Olympus 7-14mm f/2.8 PRO Review

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 307

  • @ماجدالعنزي-ر9ص
    @ماجدالعنزي-ر9ص 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I'm really glade to be one of followers to you, your review is clear and makes understand about every single piece in that lens. Thank you so much my friend.

  • @DaveDugdaleColorado
    @DaveDugdaleColorado 9 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    Nice real estate pics.

  • @PostColorGear
    @PostColorGear 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    I know that this review is over 2 years old, but its comforting to hear a professional real estate photographer say that he would (or did, or does) use micro-four thirds for his shoots. It's reassuring for sure.

  • @RedFlyerMedia
    @RedFlyerMedia 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    You have become my go-to channel for concise and comprehensive evaluations. Thanks!

  • @gadgetsgimmicksandtech
    @gadgetsgimmicksandtech 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for a comprehensive review with nice sample shots - this looks like a nice addition for my new GH-5

  • @martinlennon4673
    @martinlennon4673 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Excellent demonstration with great images 👍

  • @TXTundra-ex8bw
    @TXTundra-ex8bw 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I can always count on your reviews Darren I was able to pick up a used version of this lens in mint condition for $900 but I wouldn’t have made the purchase without your blessing take care buddy thanks again

  • @Revangelistautube
    @Revangelistautube 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Amazing lens... thank you for the very extensive demo Darren!

  • @mikemoir2603
    @mikemoir2603 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Still missing your Oly reviews,Darren! Watched this one for fun as I already have the old 4/3 7-14 F4.0. A good reminder to use the 7-14 more. Finally got the 75mm F1.8 last year,& I see why you're keeping that one!

  • @cmv.guitar
    @cmv.guitar 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great. I like your reviews in general. They are short but informative and you evaluate the products not pure from a technical point of view but from the view of a working photographer. That is what i like about it. Greetings from Germany.

    • @DarrenMiles
      @DarrenMiles  9 ปีที่แล้ว

      Curth Voss Danke Curth!

  • @kyandkev4436
    @kyandkev4436 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Cant wait to get this lens for our vlogs! Thanks for the review.

  • @jonneville
    @jonneville 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Fantastic review, and the results speak for themselves! Thanks for posting.

    • @DarrenMiles
      @DarrenMiles  9 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you! And you're welcome!

  • @mhoctober
    @mhoctober 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks Darren. I have struggled for the past 2 days wondering why my 7-14 oly wont autofocus on my gh4. Life saver!!! Cheers

  • @menoats
    @menoats 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    You took awhile to get to the footage and pictures but overall a superb review and look! Thanks

  • @gransha3
    @gransha3 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love your reviews so professional, slick and to the point. Keep up the good work Darren

    • @DarrenMiles
      @DarrenMiles  9 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Ian Moore Thanks Ian!

  • @FalharNomads
    @FalharNomads 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Perfect explanation with photographic evidence. Loved it.

  • @ogdom
    @ogdom 7 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Grippy and buttercream smooth. It's just velvety and sublime. SOLD.

    • @RSV4JeffA
      @RSV4JeffA 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Dominic B I stopped watching after “buttercream smooth...” 😂

  • @Chris-Brown-
    @Chris-Brown- ปีที่แล้ว

    This lens is, fast AF.
    I'm sold

  • @carlycruise
    @carlycruise 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks so very much Darren, your reviews are nothing less than great.

    • @DarrenMiles
      @DarrenMiles  9 ปีที่แล้ว

      Neverland Traders Thank you very much!

  • @alexcimpoi
    @alexcimpoi 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for the review and for the lovely examples of what this lens is capable of. It is amazing to see how many professional photographers are migrating from big & heavy full frame monsters to the m4/3 and this includes yourself. I personally posses the E-M1 & 12-40 2.8 and I must confess they are a marvelous couple. The quality of images is mental. Thank you for pioneering the transition-evolution to smaller, high quality cameras which opens a whole new Era within the photography that seemed to get stuck on the full frame mammoths.

