Love QE11 but that’s kinda what she did too… My grandmother would have jerked Harry bald. Before he went bald on his own. I do think this would have been a lot easier if it had been taken care of right out of the gate. At the first sign of Meghan’s crazy. Now it’s a mess. With the almost kids on top. IMO
I think if anyone takes the Titles away it will be our New PM who is anti Royal ,Roll on the day Knock the Smug look off the Racist coconut face she is Not Representing the UK so why is she on any lists shes a total user and has No mates or family only her Mother who is jail Bate ,Shes got the Trophy kids and Hazzabean is a joke any as bad as her
I totally agree with you....as much as I loved our Devoted Queen I do feel she dodged sorting this out before she passed away....maybe because she thought Harry was KC111 Son...he should deal with it....but as usual he's dragging his legs....I want the situation sorted before William becomes King....he shouldn't inherit the troubles of the manchild....I'd banish Haznoballs to Africa end of....
@@Irene-qe5huWilliam will deal with the Sharkles very swiftly when he becomes King but Charles doesn’t want to cos he’s his son and yes he still loves him but remember Mr Sharkle still has enough stuff for a 2nd book which Charles doesn’t want coming out
@@Irene-qe5huThe Queen was in her 90’s when Mrs Sharkle came on the scene, she probably didn’t have the heart after 70+ years of dealing with all the family and needed a lot of rest
Bravo! As a member of the Commonwealth too, we in Australia also have a right to know the lineage of royal children. The interest goes beyond idle curiosity. Thank you!
@@dawnbarlow-uv6wkWe pay our own taxes but the King is our head of state and when every Royal comes to visit our country picks up the tab, so your ignorance is showing, BTW, all our new coinage and money now has changed to our King just the same yours👍💯🙄🙄🪃🇦🇺? ?
I agree. They don't think like parents, act like parents, *_feel_* like parents. Very rarely are they seen with "their children." I think the "children" do not live with them.
And they don’t talk like parents. Some of their descriptions of their children is just off based on the age of the children, typical childhood development, etc.
Incredible deep read! That was so thrilling! Harry has become a troubled piece of family bringing such drama to the family. His grandmother the Queen kept her reign without much trouble , 👿 she dodged this drama! No wonder she and Prince Philip were so unhappy looking at the wedding. Trouble was brewing when mega disaster showed up.
I think the Queen had a lot of drama with Diana, the divorce, her interview and secret book, and Charles with Camilla. I also think she had a bit if drama with Fergie, and of course Andrew. She had her fair share of scandals. Harry didn’t invent it - but he sure has raised it a level! None of the others rose to the level of traitor to kin, king, and country.
If there’s anything to be thankful about where MM is involved is that she culled Harry from the RF. Even if he returns to the fold, he’ll never be a working royal, regent or king. His mental issues are worldwide knowledge now.
However, QE2 kept it in control for the sake of her subjects and the Commonwealth. She did have multiple loose cannons from KC or PC then to PD being hurt because he never gave up Camilla. But she did keep a very tight grip on all but Andrew towards the end of her life. Sadly randy Andy seems to have lost his sense of direction and right once he found SOHO house and the yacht. He was to dim to get they allegedly were filming him to blackmail their way into the family to hurt KC .
However, QE2 kept it in control for the sake of her subjects and the Commonwealth. She did have multiple loose cannons from KC or PC then to PD being hurt because he never gave up Camilla. But she did keep a very tight grip on all but Andrew towards the end of her life. Sadly randy Andy seems to have lost his sense of direction and right once he found SOHO house and the yacht. He was to dim to get they allegedly were filming him to blackmail their way into the family to hurt KC .
We as subjects under the crown and tax payers to them, have every right to know the birth details of those in the line of succession. How can the truth and evidence about the alleged two children be revealed if we don't question, talk about and investigate it. We have to do this because the Harkles have not given us as subjects, any hard available evidence and neither has the Palace. Keep doing what you do Shanta. You are always respectful and sensitive when doing your readings. I watch your excellent readings every day.
While I agree with most of what you said. If they are in the LOS it should be crystal clear. They are our monarchy. We do not pay taxes for them. The history of the Crown lands in England and Wales begins with the Norman Conquest in 1066. Historically, Crown Estate properties were administered by the reigning monarch to help fund the business of governing the country. However, in 1760, George III surrendered control over the Estate's revenues to the Treasury. The crown estate gives £312 million each year to the uk treasury. From this a sovereign grant of £86.4 million is paid to the royal family. The rest the monarch puts at the disposal of the government.
@@kyrieilluminatum5422 Sovereign grant: This money comes from HM Treasury and is funded by the taxpayer. The tax payer payed all security costs for Henry & Rachels wedding about 30 million. I think you missed the point I was trying to make.
@@velvethoot4507 nope. the sovereign grant come as from the profits of the crown estate. It gives the government £312 million and they get given an amount to manage the royal palaces and events through the sovereign grant. It’s a percentage agreed by the government and the palace. Perhaps the £30 million was taken out of the difference. Though I think it was a waste of money given the results it was not tax payers money per say
@@kyrieilluminatum5422 Do the monarchy use that for the upkeep of the royal residences and income for working royals? Does the money from the duchies of Lancaster and Cornwall go to the monarchy as personal income?
That shows how much blabbering Harry did trying to impress this woman and she blabbed just as much to him to to keep him talking….all part of the of the plan. I think Harry was a “mark from the very beginning.
Megs is not a mother......There are soooooooo many questions on these children. I also think those children are only pawns to hold over the RF, IF they truly exist. We know this pair have no morals!!! Very spot on cards! Great read, Thank you Shanta. 🇺🇸 ❤️. 🇨🇦
There are two children - a boy and a girl. Both born to surrogates. Both surrogates were able to block the idiots from adopting the children. They have custody of NO children. That being said -- the skank DID have a baby with her first husband back when she was about 19/20 YO. She got pregnant (REALLY pregnant - not lying for once) and he married her. His name is Joe, and he comes from a VERY wealthy family in Boston. They knew the skank was a gold-digger. They talked Joe into getting the marriage annulled. The skank threatened to get an abortion if he annulled. They paid her MEGA bucks to carry the baby to term. We all know how the skank worships money! After the baby was born (it was a girl) they paid her more MEGA bucks to hit the road and not look back which she gladly did. She has NEVER seen her daughter again and has had no contact with her. Based on the skank's real age the daughter would be between 26-28 YO today.
As a US citizen I don't know the rules, but the fact is that whether they paid the surrogate or just paid expenses they still USED a surrogate AND that surrogate was able to BLOCK their adoption. They have not seen the little boy since they left the UK. They do not have custody of any children. They have never even seen the girl. I cannot remember which YT channel I heard it on at the time, but someone was saying that they paid expenses AND bought the surrogate a house. That is not against the law, so it is very possible. Both the surrogate in the UK and the one in the US were able to block the gruesome twosome from adopting the babies. Think about that -- a PRINCE and the grandson of the Queen and his skank are such horrible people that they were denied adoption TWICE in TWO DIFFERENT countries. At the time of the failed adoption for the girl in the US it was reported that the skank was stalking and terrifying the surrogate and refusing to pay bills. SHE is the one who actually broke the contract by her behavior -- just like she is the one ruining her own reputation and her own life. She will NEVER get it.
