Does This Image Show China's Fujian Carrier Launching Aircraft at Sea?
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 ก.พ. 2025
- Does this satellite image show China's Fujian supercarrier launching an aircraft with its catapults at sea?
Want to support me?
/ eurasianavalinsight
www.buymeacoff...
Keywords: Type 003, PLAN, PLA Navy, Chinese Navy, modern warships, naval technology, touch-and-go, military
It's confirmed by reliable sources that the KJ600 AWACS is the green image and is catapulted off the Fujian. As for the 6th gen carrier fighter. It's going to be the J50 naval version.
Gladly quote your source. That unmanned aircraft supposedly called J-50 (unconfirmed by Chinese military or government) would need much larger wings to start and land from a carrier, especially if it is carrying a payload.
When did china get fifth gen
@@FirstOrder-le9is It was J20. Go wiki about it. I forgot the time though
@ After stealing F-22 and F-35 plans.
Cope harder yank.@cylentone
In China, things keep progessing. No need for lengthy and boring debates. (Debates happen only within circles of experts and real stakeholders, not for mass people).
I disagree.
I agree in the US politicians and defense companies CEOs make the decisions, the result is incredibly expensive projects that take very long periods to complete too much red tape and bureaucracy. China doesn't have such issues,
That's why the experts are panicking and they may do something more stupid and self-hurting!
doesnt America have 20 carriers that run on 750Mw nuclear reactors???? so the Chinese finally built one ship that we had in the Nimitz class 50 years ago, kinda pathetic bro nil
@@seancopley499 Pathetic?😂 The US has been building for so long, how long has been china been building carriers? You say that like China has been building carriers since the early 1900s. China has built a class almost the same as the kitty hawk using a fraction of the time the US had. That’s a big W for china in my book. 50 years ago china didn’t even have a carrier.
The West : China is flaunting too much!
Also The West : *snaps satellite image*
biggest shameless hypocrite in history as usual
Who said it's a satellite? 6th gen RQ-180 has been flying over the pacific for a few years now.
@cylentone If some photographer in the Philippines managed to find it then im pretty sure the chinese military would've been aware of it by now.
Considering the Chinese haste to call out america's intrusion, especially in a high priority port, i call bullshit.
Maybe China should be their Fujian Carrier during Fleet week in Los Angeles, CA or San Francisco, CA... Just saying It is not a secret.
@@rgloria40 Assuming the US would even allow such a thing, they've been barring China from a lot of international naval related trainings for a while now.
Would be cool if the 003 shows up on international fleet review though, would be a sight to see.
That would be a bonkers flex if they are building out a 80k ton fujian sister ship and at the same time building out I presume a type 004 100 to 120k + nuclear super carrier.
004 is underway and it's 110k ton, 340m in length
They've been bonkers flexing for years...
china has yet to display the ability to produce a nuclear powered aircraft carrier, something america MASTERED 50 years ago, lmfao
The "concrete inland carrier" in Wuhan is currently under renovation and enlargement. The island is seen to be smaller and is moved further back of the flight deck. A precursor of things to come in the 004 carrier?
@@syncmaster915n oh, the last I heard (I think this channel had it on one video) was that it was being dismantled. has it been built up again?
You cant tell which direction the aircraft is heading on that image. I lines up perfectly for a launch and a tough and go.
Not a touch and go test. It is a launch from a catapult. The angle aligned with the catapult. As for which 6th gen plane will be navalised. I think it is both, especially the UCAV versions.
da heck you think the j36 will launch from a carrier???? thats some ambition then because its a BIG BOY!! and how many j36 will fit in the carrier??? if that is the case this carrier will break records as its going to be massive!!!! and then youre going to get the boys saying the bigger the target for US missiles... man imagine this thing would have to be double the size just to accommodate it on deck!!?
在这个"强权即真理的世界",保持足够的武力,是保护自己的唯一可靠方式. 与之相反,如果说人类文明什么时候能进入新的阶段,就必须开始放弃这种零和博弈的思维
遺憾的是大概要等到大家打到不想再打下去的時候
@@absboodoo弱肉强食是这个世界的自然法则，所以永无止境
Winn the pooh is stronger than china. The Japanese force that attacked Pearl Harbor on December 7th, 1941, was stronger than the PLA 😂 china reminds me of a Chihuahua.....constantly barking acting tough but would be killed within a fraction of a second if anything ever happened 😅
oh really? they're slow. what progress you're talking about? imagine how many poor chekwang souls if Taiwan slaps an anti ship to this carrier?
If China can send a rover to the farside of the moon, they can surely be able to do something as simple as the electromagnetic catapult.
