Slavoj Zizek : Towards a Materialist Theory of Subjectivity
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 ก.ย. 2021
- Slavoj Zizek : Towards a Materialist Theory of Subjectivity
22 May 2014
The lecture is quoted from the link below:
Birbeck, University London
The Birkbeck Institute for the Humanities
backdoorbroadcasting.net/2014...
33:10 zizek on materialist critique of Hegel. * Chef's kiss *
Cornel West & this pervert are my favourite living intellectuals..When they over lapping,each goes to opposite direction.One calls everybody,"my brother".Another is misanthropic to the core.Perfect combination for left mind.
Thanks so much! You are doing a great job uploading zizek classes!
Absolute machine - loving these posts.
Never-ending story.There is allways but.Zizek is my 2nd favourite intellectual.Prefer Cornel West.Damn Hegel is infinite.With Kant & Dostoevsky,I feel safer.Btw,one thing that bothers me about pervert;he dismissed Dostoevsky for one single quote.Savage😂
His son obviously didn't read Silmarillion.
Excellent. 🌹
TH-cam algorithm: thanks for the gibberish.
Work should definitely be the realization of the worker, you just have to shift the accent and better qualify this statement in its ambiguous generality so that it isn't ideologically appropriated by capital. A society where labour becomes the realization of the worker's existence in a very precise way should be the ideal form of his realization. Work is the key category of human existence. Any idiot should know it. When work provides you with enough freedom to choose your activity (and how you're supposed to do it) and it also pays both you and your co-workers well enough, that's when work becomes the realization of the worker in an authentic sense, rather than as a simple ideological mystification.
"Transcript not available"
The comment about Lord of the rings isn't accurate however, there are gods in Tolkien's universe.
Yes, but in the same sense as there are gods in our universe. In the ancient legends, they intervene, but in present reality, they never make material interventions into the world
Anyone familiar with the Russian writer he mentioned, something like Andre Letornov? I can't find anything about him
Do you mean Andrei Platonov? Zizek's a big fan. He mentions him around the 13m mark.
Love zizek videos thanks!!!? But... The already is a materialistic teory of the origin of concciousness in lacan s seminare two. Chapter of that name exactly. Cant belive how little people read jajaja
Theres also a reading along the lines of "Natur Geschichte" in dialectics of enlightment. But still conciousness and subjectivity arent necessarily the same and i would say that its kind of underdeveloped in most textes.
@Liquid Snake 🤣
AU MANN! (sooo gut, bis zu diesem oberflächlichen Punkt)
>>there is NOT only "human" language, there is: Communication And humans are the only lifeform that specialized in it via Language... and counter-evolutionary deformed its only possible purposes (to organize and mediate action), and there for now: We are capable to draw meaning/identity and seemingly interpretation from nonsense (non-semantical pseudo propositions...), Identity functions and Tautologies...
(Or #Ideology in one word...which is ALWAYS bad: there is NO such thing as: GOOD, or proper ideology...All ideas are nothing but the distraction from the actual occurrence/actual reason to speak, to understand and to act....)
"The lion speaks, but we don't understand him" [W]
It is empirically wrong: There are Wolfs that lie, monkeys that lie, even dolphins and wales and rats and cats and dogs and horses...
Factually, we can even say: Humans are the only ones who are capable to MISunderstand each other, and therefor create disent, even if they are/would be actually in agreement...
It is NOT that animals have language but Humans have more developed language, the OPPOSITE is true:
Animals have fully developed language, in the sense of: immediate functional, situational communication
and humans degraded it/confused it with something it is not there for...Tried to use it for purposes they can't even fully imagine themselves - the only reason it survives is: Power!
The only evolutionary "development" of human language, is the development of confusion and distraction from what actually is (ergo: Metaphysics...)
>>In Nature we have immediate, functional: #Communication. And Humans "developed" the degeneration of Communication which than is called: Language...