    • @djmouglie
      @djmouglie ปีที่แล้ว

      and here 7 years later most people are migrating back to full frame. So a hole new era it was not. But well there is still good stuff going on for M43 :)

  • @butytraceur
    @butytraceur 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wow, one of the best reviews i ever seen!

  • @gregs4163
    @gregs4163 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Another fantastic review! Thanks for spreading the word about how awesome the Micro 4/3 system is. I purchased the 12-40 Pro and the 40-150 Pro primarily from your reviews! keep up the great work!

  • @koolkutz7
    @koolkutz7 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video review Darren-this lens looks amazing; the quality looks sublime like other Olympus/Panasonic lenses. I'd better getting saving!

  • @YourEddieBreak
    @YourEddieBreak 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    WITHOUT QUESTION...the BEST VIDEO REVIEW FOR THIS LENS! Hands down. Brother, you have a great brand all together. Your cuts are awesome, video quality on spot......KILL'N IT! I'm immediately hooked. A 1st time viewer fan. Please, keep it coming. I've watched 4 other reviews on this lens, this video helped me make my decision on whether to go with this one or a less expensive lens, & I see you get what you pay for. Buying it.
    ~ECHO~

    • @DarrenMiles
      @DarrenMiles  7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you very much!

  • @adrianland
    @adrianland 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi Darren... Hey! I absolutly agree with you...I got the same one : it's " the creme de la creme " ;-) Best regards from Provence, South of France. Bye !

  • @djrbfmbfm-woa
    @djrbfmbfm-woa 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    darren, i've used this zoom for ~10 months now, and totalliy agree with your review here. one thing - this lens exhibits a slightly more color saturated image compared to the others in the group. maybe oly thought ppl will use it for skies, etc, where blue is a biggy. nevertheless this IS one great piece of glass. thx, 'cos i bought this from this review of yours. j.

  • @lordbaloma
    @lordbaloma 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for the review....
    Amazing lens

  • @holgerreisinger1220
    @holgerreisinger1220 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for another great review. You made me buy every Olympus Pro lens you reviewed and guess what? I will do it again... ;) Can't wait to get it from my reseller here in Germany. Greetings to FL and pls. keep up your great work!

    • @DarrenMiles
      @DarrenMiles  9 ปีที่แล้ว

      Holger Reisinger Thanks Holger - it's another winner from Olympus!

  • @randyhartwig455
    @randyhartwig455 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks Darren, just the info I needed.

  • @joshross6810
    @joshross6810 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very nice review. Helped me out a lot.

  • @IanCassanova
    @IanCassanova 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    I was really interested in the Panasonic 7-14 equivilant until I saw this video, The build quality looks a tad better and they are roughly the same price when I last checked.

    • @DarrenMiles
      @DarrenMiles  9 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Ian Cassanova The Oly's a bit more, but with the f/2.8 and more robust build, I think it's worth it - it's a stellar lens!!

  • @robbyboyo
    @robbyboyo 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wonderful pictures.

  • @AerialLensVideo
    @AerialLensVideo 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great! Based on YOUR REVIEW (!) I got one of these for my Olympus M5 Mark II a few months ago and have never looked back! Thank you so much.
    By the way, there is a nice filter holder for this camera lens at "Phil Norton Photography" online, as well as an easy DIY version on the the Nhat Phan YT channel (I did the later and it works great).

  • @richardtaylor2565
    @richardtaylor2565 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks very much, Darren.

  • @TheHutchMusic
    @TheHutchMusic 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great Review: Please does this perform better than the Panasonic 7-14mm F4 in terms of low-light real estate video? (e.g especially house rooms - I noticed in your samples, the swimming pool shots were a dull day and the footage was dark)

  • @paristo
    @paristo 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Holy trinity is complete from Olympus with this and once they get 300mm f/4 out they have the holy square as well.
    Pre-ordered that objective and just waiting it to be shipped in few weeks (Olympus own page informs that the pouch and lens cap are shipping 24th...)

