Things that make you go hmmmm…. I swear I’ve NEVER seen any trial in my 55 years of life where the wild Wild West was THE LAW!! Norfolk County - judges NO ACCOUNTABILITY. Massachusetts is a beautiful state but sadly, a lot of backwards ass shady shit!! Anyone want to relocate or visit based on this??
It is juror misconduct if the family of a juror was feeding information to a juror at any time during the trial. That is why the jury is given instructions before every break and when they go home at night to not watch the news or talk to anyone about the trial. They are also asked when they come in the morning and after every break if they followed those instructions. This interview just left me angry at this jury. They didn't have the information correct(Lucky for example), they tried to create a scenario that neither the CW or defense gave them and the ones that didn't agree with the verdict form were too afraid to speak up. Someone's freedom is at stake and those that had issues with the foreman should have gone over his head to talk to the judge.
Well, they've allowed all kinds of inappropriate things in Karen's trial...why not this. I m not being sarcastic to u just sarcastic in a frustrated sense at this whole fiasco
Every day, this just keeps getting worse and worse. That “foreman” NEEDS to be questioned immediately, imo. Really seems very sus to me! I’m am outraged!🤬
I have TRIED to empathize with this jury. Yeah, that's OVER 🥴 WTAF?!? Does anyone think for themselves anymore? Ignorance at its finest! Any one of us could be Karen Read. #FKR #EndCorruption #ThisJurySucks
Yeah, it recently struck me that if the ARCA info went to both the prosecution and defense, as it did, then the state, like, really CHOSE to use Trooper Paul. I know this is obvious but I just can’t understand, aside from the fact that ARCA completely dismantled their case. This means that, along with a million other reasons, this shouldn’t have been tried once, let alone twice. I do feel for Trooper Paul though; he was way out of his depth. The rest of the LE were dishonest and corrupt, but TP just didn’t seem to get it.
@@Milwaukee-Talkie there is at least one other case where the lawyer had previously stated to media that his client was imprisoned on the false testimony and fallacy science of Tr Paul That client is in prison because of Paul Karen would be in prison because of Paul I’ve lost any sympathy for him He’s dangerous
so.. according to the "engineer" JOK couldn't fall by himself and bump his head without any vehicle present ? ... he did see a car reversing at him, he started running away, lost his shoe ( but while running he did hold on to his drinking glass and cellphone ) and then in the middle of the lawn bumped his head and scratched his arm. 🤔
If the jury did not believe that she hit him with her car - that he startled by her reversing and fell backwards, how did they explain the debris? They must have still believed that it was planted.
Honestly, little to none of what this juror has to say, makes any sense...this is a perfect storm of corruption and absolute stupidity. The amount of things that this juror didn't understand, didn't remember correctly, or just accepted as fact from the foreman is absolutely mind-blowing. It's clear that these people had no clue what the hell was going on and it's terrifying that juries are made up of people with such limited capacity. How this person is even able to be an EMT, I will never understand.
The defense assumed the jury could put the pieces together. Obviously they need them put together for them. Next time the defense should use “crayons”.
@sara_387 The decision is made on the evidence introduced, jurors are expected to use all the experience, common sense, and common knowledge they possess. But they are not to rely on any private source of information.
@LiLHarOak Correct they can disregard testimony, but not to then make up a theory. That would render a not guilty. The decision is made on the evidence introduced, jurors are expected to use all the experience, common sense, and common knowledge they possess. But they are not to rely on any private source of information.
This person didn't seem to be all that bothered by any of it...they clearly weren't willing to stand up for what was correct or speak out on their own. Even now they are saying they were hoping the foreman might say something to the judge....like, what?! How in Gods name could they even begin to imagine that the foreman would come forward (out of the goodness of their own heart) after the way everything played out in deliberation? I honestly think these people really just didn't care bc the outcome wouldn't affect them...the apparent limited IQ just made things worse.
The juror saying the least credible witnesses were the plow driver and trooper Paul just goes to show there are some people who will never accept that sometimes police (and sometimes their family) do lie about serious things and they’ll typically always take their word for it.
8:15 "Let's look solely at the evidence." (Proceeds to invent a theory of how John tripped out of fear that was never adduced as evidence). Serious doubts about that engineer. Then he pronounces as an expert that because the ARCCA guys didn't give them their data, they are not credible. Sounds like he thought they should have provided their raw data, which only an engineer could likely make sense of anyway. Very sus.
