If there is an evaluation question on law reform, i.e. ‘advantages of the influences on parliament’. Would we have to speak about advantages for each influence or as a whole?
In approaching a vicarious liability scenario question, would you go through all the steps in establishing whether they are an employee, or would you just state all of them but then only go through one... what is the correct approach? Thanks :)
It’s likely that they want four things: Traditional tests of employment- give a few examples In the course of employment - explain Akin to employment- explain Close connection test - explain
@whitefang7205 It could be part of a question where they want you to say what remedies the claimant can get. Keep it simple- pecuniary- non pecuniary- special and general- brief explanation Remember for OLA 57 it’s personal injury and property but the 1984 Act is injury only Good luck 🤞🤞🤞
![MV วิถีชีวิตใต้ - ผา อัยย๊ะ [Official MV HD]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/nODlkOUu9B0/mqdefault.jpg)
![🔴 ฟุตบอลแชมป์กีฬา 7HD แชมเปียน คัพ 2024 [รอบรองชนะเลิศ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/zPm8ClLVhoE/mqdefault.jpg)
you saved me on paper 1 with your predictions, so i will take your word
I think you might have actually saved me
I am petrified
You can do this 🤓👊Just take your time choosing the right question and read through it properly to check what it’s asking for.
Please do paper 3 predictions human rights :)😊
Tomorrow 👊👊
Could you please do predictions for paper 3? (Human Rights)
Can you please do predictions on paper 3 contract law
do you reckon you could do a short video on structuring evaluation questions?
And thanks for the predictions!
Yes! There’ll be one coming later this week 👊
Really interesting. Do you have lots of qualifications ?
Law degree and a Masters in Law. I’m also a qualified teacher and Senior Examiner 🤓🤓
@@learnlawwithhannahGosh. I wish I was that clever. 🤛✌️💪🙏👩🏻🎓
Can you do a prediction for AQA please
If there is an evaluation question on law reform, i.e. ‘advantages of the influences on parliament’.
Would we have to speak about advantages for each influence or as a whole?
I think you could do a mix of both. In other words, some general advantages and then some that are specific.
In approaching a vicarious liability scenario question, would you go through all the steps in establishing whether they are an employee, or would you just state all of them but then only go through one... what is the correct approach? Thanks :)
It’s likely that they want four things:
Traditional tests of employment- give a few examples
In the course of employment - explain
Akin to employment- explain
Close connection test - explain
Do you think contributory negligence and volenti non fit injura would come up
Unlikely to be just defences
If the essay question is on negligence duty of care. Do I only include duty of care AO1 and not the whole of negligence?
Yes 👊
can you possibly make more video on human rights there is not any resources for them your old videos are good but maybe an updated one
Was there anything in particular that you’re struggling with?
@@learnlawwithhannahWould you be able to do some Article 5 ECHR please?
@@learnlawwithhannah any scenario based question on the articles and how to answer them
How do I contact you ?
You could message me on IG
Is this for aqa?
OCR
@@learnlawwithhannah ah okay no worries
Do you believe that OLA 57 has a higher chance of coming up than negligence for evaluation?
Possibly but I don’t know as AS students had an essay on negligence which focussed on duty of care
@@learnlawwithhannah Do you suggest we revise every aspect of Negligence, or would Duty be most likely to come up if not OLA 57?
@whitefang7205 Any part or all of it could come up- I’d revise the whole lot to be on the safe side 👊
@@learnlawwithhannah sorry for so many questions, do you reckon remedies will come up?
@whitefang7205 It could be part of a question where they want you to say what remedies the claimant can get. Keep it simple- pecuniary- non pecuniary- special and general- brief explanation
Remember for OLA 57 it’s personal injury and property but the 1984 Act is injury only
Good luck 🤞🤞🤞