  • @olafweyer859
    @olafweyer859 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good review.
    Good salesman too (and that's a compliment).

  • @terrywbreedlove
    @terrywbreedlove 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    When the hand holdable high resolution mode makes its way down to the EM 1 and EM 5 mark 3 cameras this lens will make some outstanding landscape photos. The only drawback is I need a polarizer filter for landscapes and this lens doesn’t have filter threads. Bummer

  • @dionsanza4600
    @dionsanza4600 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    do you think you could use the olympus 12mm f2 lens for real estate photography? i would like to get into it but the 7-14mm lens is so expensive?

  • @bicycleninja1685
    @bicycleninja1685 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for your review. Love the video, it looks great! I was looking into the Canon 16-35 f4/L, but I just could not find a camera to go with it that was a good value. This looks like the best wide zoom lens for the Lumix GH5, which has great reviews. I will be doing real estate photography as well as having some fun shooting video and stills in the L.A. area (museums, landscapes, ocean).

  • @seaoneworld218
    @seaoneworld218 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi great video, thanks. You convinced me to get this amazing lens.
    When I open to wide-angle (7-8mm) on my GH5 Lumix, it is impossible to have a clear focus, the image is all blur.
    Could you please help me? Is it a setting that I must do on my camera or is it a manufacturer issue regarding the lens?
    Thanks in advance.

  • @gcovacev
    @gcovacev 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent videos Darren. Congratulations for your work.
    Just watched the one for the 12-40mm and the 7-14mm videos. I'm trying to decide, being an amateur, how much is needed to buy the 7-14mm for landscape shooting if I already own the 12-40mm 2.8 PRO? thanks x your answer.

    • @DarrenMiles
      @DarrenMiles  8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +gcovacev I think it's $1,299, but you can get it used for less I'm sure... The f/2.8 is a big advantage in my opinion...

    • @gustavocovacevich5892
      @gustavocovacevich5892 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Darren Miles but I have the f/2.8 already in the 12-40...?

  • @GlobeHackers
    @GlobeHackers 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great job. I really like your reviews. Thanks much!

    • @DarrenMiles
      @DarrenMiles  9 ปีที่แล้ว

      Globe Hackers Multimedia Thank you!

  • @LaurenceRoach
    @LaurenceRoach 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I will buy one - thanks

  • @JjackVideo
    @JjackVideo 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The no filter thread is the only thing keeping me from buying this one. A polarizer just makes the videos pop like nothing else

    • @WMedl
      @WMedl 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Square filter holders like the Rollei or Nisi do work ...

  • @Digimurr
    @Digimurr 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi Darren, we bought the OMD em5 Mark II and the 7-14mm pro lens. My wife does video tours for REALTORS® in the city where we live. We're having a terrible time with image stabilization and 'jello' effect where the image wobbles? Have you every come across this? We love everything else about the camera and lens, but as she does a walking tour the poor image stabilization and 'jello' effect is not going over too well. Have you ever had issues with these items. We are using the iSm2 setting for video IS. Is this common or should we be sending the camera in for service?

    • @DarrenMiles
      @DarrenMiles  8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Are you shooting hand held? Even the very best in body or Image stabilization systems are designed for handholding not walking. If you're walking and you need to do video you need to purchase a gimbal device that stabilizes the entire camera , handholding and walking with the EM five Mark I for video is unrealistic, you'll get all kinds of jello.

  • @lisa8369
    @lisa8369 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for the great reviews. Just bought an OM-D and lens choice is tricky! These are very helpful. PS love the cat 😀

  • @stevenmp66
    @stevenmp66 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hello. Are you using the lens in your business? If so, are you still happy with it?

    • @DarrenMiles
      @DarrenMiles  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Steven Peterson I am currently not, but I absolutely would! I have the Nikon 14-24 on a D750 as my primary setup for real estate. I prefer a full frame sensor when I’m lifting shadows in post - over M43 - but the latest M43 cameras, specifically the em-1 Mark ii are adequate enough in low light whereby if I were just starting today, I’d have no problem with that combination (em1 ii and oly 7-14) - a stellar combo!

