Where is Russia's ‘PAK DA’ Stealth Bomber?
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 เม.ย. 2024
- Save 20% on your system and your first month is free when you sign up for Fast Protect Monitoring at simplisafe.com/task
Pak Da is a Russian acronym for “'Prospective aviation complex for long-range aviation” which is far less catchy. The strategic stealth bomber aircraft claims it will have a range of 7,500 miles (12,000 kilometers), and the ability to remain in the air for 30 hours, Hypothetically speaking , if that accurate, in theory, the the Pak Da could hypothetically almost carry a nuclear warhead from Moscow to New York City without the need to refuel until they were back over the Atlantic ocean. Do you like how many qualifying statements I packed into der?
Compare that to the estimated 2,500 mile range of the new American B-21 or possible 5,200 mile range of China’s H-20 and you can understand why some experts are very skeptical while others are claiming it will be the most lethal stealth bomber ever produced. In this video I want to examine what makes this aircraft unique compared to Russia’s existing strategic bomber fleet, if it would be useful to them in Ukraine, and I want to analyze how the Pak Da might fit into Russia’s larger air and nuclear strategy.
This is the (too-POH-lev) Tupolev Design Bureau, just east of downtown Moscow along the banks of the (YAW-zah) Yauza River. (zoom into the company using google earth or maps, then show the photos of the company using this link). Tupolev is Russia’s state-owned aerospace defense design company. It specializes in long-range aviation. Founded in 1922 Tupolev has designed over 100 models for both civilian and military aircraft. This includes all of Russia’s bomber aircraft from the Tu-160 to the Tu-2 of World War II. Source here. Russia’s attempts to match the stealth bomber capability for the first time hit the ground started as early as 2007. But it was in 2008 when Tupolev received the financing to design the Pak Da. Then by April of 2014 Mikhail Pogosyan, head of Russia’s United Aircraft Corporation, announced that Tupolev had finalized the initial designs and were moving on to the construction of a prototype.
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @taskandpurpose
Task & Purpose is a military news and culture oriented channel. We want to foster discussion about the defense industry.
Follow me on socials:
/ cappyarmy
/ cappyarmy
Email capelluto@taskandpurpose.com for inquires.
Save 20% on your system and your first month is free when you sign up for Fast Protect Monitoring at simplisafe.com/task
How do you know it's a she and not a he?
OMG! The Chinese carrier Fujian has gone to sea for sea trial today! It takes China 5 years to build a carrier. US took 12 years to build Ford. And USS Ford is only partially working. OMG!!!!
@@KittyCat-qg4vdOMG , the Ford Carrier is obsolete…. Only the superior Chinese knock off carriers are the true masters of the seas …. 😂😂😂 they can’t even get the catapults to work , and sea trails will probably last until it’s sunk by a US fighter during the up coming thrashing the PLA and PLANavy will receive at the hands of the US , Japanese , Taiwanese , Australian, British navies and Airforces 😂😂😂
@@KittyCat-qg4vdnice but the rassian yeah that thing is sexy
This video gave me an idea you might to cover: I always wondered how russia deals with customers of their military gear when they call back saying that their products aren't performing as advertised.
EDIT: 15:51 Also, what the hell is a Tu-190? A plane _even_ more stealthy than the PAK-DA?
It obviously disappeared because it’s invisible and that good at stealth
Just like the Su-57 and the T-14 Armata, the world's first stealth tank.
Why dont you ever see Elephants hiding in trees? Because they're so good at it!
😅😅😅😅😅
Along with the uninterceptable Iscander.
To be fair, balsa wood and paper is *very* difficult to detect with radar
Military leaks that were not on the War Thunder forum, usually means there’s probably no plan to add said vehicle into the game.
Needs to be BUILT for WarThunder to add it. No WOT paper/made up tanks hahaha
Meh add it
😂😂that says a lot.
I believe in Aurora!
@@xxxlonewolf49 paper tanks exist in war thunder...
I heard this bomber is actually a Transformer in disguise: it transforms into a Russian general's newest Bentley.
It will probably transform itself into a pile of rubble on it's test flights.
Before 2021 I would have said you're right. Now? Not anymore.
