IT'S CRAZY! China's J-20 Becomes the Sole Supercruising Stealth Fighter!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 38

  • @charlesrichardson8635
    @charlesrichardson8635 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Seems strange that you would claim "sole supercruising stealth fighter" but the F22 Raptor with has been doing this since 2004. It's a great capability if it really happens, but not the first or sole.

  • @trzcinq
    @trzcinq ปีที่แล้ว +5

    💪Go China🇨🇳

  • @WRuiz10768
    @WRuiz10768 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Unless all Raptors have been grounded, that is a lie.

    • @jessier3602
      @jessier3602 ปีที่แล้ว

      Why did you all F-22 Raptors are grounded and what's the lie? The Chinese J-20 is a copycat of the US F-22 Raptor which Chinese hackers stole from US Defense Contractors of the Raptors. This latest news 2 Chinese Spies wearing the Uniform of the US Navy were recently caught by Federal law enforcement when they stole navy ships secrets, also schedule of military exercises data with the allies of the US like Japan,UK,Philippines, Australia, the 2 military Chinese decent soldiers of the US Navy also stole the technology of the Radar Systems that detect enemy ships, combatants, aircrafts. They are now in a Federal Prison

    • @jessier3602
      @jessier3602 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      No US F-22 Raptors have been grounded in fact a lot of them are involved in flight exercises with US Defense Allies

    • @Bangy
      @Bangy 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      In production*
      F-22s are not in production.

  • @ioanbota9397
    @ioanbota9397 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Realy I like it they are so powerful

  • @scottdevaney3928
    @scottdevaney3928 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    They better be careful We're trying to mighten up with AYF23 design which super cruises faster than the F22

    • @charlesrichardson8635
      @charlesrichardson8635 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      There is a limit on supercruise on any engine because of the way the engines actually work. So you may go 1.5 vs. 1.6 Mach, but even that will change on altitude. The US reports ground test results where China reports high altitude tests, so the F22 high altitude output is better than this engine. Good try though!

  • @scottdevaney3928
    @scottdevaney3928 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Also if you want to talk about the original super cruise plane Sr 71 super cruise mock 3 plus .
    Let me know when you put a couple cars on the moon or something outside the solor system that at 50 years old still working or have self landing boosters a shuttle or mach 3 plus bomber xb70 or a piloted mach 6 plus space plane x15...nice of china to get to the party 50 plus years late

    • @ForcesCast
      @ForcesCast  ปีที่แล้ว

      We melt this curiosity in next mind

    • @ForcesCast
      @ForcesCast  ปีที่แล้ว

      If we're talking about the original super cruise plane, the SR-71, it could fly at very high speeds, around Mach 3+. It was impressive because it could keep flying quickly for a long time. As for cars on the moon or things beyond our solar system, that hasn't happened yet. But there have been advancements like reusable rocket boosters that can land themselves, similar to a shuttle. The XB-70 was a bomber that could go around Mach 3+, and the X-15 was a piloted space plane that could go even faster, around Mach 6+. China's recent achievements in space are significant, although they came later than some earlier accomplishments.

    • @obiwan5781
      @obiwan5781 ปีที่แล้ว

      Merikkkans think they landed on the moon 6 time with technology from the 60s 😂

  • @oneskydog6768
    @oneskydog6768 ปีที่แล้ว

    Chinese super cruise all the better to run away.

  • @scottdevaney3928
    @scottdevaney3928 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Lol Chinese 6th gen

  • @kimphuong5395
    @kimphuong5395 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Nikki not too smart. No one going to listen to her any way

  • @scottdevaney3928
    @scottdevaney3928 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    What is this chicom propaganda????
    Fact Chinese engine's are poor quality an performance unless they stole American design

    • @horridohobbies
      @horridohobbies ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Prove it. Show us the evidence. Otherwise, you're full of hot air.

    • @scottdevaney3928
      @scottdevaney3928 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@horridohobbies lol they haven't produced a military engine worth a china thats why they have kept close ties to china...if china has anything worth a china the stole it or copied it or it don't exist!
      If not for Clinton telling NASA to help china on Proper techniques on mervrehenary they hatevery injury they hadn't had any success on getting stuff back from space that they shot up you can say thank you to the American taxpayer Is an American brain power

    • @louischau7982
      @louischau7982 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      If the Chinese can build a space station with their own technology. Do you think they can not build planes ?

    • @peterhsieh380
      @peterhsieh380 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Your hatred of China is second to none, and why bother even to watch?
      If you continue to watch China's militaries, I am afraid you will have heart attack sooner or later.

    • @obiwan5781
      @obiwan5781 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@peterhsieh380China lives in his head rent free, but cia pays these shills to be racist 😂

  • @daveblockabg
    @daveblockabg ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Still not better than raptor and raptor is not retired. Just not producing new u it’s

    • @Sunabozupunk
      @Sunabozupunk ปีที่แล้ว

      The F22 is old with old and outdated technology, its advantage was its powerful engines, but not anymore with the new W-15 engines of the J-20. And don't tell me about the obese F-35 flying brick that even American specialists consider a failure.

    • @nanyanguo1
      @nanyanguo1 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      cant keep up say so .

    • @oot007
      @oot007 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Let the facts speak for themselves.
      F35 - 191kN max thrust
      F22 - 312kN
      Su57 - 342kN
      J20 - 362kN

    • @scottdevaney3928
      @scottdevaney3928 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ya china claims a lot things along with Russia witch are bullshit

    • @Brandon_Tyr
      @Brandon_Tyr 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@oot007 At which altitudes were those measured, and at what Mach number? Are these intalled or uninstalled thrust measurements? How heavy is each of those planes? How draggy are those planes at supersonic speeds? All of these change how the math works out.

  • @YusTus-h9s
    @YusTus-h9s ปีที่แล้ว +1

    FIREFOX ` CLINT EASTWOOD
    VERY NICE MOVIE FOR ITS' TIME