  • @curtispolk6719
    @curtispolk6719 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    You didn't mention distortion. I saw a bit of stretching in the video clip where you son (I assume), jumped into the water from screen right.

  • @barandcross
    @barandcross 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey - neat review. Filming video in the Arizona desert at 25fps 50p for landscape inserts into my western films is what I would love this lens for. But without an ND filter this will be very tricky. I don't have a matt box and separate ND filters so what is the possible fix please. I don't want to shoot ay 100fps . Should I look at the Samyang or the Laowa 7.5 lenses perhaps?

  • @kharris28
    @kharris28 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice review. Just a quick "heads up" that at 1:44 you refer to the zoom ring as the focus ring.

    • @DarrenMiles
      @DarrenMiles  9 ปีที่แล้ว

      Crap! Thanks for the heads up, every now and again I make a slip up like that :-). Thank you for the kind words!

  • @MovieCreationsUS
    @MovieCreationsUS 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Really nice shots! How's the focusing on this lens? Does it have the electronic "Fly-by focus" or "focus-by-wire" ?? I have an Olympus 25mm f1.8 and for video and constant focusing is challenging.

    • @DarrenMiles
      @DarrenMiles  9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +Movie Creations Thank you very much! It is focus by wire, but unlike Sony, the manual focus has a distance meter and does not react to how quickly you turn the focus ring, it correlates to the distance meter, which is GREAT....

  • @terrywbreedlove
    @terrywbreedlove 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    I want this lens for my PEN F because the image quality is so damn good but I wish they would have made it F4 or something to keep it smaller and I want to use filters. I don't need F2.8 on a wide angle though I do know why others would such as shooting events indoors etc.

  • @pentaxk5
    @pentaxk5 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi! Darren ! Your comment is valuable tips before I purchase a new toy! and how's the quality compare with the Olympus ZUIKO DIGITAL ED 7-14mm f/4 ( the former version)? except the size/weight?

  • @JazzMYX
    @JazzMYX 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Your reviews are amazing and the video quality is fantastic! What camera do you use to film?

    • @DarrenMiles
      @DarrenMiles  9 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      JazzMYX Thank you very much! This was shot on a GH4 with the Olympus 75 f/1.8

  • @halz7
    @halz7 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    As always a great and informative review.

    • @DarrenMiles
      @DarrenMiles  9 ปีที่แล้ว

      halz7 Thank you very much!

  • @mikecoster2709
    @mikecoster2709 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey Darren, great video review. Love the in-depth look as well as the samples to back it up. I have a questions relating to the movement of the lens in and out for stabilizer use. I also do real estate photography/videography, and I'm wondering if the movement of the lens in and out when changing focal lengths might affect the overall balance when being used on a stabilizer. Do you have any experience in this area?

  • @Centauri27
    @Centauri27 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great review, Darren. I notice that your images are virtually distortion free, unlike my Olympus 9-18 which distorts noticeably at the edges. Is this due to the higher quality optics of the 7-14?

    • @DarrenMiles
      @DarrenMiles  8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Carl Lum I would assume so, but I haven't used the 9-18, so it's hard for me to say, I can only speak for the 7-14, which is AMAZING!

  • @harrisedgar
    @harrisedgar 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great Darren...!!! Just great...!!! I was waiting for this lens a your angle on it, but I have to say that you are the very first review I found... (and the beauty is that i was notified automatically via Google+)
    By the way, great review....!!!

    • @DarrenMiles
      @DarrenMiles  9 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you Edgar!

    • @donut070707
      @donut070707 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Edgar Harris try this
      robinwong.blogspot.sg/2015/05/olympus-mzuiko-7-14mm-f28-pro-lens.html

    • @harrisedgar
      @harrisedgar 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      donut070707 Thank you... Very helpful...!!!

