CRUSHING the most INSANE criticisms of Israel | with Rabbi Manis Friedman
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 14 ต.ค. 2024
- The legendary Rabbi Manis Friedman, the most watched rabbi on TH-cam, joins this episode to discuss Israel's war in Gaza. With the view of Halacha, he responds to criticism by the UN and the international community of the IDF's tactics, absurd accusations of Israel committing war crimes, the recent hostage deal, how the IDF should think about civilians, and calls for a ceasefire. He also reveals a deeper spiritual meaning in the war.
Rabbi Friedman hosted his own critically acclaimed cable television series, Torah Forum with Manis Friedman, syndicated throughout North America and is known as “TH-cam’s Most Popular Rabbi”.
Rabbi Friedman’s first book, Doesn’t Anyone Blush Anymore? published by Harper San Francisco in 1990, was widely praised by the media. Following the publication of the book, he was featured internationally in over 200 print articles.
In his private practice Rabbi Friedman has helped thousands of couples and individuals achieve fulfilling, balanced relationships, through in-person meetings or remote video consultations.
Rabbi Friedman is a noted Biblical scholar, recognized for his sagacious grasp of Jewish mysticism. In 1971, he founded Bais Chana Institute of Jewish Studies in Minnesota, the world’s first yeshiva exclusively for women, where he continues to serve as dean. From 1984-1990 he served as simultaneous translator for the Lubavitcher Rebbe’s televised talks.
Born in Prague, Czechoslovakia in 1946, Rabbi Friedman immigrated with his family to the United States in 1950. He received his rabbinic ordination from the Rabbinical College of Canada in 1969 and is a professionally ranked member of the National Speakers Association. His speaking tours take him to every part of this country as well as Israel, England, The Netherlands, South Africa, Australia, Brazil, Venezuela, Peru, Canada, and Hong Kong.
With the launch of itsgoodtoknow.org, Rabbi Friedman is now using the latest technology to spread morality to a wider audience throughout the world through his books, videos and personal meetings. He has made it his mission to reach every one of the billion people on TH-cam in order to help them improve their relationships and deepen their connection with G-d.
#israel #gaza
►Alpert and Associates
Call Moshe Alpert!
Email: Moshe.alpert@nm.com for a free consultation, or head to bit.ly/mosheal...
Or call
718-644-1594
________________________________
► Town Appliance
Visit www.townapplia...
Message Town Appliance on WhatsApp: bit.ly/Townapp...
_____________________________________
► The Kichels
The Kichels are all about bringing joy and humor to people - Especially during this challenging time, it's super important to stay positive and live life with joy- and this a great way to do that.
Run go get this game for Chanukah- for your parties- or just for your family to play after candle lighting- you will have an absolute blast!
Order Here: amzn.to/46LR2f8
________________________________
Join Ishay Ribo, Avraham Fried, Benny Friedman, Shulem Lemmer and Mordechai Shapiro
December 16th at the United Palace!
Buy tickets at symphonyofthes...
#jew #jewish #podcast #frum #rabbi #frumpodcast #meaningfulpeople #torah #mitzvah #hashem #jewishmusic #jewishpodcast #israel #Rubashkin #nachigordon #jewishpod #Sderot #AmYisraelChai #Judaism #Israel #Depression #PostpartumDepression #PPD #newborn #jewishlife
Watching your show from South Africa. I am a Christian, and I support the Chosen people. Amen
Because ignorant are everywhere God has no time to spend with rotten human beings
😂😂😂😂
Chosen garbage 😅😅😅😅. Did u have a chance to see how this chosen garbage are traiting christian ?!!!! Get informed
Yes, now it's time for all Arabs to recognize,so the whole world will be blessed and in peace.🙏👍
Sim ainda existe pessoas que apoiam o Diabo se o Mundo nao fosse assim nem teria existido o sofrimento do Guetto da Varsovia e Estalingrado
Uma vergonha para uma velha que viveu no Estado Fascista racista de Apartheid na Africa do sul mentalidade da serpente extremista religiosa da Sinagoga do Satanas pessoas de Deus tem amor com os outros
One of the Israeli soldiers who was just killed said, "if I die protecting my people, it will be a blessing. If i were to fall captive, I forbid anybody from releasing any terrorist or from endangering any Jewish life to release me."
He’s wise. The current Israeli government is stupid.
Your Soul is safe with God now, God Bless 🙏❤️
Condolences and prayers for his family and friends. May his memory always be a blessing. 🙏
Outsiders and BABBLERS should be ignored and told they've never been to Gaza frontline in the war
How about 3 Israeli hostages carrying a white flag and screaming in hebrew who were just killed by IDF? This is what you get with your blind indoctrination, killing even your own people in blind rage, let alone Palestinian women and children.
Thank you for having Rabbi Friedman. His analysis, perspective, left me in awe. Of course! It's logical ; it makes sense!! Am Yisrael Chai! Dear Chosen People, shout it from the rooftops.
Thank you. This was very clear and informative. Thank you to the Rabbi for expressing his knowledge, experience, and common sense on the subject of inheritance. ❤
Guy supporting Meir Kahane. He got what he preached. Hatred and bloodshed.
I'm so grateful for this post. i understand the power of being a good example can have such a good influence on those around me
Thank you meaningful people for interviewing Rabbi Manis Friedman!
He brings such clarity and meaning to our current issues within daas Torah! Yasher koach!
So much meaning you that even within 6 minutes, when talking about too many palestinian civilians dying, he can't help himself he chuckles. This is the man that represents your faith? so sad
Full of hatred and disobeying Torah and YHWH
@@zaydevans2077and it's okay for hamas to represent Palestinians?
The hamas leader was asking people to kill jews around the world.
It’s war -unfortunately it happens, especially with the tactics used by Hamas. As retired Marine, I assure you that no one takes pleasure in that fact, but it does happen.
The Rabbi’s cynicism is justified if you listen and dig in to the history of the region.
8:00 HE ASKS _"WHAT IS A CIVILIAN"!?_ 8:00
International humanitarian law is based on the principle of the distinction between civilians (and civilian objects) and combatants (and military objectives). The civilian is defined in opposition to the combatant. Literally, a “civilian person” is any individual who is not a member of armed forces.
Rule 1. The parties to the conflict must at all times distinguish between civilians and combatants. Attacks may only be directed against combatants. Attacks must not be directed against civilians.
State practice establishes this rule as a norm of customary international law applicable in both international and non-international armed conflicts. The three components of this rule are interrelated and the practice pertaining to each of them reinforces the validity of the others. The term combatant in this rule is used in its generic meaning, indicating persons who do not enjoy the protection against attack accorded to civilians, but does not imply a right to combatant status or prisoner-of-war status (see Chapter 33).This rule has to be read in conjunction with the prohibition to attack persons recognized to be hors de combat (see Rule 47) and with the rule that civilians are protected against attack unless and for such time as they take a direct part in hostilities (see Rule 6). Belligerent reprisals against civilians are discussed in Chapter 41.