Sakazam a gde je vas b2 sto je pao u hrvatsku da li su vam to rekli i 2 f 117 za jedan znate imao je tehnicki kvar o neva drugi pao u hrvatsku eto koliko su vam dobri vasi avioni izvinite nismo znali da je.nevidljiv😊
@@draganmirkovic2492You had informants watching the F117’s sitting at the airbase fence in Italy tracking the direction of takeoff, and then you radioed it to command in Serbia. The Serbians proceeded to estimate the path of flight, and set said path as a coordinate system in the s150 targeting system. The US never made the mistake of letting the public watch aircraft takeoffs ever again. If the US didn’t get sloppy then the Serbians would never have even had a chance to shoot it down.
@@KD-wl3fk da prvi f 117 je pao u srbiji drugi je pogodjen itesko sleteo u hrvatsku a b2 pogodjen i pao u hrvatsku i 7 dana su delove odvozili kamionima u velikoj tajnosti da se nesazna za sve vreme rata sa nato izgubljena su samo 13 vozila i oko 900 vojnika a vasi gubici 495 vojnika i pilota 19 helikoptera apac i nekoliko hiljada albanskih terorista imas puno toga na internetu druze.moj kad bi kod vas imalo demokratije znali bi ste svaku istinu nadam se da ce gospodin Tramp pobediti pozdrav
The Tu-160 doesn't get the credit it deserves - an intercontinental supersonic bomber that's bigger than a B52!
Marvel of engineering
Tu-160 won’t go within 50 miles of Ukraine border. Hardly a sign of marvellous tech.
" Russian firms buy $4 billion worth of India-made arms, pay in Indian rupee "
@@davidelliott5843If it performs its task from the distance of 50 miles what is the reason to enter the Ukrainian airspace?
@@manichaean1888exactly, why risk it? To prove something to some geniuses on the TH-cam comments section 😂
What Happened to Russia's New Stealth Bomber?
Russia: Yes.
I mean - i think they should focus on making the SU-57's stealth better than an F/A-18 super hornets or hell - even PRODUCING the damn thing, but hey, that's just me
They are upgrading the tu160m rn
Also their factories are focusing on su35 su34 ka52 cause they are the most useful in ukraine atm
@@RazorsharpLT It was always Alice chasing the Skunk!
The same thing that happened to US new corvettes and coast guard ships )
@@RazorsharpLT They should focus on getting out of Ukraine.
Man, I can relate to Russia...
So many plans, so little cash, all my own fault.
Nah, wrong. If you were like Russia it would look like: "So many plans, so much cash, nothing works, it all fault of the rotten West!" while packing your pockets with stolen money.
Then why yhey coming up with new weapons in ukraine?
🏆😂😂Except unlike russia, you have self-awareness.
@alexnderrrthewoke4479 the blyat mobile is truly revolutionary
@@alexnderrrthewoke4479when do you get your lunch break at the troll farm 🥱
There is absolutely no way the B21 only has a range of 2500 miles. The B2 has a range of 6000 miles, The B52 has a range of 8800 miles, and the B1 has a range of 7500 miles. They are not replacing the B1 and B2 with a "long range bomber" that only has 1/3 of their range. A simple google search shows Popular Mechanics estimates that the B21 has a range of 6500 miles which is probably fairly accurate given the range of the other long range bombers currently in use by the USA.
A range of 2500 miles would barely be enough to fly from New York to LA or from LA to Hawaii.
🎯🎯💯
I don’t know where this man gets his facts , 2500 mile range on the b21
It's all over the internet. B-21 can fly without refueling 2,500 miles
@@Grim_Reaper_from_Hell I’m not a military expert, but the range is 6500 miles. The United States will not develop a plane that has less range. It makes no sense.
@@larrybelton5489 the original source, I believe, was some sort of Australian purchase agreement so it may be the range of the export version of the bomer. Who knows
The video editing is great in this one.
Sometimes you just know when the comment section is going to be 80% of people saying the same joke.
Which joke? I haven't seen it.
@@highdefinist9697 That's a shame
@@Omni0404the joke is stealthy.