  • @delpierro0815
    @delpierro0815 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great review, Darren - and nice insights of your private life ;). Looks like a must buy!

    • @paristo
      @paristo 9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      ***** His private life or the objective? ;)

    • @delpierro0815
      @delpierro0815 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      paristo The lens ;)

    • @sealand000
      @sealand000 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ***** The lens is a must buy, but the price makes it a can't buy ;)

  • @MontrealRealEstate514
    @MontrealRealEstate514 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi Darren, long time lurker of your channel, first time commenter. I have a few questions for you, I'm a realtor in Montreal and I refuse to take my own pictures, I leave that job to professionals like yourself. I do enjoy videography and content creation for my own purposes tho. I was thinking of getting a gh4 or GX85 or possibly wait for the em 1 mk2 or gh5 with this olympus lens. I'm guessing dual I.S. would never work on the GX85 with this lens is that correct? I'm debating between going with this setup or a metabones speedbooster with a canon 10-18. What would you recommend?

  • @AsianVideoGamer
    @AsianVideoGamer 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    I want such a lens, I got the 12-40mm f2.8 and 40-150mm f2.8 .... I just need this one...

  • @sutho73
    @sutho73 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi Darren, what settings did you use for autofucs with this lens on the GH4. I can't seem to get mine to AF...just shows MF in top right corner? I'm having the same trouble with the 12-40mm f2.8 - but the 40mm-150mm auto focus works straight away.
    Love your reviews by the way. I bought all 3 Olympus pro lenses after watching.

  • @MattSzymkow
    @MattSzymkow 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    I shoot a lot of real estate and this makes me want to do a full switch (already have and EM-5 and a couple lenses, my go to travel kit, though have Canon and L lenses)...on the other hand I shoot a lot of concerts as well and not sure tracking can keep up. :/

    • @DarrenMiles
      @DarrenMiles  9 ปีที่แล้ว

      Matt Szymkow The tracking function with the EM-1 has been drastically improved with the firmware version 3.0 - the EM-5ii has decent tracking - but at a slower burst rate. You can always rent one and see how it goes before you dive in...

    • @MattSzymkow
      @MattSzymkow 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      Good call Darren Miles I always want to try my EM-5 at shows, though fear I may miss shots with it and thus its stays at home. It's been great for secondary architectural work though.

  • @sorrybut_TRUTH_hurts
    @sorrybut_TRUTH_hurts 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    may i ask, what camera and lens did you used here? very sharp on 480p really.

  • @robertstark9941
    @robertstark9941 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent informative video. Would you recommend this lens for a GH4? Did you try it with your GH4 and if so were you happy with it?

    • @DarrenMiles
      @DarrenMiles  9 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Robert Stark I absolutely would, but the flare patterns are still an issue, overall image quality is excellent.

  • @NickPowellPhotography
    @NickPowellPhotography 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi Darren, great review! Couple of questions... What software do you use for your HDR processing, or do you use Photoshop? Also, any plans to do a review of the new Panasonic 8-18mm f2.8-4 as I currently have the 7-14mm Panasonic and the flare is horrendous!

  • @MrRenoman2011
    @MrRenoman2011 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks Daren great video and you do get what you pay for when it comes to photography. Cheers

  • @penaso2006
    @penaso2006 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome! Thank you for the review.

  • @SailorMotovlogs
    @SailorMotovlogs 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    SOLD. This will complete my collection got the gh5

  • @A1Bokeh
    @A1Bokeh 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Would love to see videos like this but putting lenses against eachother

  • @timur7381
    @timur7381 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice review, as always) Seems like an amazing lens, too bad can't justify it for myself yet, since I'm not making money with photography) Got myself samyang 12mm f/2 for wide shots, quite like it so far. Its all manual, but pretty easy to focus with focus peaking, and the fact that anything beyond 1-2 meters is in infinity focus)

  • @galihbaskoro3380
    @galihbaskoro3380 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi Darren, I plan to use this lens for landscape photography. Can it be attached with ND filter? I am curious after saw the rectilinear zoom movement in your's video. Thanks

