The Craziest British Officer chose this SWORD?
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 3 ต.ค. 2024
- I specifically collect unusual British officer's swords, but this is absolutely one of the craziest I have ever got my hands on.
▼3 extra EXCLUSIVE videos each month on PATREON, which make this channel possible:
/ scholagladiatoria
▼Facebook & Twitter updates, info, memes and fun:
/ historicalfencing
/ scholagladiato1
▼Schola Gladiatoria HEMA - sword fighting classes in the UK:
www.swordfight...
▼Matt Easton's website & Pinterest:
www.matt-easto...
www.pinterest....
▼Easton Antique Arms - antique swords for sale:
www.antique-sw...
#britisharmy #antiques #military
"Craziest British officer" instantly means Mad Jack Churchill.
Hey, Adrian Carton de Wiart was also absolutely mad.
Second world war and he used a claymore and long bow.
I knew before even clicking on the video. That's one of my *favorite* stories to tell people about WWII
In a german Arms magazine, i am german and Brittas boyfriend, an italian officer of wwll was noted, who was a low rank nobility and in wwll an anachronism. He was a brave an unusual man, but His loyality was Not for Mussolini, but for official head of state, the italian king. About this man, forgotten His Name, is rarely written.
@@brittakriep2938Amadeo Guillet by any chance?
It's not ugly, it's beautiful and I love it.
For a sec I thought you acquired Churchill’s actual sword
Mad Jack Churchill i pressume?
Same here
I think he got everyone with that title and the picture.
I think he was trolling us a little. Jack Churchill was only born in 1906, and I'm not aware of any branch of the military admitting babies... so it's possible that the owner of this sword was still the maddest British officer at the time the sword was made!
Same
Ah, "Dedicated thruster," my old college nickname.
Don't forget "Massive fingerings". I had to giggle a little when he said that. My inner 12-year-old would not be denied. 😀
Must've been a big hit on the fencing team
Despite being heterosexual and not named ben, mine was "Bengay" because of the tagline - _"8 hours of penetrating heat"_
:X
Touché,
You guys had duels in college?
I was expecting mad Jack's basket hilt sword too
same
And me.
ME TOOOO!
I want to hear more about these "Sword Scandals".
Same here. I think anyone who thinks the pipeback sword is just scandalous! 😂
I mean if they think it's a good sword...😂
Matt has made a video about these before: th-cam.com/video/oVTKWeixSBY/w-d-xo.html
Thanks@@jellekastelein7316
Well there were swords which often went into scabbards meant for other swords. Then the original scabbards raised a hue-and-cry. Sometimes it led to duels between the erring sword and the sword which should've legally gone into the other scabbard. "How dare you enter my scabbard and befoul the chastity of my scabbard? "
It's so specific....its fun to think of how much that officer probably loved showing people his sword.
We all have different aesthetic tastes. I quite like the look of that sword, and nothing Matt said in his presentation suggested what was "mad" about it.
In fact, all of the very good context Matt gave made it seem all the more reasonable to commission a sword like this in the early 1900's.
If in the 1880s they debated this topic through 'letters to the editor' in newspapers, then we should carry on the tradition through TH-cam comments...
Skilled officer commissioned a tool from a skilled bladesmith, to me it seams if you want a tool to do your work you get one designed by you to do your work
If the officer knows more about swords than the swordsmith, maybe the officer should find a better swordsmith.
When I saw the title, I immediately thought of Mad Jack Churchill.
Same here! 😅
To be precise, the Colt automatic pistol was already on the market at that time. However, it was not yet as sophisticated or commercially successful as the 1911 model would become.
Since watching your videos I have learned a lot of new things about edged weapons from different eras. Thanks! And keep it up Matt!
Perhaps I have bad taste, but I think it looks quite nice. It has the air of something from a sci-fi or fantasy novel, without being over the top. I quite like it.
Indeed: it just needs a little refinement. It's basically just a sidesword with knuckle protection, brought up to date through DIY.
There were some at Sanhurst, Hanover, and such who took swords, horses and such, very seriously until the start of WW2. Some one needs to dig in their archives.