Let's not forget it was the prosecution that defended the McAlbert's by making the case all about them, the defence had no choice but to point out their lies. Which they did well leaving no room but an opinion of reasonable doubt especially with all the tainted evidence the prosecution presented. The jury were obviously brain dead from weeks and weeks of listening to Lally. What a shame the majority of the jury have no critical thinking skills and the foreman should bow his head in shame, I bet he was the one who filed to suppress the jury names for longer
8:50 THEY ARE NOT ALLOWED TO MAKE UP FACTS!!! They are to decide if the CW proved that the def is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt! 🤦🏻♀️🤦🏻♀️🤦🏻♀️🤦🏻♀️FFS!!!
There is SOOOO MUCH wrong with this interview! It frankly scares tf out of me for a re-trial. Imo there were jurors who lied to get on the jury. 2 of them didn't even want to deliberate!? They just went back there and made up their own facts about the case, didn't listen to hardly any of the testimony and criticized the defense for DEFENDING THEIR CLIENT! I can't believe this interview. Also, some of them obviously spoke to people about the case and imo this is why the cw doesn't want their names out there and don't want people to speak to them. Because now we know there was juror misconduct and I would bet money the foreman was connected to the cw or judge. Something is so off about this whole thing. The foreman told them it was ALL charges or none?! Like they couldn't talk to the judge themselves. I just can't believe my ears.
Jury was wrong on Lucky. He reported that he hit the basketball hoop. He didn't report that a car was sitting infront of 34 fairview at like 3 in the morning cause be was trying to be nice to the Alberts.
Calling out Lucky for allegedly changing his story is pretty sad coming from CW. Lally claiming Lucky started his shift at 10:30 as opposed to 2. Sure Lally they start plowing before it snows. Only Higgins does that.
24:14 Yanetti should have KNOWN to ask BEV before she bolted. I feel like the defense just wanted the mistrial instead of a conviction. I think it was a strategy because the jury was hung and they didn’t want jurors being pressured into changing to guilty!
It was a very very long trial. Lally dragging on and on with lots of long breaks between days of testimony. I’m not surprised the jurors memories are not fresh. Add in the fact that Mass does not allow read backs and the judge does not answer the juror’s questions truthfully and this is the hot mess you get!
@@McQuizzical a family member What family member and the family of who is flipping interesting I’m not a 100% convinced yet, it was a jurors family member (Edit) unless of course it was the foreman’s family member??????????????
@@louisejeffries7155 Given all we've seen and heard so far I'm not suprised just very disappointed. Its shocking whats gone on and is still going on, isnt it?
I'm the same. From AZ and came to the trial a little late. Didn't even know until many days after the verdict that TB, Turtleboy, and Aiden were the same person and even then just thought he was a reporter/blogger. But I watched every moment of the trial and it's as obvious as the sun in the sky that Karen Read had nothing to do with OJO's death. This jury and the DA's office is beyond suss.