No official contrary practice was found with respect to either international or non-international armed conflicts. This rule is sometimes expressed in other terms, in particular as the principle of distinction between combatants and non-combatants, whereby civilians who do not take a direct part in hostilities are included in the category of non-combatants.[27] Alleged violations of this rule have generally been condemned by States, irrespective of whether the conflict was international or non-international.[28] Similarly, the UN Security Council has condemned or called for an end to alleged attacks against civilians in the context of numerous conflicts, both international and non-international, including in Afghanistan, Angola, Azerbaijan, Burundi, Georgia, Lebanon, Liberia, Rwanda, Sierra Leone, Somalia, Tajikistan, the former Yugoslavia and the territories occupied by Israel.[29] As early as 1938, the Assembly of the League of Nations stated that “the intentional bombing of civilian populations is illegal”.[30] The 20th International Conference of the Red Cross in 1965 solemnly declared that governments and other authorities responsible for action in all armed conflicts should conform to the prohibition on launching attacks against a civilian population.[31] Subsequently, a UN General Assembly resolution on respect for human rights in armed conflicts, adopted in 1968, declared the principle of distinction to be applicable in all armed conflicts.[32] The Plan of Action for the years 2000-2003, adopted by the 27th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent in 1999, requires that all parties to an armed conflict respect “the total ban on directing attacks against the civilian population as such or against civilians not taking a direct part in hostilities”.[33]
*_Highlights:_*
When the ICRC appealed to the parties to the conflict in the Middle East in October 1973, i.e., before the adoption of Additional Protocol I, to respect the distinction between combatants and civilians, the States concerned (Egypt, Iraq, Israel and Syria) replied favourably.[17]
In the Kassem case in 1969, Israel’s Military Court at Ramallah recognized the immunity of civilians from direct attack as one of the basic rules of international humanitarian law.[12]
Is it more clear to you, NOW, what is a civilian and what is not? What a shocking thing to do is to display mental gymnastics so as to mentally avoid the dissonance of maliciously redefining the term "civilians" for the dubious purpose of alleviating the shameful feelings of doing murder and war crimes. And by a RABBI! SHAME.
Catholic here. I trust this Rabbi. His wisdom is biblical.
There's another rabbi I think you'd benefit from as well. Tovia Singer, right here on TH-cam. ❤
@@SeekingToServe i'VE watched a few of his videos. He is a bit anti-Catholic/Orthodox, for my taste.
@@SeekingToServeone for Israel here on TH-cam
The pope would not agree with his interpretation of what is a civilian. Are you sure you're a Catholic. I follow the church, and I don't believe in this genocide. Part of his argument about Germany is misleading. Woodrow Wilson said not to punish Germans severely. Germans were crippled financially. And this rabbi is chuckling at carpet bombing of Germans. That's not church teachings. This is ancient Old Testament, Babylonian, Mesopatamian thinking. Jesus didn't follow that logic.
@@SeekingToServeRabbi Yoel Gold - I really like him!
Perhaps the IDF should consut with Rabbi Friedman
I think the IDF gets it. Biden's handlers need to watch, learn and study.
So should the Commander in Chief rool
The IDF is conducting its genocide just fine without the rabbi.
Thank you, Rabbi! I made Aliyah almost 36 years ago, from Philly.
I am a retired Critical Care Nurse Specialist. I retired 4 years ago. I worked in the Hadassah Ein Kerem ER during the 1st Intifada.
Over those 36 years, I have come to the same conclusions that you teach us, are in the Torah all along.
Even though I know that we never stop learning, I still wish that I heard you teaching this at least 35 years ago.
It would have eased my heart through those years.
Condolences to you, who never learned about apartheid and genocide perpetrated by Zionists towards the Palestinian people.
@debesele Condolences to you, who doesn't know the definitions of Apartheid and Genocide.
You can't have Apartheid if the minority in question has the same rights as the majority, and enjoys the exact same salary for the exact same professions and schooling as the majority.
Genocide can only occur after the annihilation of the majority of the population in question
The so called Palestinians have quadrupled the size of their population, therefore...NO GENOCIDE.
You throw around words that have nothing to do with reality.
Hamas, Hezbullah, Iran and the Palestinian Authority all have in their Charters the intent of committing GENOCIDE against all Jews.
They already perpetrate APARTHEID in the areas that they control. NO JEWS ALLOWED, and PAY FOR SLAY against Jewish civilians.
It must have been very tough as an ER doctor in the first intifada. Not so much at the beginning, when it was only peaceful protests. But once some Idf scumbags murdered a few of the people they hate. Then your emergency room must have been inundated with owies and boo-boos from the relentless rock throwing Palestinian "combatant" prepubescent children "terrorists". Truly. It must have been a horrible time for you. Are you okay? What inspiring strength. Wow.
@@sarahkoren7294You talking BS .Zionists started all this 75 years ago
So much of my despair has been lifted after listening to this brilliant man. Wonderful human being.
We definitely need a lot of prayer.
Rabi’s sarcasm is warranted and efficient to bring a measure of common sense into this madness
Absolutely.
There is no common sense in this. The Bible has great truth. The greatest truth is it's full of satanic lies and the world needs to except that as truth . And not disregard the truth that is in Jesus .That these people denied and had put to death...
Hi Guys, I'm a British Christian Ashkenazi Jew on My Mother's Father's side of the Family, to which, I Sadly don't have any Connection to My German Jewish Roots, Family, Customs or Traditions, because of the Persecution of the NAZIS, My Grandfather had to Flee Poland in 39 & managed to Escape the Genocideal Slaughter of His People & He Managed to safely Arrive in Britain in 42, to Stand & Fight Hitler & His Goons for the British. So Sadly I have no understanding of Hebrew or Yiddish, so a lot of the Jewish Words that the Rabbi used, just went straight over My Head because of the Lack of Understanding in My Peoples Language but what I did Understand was very Wise & Valuable, so Thank You, My Brothers. Great Video. GOD Bless You Both, Praise & Glory be to GOD in the Name of the Holy Spirit & our Lord, King & Saviour the Massiah, Amen.
You can't be Christian amd a jew they are incompatible. Zionist maybe but Christian never.
Dude, what? The English words he used made him out to be worse than any nazi who did gleeful double shifts, ushering people into the ovens.
8:58 NO, Mr. RABBI, you DO NOT need to vet if people are civilians and *they DO NOT need some special identifying marker.* IT IS COMBATANTS WHO MUST MARK THEMSELVES AS COMBATANTS. EVERYONE ELSE IS CONSIDERED CIVILIAN UNTIL THEY TAKE DIRECT HOSTILE ACTION AGAINST YOU. Combatants Identify themselves by HAVING WEAPONS or wearing UNIFORMS or driving weapons of war or donning the INSIGNIA of their armed force. You god forsaken monster. If you don't like that, then do not occupy nations.
8:00 HE ASKS _"WHAT IS A CIVILIAN"!?_ 8:00
International humanitarian law is based on the principle of the distinction between civilians (and civilian objects) and combatants (and military objectives). The civilian is defined in opposition to the combatant. Literally, a “civilian person” is any individual who is not a member of armed forces.
Rule 1. The parties to the conflict must at all times distinguish between civilians and combatants. Attacks may only be directed against combatants. Attacks must not be directed against civilians.
State practice establishes this rule as a norm of customary international law applicable in both international and non-international armed conflicts. The three components of this rule are interrelated and the practice pertaining to each of them reinforces the validity of the others. The term combatant in this rule is used in its generic meaning, indicating persons who do not enjoy the protection against attack accorded to civilians, but does not imply a right to combatant status or prisoner-of-war status (see Chapter 33).This rule has to be read in conjunction with the prohibition to attack persons recognized to be hors de combat (see Rule 47) and with the rule that civilians are protected against attack unless and for such time as they take a direct part in hostilities (see Rule 6). Belligerent reprisals against civilians are discussed in Chapter 41.
