You are not OBLIGATED TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS AFTER YOU HAVE HANDED ALL THE NECESSARY DOCUMENTS. License, registration and proof of insurance. It’s never ILLEGAL TO REMAIN SILENT. I DON’T ANSWER QUESTIONS
Believe it or not, just remaining silent without invoking the fifth amendment has been ruled by the courts to be deemed suspicious enough for detention. You must invoke the right to remain silent to be protected by the fifth. Screwed up, huh?
It may not be illegal to remain silent, however, staying quiet is not an assertion of rights. The best way to not speak in a way that cannot be misinterpreted is to state I would like a lawyer present prior to any questions, period. Or… state “I invoke my right to remain silent” and then shut up; otherwise, it may be misconstrued and not applicable. The courts do not recognize straight silence as an assertion of rights, nor speaking after you invoke your rights. Just be quiet.
You are spot on with that. If a cop threatened to arrest me for not giving him extra information, then arrest me so I can sued the police department for hundreds of thousands of dollars.
@@blackredneck4378 it’s not until municipalities are on the verge of going broke or having to reduce services due to high payouts for rights violations that it may dawn on them that “hey some officers are costing too freaking much to be working for us”. Then maybe they will be inclined towards ending QUALIFIED IMMUNITY. Look at what has happened where it has ended. Bad Officers May quit and move to other jurisdictions and I say good riddance. They will soon get caught or have to change🙏🏾before they kill somebody(ALTON STERLING).🙏🏾
@@letsgobrandon3007 "...nor speaking after you invoke your rights." That statement is not accurate. You may choose to selectively answer or not answer any questions before or after invoking your rights. It would be utterly preposterous to compel a person to answer questions because they selectively answered questions after invoking their right to shut up.
The fact they are so easily willing to say "sue me" just shows the mentality that Qualified Immunity has given these tyrants.. "sue me... what do I care, I'll never accept wrong doing. You and the rest of tax payers will pick up the bill." Qualified Immunity should be abolished and every badge should carry liability insurance.
The difference between ‘reasonable’ and ‘lawful’ seems vital. The threat to contact the military (his employer and master) is disgusting as anticipated retaliation. I hope this man makes complaints and follows up.
The "good' cop says he doesn't know the law, but he sits there copsplaining instead of looking up the law. He know the law, he's just lying because he's allowed to.
Or, as equally possible, he doesnt know the law and doesnt care either as there are no/few consequences for not knowing the law for him. A citizen however, not knowing is not a defence.
Or, he knows the law, but also knows the other guy. And the other guy is gonna do what he's gonna do, and all you can do is challenge it after. It's just a fact, Jack.
But it could be rectified....the cops could acknowledge and stop committing the violation. Problem is, cops are trained to violate rights in the name of profits. The greater the ignorance of the law by those "subject" to the law, the greater the profits for the administrators of public policy and cops are used as the administration's collection agency. Take the We The People Course...arm yourself in the war of information. -VGQ
@@Still-Learning Totally agree. I was just referring to the instance in the video (and any other time) if it's violated that instance cannot be rectified. But it needs to stop.
Dear Abiyah, Thank you for exposing the truth about policing in Amerika. Thanks for doing the right thing for the people. Keep on speaking the truth. Thank you
@@WeThePeopleUniversity Why don't the good LEO's expose the bad ones in your opinion? Seems like some shady business is happening in a lot of police departments. Almost as if the people running the show are all typically hiring little "henchmen" for themselves to do their evil bidding almost like their little cronies or something rather than upholding justice and the law in a professional manner. What's the problem? I mean how hard can it be to hire sensible, ethical, professional, hard-working, moral, kind, educated, and normal people to do the job correctly???... 🤔🤔 Do we seriously live in a reality in which this is simply not possible? What do you think? Thanks for all that you do. You were one of the very few good ones.
The officer is legally allowed to ask almost anything. He can ask for your sandwich and he can ask you to wash his car. He cannot legally order that you comply with those requests. The officer is asking to surrender your rights for his safety. Who will protect your safety?
We have no right to expect safety to be provided by law enforcement or any other public servant for that matter. The only one who's going to protect you is you.
Brother, I appreciate your honest and fair approach to these. I support LEOs when the obey the law. But I hate to see them be thugs as well. You’ve got the proper mindset on all of these.
It's insane that as a society this is what is going on millions of times a year. So much time, energy, and happiness is destroyed due to these lunatics that have taken over government so they can destroy humanity.
😂😂 yeah no shit, I'm sorry but your comment was just funny to read bc I honestly don't even know what to think or feel any longer since everything is just so fucked up now a days. I think it's bc you used the words lunatics, government, and destroy humanity all in the same sentence. Lol. Yeah that's pretty much the case, it really is fucked up........I can't tell if I want to laugh or cry any longer with this ridiculous fairy tale existence we've lived in for far too long......
Then you remind him - it’s not about suing. The money is an after thought. We are going after certifications. Cops that cost taxpayers money don’t get to keep their jobs.