China until 2007 couldn’t even make the ball of a ballpoint pen.
Be wary of any claims of accomplishment they make. They have a terrible history of lying about their capabilities.
This has been seen in their economic, corporate profit reports, census…it just never stops with the lies.
So be very wary…
China is progressing at the speed that is closer to wartime development speed than peacetime. Impressive.
Especially considering the US has been at war for the last 20 years and hasn’t even come close to the industry production as China in the same timeframe. China is in top and at this rate will be able to beat the US when it comes to manufacturing and production of heavy industry. Technologically the west might still have an edge but the west does not have the means to produce all that advanced tech in the way China does for its less advanced tech. This is not even considering the rapid advanced if Chinese technology with the electromagnetic catapults on type 003 carrier.
If china keeps pi$$ing off the world they won't be around for long
@@FrizzlemanExactly its just like ww2, the nazis had superior everythinf, but we had the means of mass production and we also had unlimited troops.
@ totally agree that’s exactly what I’m talking about
@@Frizzleman I thank god some people see it at least, i always feel alone when talking about china to anyone, they dont see how much of a threat china truly is. History is the greatest teacher. We are have underestimated china and now that we are catching on, theyve surpassed us without our knowledge
I agree with your assessment - The Shenyang J-50 is the primary candidate for a 6th generation carrier aircraft. The J-36 looks to be too large for carrier operations.
All hail China!
🤣😭🤣 funny joke!!
@@demunbell be like your life😊
@@是去苦多 "just like my life"?... Your English is poor.😉
Chill out, China's aircraft program is still so new, and has a long way to go. I still believe aircraft carriers are an antique of the mid 20th century Pacific campaigns. They saw limited action after that, used mostly to intimidate smaller countries and for photo shoots. They are just target practice with advent advanced, torpedoes, cruise missiles both supersonic and hypersonic.
China’s aircraft carriers are not the Center of their fleet like how the U.S. carriers are they are more support role ships
well~China has all the toys, now we pursue space toys.
Someone said that on the ocean, there are subs and there are targets.
Nobody ever learns - just like the UK 2 new carriers, they are already dead in the water!
UK is too bloated and corrupt to use their carriers. China is focused and capable. These carriers are a huge threat to the west and it’s foolish to pretend otherwise.
The image certainly shows something "leaving" the deck, in the same "general" direction as the catapult system runs. It would be very reasonable to assume this is proof of a launch, but as others have stated it may well be something else.
To Be Honest........
It Looks like a helo, you can see the rotors "spiking out" from the main "green blob", with the tail structure pointing towards the FD. Also, is That a shadow within the 'blue circle'....look at the shadow of the ship and the shadow of "possible" helo. Looks like the helo is flying a Bit above the ship, to cast a ~Barely visible, shadow.
Remember, this IS a satellite image...
*Its very likely China may have next gen J36 planes for those two nuclear carriers coming*
I wonder. From what we've seen, the J36 is huge and more of a "fighter-bomber". I think OP is correct, it will likely be the smaller J50.
dude the size of the carrier ship just to accommodate the thing on deck... much bigger than the j20, if the j36 is going to be navalised then whats stopping the j20 from being navalised???
the carrier would be double the size of anything in existence!!! i mean Chinas breaking records from the sound of things so why not make an ace combat sized carrier, theyve got the futuristic planes to match....
imagine the runway length to launch and stop a fully loaded j36!!!???
i mean i would love to see china do it as a manufacturing flex for sure!!! but everything else would need to scale up to protect it at sea!!!?
this thing would be a monster aand would need monster protection!!??
did china find megatron on the dark side of the moon then???
@@antwango probably because there isn’t much of a practical reason to make something much larger then current super carriers. The last time a carrier was being built to cater to a large plane for a single specific mission I think was the United States CV-58 class which in hindsight was fundamentally a iffy design especially compared to the Forrestal which came a few years later
How, they only have a flight test model flying, not a production model. Give it some time.
TWO carriers? Simultanously? Wow this is insane.
no...
So are we.
Regarding the satellite image, commercial imaging satellites like Digital Globe can provide 0.5 meter resolution. There must be a story behind why this image is less than 0.5 meter resolution. Maybe it is simply a color image with 2 meter resolution that has not been “pan-sharpened” with the monochrome 0.5 meter image.
Grasping. Port side catapult is an auxiliary station, unfavorable in relation to the dedicated forward catapults for many reasons not the least of which ia sharing the runway space, complicating emergencies and in light of mitigating circumstances, "oh we only built out the catapult that is also situated in the landing track," it is obviously not a launch.