No official contrary practice was found with respect to either international or non-international armed conflicts. This rule is sometimes expressed in other terms, in particular as the principle of distinction between combatants and non-combatants, whereby civilians who do not take a direct part in hostilities are included in the category of non-combatants.[27] Alleged violations of this rule have generally been condemned by States, irrespective of whether the conflict was international or non-international.[28] Similarly, the UN Security Council has condemned or called for an end to alleged attacks against civilians in the context of numerous conflicts, both international and non-international, including in Afghanistan, Angola, Azerbaijan, Burundi, Georgia, Lebanon, Liberia, Rwanda, Sierra Leone, Somalia, Tajikistan, the former Yugoslavia and the territories occupied by Israel.[29] As early as 1938, the Assembly of the League of Nations stated that “the intentional bombing of civilian populations is illegal”.[30] The 20th International Conference of the Red Cross in 1965 solemnly declared that governments and other authorities responsible for action in all armed conflicts should conform to the prohibition on launching attacks against a civilian population.[31] Subsequently, a UN General Assembly resolution on respect for human rights in armed conflicts, adopted in 1968, declared the principle of distinction to be applicable in all armed conflicts.[32] The Plan of Action for the years 2000-2003, adopted by the 27th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent in 1999, requires that all parties to an armed conflict respect “the total ban on directing attacks against the civilian population as such or against civilians not taking a direct part in hostilities”.[33]
*_Highlights:_*
When the ICRC appealed to the parties to the conflict in the Middle East in October 1973, i.e., before the adoption of Additional Protocol I, to respect the distinction between combatants and civilians, the States concerned (Egypt, Iraq, Israel and Syria) replied favourably.[17]
In the Kassem case in 1969, Israel’s Military Court at Ramallah recognized the immunity of civilians from direct attack as one of the basic rules of international humanitarian law.[12]
Is it more clear to you, NOW, what is a civilian and what is not? What a shocking thing to do is to display mental gymnastics so as to mentally avoid the dissonance of maliciously redefining the term "civilians" for the dubious purpose of alleviating the shameful feelings of doing murder and war crimes. And by a RABBI! SHAME.
Thanks Rabbi Freidman like always you put it so clear!!!!
unbelievable that the host refers to the palestinians just as 'arabs' within the first 7 or so mins. Already trotting out the same sort of stereotypes that would get you called antisemetic the other way round, love it.
@@zaydevans2077calling arabs arabs is a problem?
8:00 HE ASKS _"WHAT IS A CIVILIAN"!?_ 8:00
International humanitarian law is based on the principle of the distinction between civilians (and civilian objects) and combatants (and military objectives). The civilian is defined in opposition to the combatant. Literally, a “civilian person” is any individual who is not a member of armed forces.
Rule 1. The parties to the conflict must at all times distinguish between civilians and combatants. Attacks may only be directed against combatants. Attacks must not be directed against civilians.
State practice establishes this rule as a norm of customary international law applicable in both international and non-international armed conflicts. The three components of this rule are interrelated and the practice pertaining to each of them reinforces the validity of the others. The term combatant in this rule is used in its generic meaning, indicating persons who do not enjoy the protection against attack accorded to civilians, but does not imply a right to combatant status or prisoner-of-war status (see Chapter 33).This rule has to be read in conjunction with the prohibition to attack persons recognized to be hors de combat (see Rule 47) and with the rule that civilians are protected against attack unless and for such time as they take a direct part in hostilities (see Rule 6). Belligerent reprisals against civilians are discussed in Chapter 41.
No official contrary practice was found with respect to either international or non-international armed conflicts. This rule is sometimes expressed in other terms, in particular as the principle of distinction between combatants and non-combatants, whereby civilians who do not take a direct part in hostilities are included in the category of non-combatants.[27] Alleged violations of this rule have generally been condemned by States, irrespective of whether the conflict was international or non-international.[28] Similarly, the UN Security Council has condemned or called for an end to alleged attacks against civilians in the context of numerous conflicts, both international and non-international, including in Afghanistan, Angola, Azerbaijan, Burundi, Georgia, Lebanon, Liberia, Rwanda, Sierra Leone, Somalia, Tajikistan, the former Yugoslavia and the territories occupied by Israel.[29] As early as 1938, the Assembly of the League of Nations stated that “the intentional bombing of civilian populations is illegal”.[30] The 20th International Conference of the Red Cross in 1965 solemnly declared that governments and other authorities responsible for action in all armed conflicts should conform to the prohibition on launching attacks against a civilian population.[31] Subsequently, a UN General Assembly resolution on respect for human rights in armed conflicts, adopted in 1968, declared the principle of distinction to be applicable in all armed conflicts.[32] The Plan of Action for the years 2000-2003, adopted by the 27th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent in 1999, requires that all parties to an armed conflict respect “the total ban on directing attacks against the civilian population as such or against civilians not taking a direct part in hostilities”.[33]
*_Highlights:_*
When the ICRC appealed to the parties to the conflict in the Middle East in October 1973, i.e., before the adoption of Additional Protocol I, to respect the distinction between combatants and civilians, the States concerned (Egypt, Iraq, Israel and Syria) replied favourably.[17]
In the Kassem case in 1969, Israel’s Military Court at Ramallah recognized the immunity of civilians from direct attack as one of the basic rules of international humanitarian law.
Is it more clear to you, NOW, what is a civilian and what is not? What a shocking thing to do is to display mental gymnastics so as to mentally avoid the dissonance of maliciously redefining the term "civilians" for the dubious purpose of alleviating the shameful feelings of doing murder and war crimes. And by a RABBI! SHAME.
8:58 NO, Mr. RABBI, you DO NOT need to vet if people are civilians and *they DO NOT need some special identifying marker.* IT IS COMBATANTS WHO MUST MARK THEMSELVES AS COMBATANTS. EVERYONE ELSE IS CONSIDERED CIVILIAN UNTIL THEY TAKE DIRECT HOSTILE ACTION AGAINST YOU. Combatants Identify themselves by HAVING WEAPONS or wearing UNIFORMS or driving weapons of war or donning the INSIGNIA of their armed force. You god forsaken monster. If you don't like that, then do not occupy nations.
The right path to see this war is to put it on the Tora context. Thank you, Rabbi Friedman. Amaizing teaching!🔥
Torah said don’t steal and do right.
Why aren’t you following that?
Torah says to kill thousands of children? Phew!
How sad to use the beautiful Tora the words from God, to change it and use it as a weapon or license to kill indiscriminately civilians 🤬 shame on you !
Pure Zionism sickening 🤮
@@LickyTee keep that question for @robs
Rabbi Manis Friedmann is a wise man a little knowledge is very dangerous to one who does not understand what knowledge is. This podcast is true enlightment
Great interview. Thank you, Rabbi Friedman and hosts. I am Christian and did not know much about the Jewish religion, but listening provided me clarity about alot of things. The war and how to think about life in general. God Bless all three of you and your loved loves. I am American and I stand with Isreal. She will remain strong and alwsys undefeated. As i tell others, "Don't worry God and Jesus will take care of you. He will always have your back." Gentleman, that is so very true. Keep your faith and don't live in doubt. Keep you eyes on the Lord and he will not fail you. Live in Thanksgiving when life becomes difficult. I wish you and all your loved ones and Isreal Happy Hanukkah. I would love to hear from Rabbi Friedman again. He is so very wise and a true gentleman. Isreal is always in my prayers and "breath prayers" through out my day. ✝️🇮🇱🙏🇱🇷.
Do you believe in the full canonicity and authenticity 1st and 2nd Maccabees as we Catholics do because that is where Hanukkah comes from?
What did these people do against Jésus and his mother ? Did they believe him ? Or did they want to murder him ? where does the presumed love lie in this relationship ? Who lied ?
This was amazing I stand with Israel and try and educate everyone I know 🇮🇱🇮🇱
You cannot educate people with poison.
