The Future Of The Space Economy | CNBC Marathon
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 10 พ.ค. 2024
- CNBC Marathon explores the current space economy and how new endeavors for space travel, exploration and mining are being developed.
NASA has been using the current spacesuits on the International Space Station for decades and they are showing their age. The agency has had issues not only with finding the proper sizes to fit its increasingly diverse astronaut corps, but also with degradation of some suit components. Now NASA is turning to two commercial companies: Axiom Space and Collins Aerospace, a subsidiary of Raytheon Technologies, to build and maintain its new generation of spacesuits.
The International Space Station will likely be retired within the decade. NASA hopes to save money by having commercial companies build the next space outpost. Some companies including Sierra Space and Axiom Space are already working on a commercial space station. But the question is, will these stations be ready in time?
Just a couple of years ago, it seemed that space mining was inevitable. Analysts, tech visionaries and even renowned astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson predicted that space mining was going to be big business. Space mining companies like Planetary Resources and Deep Space Industries backed by the likes of Google’s Larry Page and Eric Schmidt, cropped up to take advantage of the predicted payoff. After all, the holy grail of asteroids, known as 16 Psyche, had an estimated worth of $10,000 quadrillion.
Chapters:
00:00 Introduction
00:51 NASA’s Next-Generation Spacesuits - A Behind-The-Scenes Look (Published February 2023)
16:45 What The Next Space Station May Look Like (Published August 2021)
30:05 What Happened To Space Mining? (Published October 2022)
» Subscribe to CNBC: cnb.cx/SubscribeCNBC
» Subscribe to CNBC TV: cnb.cx/SubscribeCNBCtelevision
About CNBC: From 'Wall Street' to 'Main Street' to award winning original documentaries and Reality TV series, CNBC has you covered. Experience special sneak peeks of your favorite shows, exclusive video and more.
Connect with CNBC News Online
Get the latest news: www.cnbc.com/
Follow CNBC on LinkedIn: cnb.cx/LinkedInCNBC
Follow CNBC News on Facebook: cnb.cx/LikeCNBC
Follow CNBC News on Twitter: cnb.cx/FollowCNBC
Follow CNBC News on Instagram: cnb.cx/InstagramCNBC
#CNBC
The Future Of The Space Economy | CNBC Marathon
![[Vowel]물고기는 물에서 살아야 해🐟🤣Fish have to live in the water #funny](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/3G9MH063Cx4/mqdefault.jpg)
Love this long form content about space CNBC. Keep it up!!
Fix climate change before exploring space.
@@ncard00 the technology developed helps fight climate change.
Whiney, mindless narrator ruins this video.
Part of me thinks that all these companies developing things for "space" aren't really for space but space is just an excuse to develop loads of mad stuff and some kind of economic stimulant. (comment inspired by the 3D printed space suite)
Space tech and missions are always 10 years away and never seem to get closer.
This is good stuff… opening up new industries and markets is the fastest way to grow the economy.
Improve infrastructure and economic growth? Highspeed bullet trains and maglev super train technology, the new american dream....
xD, When do you think there will be a highspeed rail from Washington to New York? 2050??? @@carlsmith5545
NO, BRING BACK THE LOW TRUMP TAX CUTS WE HAD---THAT WAS THE BEST ECONOMY EVER IN THE USA...WAKE UP...FORSAKE NASA AND THE BILLIONAIRES CLUB...NASA IS A SUBSIDIARY OF THE ARMS MANUFACTURERS LIKE LOCKHEED MARTIN, NORTHROP GRUMMAN, BOEING, BAE ETC
00:04 Trillionaire potential in space economy
02:28 NASA's spacesuits face funding and safety challenges.
07:06 NASA awards contracts for space suit design and maintenance
09:13 Advancements in spacesuit technology and design for space exploration
14:07 Space commercialization enabling new countries to participate
16:13 International Space Station's future and impact on research
20:23 Privatization of space stations and cost-saving for NASA.
22:20 Axiom plans to use SpaceX for crewed missions to the ISS and aims to build a cheaper space station
25:59 Private sector companies racing to launch commercial space stations before ISS retirement
28:04 China seems to be winning the race for a permanent presence in low Earth orbit and the moon.
32:29 Space mining is a long term endeavor with limited commercial support.
34:39 Space mining goes beyond precious metals to include valuable materials like water and helium.
38:37 Space mining company TransAstra is developing technology and securing contracts for its space missions.
