Br hamza tzortzis vs Jagraj Singh speakers Corner old but classic

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 ส.ค. 2024
  • Please like and subscribe and share support the channel

ความคิดเห็น • 59

  • @bonleofen
    @bonleofen 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    The guy is just here to speak but I suspect he even listened to what Hamza is asking/saying.

  • @abdulelahkhunji6871
    @abdulelahkhunji6871 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Hamza is brilliant , like to watch him A very patient and intelligent personality ❤️👍🏻

  • @bonleofen
    @bonleofen 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    What the Sikh guy is teaching is that you have to completely close yourself from listening to others. Like summum umyun bukmun. He knows if he starts to actually listen, his faith will water down.

    • @bonleofen
      @bonleofen 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @R G brother I'm not commenting on Sikhi yet. I'm just talking about the guy who's in video. He purposely does not want to engage with questions he is faced with.

    • @bonleofen
      @bonleofen 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @R G bro you're currently using rationale to explain that rationale can't be used for unseen. That's just trying to rob away the point of rationality by using rationality itself. It's insincere. If u think there's no rationality required for unseen, then why are you presenting rational arguments to me?

    • @bonleofen
      @bonleofen 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @R G and is that a statement of rationality?

    • @bonleofen
      @bonleofen 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @R G I don't think it's wise to suspend rationality in such a way. That way, submarines could fly and eating children could become moral. Rationality and logic are one of the result of god's will. And they will always go hand in hand and not result in suspension of either.

    • @bonleofen
      @bonleofen 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @R G please don't bring random strawman of quantum physics. It is very rational field of physics. Everything follows a deterministic principle and can be determined and calculated precisely with mathematics. The foundations of it are very rational. It doesn't follow the assumptions of materialism doesn't make it irrational. I don't know why everyone these days throws in quantum physics to rob away the argument.

  • @tiloshah4778
    @tiloshah4778 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The Sikh tried to wriggle this way and that. He tried to throw other things in. He knew in his heart that his belief has no foundation , it has no divine source but is a wish of his guru.As for bro Hamzah , Subhan'Allah, May Allah guide and bless you (Aameen), and trust me, the intelligent Sikhs know in their heart that Islam is the truth

  • @BlackStarXx11xX
    @BlackStarXx11xX 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Unrelated, but man, brother Hamza is looking better than ever!

  • @mnajeeb8883
    @mnajeeb8883 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    This sikh guy is dead shouldn't put this up

  • @muhammeddeen7563
    @muhammeddeen7563 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    How to disprove sikhism in one question. So what about the billions of people that can before sikhism was founded by gurus copying from Muslim scripture and Muslims.

    • @muhammeddeen7563
      @muhammeddeen7563 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @R G lol no there are no answers in there. I get Sikhs always giving "smart" replies like what you said. But the fact of the matter is your religion cannot be true as it didn't exist before your gurus decided to make it up by copying what Islam had to offer and making themselves the object of worship.

    • @muhammeddeen7563
      @muhammeddeen7563 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Ravi G The truth has been made clear from falsehood. The truth has come and falsehood has perished for falsehood by nature is designed to perish. there is no need to accommodate lies by hindus, Sikhs or buddhists about the false teachings in their false religions.

    • @muhammeddeen7563
      @muhammeddeen7563 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Ravi G
      Qur'an 17:81 | [Arabic-Original Text]
      وَقُلْ جَاءَ الْحَقُّ وَزَهَقَ الْبَاطِلُ ۚ إِنَّ الْبَاطِلَ كَانَ زَهُوقًا
      [English-Shakir] And say: The truth has come and the falsehood has vanished; surely falsehood is a vanishing (thing).

    • @hansfrankfurter2903
      @hansfrankfurter2903 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@muhammeddeen7563 islam didnt exist before islam either 😂 you guys are delusional. Calling Judaism and Christianity islam is just hand waving, doesn’t cut it.

    • @muhammeddeen7563
      @muhammeddeen7563 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@hansfrankfurter2903 Islam existed ever since the first creation. Don't come here with made up religions 😂😂

  • @MyTechniqueWorks
    @MyTechniqueWorks 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is invalid debate. God doesn't require you to give evidences etc God wants you to be equal to all, earn honest living, and do your prayers regardless of religion that's what point of our Sikhism - that is what Gods message is to our Gurus

  • @kutsc3792
    @kutsc3792 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Did anyone understand the sikh guys point?

  • @SS-fs5tw
    @SS-fs5tw 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    the Sikh guy got schooled on ethics of a discussion.