I just checked out because this Rabbi doesnt seem to have any sensible answers but just the same racist apartheid outlook.
Ikƙ
sophia, no one gives a shyte...
@@jakpanana3938exactly!
He is a bloodthirsty bigot.
As always, it's a wonderful presentation. I wish more people would learn the history and understand the nature of all wars.
How do these killings of innocent people does not remind you history of nazis killing innocent Jews?
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
The nature of all wars is rich middle aged men sending their poor counterparts sons to die for money.
Thank you. From an Irishman.
Thank you! This was great, gave lots of clarity. Spoke truth, we need more of it!
Love this, suggestion, put on the screen a short description when your use those Jewish words so the rest of us understand
This is brilliant. Thank you. GOD bless Israel and the IDF. Israel has and will always prevail.
IsrEl is a terrorist state.
Thats right, you must tell the world as I am born again and I say I was grafted. Rabbi you are precious, Shalom
Very powerful. God won't abandon His children.
Never.
Who are God's children? Did He tell you? Aren't WE ALL GOD'S CHILDREN???
lol they dont have a drop is isrealite blood.. they are from eastern europe ffs
I don't mind if you bring Rabbi Friedman more often 😊
Why? He's a completely evil monster.
This has strengthened me to be unapologetically a supporter of the Jewish people. We, the people of the nations, need you guys. 🕎
I'm listening to this from Australia. Since this war began on Oct7th Ive wondered if Im the only person onbearth that thinks the way ao do about war, peace, who is your enemy, what is true victory, the death of civilians and the stupidity of encouraging an enemy to hide behind them. (In this situation in particular because the civilians voted Hamas in in 2006 and by far the great majority still suppirt them in full). Imagine my relief when I heard Rabi Manis Friedman tell it like it is. Thank you Rabi, I'm not the mean horrible, nasty person many think I am. Im a realist. I love Israel, all of it belongs to the Jewish poeople and to those they invite to live with them. All of Gaza and the Westbank have long abused the position allowed them and it's time Israel claimed and conqured all that was promised them by God. Every inch of it. That includes ALL of Jerulalem, Israels capitol. And please Israel, get those abominations off Mt Mariah.
8:00 HE ASKS _"WHAT IS A CIVILIAN"!?_ 8:00
International humanitarian law is based on the principle of the distinction between civilians (and civilian objects) and combatants (and military objectives). The civilian is defined in opposition to the combatant. Literally, a “civilian person” is any individual who is not a member of armed forces.
Rule 1. The parties to the conflict must at all times distinguish between civilians and combatants. Attacks may only be directed against combatants. Attacks must not be directed against civilians.
State practice establishes this rule as a norm of customary international law applicable in both international and non-international armed conflicts. The three components of this rule are interrelated and the practice pertaining to each of them reinforces the validity of the others. The term combatant in this rule is used in its generic meaning, indicating persons who do not enjoy the protection against attack accorded to civilians, but does not imply a right to combatant status or prisoner-of-war status (see Chapter 33).This rule has to be read in conjunction with the prohibition to attack persons recognized to be hors de combat (see Rule 47) and with the rule that civilians are protected against attack unless and for such time as they take a direct part in hostilities (see Rule 6). Belligerent reprisals against civilians are discussed in Chapter 41.
No official contrary practice was found with respect to either international or non-international armed conflicts. This rule is sometimes expressed in other terms, in particular as the principle of distinction between combatants and non-combatants, whereby civilians who do not take a direct part in hostilities are included in the category of non-combatants.[27] Alleged violations of this rule have generally been condemned by States, irrespective of whether the conflict was international or non-international.[28] Similarly, the UN Security Council has condemned or called for an end to alleged attacks against civilians in the context of numerous conflicts, both international and non-international, including in Afghanistan, Angola, Azerbaijan, Burundi, Georgia, Lebanon, Liberia, Rwanda, Sierra Leone, Somalia, Tajikistan, the former Yugoslavia and the territories occupied by Israel.[29] As early as 1938, the Assembly of the League of Nations stated that “the intentional bombing of civilian populations is illegal”.[30] The 20th International Conference of the Red Cross in 1965 solemnly declared that governments and other authorities responsible for action in all armed conflicts should conform to the prohibition on launching attacks against a civilian population.[31] Subsequently, a UN General Assembly resolution on respect for human rights in armed conflicts, adopted in 1968, declared the principle of distinction to be applicable in all armed conflicts.[32] The Plan of Action for the years 2000-2003, adopted by the 27th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent in 1999, requires that all parties to an armed conflict respect “the total ban on directing attacks against the civilian population as such or against civilians not taking a direct part in hostilities”.[33]
*_Highlights:_*
When the ICRC appealed to the parties to the conflict in the Middle East in October 1973, i.e., before the adoption of Additional Protocol I, to respect the distinction between combatants and civilians, the States concerned (Egypt, Iraq, Israel and Syria) replied favourably.[17]
In the Kassem case in 1969, Israel’s Military Court at Ramallah recognized the immunity of civilians from direct attack as one of the basic rules of international humanitarian law.[12]
Is it more clear to you, NOW, what is a civilian and what is not? What a shocking thing to do is to display mental gymnastics so as to mentally avoid the dissonance of maliciously redefining the term "civilians" for the dubious purpose of alleviating the shameful feelings of doing murder and war crimes. And by a RABBI! SHAME.
8:58 NO, Mr. RABBI, you DO NOT need to vet if people are civilians and *they DO NOT need some special identifying marker.* IT IS COMBATANTS WHO MUST MARK THEMSELVES AS COMBATANTS. EVERYONE ELSE IS CONSIDERED CIVILIAN UNTIL THEY TAKE DIRECT HOSTILE ACTION AGAINST YOU. Combatants Identify themselves by HAVING WEAPONS or wearing UNIFORMS or driving weapons of war or donning the INSIGNIA of their armed force. You god forsaken monster. If you don't like that, then do not occupy nations.
God commanded the Israelites to not end the exile until a Messiah calls them back. Zionism disobeyed God. Your entire beliefs are deception from the Synagogue of Satan. If the Jews had obeyed God, there would be no bloodshed and they would have been given land in an honorable way…. Not like liars and murderers which exactly what the Synagogue of Satan are.
Because the human shields excuse is made up by Zionists.
So important!!! Thank you!!! Your best choice 😊
it is so refreshing to hear somebody thinking outside of the box.
Guys your podcasts are brilliant... Facts ... My prayers for you guys ...also for your guest the Rabbia he's brilliant PASS MY WARM REGARDS TO HIM PLEASE 🎉.." in war no one is safe" IDF are doing a brilliant job to defend all all across the world 👏 With Prayers and Best Wishes to all my Jewish Brothers and Sisters 🎉 Proud of u all guys ... British Indian SIKH stand by you all... Long live Israel 🇮🇱 💙
Amen 🙏
The World wants Am Yisrael to speak their truth and be who they came to be AMEN
Fabulous episode 👏
Baruch Hashem. Stand tall. And accept your inheritance !
I think Rabbi Friedman should speak at the UN!!!
I Admire this Rabbi
He reminds me so much of my Papa ❤ Calm, wisdom, stability, strength. That which has built up this modern society is what we need. Yet we’re allowing the comfort it created to cause its demise.
A disgusting genocidal murder apologist?
I love Rabbi Manis Friedman so much!!!
You are sick people
Love God more than anything else ❤
🤮🤮🤧🤮🤮🤮
Whether people want to believe it or not this is a Spirtual war, and there’s a lot of forces at play. But remember God is on Israels side.
Who said so?