40:35 Space mining technology and its potential impact on Earth
44:15 Space mining laws are unclear and vary by country
46:17 Asteroid mining poses challenges in resource identification and market impact
You Can't Judge A Video By Its Cover. you can by its first few chapters and certainly by its last.
🎉 you da best
A like well deserved.
3:45 Peggy Guirgis legs
tf wrong with you dude?
I wish someone would build a rotating space station with artificial gravity. it'd be so cool.
The company Vast is aiming to do that.
For a short time, Gemini 11 had artificial gravity with a tether.
@@carcinogen60yearsagoF**k Gemini 11
check out Vast
Outer Space doesn't exist.Earth is the only World there is.There are no other Physical Cosmic
Worlds out there and there is no Infinite Cosmic Spatial Vacuum Void.Outer Space has "3 Enormous Problems":Problem 1 - Survivability - Cosmic Space is completely and inherently uninhabitable,
inhospitable and unliveable.This doesn't seem/feel right.If Outer Space truly existed
it should therefore be completely and inherently habitable,hospitable and liveable.If Outer Space was real it would be 100% welcoming of All-potential Beings,Creatures and Life-forms.This means that Outer Space must be "Breathable",because otherwise Everyone and Everything would immediately and perpetually suffocate and no Life-forms would ever emerge or survive in such a lethal Cosmic Universe.Problem 2 - Cosmic Travel - All-vehicles must push "Something" in order to move and go "Somewhere".In Earth's Atmosphere Automobiles push "Air" to move,Airplanes also push "Air" to move and Cruise Ships push "Water" to move,but Outer Space has no Atmosphere.You cannot travel to/in Outer Space,because The Vacuum of Space neutralizes All-pushing power/travel power.This means that Space Travel is impossible,that No One has ever left The Earth,that No One has ever traveled to Space and that every single Space Mission from the beginning to today is a lie.If Outer Space truly existed it would need to have an "Atmosphere" in order for Outer Space Travel to be possible.Problem 3 - Vast Separation - Celestial Space is just far too tremendously vast as a territory.All-Life-forms are separated,because of the "Humongous Distance" between them.This is not convenient.If Outer Space was real it wouldn't be so gargantuan,because it has to be much smaller and more "Tightly-Knit",so that All-potential Life-forms can locate and
discover each other.Outer Space is a lie designed in order to convince The Public that Extraterrestrial Beings exist.The total "Inhospitableness" and "Unfeasibility" of Outer Space proves that Outer Space cannot exist,because Outer Space doesn't exist!
In what universe and in what industry does it make sense to not continue improving on your technology? Space suit designs and parts from 60 years ago?
If it ain't broke don't fix it.
@@Alexander_Kaleby that logic if you 12gb harddrive works why should you get a 1tb ssd, lmao we need to evolve the problem is that Nasa does not have a big budget since the end of the space race
@@theaverageportugues4200 If you have a 12 gb harddrive and need to store a file greater than 12 gb, then the "it ain't broke" part of the thing no longer applies.
More accurate would be: If all you ever need to store FITS on your 12 gb hard drive, then why would you shell out money to buy a 1 tb drive?
Sure, it is new and shiny and bigger and thus automatically better, but if your existing hardware can do what needs doing, then why buy new hardware?
Seems like this has been in the can for a while seeing as there were several quotes of what’s planned for 2022.
21:30 "massive windows overlooking earth" lol
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤ I LOVE CNBC
Least political, best science news of the major channels. I'll never switch from cnbc if they stay this way
ditto. I'm so tired of politics in our news. Please stop it, CNBC. Thank you!
Mining asteroids will be when we plan to use them to build things in space. Bringing them back to earth is not worth the cost. It would make more sense to use minerals and metals from outer space to manufacture products and then ship the products back to earth.
Helium 3 is also very viable within fusion reactors as well, IIRC?
Great Comment ! Also the US Stockpile of He3 (Helium 3) Has been depleted by the TSA by the Full Body Scanners and must be replaced soon ! ! ! tjl
AMAZING #CNBC 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
Spending a billion on spacesuits and complaining they didn't have enough funding 😭😭
Absolutely mind boggling. Yet we should pay more taxes.
$1B SpaceX - self landing reusable rockets. Astronauts to ISS.
$1B NASA - new space suit (unfinished).
So will the new suits stop the solar radiation bombardment from creating lights inside the pilots eyes when getting close to maybe passing through the Van Allen Radiation Belts on the way to the moon ?
No. And trying to make suits with that level of radiation protection is pointless and prohibitive to both cost and capability of any astronaut wearing it.
