I got ONE OUTERED!!!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 พ.ค. 2024
  • This week I play a massive 400bb pot with pocket aces and then play 2 hands vs the same opponents before getting one outered in horrendous fashion!
    Join the discord! / discord
    Subscribe for more! / @benabadbeatpoker
    Share this video with a friend
    • I got ONE OUTERED!!!
    My Socials:
    Instagram - / benabadbeat
    Edited by Skuz Digital
    skuzdigital@gmail.com
    #onlinepoker #highstakes #texasholdem

ความคิดเห็น • 155

  • @orangeteax1789
    @orangeteax1789 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

    I actually really like that you show weekly graphs. I think that approach gives more insight into the grind and what short term variance can look like. Sure it would be nice to look at a graph of millions of hands but that's not really how the game is experienced IMO. You get to millions of hands one session at a time and I think seeing winning players have wild stretches puts things into perspective.

    • @BenaBadBeatPoker
      @BenaBadBeatPoker  หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      this x10000. glad you like the weekly graphs - I think it also just helps support the narrative (whatever that really means haha).

  • @matthewgittins3338
    @matthewgittins3338 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This is the most relatable high level theoretical content I've come across. Well done you. Longer is better.

    • @BenaBadBeatPoker
      @BenaBadBeatPoker  หลายเดือนก่อน

      appreciate that a lot mate, thank you 🙏

  • @hugopk1
    @hugopk1 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Really enjoyed the longer format. Looking forward to more content 👍

  • @sickhangover
    @sickhangover หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I stopped watching poker content a while ago, but subbed for this! Good stuff, great content.

    • @BenaBadBeatPoker
      @BenaBadBeatPoker  หลายเดือนก่อน

      thank you mate! thats very kind

  • @nuggzay8556
    @nuggzay8556 หลายเดือนก่อน

    lmaoo im not even hero and these hands sting for me 😆great vid as usual.

  • @joshmanleypoker
    @joshmanleypoker หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Nice one Bena enjoyed that!

  • @leoyuan3f
    @leoyuan3f หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Goddamn, all that high level analysis during the last hand about things like the 98s balance and then to see that...

    • @BenaBadBeatPoker
      @BenaBadBeatPoker  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      lmfao legit just pissing into the wind🤣🤣

  • @jackbrady9738
    @jackbrady9738 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is the best poker content on the internet rn

  • @nathaniel6680
    @nathaniel6680 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Awesome video mate, subbed and look forward to future content! also if you blur out someones name you might want to blur it out in the run it once/twice box as well 😂 ulul on the 99!

    • @BenaBadBeatPoker
      @BenaBadBeatPoker  หลายเดือนก่อน

      hahaha yeah I know. tbh it’s not really about full censoring people, rather than just for the most part not fully outing people throughout the hand!

  • @sneakytucky
    @sneakytucky หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    great video mate 👍

  • @wVLADw
    @wVLADw หลายเดือนก่อน

    You are becoming a great poker content creator to me. Thanks for been there!

  • @jacobyong3214
    @jacobyong3214 หลายเดือนก่อน

    i like the longer format. interesting stuff as usual. just curious on why would you hop onto a 2/5/2a game? haven't seen you played any of these in your other videos.

    • @BenaBadBeatPoker
      @BenaBadBeatPoker  หลายเดือนก่อน

      thanks bro! I have one other hand from ante table and am playing a lot more of them! just makes sense to make up numbers of tables

  • @Proactionguy
    @Proactionguy หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    hey ben, for the last hand do u think V intentionally snapped the turn to rep the pair+draw part of his range. u did mention V was full explo.

    • @BenaBadBeatPoker
      @BenaBadBeatPoker  หลายเดือนก่อน

      absolutely possibly yep! in fairness that specific read was not a huge contributing factor to my decision though!

  • @rgee5952
    @rgee5952 หลายเดือนก่อน

    benabahbee is back!