Zionism is not sanctoned by GOD is it? Where in the Torah does it say follow the ways of an atheist? Where does it say in the Torah, GO CREATE A STATE designed by an atheist who sanction murder, theft, idoltry WHERE? Zionist rabbis are peddling lies.
Deus nunca está ao lado do Genocidio e mentira
Deus nunca estava ao lado do Hitler Deus está sempre ao lado de vitimas os oprimidos
Deus e amor quem mata não tem nada com Deus
Wonderful class on Jewish history. Yeshua bless you all.
ha ha, I fell asleep listening to a debate by Ben Shapiro and this video came on autoplay while I was asleep. I dreamed an old Jewish man came to my outside concert and we sat in a tent and discussed Judaism and the response to Hamas and how it's always been. I woke up and this was on. Huh. He looks just like he did in my dream. ha ha! I'm halfway along and so far, nothing he said in the dream is like what he's saying in real life. In fact, some statements are the opposite.
But I like his perspective and his vibe. It's meant to be entirely reasonable, not emotion-based, not inflammatory, just reason. I'd much rather listen to this than all the Palestinian yelling and hissy-fitting.
First of all, thank you Rabbi Friedman for helping to m'kariv my husband in NMB about 15 years ago.
Here is my question: how do you reconcile your understanding that we already deserve moshiach with what the Chafetz Chaim said "Each generation in which the Temple wasn't rebuilt it's as if it was destroyed anew"? I'm guessing there is another way to understand his statement but most people seem to use that statement as evidence that it is because of our subpar actions that the temple has not been rebuilt.
I have been making this point ad nauseam since this war started. Namely why is it that when Arab countries don’t use human shields with each other? Because it wouldn’t be effective. It would have no effect on strategy at all. life does not mean much to them”.
Oh my goodness, this makes so much sense. People that can’t be happy no matter what they get, never satisfied.
It was fantastic to me watching this talking. I am going to watch it again to try to absorb all this vital knowledge. Thank you
An insightful discussion!
@MeaningfulPeople
@Niche....
First time seeing you. Just wanting to say that the way you present is outstanding. Simple outstanding. You could easily have your own show on CBN.
And more importantly bro, you do it in a beautiful way as to be " a light to nations".
Well done oh son of Hashem.
Shalom
The wiseman made perfect sense.
I love listening to common sense.
love this, so many pearls of wisdom. thanks so much!!!
It’s always a pleasure to hear you both . Thank you .
“The whole issue is inheritance.” I am Christian and we have always known that this is historical truth… nothing will be good enough for them as long as one Jewish child remains alive. We pray for the peace and protection of Israel.
Them?
You do know that for centuries, though, Muslims and Jews lived side by side. And guess where huge numbers of Sephardic Jews went to when they fled Spain? Turkey, Syria, Palestine. The Jewish population was very tiny in Palestine in the 1400s until the Sephardic Jews filled their ranks. The Jews, Christians, and Muslims were neighbors without much incident back then. It was when Zionism emerged in the 20th century that things unraveled. The way Jews and Muslims and the Christians think is based on the politics of the 20th century. It's not how the people thought in the 1800s. An envoy of Rabbi Sonnenfeld who wanted coexistence with Muslims and Christians was shot to death by Zionists. The rabbi grew up with Muslims and liked them.
Rabbi sonnenfeld died from illness that he had for 3 months prior. he died in 1938. ten years before israel. not sure where you got this idea he was shot by zionists? @@QUINTUSMAXIMUS
@@QUINTUSMAXIMUS
never ever Jews lived in peace among Muslims. they lived as dhimmis, as second class subjects, who were constantly robbed, subjected to all kinds of humiliation, and periodically raped and slaughtered en masse. stop spreading this BS. at least not on Jewish channels. we know our history and you only embarrassing yourself. go away!
You cannot be a Christian and support Israel. Read your Bible.
This is the best episode ever! I just don’t understand when we all have to feel a certain way like won’t we always have people who don’t feel a way .. like what is it like majority or really everyone has to believe ?
This has been a big question of mine for a while now
Hey thank you very much for this enlightening conversation and insights. This helps all Jews get keys and be prepared for the spiritual front which is all part of this war. Though as a diaspora Jew there are some Hebrew terms which I don’t get. It would be nice to have clear translations or explanations in a box. Thank you for your work !
spiritual must be expressed in righteous deeds and acts, not in occupation and killing of children
@@rivkaestherkletski4184 are you talking about killing, raping, abducting in the name of allah ? Do you expect Jews to wait to be butchered again and again ?
I am a Christian and a Catholic but my heart is with His Chosen people. This message about the Moshiach resonates with me deeply. We can never be deserving ever, but God does not work through those who are deserving but those who are willing. We can only be ready. I had a Benedictine in my car today and he was talking about God wanting his people to be serving and loving of others. But I told Him, God's greatest desire is not for us to merely obey Him, but rather His greatest desire is for us to be capable of genuinely Loving Him and sharing Intimacy with Him through this devotion. God is not a modalist, but in recognizing our need for God, we experience Humility before Him. Our contrition causes us to desire to be of service, because we know at such a deep level that we don't deserve His Love and yet it fills us greatly in a way we cannot even fathom but are deeply compelled to share. But yes the person who knows this level of Love is deeply needed by those who need God. ❤
Stand with the synagogue of zaytin. And you call yourself a Christian. The Messiah has already come. He is risen✝️
Trying to understand both sides here, but the comments at 10:25, “ And even the babies…Somebody has to identify the babies as non-militant” is where I check out. Good luck with all this..
Indeed. Goes to show no matter how well-spoken someone is, that doesn't mean that that person has anything intelligent to say.
I am actually shocked 😨😱 on the take but the comments seem to treat like he said something enlightening.
Totally agree, MY eyebrows went up and moving on
Oh thank God.. Shukralhamdulillah.. Reading the comments were beginning to horrify and disappoint me even more than the sadistic perversion of the holy by someone who so smugly claims to represent Him.
And I can assure you one thing.
He sees what they do.
And unlike some.. Who know not what they do. This vile bunch know exactly what they're doing.
He Sees. And He Knows.
And there is no escape from Him.
You guys must be absolutely out of your minds if you think that these people should not defend themselves and the Country after literally being the victim of the most horrific and barbaric mass crimes against humanity ever committed.
I’ve seen the photos, videos and testimony on the ‘Hamas massacre’ website and if any person on Earth is in denial or ok with that.. Then they are not only on the totally wrong side of history… But I am truly concerned about the fact that I live on the same Planet as those people.
The world has well and truly gone totally mad.
Excellent. Voice of truth, clarity... We as Jewish people are so busy trying to make the world happy and always sound like we are "so nice" that we are digging our own grave.. there is a Torah that's the guideline... We are not smarter, more merciful or kinder than g.d and is time to stop pretending we know everything.. to be humble and follow the very clear guidelines the Torah is giving us! And stop excusing ourselves by doing the right thing!!!
Xactly
So weird how jewish people can decide that ‘no longer being nice’ means going full on third reich. I guess that’s what happens when you’re too busy trying to be white european and no actually jewish.