@@rizkyadiyanto7922 as if us projects
@@highdefinist9697 Thats because we're so good at stealth you never even noticed our humour
So stealthy, it hasn't been spotted on the drawing board either
Nice 😎
Russia is easily capable of Designing a stealth bomber with a radar signature only slightly bigger than the Pentagon. How dare you insult them!
Its literally being developed
@@apathyguy8338 and patriot still cant detect it 😅
@@Castragroup yeah sure whatever your delusions tell you vatnik
B-21 only has 2500 NM?
Very obvious mistake here.
This means it has less range than a B-25 from WW2 era.
B-21 is estimated to have a range equal or further than the B-2 (I.e. >8000NM)
What a coincidence I was just researching this exact topic yesterday.
Do they want another F15 situation? Because lying about specs is how you get another F15.
That’s probably exactly what they want
America is going broke, their growth in national debt is unsustainable
Growing by a trillion dollars approx every 100 days
How long til that house of cards falls? Well you could accelerate it by baiting them into spending hundreds of billions on aircraft development to counter a threat that doesn’t even exist
The most gangster fighter of all time?
@@jeremyjackson8196they overhyped the foxbat, so we built the f-15 to counter that only to find out the foxbat was a lemon.
Even worse another way to get an F22 situation.
It's already too late, they just haven't told us yet. 😂
55 seconds into the video: I've created my own stealth bomber, the "F U" bomber, which has a range of 10,000 miles, in service and operated by the UK military😤🇬🇧
Yeah. I work at a hidden german site finl testing our stealth strategic bomber. Its figures are a bit old fashioned german but we are just the best engineers in the world. So what did you expect less than a small bomber weighing just 12,723 t with a payload of 73,321 t and an operational range of 232.227 nm at a service ceiling of 534.877 ft. I have seen it once before initial powerup. Since then it was never seen again and only the engineering crew has goggles to see all the work left. Delivery to the Luftwaffe starts hard scheduled on July 7th and it is planned to make it appear on July 14th over the US capitols to fade again.
The only thing unbelievable about that is that the UK is operating something new.
@@boejiden7093 Brutal, but true. 🤣
Hey, wiseguy, you forgot to mention that you design can carry 80 12,000 pound bombs or a dozen Czar Bombas...
Britannia rules the air 😂😂
>Leak, for once, is not on the War Thunder forum
I spilled my coffee when I heard that & was like... "IMPOSSIBLE" LOL
Good analysis cappy
So you're telling me this thing is the size of a B-21 but carries twice as much load? How is that possible?
Soviet magic obviously
actually they claim its the same weight at the b-2 bomber with a similar max take off weight of 112 tons and a payload still larger than the b-2 at 30 tons. but thats just one russian source its not like the Russian military is saying any of this. it looks likely this will never get built but who knows!
The power of will
Vodka and some madlad russians
@CubeInspector haha no they're not. The Soviets were good at rocket engines, but jet engines have always been shit. Chris is giving the Russians way too much credit. They lie everytime about their capabilities, including their jet engines. Remember the Foxbat? They claimed it could do Mach 3.2+ and claimed it was made mostly of titanium. But we eventually got our hands on one and figured out quickly that it was a heavy slow bird. First, it would yard sale itself if pushed much pass 90% throttle and it was made of nickel steel, not titanium. That's how we made the best fighter jet ever made; the F-15
It is so stealthy , we never saw it in action
Yeah, probably never will either
All PLL that say this don't even know what is bomber and how it's work and doesn't even know how fighter plane made
@menzbercedes8962 fortunately, without Ukranian engineers - Russia doesn't know how fighter planes are made either.
Must be flying in space…
Duh...it hasn't been built yet🤡🤡
Are you dense?
Excellent Analysis
The concept art for this plane looks pretty slick. If the internet has taught me anything, if it looks too cool to be true, it probably isn't real.
So stealthy, we didn't even detect it leaving the designer's notebook.
Cope. How's the $61B doing on the battlefield? Oh, wait, it arrived so stealthily that it's not even detectable from the battle outcomes.
Kazan a small city with almost 1,500,000 people?