@@karinaz8756 man I wish it was like that. These police department will keep bad cops on the force and only God knows why. Derek Chauvin had 19 complaints and him putting his knee on a person neck was his second complaint.
The issue with rolling the window down all the way is that now cops, who know they're being filmed, use the fully lowered window as an excuse to claim that they smell something and now have probable cause to search without your permission.
Yeah, that or they just want you to be at their every beck and call, obeying their every command as our "masters" no matter how ridiculous, absurd, or inconsiderate their requests are. I remember not rolling my window down all the way one time and the idiot cop thought it was important enough to stick it in his police report. I'm not kidding, I know bc my lawyer told me after he read it. These cops now a days are not fucking around and not in a good way either. We need to remove and replenish that sweeps as well as cleanses the entire nation of these fucking morons with new ones.
I have yet to hear a fire fighter or a soldier to whine about "safety" within their vocations. It is disingenuous for LEOs to rant about safety in the profession of dealing with criminals.
Guess you missed all the videos of firemen spraying cameramen with high powered hoses for recording or all the videos where they had cops attack people for them because they were being recorded… they’re right here on TH-cam
@@KevinSorbo. You are correct, I have missed the firefighters spraying people with hoses. Was that in China or Iran? When LEOs attack for recording, they are criminals. We have the "RIGHT", don't need permission, to record our public officials in the performance of their duties, while in public. I am not saying public officials conduct themselves properly at all times.. I am saying, when they do overstep their authority, they are breaking the law.
@@malcolmchevrier6866 it was this strange place called Los Angeles the last video I caught the one before that I believe was Florida… maybe you need to step into reality and grow up and when you start to finally mature you’ll realize all that propaganda you ate up in school made you stupid.
Bonus fact: When in the military, your state license can be expire and still valid. Each state is a little different, but they all say your license is good for as long as you're in the military without having to renew said license.
As you stated, having an expired driver's license depends on state laws. Some states only allow your licenses to be expired for up to 90 days while others may authorize up to six months. Are you actually saying that as long as I have an active duty CAC, I don't ever have to renew my driver's license? If so, that is incorrect. I lived in state A, my driver's license was from state B, and my car tags were from state C; and yes, if you are on active duty, this is legal in all states. Some states will allow having a driver's license without a photo; so if you have a DL from state A, then state A may allow you to mail in your DL and they will mail you your new DL without a photo on it.
@@james3588 Unless the rules have changed recently, yes, you could go your whole career in the military without having to renew your license. You receive your "official" state of residence when you enlist. That never changes except when you reenlist and that's up to you to change. Thus no matter where you live after that, you can' have a license in one state, live in another state. You can't have a vehicle registered in a third state, unless you've established residence there.
That is not correct, you cannot go your entire career without renewing your DLs. Each state has its own requirements on how and when to renew active duty members' DLs. And yes, you can have a tag in one state, a DL in another state, and a residence in another state, or at least prior to 2016 when I retired after 28 years.
@@james3588 According to the laws in my state (IN) you can go your whole enlistment without ever having to renew your license. Most states are that way, but i will admit there may be a state or two with different rules. The variation is how long you have to get a new license once you end your military service. Then there's the idea if you drive anything military while you're in, you have to get a military driver's license, which notes what vehicles you're qualified to drive. Btw, while i didn't serve 28 years in the military, i did serve as a personnel admin specialist (75B) at company and battalion level. And the only way you can tag in one state, license in another and reside in a third would be on a temporary basis, dependent on state law, until you can get them all under one state. But that would be a pretty rare circumstance.
Sid the Scientist is a bad man! I wish he would audit full time. Love that he expressed that it was condescending for the cop to keep saying, "I'm not an attorney". I agree!
Strange how this "good cop" starts to talk about the tint on the other guy's windows and having an unobstructed view of the inside of his vehicle?!? Look over HIS shoulder and look at the tint on HIS vehicle and then explain why the police are allowed to have privacy in their vehicles but we are not?!? Str8 up BS!!!
@@rayh592 - Animal Farm! The George Orwell book that people forget about. LOL No animal shall sleep in a bed, with sheets. See!?! There is no rule about beds. It's the sheets that we have a problem with! LMAO
He’s in the military and this investigation is about an address that’s clearly on his license, so what more do they want, do they want him to give addresses to every military post he’s been on or foreign country he has visited? This cop is asking for information beyond the legal scope of his investigation!
I would be considered incompetent, and then terminated, if I was at my place of work and not know how to do my job. How do the little blue men keep getting paid and not know theirs?
What is the crime he's suspected to have committed ? Without articulating the crime he has no authority to interfere with a man exercising his right to access a public venue.
The simple truth is, if he knew his job...and gave the driver options, for officer safety and was curtious this all goes so much better. They need to loose the ego trip and treat people like people....
IN "This day and age" the cops know if the vehicle is registered, to whom it is registered, and most likely what the registered owner looks like. The need for proof of registration is as pointless as proof of insurance sans property damage!