Well the world doesn't go by that you have followed international rules or risk being isolated while being surrounded by enemies
@@revolutionarydragon1123they can't be isolated, world need Jews more than Jews need the world,most of invention in science and technology are mostly done by them ,they are the chosen people, and they are the most wealthiest people in the world
Thank you for sharing such truths so simply
Wow. The Lord has blessed you with wisdom. I pray for Israel,. I pray for peace in Jerusalem. 🙏🙏❤️❤️
Id like to point out that the remark that R Manis said regarding "unconditional love" does NOT contradict the whole premise that you spoke about with Sonny Pearlman
when Nesanel speaks about Giving addicts unconditional love that means actually demonstrating that not just saying it and that's what the Rabbi is calling out people who are just told that there "loved" but don't FEEL loved
Also I do think a more appropriate name for the episode would be "war, in hashkafa" that's more accurate based on the conversation that you had
I have watched Rabbi Friedman on TH-cam many times. Rabbi Friedman has an expansive knowledge of Torah and how to apply it to human life. His wisdom is something that anyone can appreciate. As a Christian, I value his counsel.
I am not Jewish, I am a Spanish follower of Yeshua , .and I am also proud that you are The chosen people. I know it is True. Amen
Ehr, are you sure about it?
The rabbi said that that theri children are different from other ones (ex. yours?), babies should be identified as non-combatants, etc. That's not only discriminatory, stupid, ignorant of the most common laws, etc. but also ignorant about the jewish religion, that tells something quite different (I can cite specific parts of the Talmud + Halakha and interpretations by several rabbis) .
Not to mention various other parts that are going from the justifications of killing civilians (that he defines as those that surrender - an absurdity) and insensitive phrases about deaths (of other people).
I personally feel a little disturbed when hearing "... killing too many" and then a laugh.
Note: those in that video do NOT represent the jews and jews are just humans like other.
@@leonardoarmandoiarrusso1225I'm sure it's bc you didn't understand, exactly what he means..😊 Just like in Talmud it talks about, not eating on same table with gentle why,, bc at that time they didn't believe in God and many of them were saying bad things about God, and it was a different rabbi interviewed, than he went further and added, even if it going to be a Jewish person who is bad with behavior or criminal and will say bad things about religion, or God , it will feel same , for me to sit and eat on same table. It's not everything,is about what religion you are .😅
@@nissim525 and you understand? Only by hearing? Wow...wkwkwkwk
@@leonardoarmandoiarrusso1225 agree with you...Jews are just human like others...
@@diraarfiani5222 Don't matter,if you ask the Rabbi.
The Rabbi is telling the truth, is in the Torah I'm a 100% with Israel you're a the chosen people of Adonai. I'm Christian from Samoa and New Zealand
th-cam.com/video/RiZ2USokfio/w-d-xo.htmlsi=h0WBfKnth9_jeyuL
This was great.
Regarding showing strength: at recent pro Hamas rallies in both NZ and Australia, local Maoris, Christians, arrived before them and performed the haka. This is a ceremonial dance performed by Maori warriors to intimidate their enemies and to give courage to the warriors. (You will always see it performed by New Zealand players prior to international football games.)
The pro Hamas supporters were very intimidated. Anyone would be because Maoris are big boys.
oh, it was glorious! I saw it on YT.
I love this !!
Maoris support Palestine in large numbers. They know what colonizers look like.
Thank you rabbi Manis Friedman
Rabbi Friedman I am soooo glad you mentioned the music festival..they danced around a statue of Budda!!!
But he justified that. Said it was ok. That is crazy.
@@voiceInDetroitYou missed the point. He didn't justify the statue or the profaning of the holy day; he merely said that the Jew dances on Simchat Torah. Even the Jew farthest away from Torah retains a spark of holiness, no matter how deeply it is buried.
@@SeekingToServe thanks. I am glad he didn't intend to justify it. Would he say the same thing about the dancing around the golden calf in Exodus?
I wish I understood more Hebrew. But this episode with Rabbi Friedman has blessed me so much.
14:42 - Proportionallity; True Peace!
24:14 - Two enemies Ismael and Yaacov
29:46 - What Israel offered and was refused | Family feud
34:55 - poignant, that the festival was a spiritually placed aversion to a greater evil that could have occured... Woow that's mind blowing... that a glory (kavod) can be the part of the precipitation of an Evil, yet be the Evil's aversion from being more detrimental.... #SeedsThatDieDoLive
38:22 - You got a big point there Rabbi...Israel's to Stand Stong On the Promised Covenant.
45:05 -"bullies only pick on people that appear weak!" #qotd
50:43 - Atheist Jewish; say's he doesn't believe; she says, whether you believe it or not, we know it's true....
52:28 -Oh you don't know that they're chosen?
55:07 -
Very inspiring. thank you very much for this talk. ❤️❤️
I relate so much to this. As a someone who has been through a lot of suffering and abuse since I was a child the bit about having confidence I claim what’s yours really spoke to me.
which bit did you like especially? When he justified collective punishment because they didn't 'surrender'? How are 2.2 million people supposed to surrender? what would that even look like? He's talking complete bullshit, they've already displaced 1.8 MILLION people what does he want? them to peacefully walk towards the boarder? they did that and got shot down, 200 of them in the great march of return. This is where the issue is, the palestinians aren't civilians because they can't possibly differentiate between the 'terrorists' and the children, so they just bomb all 2.2million of them and hope? Thats what this guy is justifying and you go "yep I had alot of abuse in my life and suffering so him justifying the suffering of 20 thousand people dying with no way to escape, that really struck a cord with me that genocide denial."
@zaydevans2077 where did you get your information from?
@@devikalambert1674 you're going to need to be much more specific than that, which bit do you want a source for?
@@zaydevans2077You misunderstand.
@zaydevans2077 is it mainstream, hamas or properganda, have you visited or lived in gaza, have you lived in Israel?
Fascinating and helpful historical/biblical and common-sense guidance from the Rabbi (a bearded Christopher Plummer lookalike!) for this middle aged Celtic Christian woman. Admittedly, the frequent Yiddish references made it more difficult for me to follow the argument sometimes. Maybe you guys could subtitle this for those of us that do not understand the language. It was very interesting and informative. Thankyou
it’s not Yiddish, it’s Hebrew, but with Ashkenazi pronounciation, where the letter “Tav” is pronounced like “th”, or “s” instead of “t” at the endings of the words (and we have a lot of words ending with “Tav”), and “O” in the beginnings and middles of the words sounds like “Oi”, and some of the accents in the words are also a bit shifted :) that’s the Ashkenazi accent in Hebrew.
there’s also a heavy American accent on top of it all :) that’s why it gives this weird Germanic Yiddish-like feeling :) but it’s Hebrew.
in Israel we speak the same language differently, because here we adopted a Sephardic pronounciation which is closer to the original one, with the influence of the Yemenite Mizrahi one, which is the closest to the ancient Hebrew pronounciation, and only some Ashkenazi influence.
it’s a sort of like… in Israel all the Jews finally came back together and their Hebrew dialects and accents that each group developed in Diaspora, have merged back together. but those who remained in Diaspora, kept their distinctive dialects and accents, so they still speak like they did for the 2000 years of exile.
❤❤
Thank you rabbi
Ì am in awe of Rabbi Friedman and his words of wisdom. World leaders should listen to him and learn something. I am a Christian from Australia and support Israel and pray daily for them. Thankyou so much, i learnt so much from Rabbi Friedman and enjoyed the way he spoke, he made evèrything so clear. This progra me is excellent.
Kes imak bi ayri
that’s what I thought while I was listening: I wish they could learn from Rabbi Friedman…
I’m a Christian in the US, I stand with Israel. This is good vs evil. I pray for Israel daily.
Let Rabi Manis complete. His speeches,then get wat he is trying to say then question,do not interrupt whe He has not finish speaking,he is sharing His knowledge of wat he gone true,,many are listening to u Rabi Mani.Lord be wit u
Christians who are familiar with the scriptures know the Jewish people are G-d's chosen people and the land is yours by inheritance.
amen!
