Thank you for the feedback on the volume. It’s weird because LIVE it was clear and plenty high. It’s a new mic so maybe I need to push the gain? I’ll look up how to do that and remedy it before the next broadcast on Sunday at 3pm EST. Thank you for listening!
Thank you for the feedback on the volume. It’s weird because LIVE it was clear and plenty high. It’s a new mic so maybe I need to push the gain? I’ll look up how to do that. I do barely speak above a whisper when I’m not doing well. I promise to remedy this before Sunday at 3pm EST for part 2. As to Grace, amen. ❤
Wait a second... Which version? Because KJV was written specifically to allow the king to divorce his wife. Its what caused the Church of England to split with the Vatican
I've heard this a few times over the years, however, there is no credible evidence that King James I of England commissioned the King James Version (KJV) of the Bible to permit or justify his divorce. This claim is a common misconception, often conflating historical events and motives surrounding the English Reformation and the creation of the KJV. We have to look at the Historical Context of the King James Bible to understand the events and impact accurately. Purpose of the King James Version: King James I authorized the translation of the KJV in 1604 to unify religious factions in England and Scotland. The Puritans and the Church of England both desired a standard Bible free from the biases of earlier translations, such as the Geneva Bible, which contained controversial marginal notes. The translation aimed to produce a Bible that was accessible, accurate, and suitable for public worship in the Church of England. Timeline: King James ascended to the throne in 1603, and the KJV was completed in 1611. At no point during this period was James I seeking a divorce, nor is there evidence that he had concerns about biblical teachings on marriage that influenced the translation process. King James was married to Anne of Denmark from 1589 until her death in 1619. There is no record of James seeking a divorce from her. Unlike King Henry VIII, whose desire for a divorce led to the English Reformation, King James I’s reign did not involve significant marital disputes or controversies that would have influenced biblical translation. I hope this is beneficial to you. Thank you very much for listening!
@DrShawnMichaelGreener-kg3sv every bit as much evidence of that story as evidence for the validity of the book itself. Glad to see special pleading is not beyond you
Mosaic law allows for divorce. However. NT teaching does not acknowledge the possibility of divorce. 'What God has united let no man tear apart'. ( Matt.19 ,mark 12). The teaching is quite clear. I was divorced once in my life. We will short of His perfection. It is inevitable.
I am going to do a teaching where I respond to this, I think on Friday at 5pm EST. I appreciate your comment, even the dissenting ones submitted with dignity and respect. Thank you for watching!
Sounds low. Had to tuen up volume way up
Thank you for the feedback on the volume. It’s weird because LIVE it was clear and plenty high. It’s a new mic so maybe I need to push the gain? I’ll look up how to do that and remedy it before the next broadcast on Sunday at 3pm EST. Thank you for listening!
Volume way low. Had to turn it way up. I've seen too much grief. Offer grace, not judgement. That shows love...shalom.
Thank you for the feedback on the volume. It’s weird because LIVE it was clear and plenty high. It’s a new mic so maybe I need to push the gain? I’ll look up how to do that. I do barely speak above a whisper when I’m not doing well. I promise to remedy this before Sunday at 3pm EST for part 2.
As to Grace, amen. ❤
Wait a second... Which version? Because KJV was written specifically to allow the king to divorce his wife. Its what caused the Church of England to split with the Vatican
How do you mean, ‘which version?’
Thank you for listening. Part 2 is Sunday at 3pm EST I’ll get the volume sorted by then as well.
I've heard this a few times over the years, however, there is no credible evidence that King James I of England commissioned the King James Version (KJV) of the Bible to permit or justify his divorce. This claim is a common misconception, often conflating historical events and motives surrounding the English Reformation and the creation of the KJV.
We have to look at the Historical Context of the King James Bible to understand the events and impact accurately.
Purpose of the King James Version:
King James I authorized the translation of the KJV in 1604 to unify religious factions in England and Scotland.
The Puritans and the Church of England both desired a standard Bible free from the biases of earlier translations, such as the Geneva Bible, which contained controversial marginal notes.
The translation aimed to produce a Bible that was accessible, accurate, and suitable for public worship in the Church of England.
Timeline:
King James ascended to the throne in 1603, and the KJV was completed in 1611.
At no point during this period was James I seeking a divorce, nor is there evidence that he had concerns about biblical teachings on marriage that influenced the translation process.
King James was married to Anne of Denmark from 1589 until her death in 1619. There is no record of James seeking a divorce from her.
Unlike King Henry VIII, whose desire for a divorce led to the English Reformation, King James I’s reign did not involve significant marital disputes or controversies that would have influenced biblical translation. I hope this is beneficial to you. Thank you very much for listening!
@DrShawnMichaelGreener-kg3sv every bit as much evidence of that story as evidence for the validity of the book itself. Glad to see special pleading is not beyond you
Mosaic law allows for divorce. However. NT teaching does not acknowledge the possibility of divorce. 'What God has united let no man tear apart'. ( Matt.19 ,mark 12). The teaching is quite clear. I was divorced once in my life. We will short of His perfection. It is inevitable.
I encourage you to listen to the next two parts of the series, Part 2 is Sunday at 3pm EST.
I am going to do a teaching where I respond to this, I think on Friday at 5pm EST. I appreciate your comment, even the dissenting ones submitted with dignity and respect. Thank you for watching!