    • @BenaBadBeatPoker
      @BenaBadBeatPoker  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      the reverend reporting for duty

  • @Ironfrog-dm3yf
    @Ironfrog-dm3yf หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great vid😁

  • @edconnick3737
    @edconnick3737 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ohh yeahhhhh BENA

    • @BenaBadBeatPoker
      @BenaBadBeatPoker  หลายเดือนก่อน

      1 more week til I win yours and smits house ❤️

  • @jackpainter1488
    @jackpainter1488 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This video dropped at the perfect time, just had a set over set one outered on river

    • @BenaBadBeatPoker
      @BenaBadBeatPoker  หลายเดือนก่อน

      noooo, may the poker gods bless you in your next session 🙏

  • @MRBU1LD3RM4N
    @MRBU1LD3RM4N หลายเดือนก่อน

    my bluff filled up :P

  • @user-ti6bj8gs5r
    @user-ti6bj8gs5r หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ben, when you say on the 258 rainbow, that deep you wouldnt chk raise with JT but at 100bb deep chk raise mixes, is that because 100bb deep you get to bet go with it when you pick up equity, or chk shove etc etc?

    • @BenaBadBeatPoker
      @BenaBadBeatPoker  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      i would just much rather have more robust equity that blocking the mid-strength value region from villain when at 200bb deep

    • @user-ti6bj8gs5r
      @user-ti6bj8gs5r หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@BenaBadBeatPoker OK nice one

  • @FizzyToni
    @FizzyToni หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    In that KTo hand, do we ever have Q8 as you were saying? Since we obet OTT, I don't think Q8 does it (almost) ever.

    • @seslocrit9365
      @seslocrit9365 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah, IMO. He's representing sets and straights on the river. He has 75/T9/(pJs??, maybe)/p6's/p4s.

    • @BenaBadBeatPoker
      @BenaBadBeatPoker  หลายเดือนก่อน

      I didn’t specify but I meant Q8hh! I would mostly check the other Q8’s but I don’t think they make the worst bets ott even when polarising

  • @dbshash
    @dbshash หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Love the content (fwiw I think 33 can fold to flop xr in that config)

    • @BenaBadBeatPoker
      @BenaBadBeatPoker  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      yeah i agree with you but also didn't think going into it would add any value haha. just pay the person their money and be on my way :D

    • @dbshash
      @dbshash หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@BenaBadBeatPoker doesn’t change your line at all I don’t think, was just responding to you saying that villain played his hand perfectly, I think 33 might have to fold to flop xr

  • @eastyyy22
    @eastyyy22 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I like it when you lose so I feel less useless

    • @BenaBadBeatPoker
      @BenaBadBeatPoker  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      glad to be of assistance lad

  • @Lucas-fh5dl
    @Lucas-fh5dl หลายเดือนก่อน

    Amazing quality videos. I'm certain you run into many more interesting spots. It would be great to see longer form content.

    • @BenaBadBeatPoker
      @BenaBadBeatPoker  หลายเดือนก่อน

      I do yes! but these are some of the most interesting. how would you feel about watching smaller non all in pots?

    • @Lucas-fh5dl
      @Lucas-fh5dl หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@BenaBadBeatPoker I'd say those are probably more helpful honestly. The big ones are exciting and all, and your analysis with them really solid, but those aren't super common.

    • @BenaBadBeatPoker
      @BenaBadBeatPoker  หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Lucas-fh5dl awesome. the next vid has a couple smaller pots so please let me know what you think! glgl

  • @criostasi4080
    @criostasi4080 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Just a general question about bet sizing on the river. When you say.like the example in the video "I go all'in with set and str8 for value and with some bluff and go 66% with 2pair" doesn't leave you unbalanced when you bet 66%? You are capped on your value and never have bluff. Your opponent can fold all bluff catchers and raise all'in with top range and bluff against your 66% size. Or your decision is based in the fact that your opponent doesn't know your strategy? But than is not a GTO line, is an exploitative one. I am not saying your strategy is bad. You are way ahead of my level. Just curious to understand the thinking process a little deeper.