The forgotten Ford edge that the Alberts don't remember I have five family members with five cars I remember all of our cars. They didn't mention the Ford edge for a reason they got rid of the car
This is an EMT who thinks it’s clear cut that the cause of death was a blow to the back of the head It isn’t the cause of death the left temporal blow with shearing and haemorrhage is what took John down The lac on the back of the head (been saying since way back) is ‘tomato splat lac’ from falling backwards onto something hard and I suggest uneven - concrete stair for instance While this kind of fall can cause fractures it doesn’t cause the shearing, haemorrhage and ultimate exsanguatiin (bleed out & cold) John suffered and is what caused the death (keep in mind Whip lash will cause shearing and kill you to) There has to be concern about the training these people are getting Then there is an engineer who simply doesn’t understand spatial perception What are these people being taught? Oh and Jen a better search would’ve been ‘how long before you get cold when left out in the snow with a torn brain and bleeding to death’ It’s Sickening
This is so annoying. First - if an LE person is on this jury-they would have suspected immediately the other proceedings were the Feds, or Internal affairs, DOJ - etc. But apparently, for some odd reason, he failed to mention or acknowledge that possibility. That's really suspicious to me. Second, whether you weren't clear on what in the world happened, the FACT you had dirty cops collecting evidence in solo cups, storing in stop/shop bags, inverted videos, leaf blowers, the owner ( a cop!) never coming outside, JM never running inside, Proctor? (O Proctor with his unethical texts, that alone would have been my deciding factor) ..how, in the h e l l could you convict a woman after an investigation as shoddy and irresponsible for a BPO! As a juror, that would have been my NG vote from the get-go..shame on the police and the CW would be my thoughts. If LE didn't care enough to investigate with dignity, integrity, of a fallen brother in blue , there's no way I'm convicting this woman I'm not even doubting or double doubting what might have happened, the LEO didn't do a proper investigation, and the CW wants us to clean it up for them with a G vote? Serious? ...as far as where the ARCCA Phds came from? Who gives a rats arse...? The science and facts were all there... something is terribly wrong with this jury. Sorry, but there is. P.s., maybe the damn noise they heard outside? Was the day that inmate escaped the county jail. That created a lot of commotion. There were other things going on for 9 weeks on the streets that were noisy. We heard the sirens, we heard the noise not related to legal peaceful support/protesting for a woman framed. If they werent sure? The NON investigation should have "spoken to them" 🙃😏🙄🙄🙄
These are my thoughts too. The shoddy (at best) "investigation" created unredeemable reasonable doubt. Even if you've only watched cheesy courtroom dramas you'd know more than these jurors displayed. This case is insane and corrupt on dozens of levels.
@desertcat4193 Cat, I'm just tired of hearing them at this point! 😒. Rant rant, scant scant! 🤣. I mean, you have to laff, right? ( good to see you BTW, 🤗💕 Even tho I'm bitching!
They should look into the judges past cases because anyone could see she has a bias and not looking for the truth should not be a judge i heard she was climbing the ladder but she has blown that
@@derekferguson3516 no she hasn’t unless the Fed’s do step in According to Sean they call this getting pennies or coins there She’s absolutely buying her assured success with the DA’s office and all his corrupted cronies
I said from the first note from the foreman that he was shady at best; a plant at worst. This juror has no idea how sheeplike, unintelligent, and dishonest he came across. "Derail us." ? What does that even mean? Even if it was an insurance company who hired ARCCA, the jury still should have respected their credentials and experience and compared and contrasted that with Trooper Paul--which was the ONLY evidence presented. A jury is not supposed to speculate or guess about anything outside of the facts in evidence.
It’s so awful even the jury played into this corruption.
The foreman derailed the jury. Looked at as an authority figure, but messed it all up, or derailed it as was supposed to? Bev picked him!
Things that make you go hmmmm…. I swear I’ve NEVER seen any trial in my 55 years of life where the wild Wild West was THE LAW!! Norfolk County - judges NO ACCOUNTABILITY. Massachusetts is a beautiful state but sadly, a lot of backwards ass shady shit!! Anyone want to relocate or visit based on this??
It is juror misconduct if the family of a juror was feeding information to a juror at any time during the trial. That is why the jury is given instructions before every break and when they go home at night to not watch the news or talk to anyone about the trial. They are also asked when they come in the morning and after every break if they followed those instructions. This interview just left me angry at this jury. They didn't have the information correct(Lucky for example), they tried to create a scenario that neither the CW or defense gave them and the ones that didn't agree with the verdict form were too afraid to speak up. Someone's freedom is at stake and those that had issues with the foreman should have gone over his head to talk to the judge.
Well, they've allowed all kinds of inappropriate things in Karen's trial...why not this. I m not being sarcastic to u just sarcastic in a frustrated sense at this whole fiasco
Every day, this just keeps getting worse and worse. That “foreman” NEEDS to be questioned immediately, imo. Really seems very sus to me! I’m am outraged!🤬
The engineer thinks he knows everything.
So true, software engineer? Disney imagineer?
@@empireofpeaches welder
Obviously has had arch eye and completely lost his spatial perception
Or perhaps a plant to keep the foreman company ????
I have TRIED to empathize with this jury. Yeah, that's OVER 🥴 WTAF?!?
Does anyone think for themselves anymore? Ignorance at its finest!
Any one of us could be Karen Read.
#FKR #EndCorruption #ThisJurySucks
So by logic, if the ARCA guys were unconvincing ….that would mean that Trooper Paul was CONVINCING ?! 😂 ok……
😱😱. That jury…whoa.