@@kittycat4900 I think as you do about the real mothers of these children changed their minds about letting Harry and Meghan have their babies, and so refused to go through with the adoptions.
That as well as eye color all change during the first months of life. Both my babies had dark hair and grayish eyes at birth. Later they were brown eyed and blonde.
As per the great HG Tudor .. the people who are offended by eg your readings Shanta .. they lack the intelligence to understand. They lack insight and they only understand: dont agree then attack. So sad but be happy they leave! You are doing great you are a true woman of substance and do not allow trash to affect your work❤❤❤
Thank you Shanta❤ What incredible readings …. all these lives that M&H have ruined and interfered with, they’ve accumulated a lot of negative karma between them. It’s like watching a never ending horror story …
When "Archie" first made his public appearance remember Harry said, "babies change a lot over a 2 week period." When, in fact, Archie was suppose to be only 2-3 DAYS old.
I agree. That is why that cards keep saying look elsewhere. They are either borrowed ( at first) and now hired. Too many things add up to no children at all.
Plus, who leaves their children all of the time?? I don't care even if they were leaving them with family NO parents leaves their children for weeks or even months at a time. And when they go someplace that would be "kid friendly" and that the children would enjoy they show up childless. Tell me you aren't really a parent without telling me that you aren't really a parent.
the sad part is there are probably more than a million bi-racial little children in the UK and since by then Harry was down the line of succession ,it would not have made any difference to the populace how Archie looked or if he was a surrogate child.... people adore Kim and Kanyes and Hallie Berry's children , here in the US for their cuteness...lots of bi-cultural children too ......I just watched that British movie Belle today with Sam Reid and historical racial intermarriage and it was a great movie with a powerful message about Dido Belle ,a real person, who was an heiress of color and wealth
If they had openly adopted any race of baby in the UK I feel it would have been welcomed wholeheartedly by both the RF and the UK citizens. It's the underhanded and downright dishonest behaviour by these two that is the problem and always will be.
The only time baby Archie looked real was during the trip to South Africa. The newborn Archie never moved and it also looks like a doll in Canada until the birthday picture. After Canada when Archie would be too old to be a doll we saw photoshopped pictures and different looking children
I wonder how they got away with not letting the paramedics see the patient. In UK they don’t just “go away” once they’ve attended a call, there is a duty of care and at least one of the attending medics would have at least checked on the patient. And a report would have been produced. Where is that?
H often travels back to the UK. Yes, a lot of his visits involve his multiple lawsuits and showing up to court dates, but he's definitely involved in other things there. I think he's been trying to negotiate terms or even search for a boy. He lives such a complicated, messy life. You mean to tell me he couldn't even get an arranged marriage where a nice, respectable woman would give him legitimate children, go to events with him in exchange for a title and comfortable life? How awful was he privately that no one wanted to be near him?
That's what I've wondered for ages. He allegedly married for "love". I think his tastes in the bedroom may be beyond what some of his girlfriends regarded as "normal".
@@ginathomas7813I think that's what he tells himself, but the life he lives now is very unstable. I'm just wondering why he didn't marry someone with some agreement in place, have children and have a separate life where he could do what he wants in his own bedroom. At least he would be home and have the palace pr maintain his image. Now he has none of that, not even children.
@@myhadesmoonHarry and Andrew share a braincell. They feel entitled to use others and do it in plain daylight. "Someone will clean up for me. And anyway, plebs love me!" Remember Randy Andy dated Koo Stark? All that royal closeness with sa\/¡||€... There is some debauchery going on in the palace... And the weak of mind fall headfirst.
Another thing regarding birthdays. It's not a coincidence that both "children" share birthdays with two very famous, Oscar winning actors known for their humanitarian efforts. M's own alleged birthday is the same day as a former president that she has desperately tried to connect herself with. She even had the nerve to copy a project he did for his birthday and never followed through with it.
They DID pick the birthday for both children. Both were born to surrogates and still live with those surrogates. The actual birth date is different than what Loser and User claim. The skank's birthday is actually 8/4 but NOT 1981. Her real DOB is 8/4/77.
I believe Archie lives in the UK with his actual surrogate mother and Harry goes over there and visits him a few times a year. Further, I believe that they weren't successful at obtaining a Lili aka, Invisibet. Just my thoughts on the matter.
I think the real mother changed her mind about them taking the baby especially when she found out Harry and Meghan were leaving the UK to live abroad. Thus, the baby is with the real mother.
I wonder if she saw something that Meghan did on the South Africa trip and resolved that her son would never be left with Meghan. Harry cradled Archie very protectively and wouldn’t let Meghan carry him after n interview.
I was thinking.. maybe the birth mother decided to keep him... and ran away with him!! And they couldn't find her, so had to start over.. or adopt a boy?
About the domestic violence and abuse, many have said Meghan is violent and abusive towards Harry AND OTHERS when she gets angry, and she gets angry easily, and often.
Spot on. The mother worked at the palace and H got her pregnant. She spoke to the Queen and she bought her a house for her and her baby. I can’t remember who said it but I think it was a reader.
Wow! There are lots of clues in this reading but, as it says, we must think differently to make sense of them. So we'll have to do it! The references to aggression, abuse and crimes needs deeper exploration. I've often said that RF's concern about self-harm may be misplaced. A short-temper, combined with past reports about ill treatment of women, tells me that harm will be directed elsewhere.
Shanta I’ve just had a thought, Prince William used to fly air ambulance, I wonder, has he through his contacts found out something? A reading on that might be interesting.
I don't know enough about the intricacies of the LoS but I have wondered if, in her haste to grab those titles, she actually put herself in a weak position in the event of a divorce and custodial fight. By bestowing those children with the titles and last name of Sussex, their legal status is Prince and Princess of the United Kingdom. Does that impact who gets custody if they split? I am curious if anyone knows their history. Charles had custody of the boys, Andrew got custody of his girls and Anne's kids stayed with her in all of their divorces. Now, they all remained in the UK and are not dual citizens so perhaps not as straight forward. I do believe they have kids together and she just uses the "mystery" about their births to keep attention on herself. Otherwise she would have sued and he would be livid after the years of unfair gossip that he wasn't Charles' son. Of course he is. He looks like his grandfather.
The dna 🧬 is not the sole relevant part to have LoS inheritance rights they have to be BORN OF THE BODY OF A LEGAL SPOUSE. There is no unimpeachable way to prove that now. This is why there are a number of signatures on the other royal births. They are attesting to the veracity of the birth circumstances. There was no such verification to the 2 purported kids and even if they try to trot out some BS piece of paper now if it isn’t the royal physicians then it’s irrelevant.