    • @BenaBadBeatPoker
      @BenaBadBeatPoker  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      very interesting and good question. so in this exact scenario i will split and not use b66 with any nuts. And I would also assume that this would be the solvers output too. that said, I did acknowledge in the video that betting 66% was likely a mistake theoretically because my value range just wants to go all in. also I would have some other bluffs in my range for the b66. a hand like QJ for example that double blocks villains calls and allows him to have worse Ax

  • @samirdarwich355
    @samirdarwich355 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The x/c x/c x/r line might be one of the most underbluffed spots there is in SRP. That said, I think folding the AT is ok on river, not sure if I could do it though. Your reasoning of him reading into your "weak betsize" might happen less often than your brain trying to find any reason for a call. All the best and GL!

    • @BenaBadBeatPoker
      @BenaBadBeatPoker  หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      yeah totally can agree that I maybe over levelled myself. although I’d you’re gunna make a speculative call it’s always best to do it vs someone capable!

  • @yalce
    @yalce หลายเดือนก่อน

    I like how you called the QJo player a nit and then you're in a similar spot with ATcc. Everybody is a nit

    • @BenaBadBeatPoker
      @BenaBadBeatPoker  หลายเดือนก่อน

      sometimes you gotta project your nittiness onto other players!

  • @LandoBjornson
    @LandoBjornson หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What do you think of the AA rivershove in hindsight? In practice I feel like he has traps and folds and rarely a bluffcatch

    • @BenaBadBeatPoker
      @BenaBadBeatPoker  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I think it’s an extremely standard river shove still. I would say you’re likely making fear based assumptions about them not bluff catching and only calling traps! we can’t possibly know how an unknown player will construct their range

    • @RyanSpicer
      @RyanSpicer หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      think practically the bluff catchers just get folded. think playing block is likely the best option

    • @BenaBadBeatPoker
      @BenaBadBeatPoker  หลายเดือนก่อน

      seems like such a wild underplay with AA to justify blocking. I can understand some explo reasons but even then I think shoving outweighs those. so hard to know vs an unknown though - block could well be infinitely better vs this player but we’ll never know

    • @LandoBjornson
      @LandoBjornson หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Thanks for the quick response! But Honestly I don’t think it’s an extremely standard shove. He has a decent amount of sets (lets say 8 combos), so he needs to bluffcatch at least 8 one pair hand combos for a 400 bb pot which is never a K and your range is AK+ (20+ value combos and little natural bluffs)

    • @_MMWWMM_
      @_MMWWMM_ หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Block/fold, they ain't bluffing enough on such a good river card for OOP when OOP has so many available bluffcatchers

  • @yooyoo8637
    @yooyoo8637 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hi Ben your channel is quality. What is better, 20k hands a month of good focused volume or 40k hands a month where your game is slightly worse?

    • @BenaBadBeatPoker
      @BenaBadBeatPoker  หลายเดือนก่อน

      tough one to answer mate! it depends on your goals. i have been through periods in my career plating 60-100k hands every month and enjoyed it. also was playing like 200nl so it was a lot easier to get in volume (especially at zoom). I'm now in a place where i only play 3 hours a day. general rule of thumb would simply be what you wanna make as your hourly and take it from there.

    • @yooyoo8637
      @yooyoo8637 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@BenaBadBeatPoker Appreciate the advice, GL with your games

  • @payamseyedzadeh969
    @payamseyedzadeh969 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great content as always Bena. However, I disagree with your KTo thought process on the turn. I think solver prefers to overbet the KTo combos WITH a heart, because those combos block hands that jam the turn and deny our equity (e.g. T9hh, QThh, KThh)

    • @BenaBadBeatPoker
      @BenaBadBeatPoker  หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      could definitely be correct yep. I didn’t feel super strongly either way - I think I’m just going to barrel turn with basically all my KT always as it just seems so maxEV

  • @tonyhlk8182
    @tonyhlk8182 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hi Bena, wanted to know if you had losing months? (even with rb) And how often it would happen? I'm asking because both March and April have been losing months for me, and despite knowing that I'm overall a winning player I have a really tough time dealing with that . Thanks!

