would be cool if you can make a video about type classes in Scala 3. It is one hell of an addition to the language (saves a lot of time making that by hand)
Thanks for sharing! It's not you being picky, it's unnecessary boilerplate garbage that the release should get rid of. What's the point of being more verbose than Java?
seems like the type of .valueOf should be Option[Permissions] since the passed String could be invalid
Thanks for your videos. I will follow your course on youtube first, go to your website to buy courses support you, maybe months later. Thanks.
would be cool if you can make a video about type classes in Scala 3. It is one hell of an addition to the language (saves a lot of time making that by hand)
Noted - will do
That was great, First explaining and also mentioning with conceptually wrong implementation.
Very good tutorial.
Thank you!
Thanks for sharing! It's not you being picky, it's unnecessary boilerplate garbage that the release should get rid of. What's the point of being more verbose than Java?
@@scalacode Which way is better?
@@scalacode How is it better then enums?
U rock
Thank you!
Do enum cases support parameters themselves? Something like Haskell's GADT syntax
Yes.
@@rockthejvm YaY - I have a code generator that'd look a lot nicer if it could work like that