@@Theofficialgolfer scary
Yeah, it recently struck me that if the ARCA info went to both the prosecution and defense, as it did, then the state, like, really CHOSE to use Trooper Paul. I know this is obvious but I just can’t understand, aside from the fact that ARCA completely dismantled their case. This means that, along with a million other reasons, this shouldn’t have been tried once, let alone twice. I do feel for Trooper Paul though; he was way out of his depth. The rest of the LE were dishonest and corrupt, but TP just didn’t seem to get it.
@@Milwaukee-Talkie there is at least one other case where the lawyer had previously stated to media that his client was imprisoned on the false testimony and fallacy science of Tr Paul
That client is in prison because of Paul
Karen would be in prison because of Paul
I’ve lost any sympathy for him
He’s dangerous
With Lucky he did report the accident with the basketball hoop , didn't they take notes 🙄
It's not the jury's job to come up with an alternate theory. That was eye-opening for me
Omg, these jurors are unbelievable! Maybe it's a good thing Karen is getting a new trial!
This jury was at such a disadvantage because of the judge! What a shame! Such corruption!
so.. according to the "engineer" JOK couldn't fall by himself and bump his head
without any vehicle present ?
... he did see a car reversing at him, he started running away, lost his shoe
( but while running he did hold on to his drinking glass and cellphone )
and then in the middle of the lawn bumped his head and scratched his arm. 🤔
If the jury did not believe that she hit him with her car - that he startled by her reversing and fell backwards, how did they explain the debris? They must have still believed that it was planted.
@@sara_387 Exactly, that theory just puts into question all the other prosecutions evidence. Makes no sense!
Honestly, little to none of what this juror has to say, makes any sense...this is a perfect storm of corruption and absolute stupidity. The amount of things that this juror didn't understand, didn't remember correctly, or just accepted as fact from the foreman is absolutely mind-blowing. It's clear that these people had no clue what the hell was going on and it's terrifying that juries are made up of people with such limited capacity. How this person is even able to be an EMT, I will never understand.
Lucky did report the accident with the BB hoop he never reported the Ford Edge outside of 34 Fairview.👍
Correct
The defense assumed the jury could put the pieces together. Obviously they need them put together for them. Next time the defense should use “crayons”.
I think the family members comment is to cover a court insider influences.
To my knowledge, the jury isn’t supposed to come up with their own theories, like he tipped backwards and hit his head.
You are correct I did a follow up video on Jury Misconduct on my channel. ❤
I believe they can reject both the defense and prosecution theories and have their own.
I’ll have to check out your video
@sara_387 The decision is
made on the evidence introduced, jurors are expected to use all the
experience, common sense, and common
knowledge they possess. But they are not to
rely on any private source of information.
@LiLHarOak Correct they can disregard testimony, but not to then make up a theory. That would render a not guilty. The decision is
made on the evidence introduced, jurors are expected to use all the
experience, common sense, and common
knowledge they possess. But they are not to
rely on any private source of information.
How pissed are the jurors with the floorperson & Engineer now!!?? Would love to know.
This person didn't seem to be all that bothered by any of it...they clearly weren't willing to stand up for what was correct or speak out on their own. Even now they are saying they were hoping the foreman might say something to the judge....like, what?! How in Gods name could they even begin to imagine that the foreman would come forward (out of the goodness of their own heart) after the way everything played out in deliberation? I honestly think these people really just didn't care bc the outcome wouldn't affect them...the apparent limited IQ just made things worse.
4:21 in violation of the daily admonishment by BEV!
This was like comedy horror hour. You see the killer coming but he’s Michael Morrissey.
The juror saying the least credible witnesses were the plow driver and trooper Paul just goes to show there are some people who will never accept that sometimes police (and sometimes their family) do lie about serious things and they’ll typically always take their word for it.
Apparently Josh Levy requested that Judge Bev not allow the jury to know about the FBI investigation.
8:15 "Let's look solely at the evidence." (Proceeds to invent a theory of how John tripped out of fear that was never adduced as evidence).
Serious doubts about that engineer. Then he pronounces as an expert that because the ARCCA guys didn't give them their data, they are not credible. Sounds like he thought they should have provided their raw data, which only an engineer could likely make sense of anyway. Very sus.
Lucky certainly did report the hoop and not the car parked .
