History of Equity | Equity & Trusts
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 3 ส.ค. 2024
- Subscribe to my personal channel for videos on how to study law effectively & efficiently: / @heygarethevans Equity draws on principles of 'fairness', 'justice', 'morality' and 'ethics'. Underlying all these is the principle of 'conscionability'. It is said to moderate the harshness of the Common Law. These were the foundational principles of equity Everything in equity is underpinned by conscionability. “The idea is that a sort of sclerosis of the common law had set in, as a result of which it failed to adapt to new developments in society and economy, and the Chancery provided remedies for these problems”
Equity is founded on these principles but, like the law, it depends on precedent. It is necessary to understand its development to appreciate how equity works. So, like the law it is based on precedent and it is NOT discretionary
If you have any questions drop me a message below 👍🏻
-------------------------------
Hey! If you’re new to the channel… my name is Gareth Evans
I am the owner of Digestible Notes, a website created to make learning fun and easy to understand. Our ultimate goal is to make education accessible to everyone and centralise the internet's vast sea of information.
I want to show you that anyone can achieve their learning goals and live their dream life.
Read from our website: digestiblenotes.com
-------------------------------
SEE MY VIDEO ON LEGAL AND EQUITABLE RIGHTS ➡️
• Legal vs Equitable Int...
If you liked this video you may like my website post on 'Introduction to Trusts': digestiblenotes.com/law/trust...
Subscribe to my personal channel for videos on how to study law effectively & efficiently: th-cam.com/channels/wgN8QVt3yIqcoi04EVqEYA.html
This was absolutely splendid my dear chap
Indubitably. It was absolutely spiffing, Old Bean.
Indubitably, these videos have proven to be most efficacious in elucidating my understanding of the law of equity.
Thank you Gareth, this video is a great introduction to the law of equity.
You even mentioned Bleak House. Dickens did have his issues with the courts.
The bbc made an excellent version in 2005, which is well worth a watch. I enjoyed the coroners court they held in the local pub.
I will be watching all your videos, thanks once again.
This was extremely helpful, thank you!
This is so helpful. Thank you.
No worries 😁
@@digestiblelaw4647 Do you offer tuition? Please provide your email/no if you do, thanks!
Dude you must be sent from heaven
Very well researched and presented
Very interesting, thanks a lot!
Thank you so much for sharing. You talked about the principle of conscionability in slide 3. I have looked in most books and various legal engines but cant find the same but the principle of unconscionability. Where can i find something about the principle you talked about?
Great. Cheers
Amazing
I love your work. Is there a link to your slides. Iam after equity and trust law slides
do you know the name or form to use, for either a private citizen or a public citizen to declare a demand to cease operations/ time out until a proper disclosure in full/ audit in full and review by class representatives of the ethics being upheld in current courts and authorities still remaining from time antiquity, as many previous issues that were previously popular most suredly could be outdated and any furtherance to continue to do business as is is at the detriment to the entire class... .?
I want to be your friend tooooo :P
maybe...
It comes as no surprise that the kings own court and minions and their rules got favouritism over the people and their courts.
If only you could cause yourself to speak in a manner not consistent with a haughty, staunch, wannabe English-man; then would the knowledge be more palatable for the listener, which you would share. I thank you kindly nonetheless for your efforts.
I thought equity was a process of discrimination. “Equal opportunity of outcome” does not exist naturally so discrimination is used to equalize the outcome. You have to discriminate against one to give to another. Racial equity or financial equity like shown in collectivization where people get equal pay no matter what they produced lead to the deaths of millions.
Like positive discrimination maybe. Which in of itself is a contradiction in terms, as what maybe positive for some maybe inimical to others.
@@dyfnwalmoelmud8362 you mean like how they will pass up an Asian or white person just to higher a black person? 🤔 positive for that black person but discriminating against others is not positive discrimination. IT’s discrimination.
@@dyfnwalmoelmud8362 now imagine everyone practiced it. That other race would go homeless because every company practiced what violates civil rights.
@@dyfnwalmoelmud8362 that’s what we see in California today. The highest homeless rate twice the next state down. Predominantly white male. Imagine a working white male homeless in SF paying reparations to a wealthy black person? That’s discrimination people are blatantly ignoring all because of posturing.
Pretending to be virtuous with an insidious ideology.
@@scott-hr3hd I think you may have made a mistake and reversed the races when speaking about discrimination in America my friend. White people are the ones who have practiced racial discrimination in all forms throughout the history of this country. You should do some basic research to understand this.
I imagine he's sitting on a chair near the fire smoking a cobb pipe while teaching this
Kingsley Napley LLP, Bdb the pits LLP and healthcare regulators like hcpc need to know about equity. They've had nearly 400 years to find out about equity and ethics. Can you teach them from the basics? If so, you Would be saving lives of Whistleblowers in healthcare and social care...
🙏☮️☯️✝️
Your voice😩
Is chabal ko htao. Master of snack video😤