I suspect he’s being slightly sarcastic…
its small compared to moscow and st petersburg
small russian Great Tatar
I find it hard to believe the stated range estimates of Russian/Chinese equipment when it's said they lag behind in engine technology and are getting heavy "influence" from US made equivalent aircraft. When you put it into that perspective, the only way they're getting that range is if they're replacing the payload with extra fuel capacity and a magic carpet.
You will eat your words, the Russians are working with the Persians on the rug propulsion system. It will be on the war thunder forums soon.
Russian military aircraft have excellent range. The SU-35 fighter escorted Putin all the way from Moscow to the UAE without re-fueling or drop tanks, something no western fighter could do.. The TU-160 has a range of over 7500 miles and the wings of the PAK-DA have room for some huge fuel tanks. It is foolish to let biases cloud reality.
@@ramrod9556well russian fighters are big and carry alot more fuel... But are also alot heavier
@@ramrod9556also a few of western aircraft have longer ranges like f16, f15, Rafale but others are not far behind and why should they if Europe is smaller than russia distance wise
Imo it is quite interesting to see differences between patent drawings and animation, there seem to be few changes making it more efficient subsonic aircraft with less compromised aerodynamics by stealth (winglets and intakes mainly).
"Small russian city of Kazan" is 5th largest city in Russia, with population about 1.5 million.
Yea no doubt. I quickly looked and some site said it was 8th with 1.2+M, but still. It's definitely not just some small city in Russia . Compared to other large cities around the world or say in the US, sure.
- Obviously not even then. As stated below, it wouldn't even be small compared to average US cities.
That's small by US standards. Or used to be small by Russian standards.
@@RazorsharpLT It would be in the top 7 US cities.
@@wanderer10k
A metropolitan area population of almost 2 million people is not particularly big. That's about the same as the Fresno metropolitan population.
@@SirSayakaMikiThe3rd That doesn't change the fact that it is still a large city. And the Fresnoetropolitan area has a population of 1.171 million. Fresno City has a population of 542,107.
What will arrive first? The production model or the yacht purchased by the oligarch who stole the R&D money? My money is on the yacht
- "Where is money you spend on stealth bomber?"
- "I thought you said spend money on 'Bomb Svetlana'."
extremely funny joke in light of 90k bushings bag
@@beibotanov you should feel blessed, Rusky. Imagine what toys the US would have if the M.I.C. wasn't charging the government 90k for a bag of bushings.
@@zachhoefs9543 yea but that also apply to what russia would be like if they didnt have people spending all the money on yacht
@@zachhoefs9543 this post feels like a butthurt
If the Tu-160 is the Blackjack does that mean the PAK-DA is a Flapjack?
Everything I've heard and read says the b21 has a longer range than the b2. Its made with lighter materials, has a smaller payload capacity, and more efficient engines.
Brilliant breakdown. Been looking forward to this episode. Thanks for making it, loads of great details that are hard to find elsewhere.
"Small Russian sity Kazan" deserves to be listed in the treasury of golden quotes
This vid is littered with stupid mistakes, Kazan is only one of them. Talks about the TU-2 - shows model of Tu-22, What is this new Tu-190 aircraft? The model was the Tu-160 and plenty more elementary or just careless howlers.
This guy has ZERO credibility - click bait crap
Tankie cope is the funniest cope
@@apollobouncer Конечно, конечно. Это просто опять "недружелюбная погода", верно?
@@nolongerblocked6210 guys who see tankie in everyone is even more funny. Pitiful.
@@worldoftancraft cry
The 3D model that is described as Tu-160 (at 1:42 and 5:06) is in fact the one of an early Tu-22M (the later ones have inlets similar to F-15). Tu-160 has underwing air inlets.
Вы правы👍
Это не Ту-160, и точно не Ту-22М. Больше похоже на Су-24, срез воздухозаборников у Ту-22М вниз…
@@vondort1519 Воздухозаборники вниз на Ту-22М3, а на предыдущих моделях - именно такие. И я об этом писал в предыдущем комментарии.
Kinzhal is an air launched ballistic missle as opposed to the zircon, which is a hypersonic cruise missile. Very different.
2500 miles for the B-21? More like 6-8000 miles.
With in-flight refueling? Or are you saying without fueling? And yes, I realize theoretically (not technically) with in-flight refueling the distance is determined by other components other than fuel.