If the state has a violation on the books for having an out of date address, then the officer asking if it's a current address is a violation of the 5th. Threatening the man with arrest if he doesn't verbally answer a question that could potentially implicate him in a violation seems like a pretty clear case of attempting to violate a man's rights under color of law. The license is on the address, as you say Abiyah, he's satisfied the requirements under the law. Too bad this officer is too full of himself to ever get how much of a POS he really is.
When he says this isn't the place to fight it, the court is. Doesn't that somehow imply the police possibly KNOW they could be wrong and do it anyway??
Short strokes are that, in this town, they will violate your civil rights and if you are willing to go through the process of suing them then you might get some compensation. But, they are not going to stop violating your rights. It’s their ‘policy.’
It all boils down to an educated public. We have to educate ourselves as long as cops have the us vs them mentality and cops are allowed to lie. It always makes my head explode when individuals question cops if the cop’s actions are lawful. If you ask a cop “do I have to (fill in the blank) - the answer is always going to be YES. We must be able to STATE when something is unlawful. We must understand the best weapon against the cops is silence. Makes my head explode when cops try to intimidate with the threat of arrest.
The beauty (for the police and justice sytem) of writing SO many laws is that EVERY citizen IS a criminal. It's impossible to go about your whole day without breaking the law. You'd literally have to sit in your home doing nothing if you wanted to not be a criminal. So when cops approach us they are confident in our criminal nature because that's how our country operates, legally. and even when you DO comply with the law, for example going below the speed limit, they STILL try to criminalize that and claim it's suspicious behavior and probably cause. it's pretty messed up.
This guys skills in communication is great. Even when he disagrees.. he points out that his disagreement is not an offense to the officer himself but with his interpretation of the law. Very disarming. Also props to the cop himself..,. obviously a veteran and knows.. "hey man i'm just here for backup.. it's not my stop. But also does as usual come by and be the good guy and open a dialog. No hate on that honestly... that's their job to try and get anything out of the suspect.. that's why you should stfu .. More importantly is why I give this cop props.. when challenged he didn't get defensive and threaten, use force, etc. My guess is that he's been around so long as a LEO that he may have his opinions of what tactics on how to enforce the law but that's not how we do it now. Unfortunately we don't have video from initial contact or the ending. I would like to think this ended with reason over ego and i'm just doing my job and responding to a call, have a good day..but I don't think so.. curious as if you can get any follow up.
when someone says they are not trying to be difficult or you are being difficul, it is them being difficult as they are condescending and verbally aggressive in trying to get you to say you committed a crime when you did not. it is for quotas.
The officers have been trained with the belief that they can take certain liberties above, outside and beyond the law, for the base, coarse, and self-serving reason, to be able to make their job more convenient and efficient streamlining in the performance of their duties. And along with that comes an inherent tyrannical attitude that assaults the mind and all civilized notions of a free society, with these arrogant words; 'if you don't like it "hire an attorney, take it up with the courts and sue me". It's that callous disregard for the rights of the citizens they come in contact with, who pay them more than reasonably for their lack of knowledge and training, and expect them to be on the straight and narrow when it comes to protecting and defending those constitutional rights, that make the relationship with the police more of "us verses them", and creates an animosity against law enforcement and the judicial system.
Unfortunately the police have the ability to indiscriminately punish you for not allowing them to violate your rights. these police were ready to put this man in a cage and pass along a huge financial and social burden if the person declined to allow the violation. If he had invoked his 5th amendment right to silence they would have loaded him up and given him a bond payment. And if you want to fight in court the price just goes up and up and up. Meanwhile they are represented by the city with the full force of the DA and even in the very worse case scenario for them it is the tax payers who cover the costs leaving the police to continue violating people's rights like the mindless savages they are until someone tells them different. That's why they are happy to pass you along to a court. Because they know they will be protected in ever case and face no reprisals for their many violations.
Qualified immunity needs to disappear. All officers must be held accountable for every civil rights violation. Settlements must begin at $100,000 dollars per violation. Every unlawful action must be a fine of $500,000 and 15 years in prison if committed by an armed officer. Every officer must pay for their own insurance.
The military is NOT going to give out information to anyone not even a police officer over the phone. It has to be a court order by a judge and delivered by a court appointed officer. The military is obligated to keep their personnel safe.
If you can't tell me what law I broke, you don't know the law well enough to enforce it. If you don't know the law well enough to enforce it, your incompetence doesn't grant you the right to make me do something simply because you've always done it this way.
Many people in this country have houses and vehicles in multiple States. They only hold one DL and the plates to their vehicles are all registered in the States where they are kept. For several years, I had two houses in two States with multiple cars in both States.
They will do whatever they’re gonna do, once you have their attention. Never speak without an attorney. Simply provide what is required by The Law Of Your Area, then exercise your 5th amendment and state “I will remain silent”.
Been watching you for a while just subscribed 👍🏻 when I got out of the military years ago lol I was doing the ride along thing and going to go into law enforcement… the reason I didn’t is because most police just act like these… I would be the same as you… I wouldn’t determine everyone Is a criminal right off, but my training would make me just keep an eye out 🤷♂️🤷♂️👍🏻
When a cop wants to be a smart ass and say "I'm not an attorney." The only response should be "I am not asking to be represented in court, I'm asking for you to show me the statute that you're attempting to cite me for."
