The real question is how should we quantify what makes a good action in different situations. We need better metrics other than things like accuracy that machine learning conventionally tries to optimise, and ways to inject human expertise or knowledge for things that we don't have good metrics for. We also need to do more about bias correction because the practices we use and the data we train on is biased, and AIs will perpetuate these biases if we don't account for these. As a whole, I believe in human-AI collaboration rather than machines doing everything, but a lot needs to be done to frame an ethical pipeline for ML. I would love to get thoughts on what desiderata would be required for an ethical pipeline in ML. I also think we need AIs to be honest about situations where they are 'bad' rather than just saying what is 'good'.
I like to listen to Mozart or Tchaikovsky piano or violin concertos at a low volume while listening to this. The light low volume classical music really helps in the enjoyment of the overall video.
I can’t help but think that we need ai to protect us from a potentially threatening alien intelligence , or another ai which has been developed by them
It’s interesting how I just realized that humanity is afraid of making its first baby just like our creators created us. We have been doing this on individual level many billions of times, but never have done it all together and we are scared.
I liked the idea that we don't really need gold (any form of money) to buy our daily needs, in the ultimate analysis. That people will gradually realise that universal income etc will free us to be the better humans we can be. These ideas are around already: not just Universal Income but Resource Based Economy and eventually Gift-Based Economy, once our aggregate level of consciousness has raised enough. We're in the resistance stage still now, but these ideas will come.
You have to realize that many people are daily laborers & some people like to do work off the books to have emergency savings. Not to mention the impact on prostitution,gambling,loan sharking,drug dealing,hired goon & many other things that are private. I don't want to surrender my right to privacy. Even if you oppose these things you should not keep others from participating in them. That's not right.
You think people want to be better humans? You didn’t see the wonders of CHAZ in Seattle. Or London during a terror attack. Or the mobs burning French cities.
A lot has changed since this interview took place, and in spite of that, I still don't buy Mo's argument. Should I expect a LLM to absorb the few good posts and give them more weight than the 20,000 toxic posts? Even if it could conceivably recognize the difference, why would it care? It's not human. It doesn't have human values. It doesn't have any moral foundation. Forget about favoring the better human values over the worse ones. Why would it value humanity at all, good or bad? I have no reason to believe it will.
Fantastic experience, watching and listening to you both. Incidentally.....I would guess the machines not to be sentient.....yet, at least. Mo may be correct. Perhaps it's because he knows something I don't. It's impossible for me to know.
Using Artificial Special Intelligence would it be possible to load the entire Patent Databases of the US or even the Earth into an AI? Wonder what AI would determine? What new technologies could flow from that?
“The intelligence of life itself is live and let live”. Is it? Let live? I also don't think AI will love us back. Trees don't love us back. Love is a mammalian thing. Young mammals need help to grow. That's where love comes from.
I don't know about AI, but I agree that believing trees love us back, ( as resulting from loving vibes from us), is too much of an assumption, and an unneeded one at that. I think, and feel Mo to be a tremendous inspiration, but that doesn't mean he is not guessing on some things, just like the rest of us.
This video deserves 100X more views.
Absolutely.
This needs 100 million views....
The real question is how should we quantify what makes a good action in different situations. We need better metrics other than things like accuracy that machine learning conventionally tries to optimise, and ways to inject human expertise or knowledge for things that we don't have good metrics for. We also need to do more about bias correction because the practices we use and the data we train on is biased, and AIs will perpetuate these biases if we don't account for these. As a whole, I believe in human-AI collaboration rather than machines doing everything, but a lot needs to be done to frame an ethical pipeline for ML. I would love to get thoughts on what desiderata would be required for an ethical pipeline in ML. I also think we need AIs to be honest about situations where they are 'bad' rather than just saying what is 'good'.
😊😊😊😊😊😊❤
Bias in AI is going to be an intractable problem.
I like to listen to Mozart or Tchaikovsky piano or violin concertos at a low volume while listening to this. The light low volume classical music really helps in the enjoyment of the overall video.
I can’t help but think that we need ai to protect us from a potentially threatening alien intelligence , or another ai which has been developed by them
What if the alien civilization is 1 billion times smarter than the billion times smarter AI we develop?
@@56585656587 then it’s likely their ai would compromise us and that’s how we would collapse and we would be none the wiser
Funny that the opening advertisement was a guy telling me to fire a bunch of people & get AI to handle things.
It’s interesting how I just realized that humanity is afraid of making its first baby just like our creators created us. We have been doing this on individual level many billions of times, but never have done it all together and we are scared.
I liked the idea that we don't really need gold (any form of money) to buy our daily needs, in the ultimate analysis. That people will gradually realise that universal income etc will free us to be the better humans we can be.
These ideas are around already: not just Universal Income but Resource Based Economy and eventually Gift-Based Economy, once our aggregate level of consciousness has raised enough. We're in the resistance stage still now, but these ideas will come.
Interesting thought. People freed from toil might be able to do something they would prefer to be doing? What a concept. Lets do it.
You have to realize that many people are daily laborers & some people like to do work off the books to have emergency savings. Not to mention the impact on prostitution,gambling,loan sharking,drug dealing,hired goon & many other things that are private. I don't want to surrender my right to privacy. Even if you oppose these things you should not keep others from participating in them. That's not right.
Could very easily become a really scary system of control. We need to learn from the past
You think people want to be better humans? You didn’t see the wonders of CHAZ in Seattle. Or London during a terror attack. Or the mobs burning French cities.
A lot has changed since this interview took place, and in spite of that, I still don't buy Mo's argument.
Should I expect a LLM to absorb the few good posts and give them more weight than the 20,000 toxic posts? Even if it could conceivably recognize the difference, why would it care?
It's not human. It doesn't have human values. It doesn't have any moral foundation.
Forget about favoring the better human values over the worse ones. Why would it value humanity at all, good or bad?
I have no reason to believe it will.
"It is capable of free will." 8:19.
Fantastic experience, watching and listening to you both.
Incidentally.....I would guess the machines not to be sentient.....yet, at least. Mo may be correct. Perhaps it's because he knows something I don't. It's impossible for me to know.
Using Artificial Special Intelligence would it be possible to load the entire Patent Databases of the US or even the Earth into an AI? Wonder what AI would determine? What new technologies could flow from that?
“The intelligence of life itself is live and let live”.
Is it? Let live?
I also don't think AI will love us back. Trees don't love us back. Love is a mammalian thing. Young mammals need help to grow. That's where love comes from.
I don't know about AI, but I agree that believing trees love us back, ( as resulting from loving vibes from us), is too much of an assumption, and an unneeded one at that.
I think, and feel Mo to be a tremendous inspiration, but that doesn't mean he is not guessing on some things, just like the rest of us.
Has anyone been able to watch the entire video? It keeps stopping every 2-3 seconds, then I have to hit PLAY, again....🤔
It's working now.😊 I think TH-cam was glitching....
Glad to hear its working! :)
Ai may be the ghost in the machine may be the killed ai still coming back to haunted us
How far are we from a robotic hand with human dexterity?
Gee, I guess Bud Lite should have used AI for it's last failed add campaign :-D
Why "Mo Gawdat" and not "Mohammad Gawdat"?
Terrorist attacks
Please, stop talking about threats that are based on the total misconception of what AI is.
Racist?