There's 3 aircraft carriers in construction and one of them confirmed using nuclear powered aircraft. The other two not sure because the layout still at initial stage
It’s just a rumour among the Webber, no clarification. I would say it is bragging
3 is very unlikely, I would say just 1, which is already fast.
@@kurtji8170 3 is not difficult for them at all, manufacturing capability wise, but 3 is indeed very unlikely, not the way the PLA doing things for now, unless they want to have 4 Fujian type of ACs, which is very unlikely also.
@@cheungchingtong but China keeps us guessing
@@antwango It is military, not some civil techs that you want to show off and tell everybody ASAP for capital investment, my friend.
It is already reported by some media that the next nuclear powered aircraft carrier will be 120k tons.
Why. fuzzy sat image? Even commercial satellite cameras are very good.
我本来觉得造几十艘076及其改款应该更有性价比，076中国一年造6艘都很轻松，076工期很短只需要1年效率最高，尤其076这类的舰艇是可以“海陆空”多用途的。3-4艘076的综合舰队包围对付一个美国的航母编队就可以了，何况中国还有052D，055舰载高超音导弹的优势。也即如果美国有10艘航母，中国造30-40艘076其实是性价比挺高的，就算用4艘076对付一个美国航母编队也承担的起。1艘美国福特航母130亿美元相当于接近1000亿人民币了，造5艘076是完全够的。而且中国的076既能弹射战机，又能装坦克，导弹车，还能放登陆艇，无人艇，甚至是小潜艇，无人潜航器和水雷等等，这种海陆空多功能性性价比更高。如果你说美国的是核动力的航母，其实中国造几艘核动力充电补给船就可以了。 因为核动力航母如果反应堆被击中会人员损失更大，所以造076，如果没有电力或油料了可以退到后面的安全节点核动力补给船旁充电加油就可以再回到战场了，没必要非要本身成为核动力航母面对被击中核反应堆的风险。我觉得40艘076综合舰队对付美军10艘航母舰队既够用而且性价比很高。尤其076的弹射器更长，已经考虑了弹射沈飞新6代机的情况下。
看来你还是对055的鹰击没有信心，如果你真认为咱们的导弹有优势的话，你用4艘076去对付他就太浪费了。就它现在的破航母，特别还在第一第二岛链来挑衅我们的情况下，我估计他们自己也吓得够呛。
Not really, too many 076 need more command officers. Too bulky to support and train. Right now the trend is perfect.
@@ToSoothingRelaxMusic 我有信心没有用，你造的不够欧美就不信你，它还相信它们的“神话”。如果它们现在觉得你够强还会制裁你么？当然不会。它们是觉得美国还是比你强才这样，它们觉得你好欺负才会欺负你。当你有足够数量的076又有性能，又有数量，又能两栖登陆作战，又有可批量建造有性价比的航母（多功能076）开到它们家门口常驻或溜达它们才会懂这个道理，想起这件事。当你对自己说你自己有信心没用，你应该把你有威胁的武器在海盗眼前展示它们才会明白。你哪怕翻翻很多外国人的留言你也应该知道它们是怎么想的。076因为海陆空的多功能和性价比是目前最合适的工具。
What do you realy think? The eyes in the the western countries and NATO are openened now. China steels a lot of technology from the west thats what we all know here. In 2025 the trade embargo will start. China will be poor just as in the 70`s. People have enough of it and the shit Chinese quality sponsered by their government!
F-35C been launching off carriers since 2019, 6th gen FA/XX prototype since 2020.
incredible!! the catapults must be working well if they also fitted to type 76!
Catapult launches are done at higher ship speed to get more initial airspeed over the wings, so look at the ships wake. Big wake , ship making more knots, catapult launch.
The Fujian has special propeller propulsion that minimizes wake. This has been confirmed by videos of earlier of trial sailing.
The touch n go looks off the centerline of the landing strip. It looks more of a launch to me.
They are so powerful
What is the point of discussing touch and go test and launch from a catapult？
In the long run, 10 years from now, a premium value will be placed on “unsinkable carriers” i.e. island runways. This makes me suspect we will see runway kits that can quickly be installed on islands and shoals … including extensions over water that are resting on pilings and then backfilled later.
the smaller plane seems the ideal candidate... but from the comments some people think the j36 is possible...which would mean china would be flexing... the carrier would be humongous just to have it on deck and thats just one...
imagine the runway and stopping distance the thing would need.... the hell where would you store the thing, also the size of the lift!!! i mean would love a massive transformer sized carrier from science fiction and if anybody is capable its china flexing and pushing the boundaries of manufacture.... would certainly be a statement!!!
everything that surrounds this mega carrier would have to scale up!! would be bonkers!! i would be asking china where theyre keeping magatron hostage!!??