I sympathize with Sid. I got pulled over in Washington numerous times because I did not have a front license plate (not required by my state). Even had one cop tell me I had 30 days to correct it after I explained the reason. I am and always have been a permanent resident of Indiana and I was only a temporary resident of Washington therefore I do not have to change my official records for my temporary residence. If what these cops are saying is true, your registration would be invalid the moment you drove into another state because registrations have different requirements.
The officer saying they’re going to break the law and if you don’t like it. And there’s nothing you can do about it except for go to court. And at that point they will lie.
You need to be able to Sue them with no qualified immunity especially when they threaten oh Sue me if you want to later well that action should be taken The money has to come out of their pockets
He is not even legally required to give his I'd/license, name or address,all protected under the 4th amendment warrant clause and 5th amendment right to not incriminate oneself or be a witness against oneself.
We need to continue to stand up for the rights that we have as Americans if there is no victim there is no crime wake up I love all of the creators that are fighting for freedom but we are free or not let’s not except in between
Are people's true colors always a behavior that is undesirable? And anytime someone behaves poorly is it their "true colors"? And isn't that an easy cookie cutter logic to understand people's inner thinking with... no wonder the world is running so well at the moment.
I've never told someone "you can sue me in court." know why? Because I do not want to be sued, and I'm not going to give someone a valid reason to do so. Clearly qualified immunity needs to be abolished because cops absolutely know there is zero consequences for them breaking the law, or infring on our rights.
What is missing here is he is military and federal laws allow military members and their spouses to keep their driver’s licenses and vehicles registered in their home state. He does not have to give a local address. I was in this exact situation and the judge was not happy with the cop when we were in court.
Unless it’s changed, I once heard that California was the only state where you can’t have the front windows tinted. I just have never gotten what police think they are are going to see with the window all the way down as opposed to partially. I’m sure ego is a major factor.
They contact the military they will state where he is stationed. They might give his home address when he entered. They won't state where he "lives". They don't have that info.
I should be a politician that knows nothing about politics! Why not? It works for law enforcement officers who knows nothing about law!
its already happening lol
Right, look no further than the entire democrat party.
@@MattyTheConstitutionalist Republicans do it too, frankly.
I'm a Libertarian, so don't come at me with that "you're a Democrat" B.S.
yo i live in fairborn ohio
Well, unfortunately we recently had a president who fits that description.
You are not OBLIGATED TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS AFTER YOU HAVE HANDED ALL THE NECESSARY DOCUMENTS. License, registration and proof of insurance. It’s never ILLEGAL TO REMAIN SILENT. I DON’T ANSWER QUESTIONS
Believe it or not, just remaining silent without invoking the fifth amendment has been ruled by the courts to be deemed suspicious enough for detention. You must invoke the right to remain silent to be protected by the fifth. Screwed up, huh?
It may not be illegal to remain silent, however, staying quiet is not an assertion of rights. The best way to not speak in a way that cannot be misinterpreted is to state I would like a lawyer present prior to any questions, period. Or… state “I invoke my right to remain silent” and then shut up; otherwise, it may be misconstrued and not applicable. The courts do not recognize straight silence as an assertion of rights, nor speaking after you invoke your rights. Just be quiet.
You are spot on with that. If a cop threatened to arrest me for not giving him extra information, then arrest me so I can sued the police department for hundreds of thousands of dollars.
@@blackredneck4378 it’s not until municipalities are on the verge of going broke or having to reduce services due to high payouts for rights violations that it may dawn on them that “hey some officers are costing too freaking much to be working for us”. Then maybe they will be inclined towards ending QUALIFIED IMMUNITY. Look at what has happened where it has ended. Bad Officers May quit and move to other jurisdictions and I say good riddance. They will soon get caught or have to change🙏🏾before they kill somebody(ALTON STERLING).🙏🏾
@@letsgobrandon3007 "...nor speaking after you invoke your rights." That statement is not accurate. You may choose to selectively answer or not answer any questions before or after invoking your rights. It would be utterly preposterous to compel a person to answer questions because they selectively answered questions after invoking their right to shut up.
Cop: "We can do this one of two ways."
No, the ONLY way to do this is the LEGAL way.
It’s PAINFUL watching and listening to these men
I thought the same thing.
Banging my head on the kitchen table !!!!
IM WITH YOU BROTHER !!
These are not men, men don’t pray on others….
@@Robcalitrek1 agreed
@@Robcalitrek1 *prey :-) Please DO "pray on others" that the Lord would answer your intercession for them.
The fact they are so easily willing to say "sue me" just shows the mentality that Qualified Immunity has given these tyrants.. "sue me... what do I care, I'll never accept wrong doing. You and the rest of tax payers will pick up the bill." Qualified Immunity should be abolished and every badge should carry liability insurance.
