Jesus Christ......finally someone who knows what they are talking about and explains it clearly and easy to understand!!!....thank you very much...your a legend!!!!
At around 37 minutes, I was confused about necessary conditions. You said Hilton isn't going to do it unless Marriott does it first, but in both statements, Hilton occurs first chronologically. After I wrote it out in the following statements, the example made sense: Sufficient condition: If H is true, then M has to be true. (Only H is required for M.) Necessary condition: If M is true, then H has to be true (but R and S might need to be true along with H before M is true). H is still chronologically prior.
Thank you for your explanations, they are very helpful especially because you emphasize what is important to know for future references. If I can give some constructive criticism it would perhaps be: when going over exercise examples, maybe show both the difficult ones and easy ones.
At 35:05 You gave us an example that If you put gas in your car, then you can drive. I think what you mean is put gas is Sufficient condition and Drive is Necessary condition. right? I am little bit confused there. May you help me to clarify that part? thanks in advance.
Why did you have the term "only if" as a conditional? In the legal system, if the Court writes: "Jane Doe v State of Missouri, pursuant to Section 104 of the Missouri Code of Criminal Procedure, the State of Missouri shall hereby do Z only if Jane Doe serves 100 years in the State Penitentiary without the possibility of parole," the logical connector "only if" is used as a biconditional and not as a conditional. Why is there a disconnect between legal logic and nonlegal logic?
Very helpful, I understood better with your videos than my instructor thank you for posting these videos :)
Jesus Christ......finally someone who knows what they are talking about and explains it clearly and easy to understand!!!....thank you very much...your a legend!!!!
33:44
The main operator is the dis-junction (the wedge) and not the negation.
I had to rewind cause this confused me lol
Thank you for commenting this :)
Thank you. I am following all of your Introduction to Logic videos.
At around 37 minutes, I was confused about necessary conditions. You said Hilton isn't going to do it unless Marriott does it first, but in both statements, Hilton occurs first chronologically. After I wrote it out in the following statements, the example made sense:
Sufficient condition: If H is true, then M has to be true. (Only H is required for M.)
Necessary condition: If M is true, then H has to be true (but R and S might need to be true along with H before M is true). H is still chronologically prior.
I'm aware I'm commenting on a super old video, but I can not thank you enough for this explanation!
Mark you are a god for posting this series
Thank you, I always look at your videos before a test and it is as clear as day
This cleared so much up for me, i really appreciate it, thank you!
You explained everything beautifully. Thank you!
Thank you so much sir... It helps me so much.. I am a student of university of Peradeniya, Sri lanka..
Thank you for your explanations, they are very helpful especially because you emphasize what is important to know for future references. If I can give some constructive criticism it would perhaps be: when going over exercise examples, maybe show both the difficult ones and easy ones.
Thank you for creating this lecture. I have to have a visual to understand these questions.
you just got yourself a new subscriber :D Thanks a ton
Thanks a lot, sir, for this great help... I am so much grateful to you... I owe a lot to you... Thanks a lot, sir... !🤗🤗🤗🤗
thank you so so much this helped a lot!
thank you soo much this really helps, a lot!!!!!!!!!!!! I totally understand this !!!!!! Thanks !
Great video, I was feeling lost in class and doomed for my quiz and final. Now I have hope!!!!!
+yesenia vaca-valencia Logic and women hardly go together.
+dom ji
oh really? so funny you must be... please, expand on your knowledge
Patricia Oprea well understood
34:15 - sufficient and necessary conditions
At 35:05 You gave us an example that If you put gas in your car, then you can drive. I think what you mean is put gas is Sufficient condition and Drive is Necessary condition. right? I am little bit confused there. May you help me to clarify that part? thanks in advance.
Thank You !!!
is their a way i can donate to you? these have been a lifesaver.
You're an excellent teacher. I'm gonna call your mom and order four more of ya..... :)
Thanks!!!
Are symbolic logic and propositional logic the same?
aditya kumar yes
Oh, Hi Mark!
inserting a horseshoe in Word is a real challenge
Why did you have the term "only if" as a conditional? In the legal system, if the Court writes: "Jane Doe v State of Missouri, pursuant to Section 104 of the Missouri Code of Criminal Procedure, the State of Missouri shall hereby do Z only if Jane Doe serves 100 years in the State Penitentiary without the possibility of parole," the logical connector "only if" is used as a biconditional and not as a conditional. Why is there a disconnect between legal logic and nonlegal logic?
Only if is biconditional. He covered that in the last chapter
Like
It is false the Mark is a bad teacher.
Thanks for posting.
Since I found your videos my grades have improved greatly. However, you move so fast and switch so quickly, i did not benefit from this video.
You are just replicating the book. No point.
honestly, his passion makes me want to marry him