  • @luigigrasso4289
    @luigigrasso4289 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great review thanks very much! 😉

  • @mediamannaman
    @mediamannaman 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi Darren, I'm shooting real estate with this lens on a GH4. It's making my rookie work look pro (most of the time!) and I'm really thankful I made the investment. But I sometimes struggle with composing shots because sometimes objects on the edges are distorted. For example, a doorway or a window on the left or right edge of the picture is stretched and looks wider than it really is. I could step back, or narrow it 10mm, or something like that, but in doing so I end up giving up the shot that I want. Do you have any training material that teaches how to compose shots with a bulbous wide angle lens like this? Or is this something that you clean up in post? The sample pictures you put in this video look great and I do not see the distortion. Thanks.

  • @KithunSan
    @KithunSan 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice review Darren. Can I fix this lens to my GH4 without any adaptor.?

  • @MyRetroJourney
    @MyRetroJourney 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Please show us more example pictures next time Darren because the video quality of the Olympus cameras is so poor that you can't see how good the lens really is. Thanks.

    • @DarrenMiles
      @DarrenMiles  9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Bill, most of the video was shot on a gh4 - using the olympus lens.

    • @MyRetroJourney
      @MyRetroJourney 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      Darren Miles I see, then it's due to youtube. Thanks Darren :)

    • @SKgeostrat
      @SKgeostrat 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      MrBillMorisson Or maybe you have just read that the video quality is poor, but don't quite know how to judge it!

    • @MyRetroJourney
      @MyRetroJourney 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      Steinar Knai I have a E-M1 by my own and the video quality is poor. My phone can do better.

    • @SKgeostrat
      @SKgeostrat 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      Surely you did not buy an EM1 for its video qualities! For all the rest you can compare it to the DS4. R read Ming Thein's article comparing the 5DMKIII, the D810 and the EM1. If you want video, but a GH4. ET

  • @djrbfmbfm-woa
    @djrbfmbfm-woa 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    btw, darren, have i ever said you are an excellent artist? well i am now. thx so much for these reviews. j.

  • @zadecreative336
    @zadecreative336 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi Darren,
    I'm looking at getting a wider lens - currently have a 12-35mm panasonic vario G, some people have said to go for the metabones and tokina 11-16mm rather than the olympus 7-14mm, what are you views on this? I'm also going to be using the lens for interior photography. Thanks

    • @DarrenMiles
      @DarrenMiles  9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      +Zade Aerial Given the choice, I'd always go with native glass first. The Tokina is nice, but even with the speedbooster I don't think it would be quite as wide, and for all it's greatness, the 11-16 suffers mightily from chromatic aberrations... The 7-14 - in my opinion - is an overall better way to go...

    • @zadecreative336
      @zadecreative336 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Darren Miles cheers Darren!

  • @djrbfmbfm-woa
    @djrbfmbfm-woa 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    darren, hi. re: build quality? the 12-40mm f2.8 fell from a tripod @ 3ft onto carpet and thick pile rug. the hood took the impact. still the lense broke at the bayonet mount, which is cheap plastic. all the electronic ribbon cables are sub standard quality as well. next, my 2.8 macro stopped working two days later. now under warranty repair. this is not a pro system. it is a pro-sumer system, and is not advertised that way. j.

    • @DarrenMiles
      @DarrenMiles  9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ***** Sorry to hear that about the lens, sounds like it might have landed just perfectly to break in that manner, can't explain it, just seems unlucky to me.
      I've used about 20 M43 lenses and Olympus's PRO series are easily the best built ones that I've used - along with the 75mm f/1.8. I'd even argue they're better built than some of the latest Canon L Models. I can't say the same about the Oly 60mm Macro with regard to build - I'm one of the few, but I'm not a super huge fan of that lens.
      The OMD EM-1 is considered to be a professional camera as there are plenty of pros using it in their professional work - including me. Sure, many M43 lenses/bodies are targeting consumers, many are not. Speaking for myself, I'm not easy on my gear, but I wouldn't hesitate recommending the OMD line and the PRO line of lenses to a pro or an aspiring pro.
      There are plenty of professional who use lesser cameras than even the EM-1 and are making a successful living.