I mean it's smaller than the B2.
The B-21 is supposed to have greater range without refueling than the B-2.
he mightve thought it was 6-8000 KM, and converted it to miles. Idk. im reaching, but the eye math checks out.
that mistake slipped through the cracks I apologize for missing that. I try to double check all the numbers but sometimes I miss errors. honest mistake I thought it sounded weird as I was saying it. im a dummy : / I feel pretty bad about that slip up
Tu-2 is not a thing. It was Tu-22. While saying Tu-160, it shows Tu-22m....
He was referring to the WW2 era bomber Tu-2 "Bat". He just showed the wrong aircraft in the video while talking about it
@@yomama629 Both depicted aircrafts where wrong. Both were TU-22s.. He also said TU-23M xD
@@yomama629 no, look at 12:01 - there is Tu-22M signed as Tu-23M which never exist.
Hi mate, always enjoy your vids so imagine my surprise when below your pic the vid title was shown as " transparent try on haul"!!!!! Hilarious 😁😁😁. I do TRULY hope its a youtube glitch!!!!
The whole "only air force to operate a stealth bomber" does exist in the context of only 3 countries still operating bombers at all, stealth or otherwise.
The Prospective Aviation Complex for Long-Range Aviation... brought to you by the Department of Redundancy Department.
hey at least its modular
It isn't as stupid as it sounds. Russia has 3 branches of aviation: Long-Range, Front-Line and Naval. So the development program is ПАК (Prospective Aviation Complex) and the sub programmes are for each department. ДА is of course the Long-Range Aviation branch, ФА is Front-line Aviation (Su-57) and as far as I am aware there is no current Naval programme in progress because their aircraft carrier spends 95% of its time in dock anyway.
@@smalltime0 Cool, that explains why the name looks so goofy, though it does still look goofy.
Oh man, the DoRD. I laughed out loud at that. Thanks.
With all these cool new planes in the last 10-20 years we REALLY need another Ace Combat game! Come on Namco
You have the best background, I love the skeleton wearing the roman armor - how do I get one of those?
The T14, the ‘check mate’ & this continually provide us with entertainment 😂
Western tech cant handle even a simple, non-moving, humongous object as the Crimean bridge... Serious amount of weapons that are supposed to destroy it, provided by western states cant destroy it at ALL! It seems that Nato strategic and tactical forces wont have much more chances, since they will be firing the same stuff. Of course, we might consider stealth planes being somewhat more efficient, but shadow storm is as stealthy as f-35 if I am not mistaken, flies extremely low and is... wait for it... being shot a lot! Russians are the first Europeans to witness guns! They know guns! Dont be too "my team is the greatest ever, those others are puny". Its just overaction of you being hurt about it. You hurt yourself tho. 😂
I guess you still laugh about MBT-70, aren't you. How many years we still have to wait to see the fruits of American-German friendship of breeding imperial and metrics in cooperative development?
@@worldoftancraft I looked it up - cool read. However, it's not like Russia is collaborating with some other country, making the project complex. They fail in these projects all on their own. The Su57 could be a somewhat close analog, with India, but they were always meant to be a junior partner before pulling out.
@@worldoftancraftwe call it the Abrahams. It makes T series tanks go boom.
@@MrGottaQuestionMBT 70 kinda fell apart and then immediately turned into the Abrahms and Leopard.
I mean, if we're all having trouble looking for the new stealth bomber...
Lol, delusional.
Dude, it's so stealthy not even the Russians can find it.
IT'S STANDING BEHIND YOU RIGHT NOW
Hey have you thought about doing a video about what’s goin on between Philippines and China right now? Thanks for great content big fan!
Plenty of material on that. The Philipino dictators want all that sea to themselves for their broke country. (turns out remaining feudal in 2024 doesn't work, who knew?)
So they illegally stranded a navy ship in Chinese territory, manned it and now claim to have a military base there and claim 200 miles in every direction as theirs.
China doesn't like people threatening its lifeline trade and wouldn't mind finding some oil or gas so they don't 100% rely on imports, so they claim the maximum and some more besides.