    • @BenaBadBeatPoker
      @BenaBadBeatPoker  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      hey mate! yeah i have plenty of losing months. for the last 5 years I’ve probably had something along the lines of 3 losing, 4/5 even and then 4/5 winning. definitely super normal but also I understand that it feels rough!

    • @tonyhlk8182
      @tonyhlk8182 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@BenaBadBeatPoker Thanks for your answer, keep up the work! 😄

  • @user-ti6bj8gs5r
    @user-ti6bj8gs5r หลายเดือนก่อน

    Its GG ben he had 5555 on the flop

  • @user-ti6bj8gs5r
    @user-ti6bj8gs5r หลายเดือนก่อน

    10:17 - Ben from my experience on GG i would be behind to Quad 2s or 5s on this flop!

  • @skillsIayer
    @skillsIayer หลายเดือนก่อน

    What stakes do you want to reach and stay at?

    • @BenaBadBeatPoker
      @BenaBadBeatPoker  หลายเดือนก่อน

      tough question as I could be playing up to 10k now! basically wanna mix back in hs when I feel up to handling the big swings. atm very happy playing up to 3k only

  • @user-ti6bj8gs5r
    @user-ti6bj8gs5r หลายเดือนก่อน

    Bena Bad G
    Edit: for the record I mean that In the positive way

  • @jeegee-cx7ss
    @jeegee-cx7ss หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Ben, do you think spyware might be in any popularly used poker addons? (One in particular that people use for RNG, not naming names)
    I'm seeing a lot of very good players with very poor graph results. It's almost an anomaly to see someone with a good graph over this last year or so. I understand variance, and I understand things can be worse than you can hope to expect during certain bad runs... But all these very good players, theoretically sound, are showing terrible graphs over fairly significant hand samples, etc.
    You can say like that I might be overestimating my ability, or that I have tons of leaks... I don't believe that to be true, but even if I grant that... it doesn't account for the fact that I know lots of very good other players that are showing up with very poor graph results over fairly big hand samples (then combining their graphs, which is millions of hands... and they're all losing, or breaking even).
    Personally I've been a winning player for 10+ years, but this past year is just... strange.
    Thoughts on this? Could something be going on? Have you been experiencing the same trend within your own group of poker friends?
    I'm almost at the point of buying a new pc, and not using any poker addons because the suspicion is that high.

    • @jeffshackleford3152
      @jeffshackleford3152 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If anything, this is pure speculation btw and not a claim, I think the Variance of all the better players at the same time would be more closely related to the volatility of BTC.

    • @BenaBadBeatPoker
      @BenaBadBeatPoker  หลายเดือนก่อน

      I mean it’s not out the realms of possibility, but I would say it’s close to 0% that this is happening. I know plenty of regs who are crushing the games using the same said softwares. I think the games are getting tougher, edges are smaller, and cheating is more prevalent. as a community we need to support one another in preventing cheating, and individually we need to continue to improve our game to give us the greatest chance for a good year

    • @_MMWWMM_
      @_MMWWMM_ หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yes, just look at the GG superuser scandal. Everyone forgotten about it already.

    • @_MMWWMM_
      @_MMWWMM_ หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Can we just admit online poker is dead, gtowiz, nitregs, ai solvers, bots, collusion and SUPERUSERS defiled the long dead corpse. Lucky to make 50k/yr at 1knl

    • @BenaBadBeatPoker
      @BenaBadBeatPoker  หลายเดือนก่อน

      games far from dead yet mate!

  • @garyblackwoodpoker
    @garyblackwoodpoker หลายเดือนก่อน

    GAME OPENED WHEN

  • @samu5381
    @samu5381 หลายเดือนก่อน

    100z videos while in London. Road back to the micros take series!!