Easier ways to deal with radiation in space is: Go fast, spend less time in radiation belts. And Protect a part of the crew area, where crew can shelter during high radiation transits.
18:50 couldn't be bothered to make those HVAC duct clamps orientated the same as each other.... There is even a weld seam to use for lining them up. I wouldn't want that tech to build my house.
CNBC International
Hi Bob!! 🚀🛰🌕🪐
Greatttt
Where do we sign up for Mars spacex living?
Mining asteroids is definitely a worthwhile endeavor with many challenges as well as great rewards. 🚀🚀🚀
Let’s go 🎉
By the time I can afford space travel, the seats will be narrow and hard in economy just like today.
Good stuff , but I think this was made 3 years ago?
All replays... Please cme ip with some new content
I just love how the government allways cuts the space program funding while damn well knowing the benefits and economical value of the development of space technology. Any money you put into space tech triples on earth.
That device is hilarious
Drowning during a space walk would be a horrible way to go.
Drives home the similarities between exploration of space and the oceans.
CNBS!
I wonder who else is going to comment about Hollywood portraying the space suit and space life etc. thought we knew about this
I am dubious. . . yet hopeful.
The Firmament all i got to say✝️
Not real hahaha
Re: What happened to space mining.
I find it interesting that none of these companies (and other would-be space mining companies) are not talking about how, exactly, they planning to get the minerals back to the surface of the earth. EDL (entry, decent, landing) is quite dynamic, to say the least. Hurling hundreds of kilograms of minerals at the planet is something that the FAA in the US and similar entities in other countries may take issue with.
Actually recovery of meteorites is a long way off.
You’d just slams it through the atmosphere at some country willing to let you do it. Somewhere with land and cheap labor for the mine etc.
Outer Space doesn't exist.Earth is the only World there is.There are no other Physical Cosmic
Worlds out there and there is no Infinite Cosmic Spatial Vacuum Void.Outer Space has "3 Enormous Problems":Problem 1 - Survivability - Cosmic Space is completely and inherently uninhabitable,
inhospitable and unliveable.This doesn't seem/feel right.If Outer Space truly existed
it should therefore be completely and inherently habitable,hospitable and liveable.If Outer Space was real it would be 100% welcoming of All-potential Beings,Creatures and Life-forms.This means that Outer Space must be "Breathable",because otherwise Everyone and Everything would immediately and perpetually suffocate and no Life-forms would ever emerge or survive in such a lethal Cosmic Universe.Problem 2 - Cosmic Travel - All-vehicles must push "Something" in order to move and go "Somewhere".In Earth's Atmosphere Automobiles push "Air" to move,Airplanes also push "Air" to move and Cruise Ships push "Water" to move,but Outer Space has no Atmosphere.You cannot travel to/in Outer Space,because The Vacuum of Space neutralizes All-pushing power/travel power.This means that Space Travel is impossible,that No One has ever left The Earth,that No One has ever traveled to Space and that every single Space Mission from the beginning to today is a lie.If Outer Space truly existed it would need to have an "Atmosphere" in order for Outer Space Travel to be possible.Problem 3 - Vast Separation - Celestial Space is just far too tremendously vast as a territory.All-Life-forms are separated,because of the "Humongous Distance" between them.This is not convenient.If Outer Space was real it wouldn't be so gargantuan,because it has to be much smaller and more "Tightly-Knit",so that All-potential Life-forms can locate and
discover each other.Outer Space is a lie designed in order to convince The Public that Extraterrestrial Beings exist.The total "Inhospitableness" and "Unfeasibility" of Outer Space proves that Outer Space cannot exist,because Outer Space doesn't exist!
Because this is pure fantasy and fake.
So, we land hundreds of kilograms of astronaut (+ protective spacecraft) each time a crew mission returns. Several orders of magnitude more are possible, if the entry velocity is managed properly (orbital mechanics and aerobraking). But by far the bigger market is not on Earth; it's in space ... or will be.
Some aren't planning to bring them back to Earth. They can leave them in orbit for use in space.
El pensamiento más sabio que ronda por la mente de todos hoy es invertir en diferentes flujos de ingresos que no dependan del gobierno, especialmente con la actual crisis económica en todo el mundo. Sigue siendo un buen momento para invertir en oro, plata y monedas digitales (BTC, ETH.... acciones, plata y oro)
Supongo que algunos saben acerca de la integración en la microeconomía para ayudar a sustituir FIAT o USDT por una experiencia de intercambio más tangible, aunque se parece más a una capitalización con alrededor del 43,307% de ganancias/ROI semanal... PD. Stuart Michael, me cubrió, gracias.