Well done jury for being embiciles
Thanks @AussieInsider we had a great discussion, and comments from chat were awesome. ❤
Yeah, the foreman Bev picked..hmmmm.
Merci 💕
Wow!
Down with Judge Bev "Eats-Too-Many-Cannoli".
Let's not forget it was the prosecution that defended the McAlbert's by making the case all about them, the defence had no choice but to point out their lies. Which they did well leaving no room but an opinion of reasonable doubt especially with all the tainted evidence the prosecution presented. The jury were obviously brain dead from weeks and weeks of listening to Lally. What a shame the majority of the jury have no critical thinking skills and the foreman should bow his head in shame, I bet he was the one who filed to suppress the jury names for longer
@@Flowergirl2012 He is
TB has that info and said so
He wouldn’t say so unless 100% certain
8:50 THEY ARE NOT ALLOWED TO MAKE UP FACTS!!! They are to decide if the CW proved that the def is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt! 🤦🏻♀️🤦🏻♀️🤦🏻♀️🤦🏻♀️FFS!!!
If Karen had run him down at that time why did no one see his body and where was the blood on the pavement there was not a lot of snow at that time
There is SOOOO MUCH wrong with this interview! It frankly scares tf out of me for a re-trial. Imo there were jurors who lied to get on the jury. 2 of them didn't even want to deliberate!? They just went back there and made up their own facts about the case, didn't listen to hardly any of the testimony and criticized the defense for DEFENDING THEIR CLIENT! I can't believe this interview. Also, some of them obviously spoke to people about the case and imo this is why the cw doesn't want their names out there and don't want people to speak to them. Because now we know there was juror misconduct and I would bet money the foreman was connected to the cw or judge. Something is so off about this whole thing. The foreman told them it was ALL charges or none?! Like they couldn't talk to the judge themselves. I just can't believe my ears.
Jury was wrong on Lucky. He reported that he hit the basketball hoop. He didn't report that a car was sitting infront of 34 fairview at like 3 in the morning cause be was trying to be nice to the Alberts.
It’s sounds like the jury was not doing everything they needed to do? They talked to outside influencers? What??
Calling out Lucky for allegedly changing his story is pretty sad coming from CW. Lally claiming Lucky started his shift at 10:30 as opposed to 2. Sure Lally they start plowing before it snows. Only Higgins does that.
Engineer was “engineered”
4:09 JUROR MISCONDUCT!!! Bev warned them EVERYDAY about speaking to anyone else about the case!
Not sure why I am showing as LOVETHELED🤷🏻♀️. This is PrinceLover 😂
24:14 Yanetti should have KNOWN to ask BEV before she bolted. I feel like the defense just wanted the mistrial instead of a conviction. I think it was a strategy because the jury was hung and they didn’t want jurors being pressured into changing to guilty!
I’m sorry I find this jury ignorant. Unbelievable.
It was a very very long trial. Lally dragging on and on with lots of long breaks between days of testimony. I’m not surprised the jurors memories are not fresh. Add in the fact that Mass does not allow read backs and the judge does not answer the juror’s questions truthfully and this is the hot mess you get!
@@Trish.Norman as I said. Ignorant. The info they had or lack of was reasonable doubt.
Thats crazy, I didnt even know who turtle boy was untill after the trial and verdict, so how did they know who he was?
@@McQuizzical a family member
What family member and the family of who is flipping interesting
I’m not a 100% convinced yet, it was a jurors family member
(Edit) unless of course it was the foreman’s family member??????????????
@@louisejeffries7155 Family member.. 'close source to'.. Its looking ever more likely the curruption in this case had reached into the jury room.
@@McQuizzical isn’t it though
I didn’t want to think so but it really is being to look that way
It’s scary
@@louisejeffries7155 Given all we've seen and heard so far I'm not suprised just very disappointed. Its shocking whats gone on and is still going on, isnt it?
I'm the same. From AZ and came to the trial a little late. Didn't even know until many days after the verdict that TB, Turtleboy, and Aiden were the same person and even then just thought he was a reporter/blogger. But I watched every moment of the trial and it's as obvious as the sun in the sky that Karen Read had nothing to do with OJO's death. This jury and the DA's office is beyond suss.
I'm not sure the defence had a chance to object. The judge declared a mistrial, got up and walked out the door.