What great idea 👍👍👍👍👍
I agree with you 100 percent
💯💯💯💯⚖️⚖️👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽
The difference between ‘reasonable’ and ‘lawful’ seems vital. The threat to contact the military (his employer and master) is disgusting as anticipated retaliation. I hope this man makes complaints and follows up.
You can’t argue the law with someone that doesn’t know the law.
Or someone who does not care about it
But you can educate….
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed man 🤣🤔
The guy with the camera did a horrible job even explaining his position.
Can't argue with stupid. You are just wasting your time, don't even try.
The "good' cop says he doesn't know the law, but he sits there copsplaining instead of looking up the law. He know the law, he's just lying because he's allowed to.
Which one is the good cop?
@@vernetterobertson3896 lol i dont know if he was a good cop but having a conversation about things is a step in the right direction.
Or, as equally possible, he doesnt know the law and doesnt care either as there are no/few consequences for not knowing the law for him. A citizen however, not knowing is not a defence.
Or, he knows the law, but also knows the other guy. And the other guy is gonna do what he's gonna do, and all you can do is challenge it after. It's just a fact, Jack.
"Your 4th amendment right being violated will not be rectified here" Once it is violated it can never be rectified.
But it could be rectified....the cops could acknowledge and stop committing the violation.
Problem is, cops are trained to violate rights in the name of profits.
The greater the ignorance of the law by those "subject" to the law, the greater the profits for the administrators of public policy and cops are used as the administration's collection agency.
Take the We The People Course...arm yourself in the war of information.
-VGQ
@@Still-Learning Totally agree. I was just referring to the instance in the video (and any other time) if it's violated that instance cannot be rectified. But it needs to stop.
@@johnmcenteggart1663 Got it....you can't unfire a bullet.
Dear Abiyah, Thank you for exposing the truth about policing in Amerika. Thanks for doing the right thing for the people. Keep on speaking the truth. Thank you
You ARE a man of INTEGRITY...And a absolutely BRILLIANT teacher - Hands down...
Wow thank you for that!
@@WeThePeopleUniversity I think you're awesome 👍
@@WeThePeopleUniversity Why don't the good LEO's expose the bad ones in your opinion? Seems like some shady business is happening in a lot of police departments. Almost as if the people running the show are all typically hiring little "henchmen" for themselves to do their evil bidding almost like their little cronies or something rather than upholding justice and the law in a professional manner. What's the problem? I mean how hard can it be to hire sensible, ethical, professional, hard-working, moral, kind, educated, and normal people to do the job correctly???... 🤔🤔 Do we seriously live in a reality in which this is simply not possible? What do you think? Thanks for all that you do. You were one of the very few good ones.
Ditto! 🎯👍
The officer is legally allowed to ask almost anything. He can ask for your sandwich and he can ask you to wash his car. He cannot legally order that you comply with those requests.
The officer is asking to surrender your rights for his safety. Who will protect your safety?
Absolutely disgusting to watch!
We have no right to expect safety to be provided by law enforcement or any other public servant for that matter. The only one who's going to protect you is you.
Ba
Brother, I appreciate your honest and fair approach to these. I support LEOs when the obey the law. But I hate to see them be thugs as well. You’ve got the proper mindset on all of these.
I'm tired of cops talking to us as if they have our best interests and they don't.
Funny how every time he's trying to make a legitimate point, the cops cut him off.
It's insane that as a society this is what is going on millions of times a year. So much time, energy, and happiness is destroyed due to these lunatics that have taken over government so they can destroy humanity.
😂😂 yeah no shit, I'm sorry but your comment was just funny to read bc I honestly don't even know what to think or feel any longer since everything is just so fucked up now a days. I think it's bc you used the words lunatics, government, and destroy humanity all in the same sentence. Lol. Yeah that's pretty much the case, it really is fucked up........I can't tell if I want to laugh or cry any longer with this ridiculous fairy tale existence we've lived in for far too long......
this happened 20mins north of my home.. im glad to see audits getting done all over
This cop doesn't mine getting sued you can tell by the way he said "you can take me to court and sue me". Because they don't pay the taxpayers pay.
Then you remind him - it’s not about suing. The money is an after thought. We are going after certifications. Cops that cost taxpayers money don’t get to keep their jobs.
@@karinaz8756 man I wish it was like that. These police department will keep bad cops on the force and only God knows why. Derek Chauvin had 19 complaints and him putting his knee on a person neck was his second complaint.
That is why we the people must demand that their qualified immunity must go.
Its awesome you are showing the people what corrupt, & inept bullies that they are !!!
👍👍👍
The issue with rolling the window down all the way is that now cops, who know they're being filmed, use the fully lowered window as an excuse to claim that they smell something and now have probable cause to search without your permission.
Yeah, that or they just want you to be at their every beck and call, obeying their every command as our "masters" no matter how ridiculous, absurd, or inconsiderate their requests are. I remember not rolling my window down all the way one time and the idiot cop thought it was important enough to stick it in his police report. I'm not kidding, I know bc my lawyer told me after he read it. These cops now a days are not fucking around and not in a good way either. We need to remove and replenish that sweeps as well as cleanses the entire nation of these fucking morons with new ones.