The dna 🧬 is not the sole relevant part to have LoS inheritance rights they have to be BORN OF THE BODY OF A LEGAL SPOUSE. There is no unimpeachable way to prove that now. This is why there are a number of signatures on the other royal births. They are attesting to the veracity of the birth circumstances. There was no such verification to the 2 purported kids and even if they try to trot out some BS piece of paper now if it isn’t the royal physicians then it’s irrelevant.
@@mariavas1633i read all grandkids ( read that it said the Monarch owns the grandchildren , i think it said up to 7 yrs old but not sure) but Meg got them out of the country so not sure if Charles wil own them if they are not in the UK
Wouldn’t the royals have noticed Archie was a doll while she was in the UK,at the polo match.by then Catherine had 3 children wouldn’t she and others notice the baby never moved. I noticed no royals were ever around,interacting with Archie,you only saw the doll with meg
At that polo match, Catherine was there with their 3 children, and in one picture she, Catherine, is seen sitting on the ground with Louis in her lap and she is looking at the crazy woman "juggling" this "baby?" around, holding it in such an awkward manner as not to be believed, and Catherine's expression is very strange, like she cannot believe that TOW would actually bring a "newborn baby " out so soon after birth. Plus TOW was wearing a "tent-like garment " to make it seem she still had not lost baby weight; TO didn't seem at all pleased she was there with this _______(fill in the blank). I've also read it never made a sound, and she never fed it (how could she have?). That whole episode was very interesting.
We love what you do, Lady Shanta. And you have shown you are a mix of genuinely disinhibited and well mannered. No need to go around pleasing people. This is your channel, your soul home, and we are all hosts here - from freeloaders like me to the paying members. You always surprise us. Keep up the good work. Stay safe and protected!
I believe Archie exists, also. I have my theory but very interested in what the cards have to say. And it’s apparent your country is under the Sovereign’s watch. Such a proper and intellectual population.
I have a concerned, almost sickened feeling, when Archie is discussed. But not Lilli. With her there is a vacant feeling. I've given up trying to logically identify why.
We have all felt creepy thinking about both children, no wish to insult your talent but this doesn't require psychic ability. Ones intution tells one somethingis very odd indeed.
when Harry was introducing the Archie doll he stated how much the baby had changed in 2 weeks, whereas the baby was supposed to have just came home from hospital
There is always a reason people come and go out of our lives. Let them go. You are awesome! Haters gona hate and winners gona win… keep winning pretty lady!
EVERYTHING STARTS WITH AIR & GROUND EMS UNITS called to FROGMORE the NIGHT BEFORE Archie BIRTH. EMS was told the pregnant woman would be taken to hospital by car, if EMS allowed that, they would have been required to FU & verify victims safety. They had to have the victims ID. EMS had to have generated a EMS Frogmore Response Report, where is it? Who called, who was in danger, who was body found in canal after that night❓
I had heard about the helicopter landing in Winsor grounds. I haven't heard about a body. Those two are dispicable. Harry when showing " the doll" said its amazing how they change in a FORTNIGHT.!!!! DIMWIT.
Hi Shanta, just wanted to say that I find you, Paula & Northy the most respectful & sensitive readers that I follow. You’ve always respected the fact they are children & total innocents of anything that may be going on around them or to them. While I don’t believe they should be in the LoS (due to irregularities around their births) or have royal titles, I wish them health & happiness as individuals & protection as children.
I have NEVER heard you being disrespectful in your readings towards any subject that I've listened to. It's sad that when a person has a different opinion that they think you are not entitled to your own opinion.
There was a report/rumor that surfaced about a year ago of a young lady that was seriously harmed by a certain prince. The story disappeared but you should look into it, given the references to abuse, violence and crimes. She may be the one who knows too much.
One thing I have learnt in life is we cannot make everyone happy. Not even God can satisfy everyone - someone always feels left out or offended or victim. You are human, and like God/Source/Universe you cannot keep everyone happy,. don't even try. The one you must make happy is yourself. If YOU are tired of the duo, then that is another story. That is YOUR choice,
This is the story that came out when Archie was born. Meghan supposedly said that she was having a water birth at home. The night she was to give birth, something went wrong. An ambulance came to the cottage, and the surrogate was rushed to hospital. Word was that a helicopter was also hovering over the cottage. It was said that the baby didnt survive. The reason that they used a doll whe they presented the baby to the media, was because they still hadnt found a replacement or, the replacement surrogate still handnt given birth.
You just need a fancy, small, colourful tent to attach your pretty ‘Tarot Reader’ shingle to. It is lovely! My first thoughts on seeing it was seeing you swathed in silky floaty scarves asking people to cross your palm with silver. Thanks for interesting and chatty reads.
All of this has been going on for years What I dont understand with all the thousands of people talking about the Harkles why not one person has seen them at their home and not seen anyone coming and going or any children or followed MM in all the parking lots It just speculation The cards know more than anyone
It's very odd. Several people from the area have made posts about it on social media. They would occasionally see her in the neighborhood, ask for a playdate and nothing would come of it. The actress and comedian, Rebel Wilson talked about her own encounter. She and her mother were at an event and talked to M. Her mother asked where the children were and she was not polite about it. It's not even a personal question, but she got defensive. This isn't normal behavior of a mother with two young children.
Reported that TOW went to a nursery to buy plants, no children with her. Plants for what and why no children. They would have gardeners and the children would love an outing like that. Or any outing at all I guess.
@@dt3802Her flop royal tour of Nigeria took place during mother's day. She chose to make plans to stay far away from her very young "children" on a day when many mothers are with their children. It doesn't make sense.
@@dt3802 one of her outings at a market she bought a bunch of flowers. When her pap walk was recorded she threw the flowers into a nearby bin. Talk about fake 😂😂😂
I think it is possible that BOTH children have some kind of disability, or visible defect. As a narcissist adoptive mom, she would hide their children. She is ashamed of them, just as she is ashamed of Doria's side of the family.
I watched an old video put out by HG Tutor from 2 years ago called Harry's wife 90.17. In it he states it did come up in court. Alooking from friends the same age and her father's comment at one point and also brought out by Angela Leven. It came out that Meghan's mother left when she was 2 year old while her half-sister Samantha was 15 and Tom Jr 17. Samantha was born in Nov 1964 which meashould that she is 13 year older than Meghan an when the video he published said that it was Samantha 50th birthday that mean Meghan was 44 not 40 as she was telling everyone. Please check it out meaning that Meghan is now 46,, is that true? Can you please read on it?
Megan wanted the so called child birthdate to align with a royal event. Remember Archie’s birthdate is on a royal event. Remember always a conflict of how his birthdate will be celebrated. After his father’s coronation, harry had to rush back to celebrate his son’s birthday?
I wonder if Meg's eggs were used the first time and turned out not to be viable, and they had to start over quickly with donor eggs to approximate the original predicted date of birth
I just think the first child was deficient in some way that was not acceptable to the duo, in particular to Meghan, who would have wanted what she felt was perfection. Either that or a pregnancy that didn't reach full term.