Lol in Mongolia during WW2 many Mongolians still took the horse and bow very seriously
As someone who was in the military, I would like to say that it's not so much the tool or weapon system, but how you employ it. It depends highly on the type of battlefield environment, combat changes radically a lot between open country and urban warfare.
Specially in urban warfare and with today's international rules of war, the possibilities for any type of weapons are endless. In the case of fighting an insurgency is even more.
@@tatumergo3931image the potential usefulness of a modern compound deer hunting bow with a nasty broadhead, or crossbow for a stealth situation.
@@johnrhodes3350 . I don't have to imagine it, it is a thing in some leap units. Although mostly used as a survival tool, but sometimes employed in particular operations that require it.
Today modern suppressors have about completely covered that requirement and afford the advantage of range and volume of fire.
On the other hand during the Panama Jungle Warfare and Survival Course, compound bows and crossbows were employed as a means of obtaining food, without making your presence in the area to be noticed. Plus there was an infinite amount of material from which to make ammunition from.
Which reminds me of another thing. In a survival or bug out situation, a blackpowder firearm ends up being more convenient if you know the formula for making the propellant.
Cut vs thrust was solved by Polish Hussars by having two swords:
1 - the hussar saber ("szabla husarska"): mostly for cutting, curved, on the heavy side as sabers usually go, usually equipped with a "paluch" e.g.: a thumb ring (not sure if there are any other sabers with this element!)
2 - the "koncerz" (kind of an epee): predominantly for thrusting (depending on type, frequently ONLY for thrusting), straight and long, frequently with angled handle
Both were the weapons of "last resort" used in melee and pursuit when the primary weapons (the lances and pistols) were exhausted.
He definately chose the most suitable manufacturer. Well known in sword making Thurkles.
That really is the most non regulation sword I've seen you show...very cool, I assume you are keeping it? 😂
Another great video by count Dracula. His experience of swords gained over the centuries is remarkable.
I love how Matt structured this video. It's like he is writing an essay and building a convincing argument for his ultimate point. Also, swords are just so cool.
Wow. Just --- wow. Thank you, Matt. Such incredible blades. Enjoy your acquisitions.
"What a great sword to be thrusted with! My honor, ugh..."
You say ''ugly'' matt but I like it!
That man had the exact same taste as myself with a stiff blade that has ricasso & a minimal practical hilt as anything more then a knuckle bow is usually over the top..
Even that mid rib is exactly the same as I would desire.
This officer is very much my mood kindred!
I've *just* finished reading the entirety of your piece titled "British Infantry Officers' Swords of the 1890s and the 1895 Infantry Sword Exercise." It was a good enough read that I went, oh, I remember that name!
Hopped on over to your channel and here's 25 more minutes on this specific topic that you had just helped me to learn about. Lucky day. Great stuff, cheers!
My father's (second world war, artillery) officer's sword, which hung rusting in the toolshed through most of my childhood, was something like a small sword; which is to say, wire-wrapped hilt with knucklebow; rounded pommel (I think ribbed, but wouldn't swear to that). I don't recall a finger ring or a cross guard, but the shell guard was quite small, basically two identical wings. But what I do clearly recall is that the blade was extremely narrow, three edged, and essentially a pure thrusting blade. All the hilt furniture appeared to be brass.
This MAY not have been standard issue - my father was always fairly eccentric - and was, I'm sure, primarily a dress sword. But as a data point, at least one other pure thrusting sword existed in the twentieth century British army.
Customized weapons will never cease to fascinate. Thanks for sharing!
That's such a cool weird sword and I think I'm in love.
Honestly I agree that is a masterpiece
Great vid as usual Matt.
A very interesting sword, the maker had their work cut out grinding those hollows...... beautiful work.
The dude that ordered it knew his stuff, he's looked at infantry v infantry, bayonets and swords, some cavalry and lances......and he's chosen an almost perfect weapon in my opinion.
I'm willing to bet that the Japanese despatches had officers single fighting with swords against the Russian officers, whilst the men were engaged en masse. So he's picked a long duelling sword with enough mass to parry a bayonet and get through thick winter clothing.
What a great find.
That sword is so weird that I kinda love it.
Brilliant review of a brilliant design. Never anything wrong with improved power and reach.
And the Craziest Matt Easton look in the preview...