Probable cause is only to get a legal lawful search warrant signed by a judge under oath and affirmation.
But can they PROVE what they smelled?
Do the police have certification that verified their smells are accurate?
Cannot bottle a smell and bring to court.
I have yet to hear a fire fighter or a soldier to whine about "safety" within their vocations. It is disingenuous for LEOs to rant about safety in the profession of dealing with criminals.
There job is not a profession dont believe me look it up
@@keithharris4378 Their fear is less about with their title and more about their character.
Guess you missed all the videos of firemen spraying cameramen with high powered hoses for recording or all the videos where they had cops attack people for them because they were being recorded… they’re right here on TH-cam
@@KevinSorbo. You are correct, I have missed the firefighters spraying people with hoses. Was that in China or Iran? When LEOs attack for recording, they are criminals. We have the "RIGHT", don't need permission, to record our public officials in the performance of their duties, while in public. I am not saying public officials conduct themselves properly at all times.. I am saying, when they do overstep their authority, they are breaking the law.
@@malcolmchevrier6866 it was this strange place called Los Angeles the last video I caught the one before that I believe was Florida… maybe you need to step into reality and grow up and when you start to finally mature you’ll realize all that propaganda you ate up in school made you stupid.
Hats off to the citizen for keeping his cool and also paying attention to process rather than solely content. “We are dialoguing.”
Bonus fact: When in the military, your state license can be expire and still valid. Each state is a little different, but they all say your license is good for as long as you're in the military without having to renew said license.
As you stated, having an expired driver's license depends on state laws. Some states only allow your licenses to be expired for up to 90 days while others may authorize up to six months. Are you actually saying that as long as I have an active duty CAC, I don't ever have to renew my driver's license? If so, that is incorrect. I lived in state A, my driver's license was from state B, and my car tags were from state C; and yes, if you are on active duty, this is legal in all states. Some states will allow having a driver's license without a photo; so if you have a DL from state A, then state A may allow you to mail in your DL and they will mail you your new DL without a photo on it.
@@james3588 Unless the rules have changed recently, yes, you could go your whole career in the military without having to renew your license.
You receive your "official" state of residence when you enlist. That never changes except when you reenlist and that's up to you to change. Thus no matter where you live after that, you can' have a license in one state, live in another state. You can't have a vehicle registered in a third state, unless you've established residence there.
That is not correct, you cannot go your entire career without renewing your DLs. Each state has its own requirements on how and when to renew active duty members' DLs. And yes, you can have a tag in one state, a DL in another state, and a residence in another state, or at least prior to 2016 when I retired after 28 years.
@@james3588 According to the laws in my state (IN) you can go your whole enlistment without ever having to renew your license. Most states are that way, but i will admit there may be a state or two with different rules. The variation is how long you have to get a new license once you end your military service.
Then there's the idea if you drive anything military while you're in, you have to get a military driver's license, which notes what vehicles you're qualified to drive.
Btw, while i didn't serve 28 years in the military, i did serve as a personnel admin specialist (75B) at company and battalion level. And the only way you can tag in one state, license in another and reside in a third would be on a temporary basis, dependent on state law, until you can get them all under one state. But that would be a pretty rare circumstance.
Sid the Scientist is a bad man! I wish he would audit full time. Love that he expressed that it was condescending for the cop to keep saying, "I'm not an attorney". I agree!
Strange how this "good cop" starts to talk about the tint on the other guy's windows and having an unobstructed view of the inside of his vehicle?!? Look over HIS shoulder and look at the tint on HIS vehicle and then explain why the police are allowed to have privacy in their vehicles but we are not?!? Str8 up BS!!!
Some animals are more equal than others. Pigs are the most special of all.
I actually asked a cop that once but they said cause we can I the answer I got..
@@rayh592 - Animal Farm! The George Orwell book that people forget about. LOL
No animal shall sleep in a bed, with sheets.
See!?! There is no rule about beds. It's the sheets that we have a problem with!
LMAO
He’s in the military and this investigation is about an address that’s clearly on his license, so what more do they want, do they want him to give addresses to every military post he’s been on or foreign country he has visited? This cop is asking for information beyond the legal scope of his investigation!
That's like being a electrician, and not knowing how to do electrical.
IT'S A DAMN SHAME WE HAVE TO TEACH OUR KID'S NOT TO TRUST COP'S EVER
Your analogy was spot on!!
I would be considered incompetent, and then terminated, if I was at my place of work and not know how to do my job. How do the little blue men keep getting paid and not know theirs?
I will not sit on the ground because I cannot sit on the ground. I would not do it anyway.
What is the crime he's suspected to have committed ? Without articulating the crime he has no authority to interfere with a man exercising his right to access a public venue.
The simple truth is, if he knew his job...and gave the driver options, for officer safety and was curtious this all goes so much better. They need to loose the ego trip and treat people like people....
IN "This day and age" the cops know if the vehicle is registered, to whom it is registered, and most likely what the registered owner looks like. The need for proof of registration is as pointless as proof of insurance sans property damage!