They need mike Tyson as an expert to show Jon was hit.
How did he verify this was a juror?
He saw them all in court. Had this one switch his camera on to see his face
Lucky was that he didn't report ford Edge, but apparently you don't approach The Alberts .
@@JuleAllbright-pq1mq heck no
Don’t get on the wrong side of that gang
Those dudes are likely to kill you
He was put in the Ford Edge .it would take 2 if not 3 big men to lift him. Where was Higgins at 5.00 am. 2 27 hos long to die in cold.
The forgotten Ford edge that the Alberts don't remember I have five family members with five cars I remember all of our cars. They didn't mention the Ford edge for a reason they got rid of the car
This is an EMT who thinks it’s clear cut that the cause of death was a blow to the back of the head
It isn’t the cause of death the left temporal blow with shearing and haemorrhage is what took John down The lac on the back of the head (been saying since way back) is ‘tomato splat lac’ from falling backwards onto something hard and I suggest uneven - concrete stair for instance
While this kind of fall can cause fractures it doesn’t cause the shearing, haemorrhage and ultimate exsanguatiin (bleed out & cold) John suffered and is what caused the death (keep in mind Whip lash will cause shearing and kill you to)
There has to be concern about the training these people are getting
Then there is an engineer who simply doesn’t understand spatial perception
What are these people being taught?
Oh and Jen a better search would’ve been ‘how long before you get cold when left out in the snow with a torn brain and bleeding to death’
It’s Sickening
Bunch of idiots...intelligence is apparently hard to come by.
Do dah
This is so annoying. First - if an LE person is on this jury-they would have suspected immediately the other proceedings were the Feds, or Internal affairs, DOJ - etc. But apparently, for some odd reason, he failed to mention or acknowledge that possibility. That's really suspicious to me. Second, whether you weren't clear on what in the world happened, the FACT you had dirty cops collecting evidence in solo cups, storing in stop/shop bags, inverted videos, leaf blowers, the owner ( a cop!) never coming outside, JM never running inside, Proctor? (O Proctor with his unethical texts, that alone would have been my deciding factor) ..how, in the h e l l could you convict a woman after an investigation as shoddy and irresponsible for a BPO! As a juror, that would have been my NG vote from the get-go..shame on the police and the CW would be my thoughts. If LE didn't care enough to investigate with dignity, integrity, of a fallen brother in blue , there's no way I'm convicting this woman I'm not even doubting or double doubting what might have happened, the LEO didn't do a proper investigation, and the CW wants us to clean it up for them with a G vote? Serious? ...as far as where the ARCCA Phds came from? Who gives a rats arse...? The science and facts were all there... something is terribly wrong with this jury. Sorry, but there is.
P.s., maybe the damn noise they heard outside? Was the day that inmate escaped the county jail. That created a lot of commotion. There were other things going on for 9 weeks on the streets that were noisy. We heard the sirens, we heard the noise not related to legal peaceful support/protesting for a woman framed. If they werent sure? The NON investigation should have "spoken to them" 🙃😏🙄🙄🙄
These are my thoughts too. The shoddy (at best) "investigation" created unredeemable reasonable doubt. Even if you've only watched cheesy courtroom dramas you'd know more than these jurors displayed. This case is insane and corrupt on dozens of levels.
@desertcat4193
Cat, I'm just tired of hearing them at this point! 😒. Rant rant, scant scant! 🤣. I mean, you have to laff, right? ( good to see you BTW, 🤗💕 Even tho I'm bitching!
They should look into the judges past cases because anyone could see she has a bias and not looking for the truth should not be a judge i heard she was climbing the ladder but she has blown that
@@derekferguson3516 no she hasn’t unless the Fed’s do step in
According to Sean they call this getting pennies or coins there
She’s absolutely buying her assured success with the DA’s office and all his corrupted cronies
I said from the first note from the foreman that he was shady at best; a plant at worst.
This juror has no idea how sheeplike, unintelligent, and dishonest he came across. "Derail us." ? What does that even mean? Even if it was an insurance company who hired ARCCA, the jury still should have respected their credentials and experience and compared and contrasted that with Trooper Paul--which was the ONLY evidence presented. A jury is not supposed to speculate or guess about anything outside of the facts in evidence.
This jury was at such a disadvantage because of the judge! What a shame! Such corruption!