Chosen to bring the messiah and salvation purpose
Only
@@theophilusodafi2 Romans 11:29 For the gifts and the calling of God are not subject to repentance.
@@voiceInDetroit this verse, is out of point
@@KnightWarrior-qn7ul They gave us the Bible and Jesus. If you hate Jesus' race you hate the Bible and Jesus.
I have listened. So much that Rabbi Manis says lives in my own heart. My heart’s car is that he is sincere. I have learned that 40,000 dead may not be enough. I have heard that 50,000 may be necessary. I am 86 years old and I am thrown back to sixty years ago. How many will be sent to Vietnam. Eventually a million young men were sent. It was not enough. Our military were bitter that we quit. Our religious folk trusted their leader, except the one true leader I have seen in my life: Martin Luther King,Jr. But he has no place at your table. Not chosen. No God-given land. This world is not his home. God gives us the world we can believe in. The identity we desire. May His Name be forever blessed.
I just listened to the whole thing
It’s 💯 worth it 🔥❤️🇮🇱
have you heard of the great march of return? breaks what this guy said about civilians. when they tried to not be a threat and leave they were killed while in non violent protest
@@zaydevans2077do not bother your self brother ! There satanic .. evil predators
@@zaydevans2077 This "march of return" was initiated and orchestrated by the same guys who carried out Oct 7th.
@@miks48 wow crazy, so you're telling me they tried peaceful resistance, were killed brutally 200+ of them. So they were taught once again, peaceful resistance doesn't work?
@@zaydevans2077 there was nothing peaceful about it, as proven beyond doubt on October 7th.
The real enemy is inside of you and it happens outside of you cause your heart is not pure. Listen to this
The Courage to Confront Evil: The Most Important Challenge of Our Time Audio
The discussion of Eisav/hunter/trophy seeker vs. Yishmael/inheritance/rightful owner was gevaldig!! It made me wonder, however, what was 'the deal" with the Crusades? Why did "Eisav" seek to conquer "Yishmael" (and why did so many communities of Yidden have to suffer because they were in the path? How does this episode of history fit into the paradigm?
Crusades were an answer to Muslim conquer of the Holy Land, desecration of Holy Sites and cruel persecution of Christians living in the Eastern Roman Empire area and Middle East. unless the Crusades (and believe me, as a Jew, I have my own grievances at crusaders who didn’t differentiate between Muslim invaders and peaceful Jews ) and the Reconquista, you would be a Muslim today and most probably won’t have the life standard and technology you are enjoying now, because Crusades were the force that stopped the advancement of the Islamic Chaliphate to the West on their way to their ultimate goal of global domination.
and now the internet does it's job at helping thousands of muslims see the light of the bible.
with islam there can never be world peace.
@@unisophia
I agree with your conversation. It makes me think of David, the King of Israel. Study his life and do not feel it is time to be angry against his brothers and take the crown.
One of the greatest minds of our times, Rabbi Manis must be a spokesperson for Israel. PLEASE CONSIDER THIS. You see what is happening on the PR front. This is being sent from Eretz Yisrael as a call to serve.
Even as a Christian here in Perth Western Australia, I BELIEVE the Jewish people ARE the TRUE people in the land of Israel. God PLEASE continue to Bless ALL of Israel and their people, especially those in the IDF. 🙏❤️🇦🇺🙏❤️🇦🇺🙏❤️🇦🇺🙏
If Mashiach is waiting for people to understand we might be hopeless 😩
Thank you again 😮 You have strengthened my heart….. For Zion’s sake and love of Yahweh… Not to remain silent, until His full victory …. !
God bless Israel forever 🙏
Look at what the quran says about war and peace treatieses... It says that if you make a peace treaty with someone, then abide by it and deal with them fairly. However if they breach the treaty, then you have to fight them until they can't raise arms again... Soo... Hamas broke the ceasefire... Quran says Israel has to vanquish hamas.. Allah and His prophet (peace be upon him) support Israels right to exist and defend itself.
Are you a muslim?
Israel did , Israel always broke the ceasefire but no one mentions that , a few days prior they shot protesters at the border because they were protesting the inhuman treatment of Israel, since January until Oct 7th they killed nearly 300 Palestinians, name 300 people that you know? These people are not just numbers! Of course not to start with all the children and women Israel abducted.
Not true b. s claim
@@Sultan-w5q disprove it then
Sounds good. However it says you can lie to advance your aims… for example, agree to a ceasefire or a two-state solution knowing you’re just using it to gain advantage for an attack later.
Such a smart Rabbi! He has opened my eye to clarity where so much confusion reigned.
8:00 HE ASKS _"WHAT IS A CIVILIAN"!?_ 8:00
International humanitarian law is based on the principle of the distinction between civilians (and civilian objects) and combatants (and military objectives). The civilian is defined in opposition to the combatant. Literally, a “civilian person” is any individual who is not a member of armed forces.
Rule 1. The parties to the conflict must at all times distinguish between civilians and combatants. Attacks may only be directed against combatants. Attacks must not be directed against civilians.
State practice establishes this rule as a norm of customary international law applicable in both international and non-international armed conflicts. The three components of this rule are interrelated and the practice pertaining to each of them reinforces the validity of the others. The term combatant in this rule is used in its generic meaning, indicating persons who do not enjoy the protection against attack accorded to civilians, but does not imply a right to combatant status or prisoner-of-war status (see Chapter 33).This rule has to be read in conjunction with the prohibition to attack persons recognized to be hors de combat (see Rule 47) and with the rule that civilians are protected against attack unless and for such time as they take a direct part in hostilities (see Rule 6). Belligerent reprisals against civilians are discussed in Chapter 41.
No official contrary practice was found with respect to either international or non-international armed conflicts. This rule is sometimes expressed in other terms, in particular as the principle of distinction between combatants and non-combatants, whereby civilians who do not take a direct part in hostilities are included in the category of non-combatants.[27] Alleged violations of this rule have generally been condemned by States, irrespective of whether the conflict was international or non-international.[28] Similarly, the UN Security Council has condemned or called for an end to alleged attacks against civilians in the context of numerous conflicts, both international and non-international, including in Afghanistan, Angola, Azerbaijan, Burundi, Georgia, Lebanon, Liberia, Rwanda, Sierra Leone, Somalia, Tajikistan, the former Yugoslavia and the territories occupied by Israel.[29] As early as 1938, the Assembly of the League of Nations stated that “the intentional bombing of civilian populations is illegal”.[30] The 20th International Conference of the Red Cross in 1965 solemnly declared that governments and other authorities responsible for action in all armed conflicts should conform to the prohibition on launching attacks against a civilian population.[31] Subsequently, a UN General Assembly resolution on respect for human rights in armed conflicts, adopted in 1968, declared the principle of distinction to be applicable in all armed conflicts.[32] The Plan of Action for the years 2000-2003, adopted by the 27th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent in 1999, requires that all parties to an armed conflict respect “the total ban on directing attacks against the civilian population as such or against civilians not taking a direct part in hostilities”.[33]
*_Highlights:_*
When the ICRC appealed to the parties to the conflict in the Middle East in October 1973, i.e., before the adoption of Additional Protocol I, to respect the distinction between combatants and civilians, the States concerned (Egypt, Iraq, Israel and Syria) replied favourably.[17]
In the Kassem case in 1969, Israel’s Military Court at Ramallah recognized the immunity of civilians from direct attack as one of the basic rules of international humanitarian law.[12]
Is it more clear to you, NOW, what is a civilian and what is not? What a shocking thing to do is to display mental gymnastics so as to mentally avoid the dissonance of maliciously redefining the term "civilians" for the dubious purpose of alleviating the shameful feelings of doing murder and war crimes. And by a RABBI! SHAME.