China also doesn't like Moscow's obedient servants in Ho Chi Minh city
This could be taken care of in five minutes if they made a deal to never tax or threaten Chinese shipping and agree to sell whatever they find in the sea without blockade or boycot, but hey, dictators be dictators and if Duterte Junior goes against the feudal elite to fix the underlying issues, he'd 'accidentally fall out of a window' in mere days. So it'll continue for a while.
You can solve the angle of attack air intake issue with louver on the front/bottom of the aircraft that open during high angle of attack maneuvers. This can be okay to do on stealth aircraft as them being at a high angle of attack disrupts their ground stealth profile anyway and those openings are no longer facing the ground anyway.
The flying wing design is not as much about the drag deduction as it is about payload to weight ratio. The high payload may be used to carry more weapons or more fuel.
It’ll get shot down by an S 200 and then say it malfunctioned.
The aircraft or the S200? Oh now I get it. Both of them.
Like the f-35?
@@sawney_bean Thanks for the input, Boris. : )
@@sawney_bean Ah yes, because the F-35 got show down over America by Americans lmao
Pathetic
If you believe that Ukrainian claim, you are delusional. a Tu-22M that fell out of the sky over Stavropol Krai is too far from the frontlines for it to be a Ukrainian kill, let alone with an outdated S-200 system.
Love your Content Bro, keep up the Grind. Stay Safe Good Sir.✌
Perfect question to ask!
It's above your sky.... maybe 😂
Got it now, Chris is being sarcastic, that straight face fooled me!
It was so stealthy they forgot where they parked it.
Darn it. The "find my plane feature isn't working." 😢
You mean the F35?
That plane is the stealthiest plane ever built, because even the pilots couldn't find it.
No, even better: The plane is so stealthy that even the plans for it were written with invisible ink. They simply can't build it.
Yeah, they're out of ammo, fighting with shovels and ww2 tanks, bla bla bla, everyone in the country is either deceased or rebelling, they're broke, cant make ammo or missiles and definitely can't sell oil anymore.
Right?
Right?
It is so stealthty,even the aliens from area 51 cant see it 😂
B2 ... best known for its crash on the take-off
@@gdiwolverinemale4that least that plane exists,cant say the same about the pak da
@@radustana Many types of planes exist. That does not mean they are what they claim to be. Most likely B2 is obsolete by now and can be detected by low-band and targeting radars. Why use it then instead of something cheaper?
Have been hearing about this since last 2 decades.
1:40 Slight correction, Yakolev also produced bombers up until the 70s as did Petlyakov (well 60s, because they merged).
Beriev technically made bombers until the 80s, but the later ones were largely repurposed Tupolevs for niche roles.
I think of all the military aviation companies Russia has had, only Mikoyan hasn't ever made a dedicated bomber of some description.
question.
@1:42
grey plane in the second row, behind Tu-22m and Tu-22
what is it?
feels like su-15
Even if they could put this into production, it would no doubt follow in the footsteps of all the other Russian weapons systems that have consistently underperformed and failed to meet the hype.
Hype is Russia is just BullShit&Lies everywhere else
much like the west, i'm thinking all contractors are crooks.
Like all the gamechangers supplied to Ukraine?
like what? can you give at least one example?
@@osnapitzbry😂
Exactly. These pinheaded folk are 😵💫😜
@6:20 you quote a common misconception of lift that is absolutely absurd: air doesn't magically move faster over the top of the wing to create some sort of vacuum/low pressure effect and that's not how lift works.
It does look pretty cool, a lot like a manta-ray.
I love the design of the Plane, Looks so sleek
3:30 Anyone else notice Chris' t-shirt change? 😂
The hat & gun(s) in the background moved, as well. Someone was tidying up!
I had to go back and check. I thought it was just me.
Probably stated somewhere else already in the comments, but Kasan has 1.4 million inhabitants. Not exactly a small town.
@ChrisCappy, Task&Purpose: You can read Cyrillic/Russian. That's good.
That Plane is so Stealthy, no one ever saw it, and never will !
You have the most informative and easy to understand vids on the web. Thank you
propaganda is always easy to understand
This dude talks complete nonsense and often just lies. Don't you have critical thinking?
And now the experts to tell us how it will never be a reality or how supposedly it will be in low numbers.