    • @djrbfmbfm-woa
      @djrbfmbfm-woa 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      Darren Miles thx so much for replying, darren. it's very nice of you. agree that the macro's a bit finicky in use, but the image quality is there. re: the 12-40mm, the camera house here,(lismore, nsw, australia) is giving me a good deal on a new one = 50% off retail. and i'm buying the 7-14mmPRO as well. i have no worries with the actual lense image quality at all. totally great on all the lenses. two of my favs are the 17mm prime, and the incredible 40-150mm PRO, luckily nothing has happened to them - yet........lol. you probably checked my channel out? it's a music channel which features works of mine, since 1967. darren thank you again, and plz keep up the videos with your pictures featuring, your works are stunning. j.

  • @mp4podcastDOTcom
    @mp4podcastDOTcom 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Really nice lens, but I hope their is some kind of adapter that comes out for ND filters for filmmakers.

    • @paristo
      @paristo 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      mp4podcastDOTcom Olympus informed there is coming a filter holder for plates.

    • @productionmandan
      @productionmandan 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      mp4podcastDOTcom its called get a matte box

  • @JayyPiiii
    @JayyPiiii 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey Darren! Was just wondering what Camera, Lense and Mic you use for your videos? You have always had superb quality in your videos and the background blur is phenomenal! Would love to know!

    • @DarrenMiles
      @DarrenMiles  9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Usually a gh4 with the olympus 75mm f/1.8 (at f/1.8) - mic is a Sony - (don't have it in front of me, but I think it's a Sony UMP?)

  • @flyto9
    @flyto9 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Darren, can you show a tutorial on how to take those real estate picture with bright indoor and blue sky? do you use HDR? flash? or both?

    • @DarrenMiles
      @DarrenMiles  9 ปีที่แล้ว

      flyto9 I'm offering up a private seminar in the fall here in Naples that will spend a fair amount of time on how to do successful real estate photography... You may want to consider it :-)

    • @flyto9
      @flyto9 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      I dont think I can join unless it's an online session.

  • @stevenmp66
    @stevenmp66 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome review!

  • @fiskpad
    @fiskpad 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for the excellent review as always Daren. On a somewhat different note how do you see the resolving power of this current crop of Pro Olympus m4/3 lenses holding up in the not to distant future. With new sensors being introduced such as Panasonic's latest some lenses will not do those sensors justice. The current Oly sensors while great are getting a bit long in the tooth.

    • @DarrenMiles
      @DarrenMiles  9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      fiskpad I think the PRO series lens quality far out resolves the current crop of camera sensors, but that's my opinion, I guess we'll find out soon enough :-)

  • @gregoryjob4395
    @gregoryjob4395 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey Darren great review, seems like a promising lens. Does autofocus work when you use it on the GH4

    • @DarrenMiles
      @DarrenMiles  9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +Gregory Job Absolutely! I used the GH4 for a lot of the test shots.

    • @rudolfabelin383
      @rudolfabelin383 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@DarrenMiles Thanks! Then it will work on my GH5.

  • @kungula
    @kungula 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I always like your videos, Darren. Can you tell me what head you use on your tripod ?

  • @stephenashby4740
    @stephenashby4740 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    love your reviews

    • @DarrenMiles
      @DarrenMiles  9 ปีที่แล้ว

      stephen ashby Thank you very much!

  • @Voniceman
    @Voniceman 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Which program are you using to stitch your branket fotoes for Real Estate ? I use photomatix. I'm Real Estate photographer in Denmark. Your review convinced me to buy this linse !! Thanks for a good review.

    • @DarrenMiles
      @DarrenMiles  7 ปีที่แล้ว

      You'll have to watch my seminar :-)

  • @battistimo
    @battistimo 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    How does one get started in real estate photography? I'm an amateur and covet this lens!

