I look forward to your takes. So clear, straightforward, and easy to understand! I especially love how you challenge Mimi, because it surfaces details that would not have been surfaced, because as you said, the wrong question was asked. Even if the outlook isn’t particularly nice to hear, it’s still great to be informed. Thank you for giving your time to share with us your analyses and insights.
@@MimiOng i really enjoy our dual flowing dialogue Mimi. You also challenge me and bring out my best insights and analysis as I have to think hard and respect you and our kind audience
Thank you again Stevie and Mimi for your lively, informative and practical interview. 21 minutes is too short for the best business program of ANC - Stevienomics - . I suggest Mimi that you have 1 hour for Dec..
Another lesson learnt from Stevie. “Pragmatic solutions” must be used by the current government in order to deliver good results. Thank you once again. Can you guys do this twice a month?
This really touches on Duterte's Energy secretary allowing the sale of the Malampaya gas fields to the company of Dennis Uy - which would give him own a majority of it. This goes beyond economics and touches on national security when Malampaya provides around 40% of the energy supply of Luzon.
Malampaya is actually going bankrupt so nobody wants to touch it most investors wants to invest in other alternatives and build other energy infra that will turn into profit than buy malampaya shares paubos na supply malampaya ur either brave or stupid para bumili Ng pakuging negosyo hoping that u can turn it around
My favorite rock n roll economic duo. "Economic foil", Mimi with, "Is privatization always the way to go?" and the "Straight man", Stevie with a straight answer, "My point is, you are asking the wrong question." LOL! Just love it. The relationship between the two is contagious. It is unorthodox, yet invigorating to listen. Keep it coming! 💞
Your pragmatic view of privatization is correct sir. People forget that privitization is the means to deliver better services to the people.and not the end itself. Many of the highly educated defenders of the universal benefits of privitization are looking to profit from it. If you trust blindly in the free market the recent travails of crypto will convince you to think twice.
Always looking forward watching Stevienomics with Mimi! very infectious and insightful. I wonder how this sort of table conversation would turn out with a bottle of vino...could be really interesting!
Matt, it would be a blast! I suggest, Sauvignon Blanc and Chardonnay for the white wines and Pinot Noir and Cabernet Sauvignon for the reds. Oh, I forgot, for the chaser:🥃🍷 Ilocos' Basi of Sarrat.🍷🥃
Please make your talks with Stephen bi-monthly at least. December is still a long ways. People watching him appreciate the incremental increase in human capital that they are getting :D
Thank you Sir. Your take made me challenge my belief in the Washington concensus and Reaganomics. Love your realistic approach in our fundamental problems.
Case in point when the Philippine Oil Industry was deregulated. No more government intervention, yun kapalit, collusion between big & small players. No real benefit to the end users!
The problem with Stevie's argument with the Washington Consensus is that the Philippines never fully adopted it in the first place. For too long, the Philippines adopted protectionist economic policies. On top of that, monopolization is not prohibited here in the Philippines. That's why production was inefficient and growth was stagnant for a long time. That's why the Philippines was a sick man of Asia for a long time. The only way you can open up competition and stimulate growth is to allow foreign capital access to compete in the Philippine market. Of course, some industries can never be allowed full foreign ownership, that's why I think Stevie's argument is a misnomer. The point is "economic solutions of the 1980s" is relevant for the Philippines because it never got past it in the first place.
@@scuunjieng its ok sir. always looking forward to your interviews. if only our policy makers think like you, then our country will be in a better economic standing
@@scuunjieng hi sir i would like to ask your response about the interview of sonny africa. he wants more ayuda to spur the economy. it is better than infrastructure driven daw.
They shouldve chosen a journalist who has a strong background in Economics. She could barely catch up. It's a conversation not a lecture. A good interviewer responsibly steers a what should be a multi-layered exchange to bring out the most out from the resource speaker.
According to Xi's economic plans China is looking for a 'middle economy' as it accelerates growth. Could Japan be a kind of 'middle economy' China is looking for? And this in the midst of the US's decelerating.
thank you for inviting me again
Always enjoy your insights sir Stephen
@@asmodeusmagnum many thanks
I look forward to your takes. So clear, straightforward, and easy to understand! I especially love how you challenge Mimi, because it surfaces details that would not have been surfaced, because as you said, the wrong question was asked. Even if the outlook isn’t particularly nice to hear, it’s still great to be informed. Thank you for giving your time to share with us your analyses and insights.
@@sxfia214 Agree! Always an intellectual challenge -- and a learning curve, with Stevienomics! You never know what you're gonna get! :)
@@MimiOng i really enjoy our dual flowing dialogue Mimi. You also challenge me and bring out my best insights and analysis as I have to think hard and respect you and our kind audience
Thank you again Stevie and Mimi for your lively, informative and practical interview. 21 minutes is too short for the best business program of ANC - Stevienomics - . I suggest Mimi that you have 1 hour for Dec..
Thank you for your kind words
Another lesson learnt from Stevie. “Pragmatic solutions” must be used by the current government in order to deliver good results. Thank you once again. Can you guys do this twice a month?
