How To Install Acoustic Foam - www.AcousticFields.com

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 ก.พ. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 32

  • @djhmax09
    @djhmax09 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video, thanks!
    And happy father's day to all fathers out there.

  • @ryanshreevedrums
    @ryanshreevedrums 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Does doubling up the foam so it’s 2 layers increase the absorption coefficient of lower frequencies? Or allow the range of absorption to extend lower?

    • @BicycleJoeTomasello
      @BicycleJoeTomasello 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The acoustic foam is for low mid-range to high, he recommended carbon technology to me for the low end but it's easy to set up a phone call with him and it don't cost nothing he's a really accommodating guy

    • @Bodey2
      @Bodey2 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think you increase the level of absorption if you do that, but not the rate of absorption. Dennis, please correct if I am wrong! Thx

    • @Harald_Reindl
      @Harald_Reindl 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It absorbs deeper frequencies but it really don't scale at the end - hence other technology for low frequencies

    • @AcousticFields
      @AcousticFields  2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Yes, the foam depth determines the resonant frequency or how low it will start working at. At 4" depth, we go down to 100 hz. At 6" - 90 Hz.

  • @TheRoadbots
    @TheRoadbots 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Another great video Dennis, Didn't know these facts. Very interesting. Keep it up. What is the best type of foam for movies and video games? How do you know what size to cut them?

    • @AcousticFields
      @AcousticFields  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Out foam has thye smoothest absorption curve from
      125 hz. - 500 hz.

  • @djbremsespor
    @djbremsespor 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi,
    The question remains.
    Who performed the AF foam test shown at 1:27
    Thanks!

    • @AcousticFields
      @AcousticFields  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I believe Alion Labs years ago.

    • @djbremsespor
      @djbremsespor 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@AcousticFields That sounds great. Please make their report available also. Thanks.

  • @KrisHTX
    @KrisHTX ปีที่แล้ว

    Do we need to install the frame around the foam or can we just put up the foam by itself on the wall?

  • @wraithwrecker_
    @wraithwrecker_ ปีที่แล้ว

    Would it be presumptuous to ask about your foam's density in kg/M^3 or lb/ft^3?
    Edit: for anyone else wondering, the measurements he gives below come out to roughly 30.76kg/M^3. Very clear the density of this foam is dialed in to extremely precise specifications. Likely the result of pursuing a uniform cell structure, which is very beneficial for absorption performance. From what I've seen, Auralex's foam is 32kg/M^3, but as the data shows, Auralex doesn't perform from 100-500hz. Likely the result of imprecise cell structure.

    • @AcousticFields
      @AcousticFields  ปีที่แล้ว

      Our 18" x 2" x 25" piece weighs 1 lb.

    • @wraithwrecker_
      @wraithwrecker_ ปีที่แล้ว

      @@AcousticFields Thanks! I appreciate your videos immensely!

  • @mitchabate
    @mitchabate 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Always the best videos!

  • @andx4024
    @andx4024 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    thank you

  • @Aswaguespack
    @Aswaguespack 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I have seen (and I’m sure I’m not alone) where in some commercial locations (like restaurants for one instance) where foam panels hung from the ceiling and I can’t see how that would offer any type of correction because of how it was placed, and also that it didn’t seem to be enough in size and number (and likely thick enough or the proper type) to really be of use to offer any type of correction. Pseudo Acoustic Panels more like it.

    • @Bodey2
      @Bodey2 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes haha, or thin carpet on a wall

    • @Harald_Reindl
      @Harald_Reindl 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Why do you think panels hanging on the ceiling won't work? It's simple physics and the ceiling needs to be treated too - space between foam and walls make it more efficient

    • @AcousticFields
      @AcousticFields  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Every wall surface area in small rooms exhibits a different frequency and amplitude issue. You must design for all of those variables.

    • @AcousticFields
      @AcousticFields  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Every surface area contributes to 17 % of reverb time issue. You must reach a surface treatment level of 65% coverge of each wall to start. If that is not enough, then you will have to go to the ceiling as well. Every room is usage and size dependent.

    • @Aswaguespack
      @Aswaguespack 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@AcousticFields and the particular place I was referring to had NO wall treatments, plain old brick walls, with a few small paintings (for sale) large thin glass picture windows along the entire front wall and 4 small thin foam rectangles maybe 2’ X 3’ hung from the wood rafters of the building about 4’ from the ceiling (which was a 12’ ceiling). These thin
      Foam panels (maybe 3/4” thick) did not look like they could serve any type of real acoustic treatment. 🤷🏻‍♂️

  • @jvf6257
    @jvf6257 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The world goes down and you stay bring us an input how to upgrade the room thx but,in the real world you leave us with ?

    • @Harald_Reindl
      @Harald_Reindl 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      If the world really goes down I want to hear music as good as I can until it's gone

    • @AcousticFields
      @AcousticFields  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      We are not about the real world. We are all about a completely different and very unique world where resolution of both gear, source, and room all work together to do something quite amazing. They will all disppear and it will be only us and the music.