I think this makes more sense than the surrogacy of Archie and fits the cards of three being involved and think differently. Surrogacy in the UK is very difficult and for a member of the RF to do? They would be queuing up to go to the press! Too many people involved in a surrogacy and after all this time there is still only rumour and supposition. Regardless of NDAs etc, there is plenty of money in this story and it would have come out by now.
Shanta did a reading on the kids just over a year ago no kids. If I remember Archie was H got a staff member pregnant they decided to say it was M, she miscarried and the got a surrogate that’s why long pregnancy. Delivered early and bad outcome. She was clear both kids don’t exist
People have wondered the same thing since the beginning and that seems possible. I think that they were "trying" long before she announced she was pregnant. I don't think her eggs were viable AND I don't believe that Haznoballs sperm was used. The child has NO DNA from either of them. I think he was actually born in late April and does not have the May birthday that his parents picked out (due to the importance of that date in the RF). Either way, the idiot prince and his skank do not have custody of either child. Both surrogates were able to block the adoptions. A BIG one but, in the end, just another one of their thousands of lies.
Oh wow those cards could keep this reading going for days ❤❤❤ Northy always said he was a different sign. Great reading as always lot's of love from your 6 0 clock wines 🍷 👏 👍 ❤ 💙 👌
I believe there is something medically wrong with Archie hence why they've had to get another Archie,I believe the surrogate mother of Lilli didn't turn the baby over, so no Lillibet,
@mweya3 Famous Fortunes also did a disturbing Halloween reading a couple of years ago that really upset him regarding one of the children and a connected death.
Who did ground/air EMS make contact with after 911 call that summoned them to Frogmore. Did they talk to person giving birth? Who called EMS? Who talked to "authorities/emergency personnel"? Eho said H & M would transport/ laboring wonan/pregnant woman to hospital by car?
I have always wondered why the surrogate has remained silent even if she had an NDA, I don’t believe the Artificial exists with them. I can believe if he exist he is in the UK with his biological mother. Fantastic reading ❤️
When you ask “Have we ever seen the real Archie?” I cannot help but wonder WHO or WHAT is the “real” Archie? The one supposedly birthed in England? The one who was with them South Africa - when the clearest film footage was shown? And this “Archie” seemed to be the same one in the nappy when the harridan read to him a picture book totally unsuitable for his age, and became exasperated with him.
Probably nothing. They have never met and have nothing to do with each other. After that polo match and the drama of the wedding, the Wales children knew to stay far, far away from them.
I just wish the king would clean this mess up and not leave it for William!
Love QE11 but that’s kinda what she did too… My grandmother would have jerked Harry bald. Before he went bald on his own. I do think this would have been a lot easier if it had been taken care of right out of the gate. At the first sign of Meghan’s crazy. Now it’s a mess. With the almost kids on top. IMO
I think if anyone takes the Titles away it will be our New PM who is anti Royal ,Roll on the day Knock the Smug look off the Racist coconut face she is Not Representing the UK so why is she on any lists shes a total user and has No mates or family only her Mother who is jail Bate ,Shes got the Trophy kids and Hazzabean is a joke any as bad as her
I totally agree with you....as much as I loved our Devoted Queen I do feel she dodged sorting this out before she passed away....maybe because she thought Harry was KC111 Son...he should deal with it....but as usual he's dragging his legs....I want the situation sorted before William becomes King....he shouldn't inherit the troubles of the manchild....I'd banish Haznoballs to Africa end of....
@@Irene-qe5huWilliam will deal with the Sharkles very swiftly when he becomes King but Charles doesn’t want to cos he’s his son and yes he still loves him but remember Mr Sharkle still has enough stuff for a 2nd book which Charles doesn’t want coming out
@@Irene-qe5huThe Queen was in her 90’s when Mrs Sharkle came on the scene, she probably didn’t have the heart after 70+ years of dealing with all the family and needed a lot of rest
Bravo! As a member of the Commonwealth too, we in Australia also have a right to know the lineage of royal children. The interest goes beyond idle curiosity. Thank you!
We are the ones in Britain that pays the taxes not australia
@@dawnbarlow-uv6wk
How rude!!!
@@dawnbarlow-uv6wk
That wasn't nice!
@@dawnbarlow-uv6wkWe pay our own taxes but the King is our head of state and when every Royal comes to visit our country picks up the tab, so your ignorance is showing, BTW, all our new coinage and money now has changed to our King just the same yours👍💯🙄🙄🪃🇦🇺? ?
Whatever has gone on I for one think it is obvious that they are NOT parents
I agree. They don't think like parents, act like parents, *_feel_* like parents. Very rarely are they seen with "their children." I think the "children" do not live with them.
It certainly doesn't seem to be a fact .. they are certainly not good parents.
And they don’t talk like parents. Some of their descriptions of their children is just off based on the age of the children, typical childhood development, etc.
@@margaretmckee7710 Agree. Meg always drops eye contact when asked about them. Almost like she had to remember.
Incredible deep read! That was so thrilling! Harry has become a troubled piece of family bringing such drama to the family. His grandmother the Queen kept her reign without much trouble , 👿 she dodged this drama! No wonder she and Prince Philip were so unhappy looking at the wedding. Trouble was brewing when mega disaster showed up.
@@treesoul00Honestly, I think everyone would have come out of that negatively, with the exception of the Queen and the young grandchildren.
I think the Queen had a lot of drama with Diana, the divorce, her interview and secret book, and Charles with Camilla. I also think she had a bit if drama with Fergie, and of course Andrew. She had her fair share of scandals. Harry didn’t invent it - but he sure has raised it a level! None of the others rose to the level of traitor to kin, king, and country.
If there’s anything to be thankful about where MM is involved is that she culled Harry from the RF. Even if he returns to the fold, he’ll never be a working royal, regent or king. His mental issues are worldwide knowledge now.
However, QE2 kept it in control for the sake of her subjects and the Commonwealth. She did have multiple loose cannons from KC or PC then to PD being hurt because he never gave up Camilla. But she did keep a very tight grip on all but Andrew towards the end of her life. Sadly randy Andy seems to have lost his sense of direction and right once he found SOHO house and the yacht. He was to dim to get they allegedly were filming him to blackmail their way into the family to hurt KC .
However, QE2 kept it in control for the sake of her subjects and the Commonwealth. She did have multiple loose cannons from KC or PC then to PD being hurt because he never gave up Camilla. But she did keep a very tight grip on all but Andrew towards the end of her life. Sadly randy Andy seems to have lost his sense of direction and right once he found SOHO house and the yacht. He was to dim to get they allegedly were filming him to blackmail their way into the family to hurt KC .
The question should be “ Are there any children with Harry’s DNA?”
yes totally agree with you 💯 percent 💞
If they dont like something just do what you feel ypu need to read. Ignore them. I enjoy your reads thank you. 😊
Moonbumps is all I say.
I do too
We as subjects under the crown and tax payers to them, have every right to know the birth details of those in the line of succession. How can the truth and evidence about the alleged two children be revealed if we don't question, talk about and investigate it. We have to do this because the Harkles have not given us as subjects, any hard available evidence and neither has the Palace. Keep doing what you do Shanta. You are always respectful and sensitive when doing your readings. I watch your excellent readings every day.