Many thanks. Wish I had the time to do it more than once a month
Thank you for your analysis. I enjoy watching this every month.
many thanks
Nice we have you back again..thank you for your insights
many thanks
This really touches on Duterte's Energy secretary allowing the sale of the Malampaya gas fields to the company of Dennis Uy - which would give him own a majority of it. This goes beyond economics and touches on national security when Malampaya provides around 40% of the energy supply of Luzon.
Malampaya is actually going bankrupt so nobody wants to touch it most investors wants to invest in other alternatives and build other energy infra that will turn into profit than buy malampaya shares paubos na supply malampaya ur either brave or stupid para bumili Ng pakuging negosyo hoping that u can turn it around
My favorite rock n roll economic duo. "Economic foil", Mimi with, "Is privatization always the way to go?"
and the "Straight man", Stevie with a straight answer, "My point is, you are asking the wrong question."
LOL! Just love it. The relationship between the two is contagious. It is unorthodox, yet invigorating to listen. Keep it coming! 💞
many thanks
awesome as always ANC
many thanks
Mr. Stephen Cuunjieng is so right and on point. I hope the Philippine government will consult and follow his advice.👍🏼👏
many thanks
Stevienomics is laudable. If you want to learn economics and business in action always watch Stephen.
many thanks
@@scuunjieng
I learn a lot from Stephen about the economic facts that are not learned in books.
@@felicisimomalinao1981 many thanks
Looking forward for your thoughts...
many thanks
Your pragmatic view of privatization is correct sir. People forget that privitization is the means to deliver better services to the people.and not the end itself. Many of the highly educated defenders of the universal benefits of privitization are looking to profit from it. If you trust blindly in the free market the recent travails of crypto will convince you to think twice.
Thanks
I wish a lot more of us would tune in to this program. I echo what’s being said in the comments, 20 minutes felt like a teaser.
Many thanks
very informative … Stephen is really good economist !
many thanks but just an investment banker, not an economist!
ANC. Give Stephen an hour at least. Shorten your other programs to give way to him.
Always looking forward watching Stevienomics with Mimi! very infectious and insightful. I wonder how this sort of table conversation would turn out with a bottle of vino...could be really interesting!
Matt, it would be a blast! I suggest, Sauvignon Blanc and Chardonnay for the white wines and Pinot Noir and Cabernet Sauvignon for the reds. Oh, I forgot, for the chaser:🥃🍷 Ilocos' Basi of Sarrat.🍷🥃
many thanks
@@yolanda3144-z8k many thanks
Please make your talks with Stephen bi-monthly at least. December is still a long ways. People watching him appreciate the incremental increase in human capital that they are getting :D
thank you but alas i don't have the time to accede to your kind request
Thank you Sir. Your take made me challenge my belief in the Washington concensus and Reaganomics. Love your realistic approach in our fundamental problems.
many thanks and happy you have an empirical and open mind
It is always nice to hear what Stephen Cuunjiengs opinion on different economic matters.. A very pragmatic way indeed.. keep it coming.. 👍👍
Deeply appreciated
Yessss final may fav segment with Stevienomics. Always bitin 😅
many thanks
The only guest who always makes this host look stupid. Love it.
Case in point when the Philippine Oil Industry was deregulated. No more government intervention, yun kapalit, collusion between big & small players. No real benefit to the end users!
The problem with Stevie's argument with the Washington Consensus is that the Philippines never fully adopted it in the first place. For too long, the Philippines adopted protectionist economic policies. On top of that, monopolization is not prohibited here in the Philippines. That's why production was inefficient and growth was stagnant for a long time. That's why the Philippines was a sick man of Asia for a long time. The only way you can open up competition and stimulate growth is to allow foreign capital access to compete in the Philippine market. Of course, some industries can never be allowed full foreign ownership, that's why I think Stevie's argument is a misnomer. The point is "economic solutions of the 1980s" is relevant for the Philippines because it never got past it in the first place.
yey. monday stephinomics day!
thanks
sana twice a month na lang to
many thanks but don't have the time
@@scuunjieng its ok sir. always looking forward to your interviews. if only our policy makers think like you, then our country will be in a better economic standing
@@gamingcentral2295 many thanks
@@scuunjieng hi sir i would like to ask your response about the interview of sonny africa. he wants more ayuda to spur the economy. it is better than infrastructure driven daw.
@@scuunjieng th-cam.com/video/S5pUKPBtBjE/w-d-xo.html
china did the opposite of Washington concensus
They shouldve chosen a journalist who has a strong background in Economics. She could barely catch up. It's a conversation not a lecture. A good interviewer responsibly steers a what should be a multi-layered exchange to bring out the most out from the resource speaker.
I always upset to mimi when stephen is there. 21 minute is just warming up and then times up.
many thanks
STEVIENOMICS W/MIMI AND STEPHEN. 1S A MONTH OR TWICE A MONTH SHOW. MAKE IT HAPPEN ANC! DO IT DO IT
many thanks. alas i am too busy to do it more often much as I would like to
👌👍👏👏👏👏👏🤗💓🙏
thanks
According to Xi's economic plans China is looking for a 'middle economy' as it accelerates growth. Could Japan be a kind of 'middle economy' China is looking for? And this in the midst of the US's decelerating.
Tenbits...😄
Sorry!
*I'm done sitting tight for the award advance since i acquire$23,000 every 12 days of my investment.❤*
must you pollute the comment section with this kind of post?
Useless comments.