If the state has a violation on the books for having an out of date address, then the officer asking if it's a current address is a violation of the 5th. Threatening the man with arrest if he doesn't verbally answer a question that could potentially implicate him in a violation seems like a pretty clear case of attempting to violate a man's rights under color of law. The license is on the address, as you say Abiyah, he's satisfied the requirements under the law. Too bad this officer is too full of himself to ever get how much of a POS he really is.
“I don’t know law verbatim “ NO! You need to know the law that you are trying to enforce or don’t enforce it!! PERIOD THE END
Two things you can be wrong about more often than not and still get paid,a meteorologist and a cop.
Dude, remain SILENT
When he says this isn't the place to fight it, the court is.
Doesn't that somehow imply the police possibly KNOW they could be wrong and do it anyway??
Blue-Line Thugsters 💙 😍
just say YOU'LL ATTACH YOURSELF TO THEIR PENSION
& watch how fast they change their tune
Short strokes are that, in this town, they will violate your civil rights and if you are willing to go through the process of suing them then you might get some compensation. But, they are not going to stop violating your rights. It’s their ‘policy.’
It all boils down to an educated public. We have to educate ourselves as long as cops have the us vs them mentality and cops are allowed to lie. It always makes my head explode when individuals question cops if the cop’s actions are lawful. If you ask a cop “do I have to (fill in the blank) - the answer is always going to be YES. We must be able to STATE when something is unlawful. We must understand the best weapon against the cops is silence. Makes my head explode when cops try to intimidate with the threat of arrest.
PIGNORANCE at its finest
No the military would state he is stationed in dayron but is subject to to duty station change at any time but is a Resident of Florida
The beauty (for the police and justice sytem) of writing SO many laws is that EVERY citizen IS a criminal. It's impossible to go about your whole day without breaking the law. You'd literally have to sit in your home doing nothing if you wanted to not be a criminal.
So when cops approach us they are confident in our criminal nature because that's how our country operates, legally.
and even when you DO comply with the law, for example going below the speed limit, they STILL try to criminalize that and claim it's suspicious behavior and probably cause.
it's pretty messed up.
5:30 - "But it's not local."
So what if he was from out-of-state? Americans have Freedom of Movement!
Right to travel.
This guys skills in communication is great. Even when he disagrees.. he points out that his disagreement is not an offense to the officer himself but with his interpretation of the law. Very disarming. Also props to the cop himself..,. obviously a veteran and knows.. "hey man i'm just here for backup.. it's not my stop. But also does as usual come by and be the good guy and open a dialog. No hate on that honestly... that's their job to try and get anything out of the suspect.. that's why you should stfu .. More importantly is why I give this cop props.. when challenged he didn't get defensive and threaten, use force, etc.
My guess is that he's been around so long as a LEO that he may have his opinions of what tactics on how to enforce the law but that's not how we do it now. Unfortunately we don't have video from initial contact or the ending. I would like to think this ended with reason over ego and i'm just doing my job and responding to a call, have a good day..but I don't think so.. curious as if you can get any follow up.
Man , The ignorance of law our police exhibit in these videos helps me why qualified immunity exists . Lord help us !
I get a strong sense that the shortage of officers and quick hiring of strong tough thugs...
Brave American law enforcement 😢
Leo's will never understand why they are hated .
when someone says they are not trying to be difficult or you are being difficul, it is them being difficult as they are condescending and verbally aggressive in trying to get you to say you committed a crime when you did not. it is for quotas.
The officers have been trained with the belief that they can take certain liberties above, outside and beyond the law, for the base, coarse, and self-serving reason, to be able to make their job more convenient and efficient streamlining in the performance of their duties. And along with that comes an inherent tyrannical attitude that assaults the mind and all civilized notions of a free society, with these arrogant words; 'if you don't like it "hire an attorney, take it up with the courts and sue me". It's that callous disregard for the rights of the citizens they come in contact with, who pay them more than reasonably for their lack of knowledge and training, and expect them to be on the straight and narrow when it comes to protecting and defending those constitutional rights, that make the relationship with the police more of "us verses them", and creates an animosity against law enforcement and the judicial system.
Unfortunately the police have the ability to indiscriminately punish you for not allowing them to violate your rights. these police were ready to put this man in a cage and pass along a huge financial and social burden if the person declined to allow the violation. If he had invoked his 5th amendment right to silence they would have loaded him up and given him a bond payment. And if you want to fight in court the price just goes up and up and up. Meanwhile they are represented by the city with the full force of the DA and even in the very worse case scenario for them it is the tax payers who cover the costs leaving the police to continue violating people's rights like the mindless savages they are until someone tells them different. That's why they are happy to pass you along to a court. Because they know they will be protected in ever case and face no reprisals for their many violations.
Qualified immunity needs to disappear. All officers must be held accountable for every civil rights violation. Settlements must begin at $100,000 dollars per violation. Every unlawful action must be a fine of $500,000 and 15 years in prison if committed by an armed officer. Every officer must pay for their own insurance.
The military is NOT going to give out information to anyone not even a police officer over the phone. It has to be a court order by a judge and delivered by a court appointed officer.