⚔
He's absolutely mental! Lol
I love that sword
Big props to the Neil Burridge bronze special there. I trust we all wish him well in his healing journey with cancer.
First thought: This is going to be about Mad Jack Churchill. Second thought: This is going to be about a sword optimised for cutting. Third thought: O' totally misleading title, this is an awesome sword and not mad at all!
Great presentation. Grateful to hear the word "unique" used in its correct meaning at about the 23 minute mark. That word is often diluted in its use, even by Brits. 🙂
That thing is awesome! Totally something I would have done. This guy rocks.
It's nice to see that some folks continue to favor longer blades even in the early 20th century. A 39in blade would have been rather short for a rapier in the first quarter of the 17th century. That was when Girard Thibault complained about how folks wore rapiers so long that the pommel came to the armpit of the wielder if the point was placed on the ground.
It is gorgeously singular. Thanks for showing us all the details.
I would've at least kept more of the regulation guard either doubling the knuckle guard for strength, or keep the entire original but add the quillon block.
Ugly? That ain't ugly.
Weird as hell, but not ugly.
Also worth pointing out that there was LOTS of hand-to-hand combat in WWI, but it was done with clubs, daggers and shovels. If you try to look up things like maces, spiked clubs and flails, they are very likely to be from WW1 and not the middle ages. The reason why swords weren't popular in the trenches was because snipers figured out that people carrying swords were officers and specifically aimed for them to throw enemy units into disarray. (which was also a tactic on pirate ships and even Lord Nelson got done in that way) If it weren't for the policy of gladiuscide, trench swords probably would have come in very useful.
Matt, if you're bored, you could press the blade into some plasticine and that'd really show the cross section. Maybe do it in 2 halves so when you put them together it would show up really well.
I'm in love with the ugly duck.
Now THAT is a sword worth "replicating".
Thanks for sharing Matt
thats a monster of a sword (in the best way possible, I love that guard, the protection kind of like a saber, but with the ability to finger the quillon like a rapier. It also looks amazing)
I totally approve of this sword! I actually tried to put together swords with a thrusting blade, a ricasso, a pommel, and a sabre guard over the years, for fencing. I just would keep the blade to 36" to make it faster to draw.
What a cool sword! I'd have wanted one much like that myself if I were a 1900s British officer.
Best ever sword?
Anduril, flame of the west.
Next question.
That is strictly for the younger crowd. Ringil, the sword of Fingolfin, is for the old guard.
Stormbringer Elric's sword is far superior.
@@crow4936 I dunno, Anduril never killed anyone its wielder didn't want it too (including the wielder).
Anglachel / Gurthang
Tragedy in perpetuity
You take Stormbringer, I'll take Mournblade. Deal?
I find it so funny, how the Arrangements in the back make it look like the Zweihänder with the red handle has the head of a hatchet for a pommel.
I think its very cool, beautiful even. The hand protection is such a great design.
Hope you keep this one!
That’s impressive. I picture a tall guy who really wanted to get amongst the enemy.
Wow, it's a 20th century tuck or estoc! Just what you'd want if somebody charged you on horseback -- apply fencing tactics, sidestep the attack and strike at the horse's heart en passant. With a blade that sturdy it just might work against a jeep, too . . . (Well, no, of course not, but I'd accept it in the spirit intended if I saw it in a movie, it's too much fun not to.)
I absolutely love it! ❤. I could totally see this as a prototype for something that would be adopted. Also this unique stuff is what inspires me for fantasy writing, world building
Thank you as always for the good information in these videos ⚔️
It's beautiful ❤, if only it could have had much longer rapier like quillons.
What a stunning blade matt
Trivia: The way the Romans themselves descripted the original Iberian gladius _("gladius hispaniensis")_ AND the Iberian falcata (they wrote quite graphic descriptions about the capability of either weapon to chop a limb or gut a belly), one is a cut-and-thrust which is quite good at cutting and excels at thrusting, and the other is a cut-and-thrust which is quite good at thrusting and excels at cutting. Not bad, those Iberians. It wasn't until aound a century later later in Roman history when they (who heavily favored the thrust), without totally abandoned the leaf-shaped gladius, also developed a similar weapon with straight edges (nowadays known as "Pompeii gladius"), which was a dedicted thrusting weapon with a decidedly secondary cutting capability. The Romans called both weapons just _"gladius"._Thus the confusion among modern reenactors.