May I ask what happend to that 750 f22 jets and ended up with 190 or something. I mean the plan for the b21 which isnt even out yet is tohave 200 units produced but lets wait and see if that doesnt become something like 70.
production of modern equipment is hard and takes time. The T-14 is 10 years old yet suffers the same problems your describing, its taken 2 years into Ukraine for Russian industry to kick into second gear and sustained their tank fleet in some limited capacity in this prolonged war. Take into account Tanks have a much lower bar to entry than a stealth fighter, so the fact that the US can produce 190 is impressive, even if it should probably be outputting closer to 750. Russia should be glad America is this inefficient, even now the American air force would wipe the floor, imagine if America gets into a modern war and we learn how to produce at peak efficiency like we did during world war 2?
@@corneliusmcmuffin3256 ,,production of modern equipment is hard and takes time"
Dang I wish most of you guys realised that when the Armata and su57 came out. Though I think you will get it when the russians start to laugh about the 10 pathers, 5 chally 3 and the 20 at best new gen abrams are all that western armies can muster.
It has taken 2 years nope less than a year to start mass producing stuff and start going back to the soviet capabilities. Though if in an all out war, the russians can in a matter of months do that, build back the factories and machines, get the personal and soldier. You know why ? Because they are in full control of their MIC, the west isnt. In russia its a matter of national security, in the west its a business, thats that major difference
The armat wss presented 10 years ago just like the germans presented their new panther which will come into existence in about 10 years from now IF everything goes smoothly, IF !
The armata finished its trials in late 2022, since then there have been rumors for its mass production but nothing concrete, the russians would probably hide the real numbers built for a reason.
They posted 190 over the course of 15 years if the full plan for production was to be realised it would have taken more than 2 trillion dollars and up to 2030 yo 2040 to complete the 750 units.
America would not be able to do anything because the only way for them to utilise most if their airforce is via the bases in europe and their carriers, since the cold war countermeasures for both have been created, from the high tech subs to the carrier killers to the tactical nukes carrier by supersonic missiles.
I've been working on a new stealth bomber, too. I estimate a range of 128,000 km. I've just got to wirk out how the engines attach to the paper fuselage.
Wow... Must be pretty stealthy!
It really sucks when you want to build a high tech, big ticket, bomber and find out you have severe corruption.
Yeah, corruption is everywhere in the global military industrial complex. No country can escape it.
extremely funny joke in light of 90k bushings bag
@@beibotanov jokes on you the American budget is so much bigger than Russia's that we could flatten Moskow in paper bills
@@corneliusmcmuffin3256 haha! True we don’t even need bombs.
Its hard to say how much bypass air will be coming through the intakes, that can help defuse heat.
It's stealthy that we haven't been able to detect it as it hides in the hangar, where it's permanently grounded.
Napkinwaffen.
LOL!
Except napkins exist
@@xxxlonewolf49lmfao
@@xxxlonewolf49and actually works
Best comment. 🤣👍
Changing your shirt halfway through made me think I was watching another video
This engine air intake design would put the engine at higher risk of FOD due to the intake's area length and high suction pressure possibly sucking surrounding intake panels and screws if proper maintenance is not consistent.
"intake panels"? What is this in XXI century?
@@alexanderbelov6892 Поверь! Русские придумают какой-нибудь гаджет для этого. В инструкции будет написано-"доработать напильником если не подойдёт". И установят пару десятков мировых рекордов))😜
It looks like the TU2 is mislabeled and mostly off-screen at 1:42 when it is mentioned.
It is as real as Optimus Prime , little green men and the chinesse stealth bomber
the little green men were real, unfortunately.
I've been asking about the propaganda T-14 Armada. Where it at?
they seem to be doing just fine with good old artillery. wonder weapons dont work, that's one thing we've learned.
To all the people who wanna make the "Too stealthy that it disappeared" joke on this marvelous aircraft, remember that the Su-57 became the ("first 5th gen fighter jet to have a kill") in ukraine almost 2 years ago 😏
The prototype is so stealthy, they have parked it somewhere, but can't find it anymore...
It's on some Russian general's dacha, in the shape of a well maintained Bentley.