    • @BenaBadBeatPoker
      @BenaBadBeatPoker  หลายเดือนก่อน

      definitely a likely video. but prob 500z!

    • @samu5381
      @samu5381 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@BenaBadBeatPoker that doesn’t exist anymore mate.

  • @samu5381
    @samu5381 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I think if no episode next week, we should be getting 50min video!

    • @BenaBadBeatPoker
      @BenaBadBeatPoker  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      haha I actually squeezed in a vid for you 🔥

    • @samu5381
      @samu5381 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@BenaBadBeatPoker 🔥 🔥 🔥

  • @BaadMotorFinger
    @BaadMotorFinger หลายเดือนก่อน

    The runouts are always so wacky on GG compared to stars

    • @BenaBadBeatPoker
      @BenaBadBeatPoker  หลายเดือนก่อน

      haha they haven’t been kind so far 🤣

  • @Weazel1991
    @Weazel1991 หลายเดือนก่อน

    #riggedforwhales

  • @Roxz.1
    @Roxz.1 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Too many KEWLERS :(

  • @ScottyCorbett
    @ScottyCorbett หลายเดือนก่อน

    More unreal content, just run better in the UK 🔥

  • @johngriller4997
    @johngriller4997 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Please explain how someone opening 3.5x from HJ with 98o is a “extremely extremely good reg”

    • @BenaBadBeatPoker
      @BenaBadBeatPoker  หลายเดือนก่อน

      wish I had an answer for you mate lmao. have seen their stats/wr and they do very well. not sure if you play the ante tables but most regs opening between 2.6-3x

    • @johngriller4997
      @johngriller4997 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@BenaBadBeatPoker interesting. Wouldn’t this type of player be easily exploited by over 3betting all those hands that’d be mix between 3b and flat, like ATs for example? Surely their garbo range won’t be able to sustain the heat, even if they try to adjust by counter 4betting, it’s going to become very obvious they’re overdoing it bc it’s going to be too many combos, which can be countered by 5betting lighter than standard?
      My guess is they’re doing this bc Pop doesn’t know how to respond against it since they under 3b a ton and play their strong hands faced up by not 3b linear enough.
      Another adjustment may be to bet more polarized vs them since they’re going to have more nutted hands in runouts like these. So play it as if you’re up against the bb and mix in check backs with two pairs OTT.
      Counter #1 seems better tho, wdyt?

    • @BenaBadBeatPoker
      @BenaBadBeatPoker  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      yeah you’re nailing the current dynamics perfectly. just a constant levelling war of widening and narrowing 3b and opening ranges. but because there are rec’s and 9 max it becomes a totally shitshow lmao

    • @johngriller4997
      @johngriller4997 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@BenaBadBeatPoker it’s basically live poker then 😅

    • @BenaBadBeatPoker
      @BenaBadBeatPoker  หลายเดือนก่อน

      lmfao literally

  • @ZakFromOhio
    @ZakFromOhio หลายเดือนก่อน

    Youre not okay with playing on Ignition but youre okay playing on Americas Crime Ring? Does not compute.

    • @BenaBadBeatPoker
      @BenaBadBeatPoker  หลายเดือนก่อน

      haha well I’m not thrilled playing on ACR but in comparison to iggy - at least at hs - nearly all regs are known. and if they’re not known they’re under immediate scrutiny. this should mean that overall cheating happens less in my games! as for sitewide, they’re at least working with the player base to remove bots. ignition just completely dusting it off on all fronts haha

  • @vinsterw
    @vinsterw หลายเดือนก่อน

    Pokerstars?!? Make sure to Reloadraven your account ;)

    • @BenaBadBeatPoker
      @BenaBadBeatPoker  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      OMFG the cryptic genius from the LEGEND himself ❤️❤️

  • @boiisheesh6062
    @boiisheesh6062 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Comment

  • @tejasvisharma9763
    @tejasvisharma9763 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Please show the red and blue lines as well if you are showing the graph at all.
    Unless you specifically left those out.