I adore malicious compliance. It has led to some of the most amazing items ever created. XD
"F YOU's" in physical form.
Awwwwww the moment that sword came on screen, I said to myself "Oh that looks so cool!" then Matt goes "[the sword] is super ugly!!" (15:58) hahahaha
Please show the Wilkinson sword you talked about!
On D day, mad Jack Churchill also used a long bow and arrows with good effect. It surprised the Germans that some of their colleagues had arrows in them or had been “run though” by a swordsman!
I actually rather like that hilt design. The only thing I'd do different is have the back quillon be longer and curve towards the blade. Just for aesthetic purposes, though (with saber-type hilts I always find myself wanting something sticking out on the opposite side of the knuckle guard) and I assume it's so short to keep with the regulation profile in this case.
… or comfort. Long quillons are a bother to wear. The longer, the more bothersome. Especially if you are ever required to bend over (ie keep your head down) or sit. Both of which seem like plausible parts of an infantry officer's day-to-day in that time period.
Absolutely fascinating!
I love that advanced rapier-style sword.
Now I can't help but wonder if perhaps there was a similarly cut-obsessed officer around who contrived to have a falchion blade mounted to a regulation hilt.
What a beautiful sword!
What a beautiful blade on that "service rapier." I would love to have been able to chat with the guy who commissioned that sword and find out the reasoning behind the design...
Thank you for the comparison with the 1897 I have a better understanding of the provenance of the blade I inherited from my grandfather in KAR 🙏
It’s not ugly it’s beautiful
I love the way it looks. I don't understand at all how you can say it is an ugly monstrosity. Also thanks for the overview of all of those swords. Really cool. :)
What limits the design mostly is the material from which it is made of. A light sabre, if that was even possible to be made, would be both an excellent cutter as well as an excellent thruster.
The weight, width, cross-section of the design, the curvature of the design or lack thereof, the level of safety offered to the user in the design, the points of tapering or lack thereof, the balance of the sword with fullers etc... it's not the steel here. It's how the design interfaces with a human being, both the user and one at the end of it.
Heftier, thicker blades like the evolutions from 1892 are stiffer in spiking, better for thrusting as a result, yet they're more unwieldy than the slightly-curved designs from before.
So the curved designs from before this time also make a sacrifice. At the tip of the blade, the design less firm, not straight-on like a spike, thinner and often wider. This makes for a better cut but a worse thrust. The design creates tradeoffs. Light sabres certainly exist, and they're not as good at thrusting as dedicated thrusting swords.
It's not the material that creates the most limitation. Every design creates a sacrifice and an excellent bladesteel could be used to make a rather difficult-to-use (poor) weapon in war.
@@AdamOwenBrowning . Then there's adamantium...
P. S. The design is what it's used to compensate for the material being used. Copper stronger than Flint or stone, Bronze stronger than Copper, Iron stronger than Bronze, Steel stronger than Iron and so on as we discover new and better alloys or materials. A plastic or ceramic knife has to be made in a particular shape and design for the intended purpose, in order to take advantage of the material's qualities.
Damn it, I just bought a new sword (Cold Steel Kriegsmesser). And now I want one like that officer's sword. Honestly, I thought you were going to bring up the Claymore, as in the non-exploding, non-greatword kind, and Mad Jack Churchill. But that sword is awesome
I'm . . . actually rather on-board with this idea. Being a fan of the Renaissance "sidesword" family, and the owner of a thrust-oriented model (one of Arms & Armor's "Venetian Rapiers," from back in 1999), I've long wondered if such a weapon could have been pressed into service for Georgian and Victorian purposes as a thrust-heavy cavalry weapon. It seems that our eccentric officer engineered almost exactly that!
I'd love to have a replica of that, that's such a weird and cool type of sword - a British infantry rapier
Love it! That blade geometry is just... 😘👌chef's kiss
That's such a cool sword. Weird, but cool.
You know in games where you have customization options and spend hours looking at stats and designs. Making something that so out of place but so good at that one thing. This is kinda like that.
Outstanding!