I’m sure all 3 wooden models that will be built will look formidable on the ground to the superiors.
Just FYI, cannot see if someone already pointed it out though, as you are speaking of a Tu-160, often a 3D model of a different bomber, the Tu-22M, is shown
Just like the 6TH GEN NGAD
You should cover the unmanned stealth Iranian fighter jet coming out in August.
I would not believe any stats from Russia or PRC.
I believe stats only from US arms manufacturer’s manual. 😂
@@rasheedh7043 well honestly they are probably more honest. lockheed martin knows that if you lie about all the specs the next contract might go to boeing.
Every country's media is little biased. But Russia State Media just speaks complete lies and nonsense. America has a hundred different media sources. Russia has four or five State controlled media. Outlets, They are even trying to stop independent media on the internet for people to watch and listen to. Now I agree that on TH-cam, most of it is not true, but you should still have the freedom of choice, to decide to watch it or not.
@@rasheedh7043 О, правда. Откуда вам знать, если вы даже не говорите по-английски?
@@TiocfaidhArLa34 LMAO
It's so stealthy that you can't see it.
Great video but constant use of the B-2 while referencing the B-21 killed me
Being supersonic is silly for a stealth bomber... erm I wonder what just made that sonic boom....
That's the first time I've heard of SEAD missions being carried out by slow-flying, highly-visible, easily-targetable, long-range non-stealth bombers.
Easily targeting ?
Russian bombers use long range cruise missiles and ballistic missiles
The kh22/32 range 2000km
The kh101/102 range is 4500km
Kh69 range is 400km
Etc
No air defense system have the range of even 300km imagine 4500km
Also every bomber can carry 12 to 16 missile and thats is enough to destroy any system in the world
@@ali-haider5788 И я полагаю, их тоже никто не видел?
@@ali-haider5788 the F22 exists
@corneliusmcmuffin3256 what the hell does the f22 have to do with what i said
You are getting famous...saw you do a commentary on the new "The Proof is out there, military issue". keep rocking it bro, your 15minutes is coming up...
Great content. ...
Not to be nitpicky, but on 5:13 I think you're showing a Tu-22, not a Tu-160. Anyway, great video.
Won't come, as long as the existing Soviet era designs can do the job, too. And when it comes, it always has the risk of being already obsolete and based on a economy that no longer exists.
I thought the b21 had up to 7000-9000
Before I even watch the video, I just have to say... What do you mean where is it? It's a stealth bomber! You're not supposed to know 😭
Is this like the T14? Will it be built in 2000never?
You're mean. At least 7 tanks were built 😂
Too big and too expensive, so they cancelled it
@@426baronThere are at least 130 of them. But series production hasn't been started yet.
@@alexanderbelov6892 tank for the intel.
Based on Russia's history of exaggerating the abilities of their weapons (and/or America overestimating them), I'd divide all of these estimates by two. Heck, that wooden mock-up might turn out to be the actual prototype!
how many wooden prototypes of T-50 turned to be actual prototypes of Su-57?
@@worldoftancraft U mean "stelth" bomber with gap in bombbay ....
@@mateuszzimon8216 imagine yourself making final conclusions based on early prototypes. The peak of internet expert thought
@@worldoftancraft as coming form post-communism country, i can tell u if that was "prototype. production is even worse than that
@@mateuszzimon8216 I honestly didn't knew that being from some former communist country is I guess valued more than a Ph.d in some area.
Cometh preschool dropout rocket scientists 😂😂😂
Why is there such a difference between the Patented Schematic drawing and the 3D Model Shown Throughout?
(The intake on 3D Model is to low in the front of the wing and should be further back and up, if you were to copy the Patented Schematic.)
Tu160 cruise missiles have a range of 2,500 miles and reach Washington. Russians don’t need an analogue of the B-2
The Pak Da sounds like it's the Armata of the air.
Cost analysis, and lack of mature technologies keeps a lot military projects on the shelf.
1. Judging by indirect data: the new assembly shop in Kazan, built for the assembly of the PAK DA given for the urgent resumption of production of civilian Tu-214
2. Engine for PAK DA in the press called Izdelie RF 'Изделие РФ'