🙂🎉2024 es una continuación ENCANTADORA del crecimiento de la humanidad💜
¡Stuart Michael sabe lo que hace! Sus consejos han sido invaluables para mi viaje comercial. ¡Definitivamente vale la pena intentarlo!
Pasé 10 años de mi vida invirtiendo tanto en acciones como en bienes raíces y gané mucho dinero con ellos. En algún momento de 2019, descubrí las criptomonedas y también comencé a invertir en ellas. Me di cuenta de que era mucho más rentable. Ahora mi vida se siente mucho más fácil y mejor.
Mucha gente subestima la importancia de los asesores hasta que sus emociones les provocan reveses financieros.
Last year? 19:45
Also your Osiris Rex info is about 2 years out of date (They've returned the sample now and the mission has been renamed Osiris Apex as it's now heading for the asteroid Apophis). Honestly couldn't you be bothered to do an actual video this year and just dusted off the same one you dusted off this time last year?
"by the time the suit deploys we will have spend 1 billion on the suits"........"the real problem with the program is not enough funding"........ok just stop.
Cnbc 😃
these all appear to be from 2022?
Anybody knows the name of the blond male engineer with the white shirt and dark-grey pants that comes up in the first part? You can see him at 7:50 and other moments on the first part of the video gracing the screen. Asking for a friend.
Why was Ran not there?
China had missed The Great Voyage, but catch up with Space voyage.
I'm pretty sure Dickies could figure this out😂. With a nice price tag
asteroid mining idea: redirect an asteroid to mars, let it crash on mars, then start a mining outpost on the crash site.
How about just put it in Mars orbit, mine directly from the asteroid
@@jordenrisley6761 much easier to mine on foot with hand tools
Yeah asteroids are worth billions but that’s based on the current market. What happens to markets when there a surplus?? The price drops. Once we start mining asteroids the value of gold and platinum and other minerals will drop drastically. What we call rare metals will be common and cheap. It will still be worth something but nothing like the prices of today. Hopefully we get to mine asteroids so every one can have gold and other minerals instead of just the rich.
Yep. No scarcity = no value.
That would be the point, yes. When you have an abundance of resources, the price of everything drops. Your phone, yourr car, your personal spaceship will all cost less money.
Don't count on gold getting much cheaper though. The market is already being controlled, the future gold market will ALSO be controlled.
That said, you already CAN get certain jewels for a reduced price. emeralds, saphires, diamonds and rubies can all be made artificially, if memory serves.
thank - you . ( 2024 / Jan / 14 )
Why not bring an asteroid into Earth Orbit with a lander/ pilot bridge and then mine it? Also, why grab a small asteroid and attach it to a space station to study and mine in low earth orbit? How about add a hotel and now you got a tourist asteroid destination and luxury hotel along with mining!?
I love space!
YEAH YOU LOVE COMPLETE DARKNESS, THE MINUS 500 C AND NO OXYGEN
which space?
Thats where the money is at
MOVE TO #MARS +++++++++++++++
🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
One cannot fully control if one will be an astronaut or not, but least one can build a small rocket to the moon. Rocket emoji are go 🚀🌌🚀
Do a video on T-pylons in Britain, electricity transmission lines
TIME TO MOVE TO #DEEP SPACE !!!!
😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎
future has no space for economy
Space mining isn't a matter of profit or economics. It's a matter of survival. All resources should go towards developing this capacity because money will not save us.
Given the costs of getting minerals back from space, I doubt that space mining is going to be viable before the 2060s, and even then I doubt it will ever be viable for most minerals. The cost of getting a kg to LEO has been reduced from $54,500 with the Space Shuttle to $1500 with the Falcon Heavy, and Starship promises to take that down to $200. Let's say that we get launch costs to LEO down to $50 per kg by the 2050s. We still will have to travel to Mars or the asteroid belt and do the mining and haul it back to Earth. That is probably going to cost $10k-$20k per kg at the beginning and with scale we can probably get that down to $500-$1000 per kg. Maybe that works for precious metals, but I can't see it ever working for metals like copper and nickel. In addition, we don't know what will be the climate and ozone impacts of all those rocket launches in the stratosphere, but the preliminary research by Martin Ross is scary.
