until you die for what? Just invest to earn more income

  • @kcchiew4247
    @kcchiew4247 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    We will top up with cash to 4xBRS next year, and decide which annuity plans to take when we are 65. No withdrawal from RA in our mind yet.😄

  • @flamingangelz
    @flamingangelz 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    pledging your flat is at 55 or you can pledge your flat when reaching 65 to withdraw 50% from FRS ?

    • @1m65
      @1m65  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      At 65

  • @edisontan823
    @edisontan823 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Someone tag CPFB to help explain/clarify 😆

  • @ghostm551
    @ghostm551 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Then after that Some clever people Will complain abt this and then what happen again ?!!

  • @adityathosar
    @adityathosar 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Are you looking for a video editor?

    • @1m65
      @1m65  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ben is doing that for me.

    • @adityathosar
      @adityathosar 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@1m65 oh that's nice but I think I can make your videos look more engaging and professional. I have shoot one mail to you, do checkout 😄

    • @adityathosar
      @adityathosar 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@1m65 ​ nice but I think I can make your videos more enganing and professioanl. I have send one mail to you regarding this, do checkout. 😄

  • @ghostm551
    @ghostm551 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    End of the day at 55 u still can’t relax your life with more liquidity yet . They die die want u reach 65 then bit by bit give u . Then by 65 I also cannot enjoy moving around driving car or having my dream

    • @mjmf1430
      @mjmf1430 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You can if you move to Malaysia or somewhere else for retirement 😊

  • @boonleongteo8683
    @boonleongteo8683 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    145k Compounding
    10yr 71K interest 4.915%
    15yr 119K interest 5.466%
    20yr 177K interest 6.100%
    25yr 250K interest 6.920%
    Mr Loo at age 80 after this ..Will 🎉😂

  • @boonleongteo8683
    @boonleongteo8683 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    At 68 72 enjoy your golden yrs

  • @fool1124
    @fool1124 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Just CDA snp500 la, people like to complicte their lives

  • @davyleisure9469
    @davyleisure9469 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Sg govt sibeh keng-ster... Own citizen also meed to hack

  • @MHSoh5327
    @MHSoh5327 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Where got such free lunch.? Basically you are saying top up RA up to 400+ k earn the 4% then before draw down say you only want to pledge BRS or FRS to join CPF life then withdraw whatever balance. Better have black and white from cpf board before trying this .

  • @stevenyip2631
    @stevenyip2631 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Last video you said the CPFLIFE payout is a 7% "dividends" and you want to put more into RA and live until 100 year old to maximise your return. This video you say the opposite.
    Come on..! Wake up.

    • @pangarans
      @pangarans 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I think Loo is just giving us options. One man's meat, another's poison. You decide which one suits you better.

    • @stevenyip2631
      @stevenyip2631 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@pangarans I have my own options. Don't need his.

  • @crichardwc
    @crichardwc 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This policy change shock all those who just turn 55. I am submitting feedback to ask the govt to exclude the current 55 yrs old from Sa closure. Start from those 54 as they can decide how much they want to put in. Last time there was a cut off date. Nowadays it came as a shock.

    • @Buttercookies0
      @Buttercookies0 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I understand they are only going to shut the SA early 2025.

    • @crichardwc
      @crichardwc 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Buttercookies0 what wrong with earning more money? Quoting a civil servant.

    • @Buttercookies0
      @Buttercookies0 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@crichardwc You are talking abt cut off date. I am giving you the info. I am not arguing with you on whether it is right or wrong to earn more money.

    • @crichardwc
      @crichardwc 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Buttercookies0 I mean cut off age like 55 yrs old above retain Sa account as they cannot reverse decision. 54 yrs old below will have Sa remove when they reach 55 as they can make a decision especially on whether they want to have ra or move them out to other investments .

    • @Buttercookies0
      @Buttercookies0 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@crichardwc You will have a RA once you reach 55. Can you choose not to have??

  • @Deeep_ftheta
    @Deeep_ftheta 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    The blind lead the blind… 1M65 slap himself once again.
    Stop listening to 1M65 he don’t understand policy risk

    • @cathhl2440
      @cathhl2440 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Very rude. Says alot about your lack of decency.