While I agree with most of what you said. If they are in the LOS it should be crystal clear. They are our monarchy. We do not pay taxes for them.
The history of the Crown lands in England and Wales begins with the Norman Conquest in 1066. Historically, Crown Estate properties were administered by the reigning monarch to help fund the business of governing the country. However, in 1760, George III surrendered control over the Estate's revenues to the Treasury.
The crown estate gives £312 million each year to the uk treasury. From this a sovereign grant of £86.4 million is paid to the royal family. The rest the monarch puts at the disposal of the government.
@@kyrieilluminatum5422 This is why it sickens me, when people say we pay for them. They pay for them selves.
@@kyrieilluminatum5422 Sovereign grant: This money comes from HM Treasury and is funded by the taxpayer. The tax payer payed all security costs for Henry & Rachels wedding about 30 million. I think you missed the point I was trying to make.
@@velvethoot4507 nope. the sovereign grant come as from the profits of the crown estate. It gives the government £312 million and they get given an amount to manage the royal palaces and events through the sovereign grant. It’s a percentage agreed by the government and the palace. Perhaps the £30 million was taken out of the difference. Though I think it was a waste of money given the results it was not tax payers money per say
@@kyrieilluminatum5422 Do the monarchy use that for the upkeep of the royal residences and income for working royals? Does the money from the duchies of Lancaster and Cornwall go to the monarchy as personal income?
Royal family accidentally found out when her baby bump dropped to her knees in the public eye.
Just remember, there's always someone who feels "offended".
It's become ridiculous IMO.
I'm offended by your lack of consideration for my offendedness. 🤣
@@hellemarc4767lol, world's gone crazy hasn't it?😂
@@hellemarc4767😂
As Piers Morgan has said " the world has gone nuts" 😂🇬🇧
Archie was Georges security name that shows how low those two are
Yes, and apparently Megain’s first dog ( many years back) she named Archie! So weird.
That shows how much blabbering Harry did trying to impress this woman and she blabbed just as much to him to to keep him talking….all part of the of the plan. I think Harry was a “mark from the very beginning.
WOW That woman is real low
@@annieearle962True!
She is so evil 😈
Megs is not a mother......There are soooooooo many questions on these children. I also think those children are only pawns to hold over the RF, IF they truly exist. We know this pair have no morals!!! Very spot on cards! Great read, Thank you Shanta. 🇺🇸 ❤️. 🇨🇦
There are two children - a boy and a girl. Both born to surrogates. Both surrogates were able to block the idiots from adopting the children. They have custody of NO children.
That being said -- the skank DID have a baby with her first husband back when she was about 19/20 YO. She got pregnant (REALLY pregnant - not lying for once) and he married her. His name is Joe, and he comes from a VERY wealthy family in Boston. They knew the skank was a gold-digger. They talked Joe into getting the marriage annulled. The skank threatened to get an abortion if he annulled. They paid her MEGA bucks to carry the baby to term. We all know how the skank worships money! After the baby was born (it was a girl) they paid her more MEGA bucks to hit the road and not look back which she gladly did. She has NEVER seen her daughter again and has had no contact with her. Based on the skank's real age the daughter would be between 26-28 YO today.
Thank God if she is not a mother, those poor kids if she was
@@JanGrimeAGREED, big time‼️👍🇦🇺🦘🪃
It is illegal to pay for a surrogate in the UK. Only allowed to pay expenses.
Rumor at the time was they bought a house for them as payment allegedly.
Illegal and MM don’t compute.
As a US citizen I don't know the rules, but the fact is that whether they paid the surrogate or just paid expenses they still USED a surrogate AND that surrogate was able to BLOCK their adoption. They have not seen the little boy since they left the UK. They do not have custody of any children. They have never even seen the girl.
I cannot remember which YT channel I heard it on at the time, but someone was saying that they paid expenses AND bought the surrogate a house. That is not against the law, so it is very possible. Both the surrogate in the UK and the one in the US were able to block the gruesome twosome from adopting the babies.
Think about that -- a PRINCE and the grandson of the Queen and his skank are such horrible people that they were denied adoption TWICE in TWO DIFFERENT countries. At the time of the failed adoption for the girl in the US it was reported that the skank was stalking and terrifying the surrogate and refusing to pay bills. SHE is the one who actually broke the contract by her behavior -- just like she is the one ruining her own reputation and her own life. She will NEVER get it.
@@kittycat4900 I think as you do about the real mothers of these children changed their minds about letting Harry and Meghan have their babies, and so refused to go through with the adoptions.
Europeans go to Ukraine for surrogate moms. It is an industry there. You can google it.
Hair texture and color is something that MM would be looking for at the birth.
That as well as eye color all change during the first months of life. Both my babies had dark hair and grayish eyes at birth. Later they were brown eyed and blonde.
If it wasn’t her egg?? It would not matter!! It well may be h’s child
As per the great HG Tudor .. the people who are offended by eg your readings Shanta .. they lack the intelligence to understand. They lack insight and they only understand: dont agree then attack. So sad but be happy they leave! You are doing great you are a true woman of substance and do not allow trash to affect your work❤❤❤
Thank you Shanta❤
What incredible readings …. all these lives that M&H have ruined and interfered with, they’ve accumulated a lot of negative karma between them. It’s like watching a never ending horror story …
When "Archie" first made his public appearance remember Harry said, "babies change a lot over a 2 week period." When, in fact, Archie was suppose to be only 2-3 DAYS old.
@@drcesb when they had the plastic doll.
@@antoniabaker7770 silicone babies are so cute...they are so flexible and look like natural babies...🥰
YeGh I remember that and thst was a doll
@@SmilingGorge-hj2vzyes I have one of those my granddaughter got scared of it
I don't believe there are any children, that's why there are no recent photos!!!
The consensus in the tarot community seems to be that Archie is real but lili is an actress
I agree. That is why that cards keep saying look elsewhere. They are either borrowed ( at first) and now hired. Too many things add up to no children at all.
Plus, who leaves their children all of the time?? I don't care even if they were leaving them with family NO parents leaves their children for weeks or even months at a time. And when they go someplace that would be "kid friendly" and that the children would enjoy they show up childless. Tell me you aren't really a parent without telling me that you aren't really a parent.
What a tangled web we weave....right? The layers of the grotesque seem neverending.
the sad part is there are probably more than a million bi-racial little children in the UK and since by then Harry was down the line of succession ,it would not have made any difference to the populace how Archie looked or if he was a surrogate child.... people adore Kim and Kanyes and Hallie Berry's children , here in the US for their cuteness...lots of bi-cultural children too ......I just watched that British movie Belle today with Sam Reid and historical racial intermarriage and it was a great movie with a powerful message about Dido Belle ,a real person, who was an heiress of color and wealth
If they had openly adopted any race of baby in the UK I feel it would have been welcomed wholeheartedly by both the RF and the UK citizens.
It's the underhanded and downright dishonest behaviour by these two that is the problem and always will be.