We can live within the resource limits of the planet if we prioritize it, and that is far more sustainable and less costly than trying to mine outer space. We keep figuring out how to do more with less minerals, so we could live with the Earth's existing mineral reserves, but we have chosen to not make this a priority.
For example, electric vehicles used to require a lot of expensive metals (lithium, nickel, cobalt, manganese, copper, aluminum, iron, neodymium, dysprosium, etc.), but the move from NMC to LFP batteries eliminates the nickel, cobalt and manganese and the move to sodium ion batteries in the future will eliminate the lithium and copper, so they only require iron and aluminum which are sustainable metals with nearly limitless reserves. New EV motor designs have reduced the amount of permanent magnets, so less neodymium, dysprosium and praseodymium are needed. Tesla says that it will use PM-free motors in the future Model 2. The Cybertruck reduces the copper in the wiring by 50% by using Ethernet+CAN data buses instead of point-to-point wiring harnesses and by using higher voltages (12V -> 48V components and 400V -> 800V batteries/motors), which reduces the thickness of the wires. Wiring and motor coils can also be switched from copper to aluminum in the future if copper becomes too scarce.
The same thing is happening in the energy sector. Grid batteries are switching from NMC to LFP and in the future they will use salt water flow batteries that require no metals except stainless steel. Today's wind turbines use a lot less expensive metals. Onshore wind turbines are switching from permanent magnet direct drives and electrically excited direct drives to geared drives and doubly fed induction generators which use no permanent magnets and much less copper. Offshore wind turbines are switching from permanent magnet direct drives are switching to semi-direct drives, which contain hybrid geared and permanent magnet generators, that only need 1/5 of the weight in permanent magnets and much less copper.
Thin film solar which uses lots of expensive metals/minerals (cadmium, tellurium, copper, indium, gallium, selenium) has lost to crystalline silicon solar. PV solar cells which used silver contact lines are now switching to copper contact lines.
If you look at modern electronics compared to the electronics of the 1980s, it is amazing how much less minerals are needed to make today's electronic devices, and we can reduce the mineral consumption even more if we start focusing on longevity, fixability and recyclability over planned obsolescence. I already see this happening with cell phones as the standard time that cell phones are supported with software updates has increased from 2 years to 4 years over the last couple years and the EU is creating standards to require that cell phones manufacturers use the same charging port and replaceable batteries. The average lifespan of vehicles has also increased from 100,000 to 200,000 miles and and EVs with LFP batteries should increase vehicle lifespan in the future to 400,000 miles.
We can redesign all sorts of things for longevity and fixability, so we need less resources. The average lifespan of clothes has reduced by half over the last 30 years, but we could go back to making clothes that last longer. We can get rid of most single-use plastics if we charged a tax on single-use bottles and bags and sold things in reusable containers. The move from fossil fuels to renewable energy will eliminate 40% of ocean shipping and the move to local agriculture can eliminate another 10%, so we can get rid of half of ocean shipping. Given that 92.5% of new electricity generation was renewable energy in the first half of 2023, we are on track to get to 100% renewable electricity by the mid 2040s, and we could get there by 2035 if every country decides that it is a priority.
@@amosbatto3051I agree, efficiently using materials will prolong our window of opportunity. Especially if we can move away from infrastructure and into small scale in-situ resource utilization and power generation.
By far the most effective energy saving measure we could utilize is passive solar design in all of our buildings. That would reduce energy consumption by 60%. At least for homes.
Transportation remains the greatest draw on resources and energy. So developing sustainable in-situ greenhouses integrated into every home will also provide a great deal of energy saving and health benefits.
However, I am not proposing that we should bring the resources back to earth. Rather, we should master the technology to process, refine material, and manufacture in space. Not to return home, rather to expand our civilization to the outer planets and moons in the solar system. Eventually we could construct entire stations and extremely large vessels in space.
To be able to extend the duration of our civilization beyond the current extinction event.
By my calculations we have less than 100 years before the climate will render earth largely infertile and inhospitable to most forms of life. There will be pockets that remain. But there is no guarantee that we can continue to survive through these cycles especially given the rise in industrial pollution and related cancers.
I envision the use of modular systems that work like a nano bot swarm. Redundant, small scale self automating swarms that can begin the first stages of construction in space. Leading to foundries, chemical processing, gas, and fuel generation facilities. That can also provide the essential building blocks for life and agriculture in space.
It could compliment potential advancements in technology like the ability to copy our brains into a computer system that can be replicated and repaired. That may be a viable alternative to simulate reality in the vacuum of space without any gravity. Purely reliant on energy sources as opposed to complex ecological systems required to sustain humans.