    • @DarrenMiles
      @DarrenMiles  9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      batterista I may do a seminar on this very topic in the near future...

    • @battistimo
      @battistimo 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Please do. I'd like to actually make a living off of my photography.

  • @FilmDat
    @FilmDat 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Darren! First of, lovely videos, appreciate 'em a lot!
    Second, I've been looking around for ages deciding what to buy. I sold my Olympus 9-18mm as I wanted something more wide-angle that will perform well in lo-light situations. Cheap C-mount wideangle lenses didn't work for me (no infinity focus) so my question is, would this be the best solution?
    It's quite expensive, but I can't seem to find something similar as the Panasonic doesn't quite do it with it's F4.0.

    • @DarrenMiles
      @DarrenMiles  8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +FilmDat Both are good, edge to the Oly, plus it's f/2.8 throughout the zoom range and the Oly handles both flare and CA's better.

  • @djrbfmbfm-woa
    @djrbfmbfm-woa 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    my fav PRO series lens. j.

  • @LukeSalaiz
    @LukeSalaiz 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey Darren, do you recommend a certain ND filter to go with this lens? Bought the lens after watching your review, and now wanting to incorporate an ND filter.... Thank you! Luke from Seattle.

    • @DarrenMiles
      @DarrenMiles  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      luke salaiz best bet are the wonder pana’s from fotodiox

  • @swiftangel88
    @swiftangel88 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great review, this the lens I have been waiting for.
    (use OMD EM-1 and Sony A7)

    • @DarrenMiles
      @DarrenMiles  9 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's a great oiece of glass!!

  • @Facesmany
    @Facesmany 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wow Wow Wow , great wide angle lens. Thank Darren for doing this review :) 

    • @DarrenMiles
      @DarrenMiles  9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      many Faces You're welcome! Thank YOU for watching :-)

  • @solaradt
    @solaradt 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks Darren for the review, love the lens but it's really pricy. Love your vids and real estate photos. I'm a pro full frame shooter, even though the pro lenses can cost an arm and a leg, these pro micro 4/3 lenses ain't that far off considering I got the MFT for holiday run around. Many thanks for the review.

    • @DarrenMiles
      @DarrenMiles  8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      +Tom Bungbrakearti Thanks Tom - I would use the Olympus 7-14 tomorrow for real estate - my primary camera is the Nikon D750 for real estate as the shadow recovery of the Nikon sensor is just amazing - I love M43, but it doesn't cut it for SOME of my real estate work, particularly low light shooting which is an achilles heal for M43 - curious to see how the Pen-F's new sensor handles shadow recovery.

  • @ashhashemi1315
    @ashhashemi1315 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi Darren,
    Did you have any issues with this lense and flare for your real estate work? I'm considering getting it but am worries about flare f

    • @DarrenMiles
      @DarrenMiles  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ash Hashemi yes, but not anymore than most other wide angle lenses. I had a much more difficult time with the Panasonic 7-14

  • @maggyfish
    @maggyfish 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Another cracking review... 👍

  • @keithj9165
    @keithj9165 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    hey Darren, do you still use micro four thirds for your RE photography? I'm looking to pick up either this lens or the newly announced Pana Leica 8-18 for my Em1 mkii. thoughts? what would you say the value is of that extra mm on the wide end?

  • @dieseldavey
    @dieseldavey 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi Darren are you still making reviews on olympus gear or have you gone to Nikon Thanks

    • @DarrenMiles
      @DarrenMiles  7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I am - it's just the stuff I want to review is really hard to get a hold of - the EM 1 Mark ii and the 50mm f/1.2...

    • @TerryTungPhotography
      @TerryTungPhotography 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I'm looking forward to your Olympus reviews. I normally shoot with the Canon 5D Mark IV but recently purchased the EM 1 Mark II, 50 f/1.2 and the 12-100 f/4 in order to travel lighter when on out-of-the-country projects.