That is one of the most interesting swords I have ever seen!
Very fascinating and thank you for sharing
Matt barely holding it together while saying ‘Ultimate Thruster’ 😂
Cutting edge tutorial. Very good. Although I understand yout focus being on none regulation British offiicers swords, will you do a similar video on Japanese swords?
Sword scandals? "Prominent Scottish Baskethilt Caught Canoodling with German Pallasch? Parry & Riposte!"
Heh, when you said people may think of earlier dedicated thrusting swords I instantly thought “estoc.” But you had to pick a sword with an actual blade, rather than a sharpened piece of rebar with a grip, didn’t you? :)
P.S. for those not familiar with the estoc, it has no blade at all, only the point is sharpened, and the “blade” comes in many shapes including triangles, squares, rectangles, as well as unsharpened diamonds. It’s made exclusively as an anti-armor weapon which can trivially piece mail and is easy to half-sword because it has no edge and so allows one to simply charge and grapple even a knight in armor, then use your two handed rondel dagger replacement to wedge between the plates of your now downed opponent. It’s basically a pointed pry bar to attack armor with, and is comedically good against someone not prepared for it.
That’s a very cool blade. The hilt is not ugly, it’s fascinating.
The moment you said "godawful ugly sword", I immediately guessed you were going to bring out a spadroon. But this is somehow worse.
Sword Scandal video when?
Three years ago!
th-cam.com/video/oVTKWeixSBY/w-d-xo.html
This was a very cool video about a very cool sword. I would love to see a video of the Wilkinson that you mentioned that had some parallels to this one. I couple of questions, would this be considered a type of spadroon, or is the blade too long? I also have a couple of questions regarding small sword and modern foil fencing. Why did finger rings go away from the foil, since it was to be the practice sword for the small sword, which had finger rings? And would you consider the modern pistol grip (for foil and epee) to be "finger ring replacements"? And while I am on the topic, did the actual dueling epees ever have finger rings, and if not, do you know why? Thank you again for another outstanding video.
Matt I thought this video was about a double edged narrow bladed Wilkinson that just sold at auction but this sword is exceptional.
The best historical pieces are the hideous one-off weird ones. Excellent find.
Hope we get a video on Digby Tatum-Warners umbrella.
I love everything about that. Id love a replica!
One could argue the Russian-Japanese War from 1904/5 was fought anachronistically. Already the rifles from the 1860s period were too deadly for Line Battle distance and yet majority of American Civil War was fought that way which also explains the high number of casualties. Opposite of that we see Häuserkampf in the Napoleonic Wars of 1812 , a pre-cursor of modern day combat. Its stupid to focus on one single item like Bayonet charges when you view it out of context. Cheers. PS: Beautiful unique sword piece!
In napoleonic era, some prussian Landwehr units started field service with more pikes and axes than muskets. In wwll some british Home Guard men at first got pikes.
@@brittakriep2938some finnish red guards got pikes too in finnish civil war. Thats because there werent enough rifles
@@taistelusammakko5088 : Yes , when in 19th/20th century soldiers, mostly second line, militia or semiregular, got pikes or warscytes, a lack of firearms was the reason. I am not informed, bit i heared, that during wwll, local policemen in japanese occipied territoy sometimes used spears.
Life is always about context, timing and compromise. Also swords.
I like knives big F off shiny ones......
@@crow4936 yeah, big and curved, wider in the base and with a strong penetrating tip. Maybe even blacked.
I would love to hear some deeper insight into Mortuary Swords and by extension Hasselrigs Lobster's in regards to the combat of the last heavy cuirassiers.
"I love the scoop grind. It's so hollow." - Some kinda Wizard.
“Giving point”
Hi Matt, I really like your channel and I was wondering if you could make a video about Hoplites, their weapons and tactics? I know this may not be your area of interest, but I would love to see such episode. Thanks and keep up the good work!
This is such a cool and unique piece! This is the kind of thing that a sword nerd would turn their nose at if they saw in a fantasy setting but now we can say WELL ACTUALLY
nIce bronze leaf-blade! Love it!
If you are a dab hand collegiate fencer and sign up for service... Why wouldn't you? It might save your life, might as well have the best fighting chance.
Crazy sword. Loved the video.