@@evelynharper6346 the baby would be welcomed and loved, however, could not be in the line of succession - that’s Meg’s meal ticket and leverage.
.
I don’t believe Archie was born May 6, I think he was born around April 22 or 23rd.
@@whatadollslifeKim and Keynes children? Lol
The only time baby Archie looked real was during the trip to South Africa. The newborn Archie never moved and it also looks like a doll in Canada until the birthday picture. After Canada when Archie would be too old to be a doll we saw photoshopped pictures and different looking children
We saw the same SA baby in the duck/rabbit video. Squint eye. Both Harry and Meghan had squint small eyes in baby pics.
@@antheamaybin3298 they have no children
Great reads, love the longer investigations…..H&M have spun a tangled web
I wonder how they got away with not letting the paramedics see the patient. In UK they don’t just “go away” once they’ve attended a call, there is a duty of care and at least one of the attending medics would have at least checked on the patient. And a report would have been produced. Where is that?
Unless they’re in on it too $$$$$$$
H often travels back to the UK. Yes, a lot of his visits involve his multiple lawsuits and showing up to court dates, but he's definitely involved in other things there. I think he's been trying to negotiate terms or even search for a boy.
He lives such a complicated, messy life. You mean to tell me he couldn't even get an arranged marriage where a nice, respectable woman would give him legitimate children, go to events with him in exchange for a title and comfortable life? How awful was he privately that no one wanted to be near him?
That's what I've wondered for ages. He allegedly married for "love". I think his tastes in the bedroom may be beyond what some of his girlfriends regarded as "normal".
@@ginathomas7813 I suspect Megsy was up to do many things.
@@user-wi6cz4hh5bI agree.
@@ginathomas7813I think that's what he tells himself, but the life he lives now is very unstable. I'm just wondering why he didn't marry someone with some agreement in place, have children and have a separate life where he could do what he wants in his own bedroom. At least he would be home and have the palace pr maintain his image. Now he has none of that, not even children.
@@myhadesmoonHarry and Andrew share a braincell.
They feel entitled to use others and do it in plain daylight. "Someone will clean up for me. And anyway, plebs love me!"
Remember Randy Andy dated Koo Stark?
All that royal closeness with sa\/¡||€...
There is some debauchery going on in the palace... And the weak of mind fall headfirst.
Another thing regarding birthdays. It's not a coincidence that both "children" share birthdays with two very famous, Oscar winning actors known for their humanitarian efforts. M's own alleged birthday is the same day as a former president that she has desperately tried to connect herself with. She even had the nerve to copy a project he did for his birthday and never followed through with it.
They DID pick the birthday for both children. Both were born to surrogates and still live with those surrogates. The actual birth date is different than what Loser and User claim. The skank's birthday is actually 8/4 but NOT 1981. Her real DOB is 8/4/77.
I believe Archie lives in the UK with his actual surrogate mother and Harry goes over there and visits him a few times a year.
Further, I believe that they weren't successful at obtaining a Lili aka, Invisibet. Just my thoughts on the matter.
@@mishlee6641 Agree 👍 Why Haz is in UK for BD So many lies
I think the real mother changed her mind about them taking the baby especially when she found out Harry and Meghan were leaving the UK to live abroad. Thus, the baby is with the real mother.
I bloody hope so poor children would need therapy for the rest of lives
I wonder if she saw something that Meghan did on the South Africa trip and resolved that her son would never be left with Meghan.
Harry cradled Archie very protectively and wouldn’t let Meghan carry him after n interview.
I was thinking.. maybe the birth mother decided to keep him... and ran away with him!! And they couldn't find her, so had to start over.. or adopt a boy?
About the domestic violence and abuse, many have said Meghan is violent and abusive towards Harry AND OTHERS when she gets angry, and she gets angry easily, and often.
Archie lives with his real mum in england and lilibet doesn't exist 😮 my opinion
So Archie has always stay in UK with birth mom, so who are the kids that H&M has been showing, lol
Rent a kids or friends kids.
I hope so for their safety
Or dolls 🤔
Spot on. The mother worked at the palace and H got her pregnant. She spoke to the Queen and she bought her a house for her and her baby. I can’t remember who said it but I think it was a reader.
I wonder if and when we’ll learn the truth…. My goodness, what a tangled web.
After they are divorced EVERYTHING is going to come out it's a huge avalanche waiting to happen.
Wow! There are lots of clues in this reading but, as it says, we must think differently to make sense of them. So we'll have to do it! The references to aggression, abuse and crimes needs deeper exploration. I've often said that RF's concern about self-harm may be misplaced. A short-temper, combined with past reports about ill treatment of women, tells me that harm will be directed elsewhere.
Shanta I’ve just had a thought, Prince William used to fly air ambulance, I wonder, has he through his contacts found out something? A reading on that might be interesting.
There are so many privacy rules surrounding people's medical records. That being said though, someone got to the princess of Wales's records......
Interesting. A helicopter was reported to have been seen at the scene shortly before Archie’s birth. Could it have flown in the surrogate?
I’ve heard Harry was livid when she demanded titles. This one act ruined their whole deception because of the LOS drawing attention to their DNA.
I don't know enough about the intricacies of the LoS but I have wondered if, in her haste to grab those titles, she actually put herself in a weak position in the event of a divorce and custodial fight. By bestowing those children with the titles and last name of Sussex, their legal status is Prince and Princess of the United Kingdom. Does that impact who gets custody if they split? I am curious if anyone knows their history. Charles had custody of the boys, Andrew got custody of his girls and Anne's kids stayed with her in all of their divorces. Now, they all remained in the UK and are not dual citizens so perhaps not as straight forward. I do believe they have kids together and she just uses the "mystery" about their births to keep attention on herself. Otherwise she would have sued and he would be livid after the years of unfair gossip that he wasn't Charles' son. Of course he is. He looks like his grandfather.
The dna 🧬 is not the sole relevant part to have LoS inheritance rights they have to be BORN OF THE BODY OF A LEGAL SPOUSE. There is no unimpeachable way to prove that now. This is why there are a number of signatures on the other royal births. They are attesting to the veracity of the birth circumstances. There was no such verification to the 2 purported kids and even if they try to trot out some BS piece of paper now if it isn’t the royal physicians then it’s irrelevant.
The dna 🧬 is not the sole relevant part to have LoS inheritance rights they have to be BORN OF THE BODY OF A LEGAL SPOUSE. There is no unimpeachable way to prove that now. This is why there are a number of signatures on the other royal births. They are attesting to the veracity of the birth circumstances. There was no such verification to the 2 purported kids and even if they try to trot out some BS piece of paper now if it isn’t the royal physicians then it’s irrelevant.