The military is obligated to keep their personnel safe.
If you can't tell me what law I broke, you don't know the law well enough to enforce it.
If you don't know the law well enough to enforce it, your incompetence doesn't grant you the right to make me do something simply because you've always done it this way.
They want to be able to pull you out of the car if they choose to. It's much harder to do that if your window isn't down all the way.
Argued with the confidence of a man with zero accountability.
Many people in this country have houses and vehicles in multiple States. They only hold one DL and the plates to their vehicles are all registered in the States where they are kept. For several years, I had two houses in two States with multiple cars in both States.
I can't believe how they celebrate their ignorance.
It's sad that the police don't know what the law is and a private citizen does
How are you " law enforcement '' and don't know what the law is
Having tinted windows and not rolling them down is suspicious behavior.
End qualified immunity! Make each officer personally liable!
What a waste of taxpayers money
They will do whatever they’re gonna do, once you have their attention. Never speak without an attorney. Simply provide what is required by The Law Of Your Area, then exercise your 5th amendment and state “I will remain silent”.
Been watching you for a while just subscribed 👍🏻 when I got out of the military years ago lol I was doing the ride along thing and going to go into law enforcement… the reason I didn’t is because most police just act like these… I would be the same as you… I wouldn’t determine everyone Is a criminal right off, but my training would make me just keep an eye out 🤷♂️🤷♂️👍🏻
When a cop wants to be a smart ass and say "I'm not an attorney."
The only response should be "I am not asking to be represented in court, I'm asking for you to show me the statute that you're attempting to cite me for."
All that cop had to do was radio dispatch and have them look up the laws.
This topic is a never ending story . Unfortunately it will get worst .The system is broken
Suspected of a CRIME not an infraction.
3 cops per traffic stop is a huge waste of resources.
I sympathize with Sid. I got pulled over in Washington numerous times because I did not have a front license plate (not required by my state). Even had one cop tell me I had 30 days to correct it after I explained the reason. I am and always have been a permanent resident of Indiana and I was only a temporary resident of Washington therefore I do not have to change my official records for my temporary residence. If what these cops are saying is true, your registration would be invalid the moment you drove into another state because registrations have different requirements.
The officer saying they’re going to break the law and if you don’t like it. And there’s nothing you can do about it except for go to court. And at that point they will lie.
"It won't get resolved here". Right,.. because actually following the law in the first place wouldn't make any sense....
You need to be able to Sue them with no qualified immunity especially when they threaten oh Sue me if you want to later well that action should be taken The money has to come out of their pockets
He is not even legally required to give his I'd/license, name or address,all protected under the 4th amendment warrant clause and 5th amendment right to not incriminate oneself or be a witness against oneself.
God Bless you. It’s hard to finds good people!
".....you're not an attorney."
I would of said "Do i have to be an attorney, to be able to read the English language?"
We need to continue to stand up for the rights that we have as Americans if there is no victim there is no crime wake up I love all of the creators that are fighting for freedom but we are free or not let’s not except in between
There is no Ohio law that says you have to roll your window down. In any circumstance.
Are people's true colors always a behavior that is undesirable? And anytime someone behaves poorly is it their "true colors"? And isn't that an easy cookie cutter logic to understand people's inner thinking with... no wonder the world is running so well at the moment.
The cops body language tells a bigger story than everything that they talked about
This guy is basically there for one reason and one reason only to cause trouble..
UPHOLDING THE CONSTITUTION IS A CONTRACT!
The military would say that you are a resident of Florida with assignment in Ohio.
As military, you keep your license from your issuing state. You may not "live" at your place in the military and keep your "home of record"
I've never told someone "you can sue me in court." know why? Because I do not want to be sued, and I'm not going to give someone a valid reason to do so. Clearly qualified immunity needs to be abolished because cops absolutely know there is zero consequences for them breaking the law, or infring on our rights.
What is missing here is he is military and federal laws allow military members and their spouses to keep their driver’s licenses and vehicles registered in their home state. He does not have to give a local address. I was in this exact situation and the judge was not happy with the cop when we were in court.
havent found a cop yet that actually knows the laws they allegedly enforce...
So, if the next day he got orders to be stationed in Germany, sleeping there doesn’t make him German.
Someone who is employed to enforce the law should have a law degree.
Badges? We don't need no stinking badges! Law? Law? I AM THE LAW.
Liar liar liar.I'm not trying to be difficult, says cop.
This driver was a saint. I hope you sue the shit out of them
Unless it’s changed, I once heard that California was the only state where you can’t have the front windows tinted. I just have never gotten what police think they are are going to see with the window all the way down as opposed to partially. I’m sure ego is a major factor.
They cant reach in & pull you out 💥💥💥💥💥
I know the Law well enough,. But not very well enough to apply the law legally!
Please just accept
"well enough!"
They contact the military they will state where he is stationed. They might give his home address when he entered. They won't state where he "lives". They don't have that info.
8:00
Every officer that gets a case dismissed in court for not knowing the law.. SHOULD BE FIRED. 🔥