    • @BenaBadBeatPoker
      @BenaBadBeatPoker  หลายเดือนก่อน

      I don’t leave them out intentionally and do sometimes post, but generally don’t feel it’s the ay necessary

    • @tejasvisharma9763
      @tejasvisharma9763 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@BenaBadBeatPoker Would appreciate if you do :)

  • @user-ti6bj8gs5r
    @user-ti6bj8gs5r หลายเดือนก่อน

    3:29 terrible call here Ben to be honest, your calling to chop at best, you couldn't know he was a whopper In advance, what are his bluffs? Maybe Qh Ax which blocks nuts on flop and turn, but you expect these to follow through on river?? I think you are calling to chop at best but mostly just shown KKKK

  • @Doblou13
    @Doblou13 หลายเดือนก่อน

    firsttt

  • @omerperetz8426
    @omerperetz8426 หลายเดือนก่อน

    nit bisonte or rdzone

    • @omerperetz8426
      @omerperetz8426 หลายเดือนก่อน

      now I see the 55 hand and it says the sn lol

    • @BenaBadBeatPoker
      @BenaBadBeatPoker  หลายเดือนก่อน

      haha

  • @HoangTruong-vk7ek
    @HoangTruong-vk7ek หลายเดือนก่อน

    I think your overbet shoves are too heavily skewed towards bluff (at least from your videos) and you should balance it out with value as well. Like for example the AT hand in the end i would love to see you 2x pot jam it even tho we block the calling range. (We can balance w KJ QJ KQ i think)

    • @BenaBadBeatPoker
      @BenaBadBeatPoker  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      probably some sample size bias in there! also you gotta remember that when I just value shove river for 2x pot and get called by another good hand, it’s not interesting enough to post on TH-cam haha.

    • @johngriller4997
      @johngriller4997 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      He has shared less than 0.01% of his hands to the public and you somehow found a read that he’s unbalanced on that line. Please tell me you’re joking.

    • @HoangTruong-vk7ek
      @HoangTruong-vk7ek หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@johngriller4997 i said "at least from his videos" r you illiterate?

    • @johngriller4997
      @johngriller4997 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@HoangTruong-vk7ek instead of trying to justify ur nonsense with semantics, maybe just say you were being silly with your assumptions. Everything else you said after ur first sentence was already discussed in the video, genius.
      People refusing to admit simple mistakes is why they’re eternally stuck in mediocrity. #Foodforthought

    • @HoangTruong-vk7ek
      @HoangTruong-vk7ek หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@johngriller4997 no way bro put a foodforthought hashtag in the end like its 2012 twitter. Buddy who tf hurt you it was a constructive opinion which bena himself replied with grace. #staymad2024 or #1/2chatprosunite or whatever i guess 🥰😍😋

  • @btwurpked
    @btwurpked หลายเดือนก่อน

    This video is a bit stationy

    • @BenaBadBeatPoker
      @BenaBadBeatPoker  หลายเดือนก่อน

      hahaha sometimes you gotta put your money in the middle

  • @Weazel1991
    @Weazel1991 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Also can you stop with the fantastic production quality? You're gonna overtake me and I don't like it
    Lighting is on point

    • @BenaBadBeatPoker
      @BenaBadBeatPoker  หลายเดือนก่อน

      lmaooo we are a ways off that yet ❤️

  • @michaelb4090
    @michaelb4090 หลายเดือนก่อน

    O offense but why you playing on ignition that site more rigged the acr

    • @BenaBadBeatPoker
      @BenaBadBeatPoker  หลายเดือนก่อน

      I’ve stopped playing there! just had that hand left over to post as it was pretty interesting

  • @peznino1
    @peznino1 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Shockingly bad. I really think you need to sit under a tree for 72 hours and seriously consider quitting.

    • @BenaBadBeatPoker
      @BenaBadBeatPoker  หลายเดือนก่อน

      can I not quit from the comfort of my own home??