Doesnt the king have custody as did the Queen E II
@@mariavas1633i read all grandkids ( read that it said the Monarch owns the grandchildren , i think it said up to 7 yrs old but not sure) but Meg got them out of the country so not sure if Charles wil own them if they are not in the UK
Wouldn’t the royals have noticed Archie was a doll while she was in the UK,at the polo match.by then Catherine had 3 children wouldn’t she and others notice the baby never moved. I noticed no royals were ever around,interacting with Archie,you only saw the doll with meg
At that polo match, Catherine was there with their 3 children, and in one picture she, Catherine, is seen sitting on the ground with Louis in her lap and she is looking at the crazy woman "juggling" this "baby?" around, holding it in such an awkward manner as not to be believed, and Catherine's expression is very strange, like she cannot believe that TOW would actually bring a "newborn baby " out so soon after birth. Plus TOW was wearing a "tent-like garment " to make it seem she still had not lost baby weight; TO didn't seem at all pleased she was there with this _______(fill in the blank). I've also read it never made a sound, and she never fed it (how could she have?). That whole episode was very interesting.
We love what you do, Lady Shanta. And you have shown you are a mix of genuinely disinhibited and well mannered. No need to go around pleasing people. This is your channel, your soul home, and we are all hosts here - from freeloaders like me to the paying members.
You always surprise us. Keep up the good work. Stay safe and protected!
I believe Archie exists, also. I have my theory but very interested in what the cards have to say. And it’s apparent your country is under the Sovereign’s watch. Such a proper and intellectual population.
in the cards ,no love ,no pining for a baby , no tenderness,no feeling of completion
This is an incredible read, these cards are on fire today, wow!
You never disappoint! Another stellar reading.
I'm a psychic 30 years. Grew up in toronto psychic feelings age 10. I've always felt creepy when thinking of Archie
I have a concerned, almost sickened feeling, when Archie is discussed. But not Lilli. With her there is a vacant feeling. I've given up trying to logically identify why.
No kids.
We have all felt creepy thinking about both children, no wish to insult your talent but this doesn't require psychic ability. Ones intution tells one somethingis very odd indeed.
What do your psychic senses tell you? Is there an Archie? Does he live in the UK? Is he disabled?
when Harry was introducing the Archie doll he stated how much the baby had changed in 2 weeks, whereas the baby was supposed to have just came home from hospital
Fantastic reads today! Thank you 🙏
There is always a reason people come and go out of our lives. Let them go. You are awesome! Haters gona hate and winners gona win… keep winning pretty lady!
EVERYTHING STARTS WITH AIR & GROUND EMS UNITS called to FROGMORE the NIGHT BEFORE Archie BIRTH. EMS was told the pregnant woman would be taken to hospital by car, if EMS allowed that, they would have been required to FU & verify victims safety. They had to have the victims ID. EMS had to have generated a EMS Frogmore Response Report, where is it? Who called, who was in danger, who was body found in canal after that night❓
Wow, what.
Where would I look online to find that story?
Wut? A body was found? Female?
I had heard about the helicopter landing in Winsor grounds. I haven't heard about a body.
Those two are dispicable.
Harry when showing " the doll" said its amazing how they change in a FORTNIGHT.!!!! DIMWIT.
It was a lake I think.
Do not start evil rumors, you can not prove. Only one child born, not by mrs henry.
It's so sad that there are children involved in the scheme of things.
How sad for two little souls. Thank you Shanta.❤️🇦🇺🇨🇦
Maybe the real mom ran away with Archie from those two
this kept popping into my mind too
Someone needs to find out where her niece is now and how she is living
Love today's topics! Thank you, Shanta ❤
Wow 💥 what a reading ! Thankyou so much..I believe there is a british Archie..hope one day we will all find out the truth 🙏🙏 kath xxxxxx
I think earlier you told us the 1st died and they had to get a 2nd baby and thus the 10 month pg
Hi Shanta, just wanted to say that I find you, Paula & Northy the most respectful & sensitive readers that I follow. You’ve always respected the fact they are children & total innocents of anything that may be going on around them or to them.
While I don’t believe they should be in the LoS (due to irregularities around their births) or have royal titles, I wish them health & happiness as individuals & protection as children.
Btw, I can’t get enough of your fortune telling and gossip card readings.
Follow your heart. We love you❤
I once read that there was a lot of commotion at frogmore, ambulances etc. Hmq popped over to check all ok. Didnt like what she saw going on.
I have NEVER heard you being disrespectful in your readings towards any subject that I've listened to.
It's sad that when a person has a different opinion that they think you are not entitled to your own opinion.
Both of them have a life full of lies and deceit!!!
If they don't have the original Archie, does the replacement have Harry's DNA?
There was a report/rumor that surfaced about a year ago of a young lady that was seriously harmed by a certain prince. The story disappeared but you should look into it, given the references to abuse, violence and crimes. She may be the one who knows too much.
I seem to recall that anyone doing a tarot reading 0n Archie gets a disturbing even tragic result 😐
One thing I have learnt in life is we cannot make everyone happy. Not even God can satisfy everyone - someone always feels left out or offended or victim. You are human, and like God/Source/Universe you cannot keep everyone happy,. don't even try. The one you must make happy is yourself.
If YOU are tired of the duo, then that is another story. That is YOUR choice,
I'm wondering if the surrogate may have tried to blackmail H & MM, then got scared and took off with the child.
It would be fitting. These two have been playing mind games and scams with everyone they meet.
These are incredible cards ❤
"Damn Right!" said the clock... 😄😄🇨🇦🇨🇦
Have you ever googled Lauren Foster ? She has a story of being offered the position of marrying a Prince just before Meghan cam on the scene.
Ty I’m going to look into it
That story is fastinating.
Is that a daughter of David Foster who H calls dad ?
These are incredible cards. Trishes, other tarot cards are brilliant, too😊 Awesome reading as always 😊
This is the story that came out when Archie was born. Meghan supposedly said that she was having a water birth at home. The night she was to give birth, something went wrong. An ambulance came to the cottage, and the surrogate was rushed to hospital. Word was that a helicopter was also hovering over the cottage. It was said that the baby didnt survive. The reason that they used a doll whe they presented the baby to the media, was because they still hadnt found a replacement or, the replacement surrogate still handnt given birth.
The whole story is “word salad” and nothing sounds incredible. Hard to remember lies…hence the story changes constantly. Truth is easy to remember.
You just need a fancy, small, colourful tent to attach your pretty ‘Tarot Reader’ shingle to. It is lovely! My first thoughts on seeing it was seeing you swathed in silky floaty scarves asking people to cross your palm with silver. Thanks for interesting and chatty reads.
3 yr olds love birthday lemon cake apparently...and milkshakes when its convenient and suits her narrative
Oh wow! I am having great difficulty posting comments on this. Strange. Seems to happen when anything is posted regarding their children.
If these things get exposed as fact, I don't know where Meghan Rachel will hide her shame for her supposed pregnancies.
All of this has been going on for years What I dont understand with all the thousands of people talking about the Harkles why not one person has seen them at their home and not seen anyone coming and going or any children or followed MM in all the parking lots It just speculation The cards know more than anyone
It's very odd. Several people from the area have made posts about it on social media. They would occasionally see her in the neighborhood, ask for a playdate and nothing would come of it. The actress and comedian, Rebel Wilson talked about her own encounter. She and her mother were at an event and talked to M. Her mother asked where the children were and she was not polite about it. It's not even a personal question, but she got defensive. This isn't normal behavior of a mother with two young children.