8:58 NO, Mr. RABBI, you DO NOT need to vet if people are civilians and *they DO NOT need some special identifying marker.* IT IS COMBATANTS WHO MUST MARK THEMSELVES AS COMBATANTS. EVERYONE ELSE IS CONSIDERED CIVILIAN UNTIL THEY TAKE DIRECT HOSTILE ACTION AGAINST YOU. Combatants Identify themselves by HAVING WEAPONS or wearing UNIFORMS or driving weapons of war or donning the INSIGNIA of their armed force. You god forsaken monster. If you don't like that, then do not occupy nations.
In the podcast, proportionality is discussed, but I noticed how proportionality is being interpreted as being proportional to the enemy (militants). However, in the international community, proportionality is thought of as minimizing collateral damage to non-combatants whenever there are ways to do so.
Does the international community believe Hamas was proportional in their terrorist attack on Israel on Oct 7, considering there was a ceasefire in place Oct 6 and they broke it?
Proportionality, like many other terms, have many different meanings for different peoples. It is crucial to establish word’s meanings before making policies. For Hamas, all Jews are militants. Rape is condoned and appropriate. They can kill who, how, whenever they like and say the savage brutality is proportionate to the existence of Israel. And powerful world leaders don’t disagree. Shameful.
@@le832 You are arguing by using excuses and not sticking to the argument. A minimum education is needed when trying to talk about SERIOUS matters.
To make it simple: If Subject A commits a Crime (Prohibited!!) the Subject B is in ANY possible case PROHIBITED to commit other Crimes in retaliation.
A) hamas committed crimes that are already under investigation by the International Criminal Court.
B) Israeli gov. in the retaliation committed crimes, that must be investigated but it will not be possible since they closing UN's access and have never undersigner/ratified the statute of rome.
"Proportionality" itself pertains customary international law and statute of rome (not undersigned by Israel but in a territory under the possible scrutiny of the ICC), so it makes a slight difference for the crimes that have been committed anyway: knowingly and willingly killing civilians.
"Civilians" as defined in international law and not as defined by that rabbi; with an opinable interpretation that is not even available within the jewish literature (it can be documented the opposite).
ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/ihl-treaties/api-1977/article-51
ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/customary-ihl/v1/rule14
www.icc-cpi.int/sites/default/files/RS-Eng.pdf
Mainly the rabbi said various foolish things that have nothing to do with International laws or the jewish laws (afaik the opposite can be found in the most recent jewish literature)
They do not care about the "proportionality" (or other hitngs) and by purpose they do several misinterpretation to convince the public that the IL gov actions are legit.
Anyway "proportionality" shouldn't be a major legal issue for the israeli gov. (they could ignore the customary int. law, the statute of rome that was never undersigned, etc) while their problem is simpler since, as for hamas, they've willingly and knowingly targeted civilians.
No matter the hypothetical excuses (ex. "human shields" - not a valid motivation for IL but an eventual crime for hamas).
@le832 there was not a ceasefire agreement on Oct 6. The idf and settlers had killed dozens of palestinians in the weeks before.
Wonderful insights!!
Shekoyach 🇮🇱
Keep fighting don't give into these terrible people my prayers are with you 🙏 can you tell me where the us in the torrian.please.i live in the states and i pray for Israel daily!
This RABBI and zionists are the terrible people.
The way he smirks though, about the issue of civilian casualties😮 and he is a respected spiritual leader???? Insane
Thank you very much!
The Rabbi is very correct,and Bob Marley also said so and i quote: " HE WHO FIGHTS AND RUN AWAY,LIVES TO FIGHT AGAIN ANOTHER DAY"
Hi, what are the rules regarding hostages? How can we fight the war when the enemy holds our hostages? How should we act?
Very interesting. Very illuminating. Rabbi Friedman’s intelligence is so impressive.
8:00 HE ASKS _"WHAT IS A CIVILIAN"!?_ 8:00
International humanitarian law is based on the principle of the distinction between civilians (and civilian objects) and combatants (and military objectives). The civilian is defined in opposition to the combatant. Literally, a “civilian person” is any individual who is not a member of armed forces.
Rule 1. The parties to the conflict must at all times distinguish between civilians and combatants. Attacks may only be directed against combatants. Attacks must not be directed against civilians.
State practice establishes this rule as a norm of customary international law applicable in both international and non-international armed conflicts. The three components of this rule are interrelated and the practice pertaining to each of them reinforces the validity of the others. The term combatant in this rule is used in its generic meaning, indicating persons who do not enjoy the protection against attack accorded to civilians, but does not imply a right to combatant status or prisoner-of-war status (see Chapter 33).This rule has to be read in conjunction with the prohibition to attack persons recognized to be hors de combat (see Rule 47) and with the rule that civilians are protected against attack unless and for such time as they take a direct part in hostilities (see Rule 6). Belligerent reprisals against civilians are discussed in Chapter 41.
No official contrary practice was found with respect to either international or non-international armed conflicts. This rule is sometimes expressed in other terms, in particular as the principle of distinction between combatants and non-combatants, whereby civilians who do not take a direct part in hostilities are included in the category of non-combatants.[27] Alleged violations of this rule have generally been condemned by States, irrespective of whether the conflict was international or non-international.[28] Similarly, the UN Security Council has condemned or called for an end to alleged attacks against civilians in the context of numerous conflicts, both international and non-international, including in Afghanistan, Angola, Azerbaijan, Burundi, Georgia, Lebanon, Liberia, Rwanda, Sierra Leone, Somalia, Tajikistan, the former Yugoslavia and the territories occupied by Israel.[29] As early as 1938, the Assembly of the League of Nations stated that “the intentional bombing of civilian populations is illegal”.[30] The 20th International Conference of the Red Cross in 1965 solemnly declared that governments and other authorities responsible for action in all armed conflicts should conform to the prohibition on launching attacks against a civilian population.[31] Subsequently, a UN General Assembly resolution on respect for human rights in armed conflicts, adopted in 1968, declared the principle of distinction to be applicable in all armed conflicts.[32] The Plan of Action for the years 2000-2003, adopted by the 27th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent in 1999, requires that all parties to an armed conflict respect “the total ban on directing attacks against the civilian population as such or against civilians not taking a direct part in hostilities”.[33]
*_Highlights:_*
When the ICRC appealed to the parties to the conflict in the Middle East in October 1973, i.e., before the adoption of Additional Protocol I, to respect the distinction between combatants and civilians, the States concerned (Egypt, Iraq, Israel and Syria) replied favourably.[17]
In the Kassem case in 1969, Israel’s Military Court at Ramallah recognized the immunity of civilians from direct attack as one of the basic rules of international humanitarian law.[12]
Is it more clear to you, NOW, what is a civilian and what is not? What a shocking thing to do is to display mental gymnastics so as to mentally avoid the dissonance of maliciously redefining the term "civilians" for the dubious purpose of alleviating the shameful feelings of doing murder and war crimes. And by a RABBI! SHAME.
You completely right Rabbi Freeman. I am whith you Israel. God love you.❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
Interesting and educational dialogue, thanks for producing and posting this. Only a truly evil mind looks upon war as a game.
There f#cken sick minded psychopath extremest 😵💫😵💫😵💫
I really liked listening to Rabbis wisdom. Please consider the audience who doesn’t understand all the Hebrew terms you all say. Thanks! 😊
Why are the Thai hostage involved, Bangkok post interview one of the released hostage. Some were shot and killed , they don't understand why. They are just common citizens of the world.