    • @Deeep_ftheta
      @Deeep_ftheta 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@cathhl2440 if he can’t accept criticism then don’t be a TH-camr or so call “finance guru”. Nobody force him to be

    • @Fiona20238
      @Fiona20238 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      He is just giving a suggestion, u don't have to take it if u don't like the risk.

  • @stephenang499
    @stephenang499 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So complicated, just take out all excess SA and open a Singapore Currency FD account in MY, get about 4% interest . My MY bank has FD tenures from 1 month to 1 year.

    • @petiachoo1615
      @petiachoo1615 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah and the MYR keeps dropping against the SGD.

    • @Fiona20238
      @Fiona20238 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      what bank? My stupid MY bank keep telling me foreigners cannot put FD. Also, the MY exchange rate kept dropping, quite worrying.

  • @Kelberi
    @Kelberi 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Lan sai la, pledging property is not same as losing 4% @ 200k in sa.😢

  • @jy6497
    @jy6497 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'm confused... Isn't 1M65 about achieving 1Mil in CPF at 65yo? Shielding was good in a sense that more money can fall into the 4% interest bucket (SA and RA with flexibility of withdrawal from SA), but now the 4% bucket is only in RA. For the mass majority who are not investment savvy, wouldn't it be better if all goes into RA? Try to aim for ERS... lar! If you are thinking about shielding in the first place, you are CPF rich, why not put more into RA? So if you ask how about 55 to 65? That means you are not in the 'shielding category' in the first place...

    • @taeyeonist1462
      @taeyeonist1462 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      rather aim for 1M in cash, tyvm. CPF is illiquid and subject to govt's policy risk.

  • @marvelcomiks8078
    @marvelcomiks8078 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

    SOLUTIONS now to get more money are 3: Firstly, instead of starting CPFLife at 65, start at 75 or better still start at 95, can get ALOT more money. Secondly, SELL/Re-mortgage your house back to the Government at the end just use what is left to buy your own coffin and say bye bye, Third option, make videos like this and get your channel to get some side hustle money. No more 1M65, now its 1M95, provided you live up to 95.

    • @petiachoo1615
      @petiachoo1615 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      70 will force the payout already

    • @marvelcomiks8078
      @marvelcomiks8078 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@petiachoo1615 Which means 1M is no longer possible.

    • @tskuan32
      @tskuan32 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@petiachoo1615 govt will amend the rules again cos our lifespan is increasing 😂

    • @lukeeong
      @lukeeong 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      the changes do not affect the 1M component at all@@marvelcomiks8078

    • @keniiwonga12345
      @keniiwonga12345 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Good. Discover all the loopholes so that the govt can patch them all up. Thank you.

  • @bernardwong5828
    @bernardwong5828 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nothing to do ?

  • @tanjj8283
    @tanjj8283 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Not new..

  • @konggg
    @konggg 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    No free lunch. High returns, high risk. No such thing as getting high returns by just sitting here and shaking legs and taking little or no risk. If you are not sure how to invest elsewhere, pay some money to get someone to help you.

  • @kohpeter3257
    @kohpeter3257 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    No offence,,, your options are already in place long time ago. Not something new. Thanks anyway

    • @1m65
      @1m65  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes, doesn’t mean these options are not useful in unusual times like this.

  • @taeyeonist1462
    @taeyeonist1462 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I will not put in a single cent of cash to top up CPF. Policy risk is proven 10001% real, and you people still want to toss money down a one way street.

  • @bernardkoh1650
    @bernardkoh1650 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Uncle. Stop posting all these loopholes.. CPF monitoring.. they will plug all ur loopholes.. next gen will suffer..

    • @maleman67
      @maleman67 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      People who don't understand CPF rules call it loophole. People who under the rules, manage their funds according to the CPF framework. No laws are broken.

  • @adriankt
    @adriankt 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Civil service personal can start to withdraw at age 60, the earlier the better.. y wait.

  • @adriankt
    @adriankt 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    There ia no loop hole, gov are keeping these cpf money as their reserve money. Is not our people money, is gov money. Sg is belong to PAP. Vote them out if you do not like it