Reported that TOW went to a nursery to buy plants, no children with her. Plants for what and why no children. They would have gardeners and the children would love an outing like that. Or any outing at all I guess.
@@dt3802Her flop royal tour of Nigeria took place during mother's day. She chose to make plans to stay far away from her very young "children" on a day when many mothers are with their children. It doesn't make sense.
@@dt3802 one of her outings at a market she bought a bunch of flowers. When her pap walk was recorded she threw the flowers into a nearby bin. Talk about fake 😂😂😂
"no one has ever seen them," Princess Catherine.
I wonder if Archie has a disability and they've tried to "cure" him and it's gone wrong or they just hide him
I think it is possible that BOTH children have some kind of disability, or visible defect. As a narcissist adoptive mom, she would hide their children. She is ashamed of them, just as she is ashamed of Doria's side of the family.
Wow that’s dark ….poor little guy.
I watched an old video put out by HG Tutor from 2 years ago called Harry's wife 90.17. In it he states it did come up in court. Alooking from friends the same age and her father's comment at one point and also brought out by Angela Leven. It came out that Meghan's mother left when she was 2 year old while her half-sister Samantha was 15 and Tom Jr 17. Samantha was born in Nov 1964 which meashould that she is 13 year older than Meghan an when the video he published said that it was Samantha 50th birthday that mean Meghan was 44 not 40 as she was telling everyone. Please check it out meaning that Meghan is now 46,, is that true? Can you please read on it?
I am a geneolgist. Her birth is clearly as stated on the birth records ... sorry she is 42. You cannot change the records. Not even megan can do it.
Megrat was born in 1977 making her 46 now...😮 kath 🏴🇬🇧
Megaliars old school records, date of birth. 4th August 1977.
Megan wanted the so called child birthdate to align with a royal event. Remember Archie’s birthdate is on a royal event. Remember always a conflict of how his birthdate will be celebrated. After his father’s coronation, harry had to rush back to celebrate his son’s birthday?
Mega-itch was probably concerned that Archie was 86% Nigerian 😂
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂❤❤❤❤❤
I wonder if Meg's eggs were used the first time and turned out not to be viable, and they had to start over quickly with donor eggs to approximate the original predicted date of birth
I just think the first child was deficient in some way that was not acceptable to the duo, in particular to Meghan, who would have wanted what she felt was perfection. Either that or a pregnancy that didn't reach full term.
Hahahahah she was PG 11mo. After a hysterectomy.hahaha
I think this makes more sense than the surrogacy of Archie and fits the cards of three being involved and think differently. Surrogacy in the UK is very difficult and for a member of the RF to do? They would be queuing up to go to the press! Too many people involved in a surrogacy and after all this time there is still only rumour and supposition. Regardless of NDAs etc, there is plenty of money in this story and it would have come out by now.
Shanta did a reading on the kids just over a year ago no kids. If I remember Archie was H got a staff member pregnant they decided to say it was M, she miscarried and the got a surrogate that’s why long pregnancy. Delivered early and bad outcome. She was clear both kids don’t exist
People have wondered the same thing since the beginning and that seems possible. I think that they were "trying" long before she announced she was pregnant. I don't think her eggs were viable AND I don't believe that Haznoballs sperm was used. The child has NO DNA from either of them. I think he was actually born in late April and does not have the May birthday that his parents picked out (due to the importance of that date in the RF).
Either way, the idiot prince and his skank do not have custody of either child. Both surrogates were able to block the adoptions. A BIG one but, in the end, just another one of their thousands of lies.
I wish that one of Harry's four books would explain all of this once and for all. Well, I can wish... 😄😄 What a movie it would make.
I love your black lace gloves!
Oh wow those cards could keep this reading going for days ❤❤❤ Northy always said he was a different sign. Great reading as always lot's of love from your 6 0 clock wines 🍷 👏 👍 ❤ 💙 👌
Tarot by Andie , I believe, said it was the Lili that died. She did use her friends so Gavin Gingras as A.
I believe there is something medically wrong with Archie hence why they've had to get another Archie,I believe the surrogate mother of Lilli didn't turn the baby over, so no Lillibet,
You tapped into the same energies that Skye (StrangerThanFiction) keeps coming up with every time she reads on this.
@mweya3 Famous Fortunes also did a disturbing Halloween reading a couple of years ago that really upset him regarding one of the children and a connected death.
@@wendyhendersong vaguely remember that. might go back and rewatch 🙂
In the UK although rare, a surrogate can legally keep the baby or withhold consent to allow adoption.
Fabulous Reading as Usual.Thank you❤👍🙏
Who did ground/air EMS make contact with after 911 call that summoned them to Frogmore. Did they talk to person giving birth? Who called EMS? Who talked to "authorities/emergency personnel"? Eho said H & M would transport/ laboring wonan/pregnant woman to hospital by car?
999 not 911
That whole story stinks!
This is so good, I just ordered a deck of these cards. Learned about you on Jason's video. You're really good.
I think they had 2 surrogates. I think the original surrogate refused to give them the child. This is why there was confusion of the birthday.
I have always wondered why the surrogate has remained silent even if she had an NDA, I don’t believe the Artificial exists with them. I can believe if he exist he is in the UK with his biological mother.
Fantastic reading ❤️
Meghan would have seen a natural surrogate mother as a stalker .....instead of a helper/partner
Psychopathic and sterile.
How about doing this sort of reading for Lilli? Love your readings 🥰🇬🇧💐💐😃 thank you
Timing - remember how Harry slipped up and stated that they change so much in a couple of weeks - but 'Archie' was recently born and under two weeks.
Archie is a ridiculous name remember MM was an Archie Comic fan per her father
When you ask “Have we ever seen the real Archie?” I cannot help but wonder WHO or WHAT is the “real” Archie? The one supposedly birthed in England? The one who was with them South Africa - when the clearest film footage was shown? And this “Archie” seemed to be the same one in the nappy when the harridan read to him a picture book totally unsuitable for his age, and became exasperated with him.
The Archie's actully birthday was apparently two before. He was born Louis birthday. All thede lies/ manipulation around the birthday is terrible.
In my mind somewhere William demanded DNA for Archie hence the RF haven't seen him. Is hazbeen and harkle frightened the RF will get it and use it 🤔
I wonder what the royal kids are told about Archie and Lilly. Do George,Charlotte,and Louis know about Archie and Lilly.
Probably nothing. They have never met and have nothing to do with each other. After that polo match and the drama of the wedding, the Wales children knew to stay far, far away from them.
I wouldn't be surprised if there is domestic violence involved in this toxic duo's relationship. I wouldn't put it past her..
Great read Shanta.
I always thought it odd how king Charles all of a sudden decided to start up an alternative pregnancy center right after archie
Amazing how she could have found a doctor, I bet if they had tried they could have found one in the UK. That woman makes me feel sick!
Well I still don't think there are any children and not change my mind until there is concrete evidence. But and interesting read.
With Harry's reputation there is probably a few kids floating around the UK