Is this really an update there's an awful lot of Fast Forward to 2022 in there. Is this just a video you dust off once a year?
This new space suit resembles a diving suit from the 1800s its 2024 why haven’t they worked on minimizing the suit’s technology to offer more mobility but the same protection against space?.
Meanwhile… China is testing a ‘iron man’ style prototype.! 😂
Could you provide a source?
(the surrection of mars should give humanity infinite economy as all of earth is to export to mars and everything from mars will be valuable - every mars garage will have orbital rockets )
Hey, what if Pattinson contributed funds to the space race?
Business space economy
Why not just replace them with drone robot. they only need arms i guess. 10:37
Ok I have a question about man in 7:30 🤪
It’s all about the money
In space manufacture is more realistic than space mining.
17:27 CNBC really said "all-timers", instead of alzheimers.
Its sad how mutch money is spent in war instead of stuff like this
We must protect the Asteroids from being hauled to the melting ovens; somebody will soon cry.
The concentration on making money is ridiculous. Now the idea behind it is that we develop technology in that helps humans.
perhaps space mining will be a great supplement to our debt in the US
Advances require money, money requires investors, investors require profit
I have an ideas design, The new technology Space Shuttle program designs drawing project want to Build.
If I were a billionaire I'd be prepping my money for a private scientific explorative station. Hopefully Starship gets up and running soon.
Should happen this year.
Made in Space
what comes after a quadrillion? a centillion?? why did they not just say 10 centillion??
wait until Starship comes online, it will enable techs like Big space telescopes, mining, space Servers, fuel stations, internet constellations, etc,,,
Blah blah...it ain't gonna do s***.
@@ejkalegal3145 That's what they said about Falcon
@@firstduckofwellington6889 These are puny craft. The ISS is not a "space station" but merely a space platform. We should have aircraft carrier sized space vessels by now. We should have spin stabilisation artificial gravity large space stations by now. We should have 1000+ colonist space colonies on the Moon and Mars by now. I am deeply unsatisfied and ashamed by our lack of progress this last half century.
Cellphone has become so much more than voice + text
@@ejkalegal3145 Based on what evidence?
Watch Issac Arthur.
Built a new international space station.
Is this an old video you reposted or forgot to upgrade your script? Lots of outdated information and references to stuff that happened “last year” in 2020.
Realy She like it
Seriously, $420,000,000 to design new space suit. Who is getting so rich of of this ...
Capitalists in SPACE. Tim Curry in shambles
Maybe 500,000 a suit but not billions, let the public see a breakdown of cost
A billion to design a suit bro 🤔
This video is old!!! The narrorator mentions axiom "flying crewed missions as early as January 2022..." wtf!?
I wouldn't be surprised if they recycle content
👍
not a space agency working really hard to try and look like it
How is it possible to spend so much money for no results??? Elon, you must be doig something wrong!
I don't believe an asteroid the size of a football field contain billions upon billions of platinum. Yeah right. Maybe a bigger asteroid.
so Elon will be the first trillionaire
i'd love every space eandever being a HUMAN effort, rather than a country effort.
its kind of sad to see the iss going down
also: arent there any dangers increasing the earths mass by minig asteroids? is there any research about it?
wouldnt a higher mass decrease our distance to the sun?
420 million…. Still lack of funding
How do i report this for misinformation? Does cnbc get a pass?
She lost me at "Space Tourism will reach $4 billion by 2030" that won't aged well... lol
What do you mean? Do you mean it will be much higher than $4 billion?
Neil Degrasse is the Deepak Chopra of Science
Don't insult Deepak
Here is an Idea I was thinking that SpaceX launch 1 of there super heavy rockets into and they wouldn't release the 1st stage I'm thinking that the 1st stage would be used for a space station I think that 1st stage rockets would need to be removed and they could make the engines to go back into the 2nd stage rocket 🚀. I think this would work. Just so everyone knows that the 1 stage rockets 🚀 they are 30 feet across these engines could be strapped to the inside walls just like a C17 jet. I hope this makes sense to everyone.
Stage zero is the launch pad. Stage 1 is the booster. Stage 2 is the cargo/capsule
"Neil DeGrassyyy"
A lack of funding but they have spent over 400 million howwwwww
400 million is nothing in the big picture of the us budgeting everything go the military .
FOR ALL MANKIND!!!
CGI space 🤫🤫🤫
Lunar mining is near the Earth