You have another video of the H20 to make.
that video doesn’t seem credible, i doubt we’ll see something about it on this channel
fake
I could make a H-20 video, that's sensible.
Note though I don't consider the recent H-20 flight footage authentic. I encourage everyone to treat sources that push this info with much greater skepticism and scrutiny going forward. If they repeatedly push fake footages, it would show either a lack of due diligence in cross-checking with reputable sources, or a disregard for accuracy (and focused solely on view traffic). In that case, they should be ignored going forward.
@@EurasiaNaval 那个是几年前网友做的视频，音轨被连续重复使用了四次，中国人都知道是假的，不知道哪个网友拿出来赚流量
I think our host might already have another better qualities pix.
Yes, agree with you on touch and go trials.
But I don't think J-36/XD/50 would have been designed for carrier deployment. At least not in the first variant. Both J-36 and J-50 seem to be competing prototypes for the same class of aircrafts, maybe even the same design competition program similar to YF-22 and YF-23. But regarding the size and weapons load projections, which most likely would be in the range of 15 - 20 tons, both would lie in the category of fighter bombers like the F-111, but also coming close to the B-21 Raider specs. Due to the possible versatility in question, I would see both J-36 & J-50 as multirole (reconnaissance, EWF, first wave HARM strike weapon, combat patrol, long range area/maritime denial) platform. Not as a simple fighter bomber role of the 1980's understanding.
The Chengdu J36 and Shenyang JXXX are not competing prototype models. They serve different purposes and both are production models. Hinted by the gray paints and serial numbers of the Chengdu. The Shenyang is kept extra secretive on purpose, the Shenyang is likely a navy purpose designed and built. But likely they would compliment each other on a mission.
中国没有海外基地，战轰机上航母不是个难题。主要电磁弹射器功率可以容易做大！
不知道编号的那个，体积非常小😊
My guess is a launch. If you line up the deck markings delineating the 2 sides of the "runway," the green image is closer to the right hand line than the left and, I think, more in line with the cat. Thanks for another great video ENI. Best wishes.
Common sense will tell us they will launch a slower STOL aircaft with Propeller for safety. They wont launch a J15T as that is a fast speed jet and turbo jet engine need time to spool up and unlike Propeller plane have sufficent lift at low speed. Most likely the KJ500 is being tested first before testing the J15T.❤
电磁弹射的功率可以做到美国蒸汽弹射的三倍！！！
感觉博主肯定在追观网军工组的博客
视频重点（中文版）：
不确认是否弹射了，也不确认是什么机型，个人猜还是在触舰复飞。
根据中国著名大V（军工组？），正在同时开造一常一核，六代上舰项目也在推进。
个人补充：
今天看到回港照片了，轮胎印很密，挡焰板很干净，应该是进行了较多次的触舰，还没弹。最显眼的是桅杆被熏黑得不成样子，估计厂家要忙活调整了。
去年就看到武汉航母楼在动工，现在已经看到舰岛后移，而且放了一架北六。核开造是板上钉钉了，北六上舰也没悬念。
而再加一常也非常合理，因为常的在航率高，在复兴大事上的作用更大，现在一艘显然不够。时间上也差不多了，福建测得七七八八就可以确认图纸了。
我认为北六上舰优先级不会比南六低甚至更高，因为复兴节点更需要海军。
🇨🇳 🇵🇱🤝
哈哈podcast说的不会是军工组吧
Lots of pro-PLA AIs here.
Looks like a helicopter
The J50 underfuselage has a deep groove which is clearly room left for the tailhook to fold up. And it makes sense that the "South for airforce; North for naval aviation" arrangement to be maintained since Shenyang has specialized in carrier-based fighters with the J15 series. So it has to be J50. Only question is, if they will skip the J35 since the two are basically at the same stage now. If I were the Chinese admiral, I will, as the Chinese traditionally do, defeat the enemy without the need to fight a war with the J50 - speed up its deployment by skipping the J35. This will cast doubt on, and even obsolete the entire Western F35 naval program. This is a financial defeat the the West in its current form can not recover from, coupled with their pending defeat in Ukraine.
From the 1980s onward, the Chinese doctrine has been "Walk Your road. So you have no road to walk." 2025 marks the beginning of the new doctrine "Walk ahead of you. And make you walk my road until you run out of money".
Can you make a video About Chinese new Main Battle Tank development, i know your channel focused more on naval,but Can you make one?
兄弟你不需要担心我们的坦克有多强，因为我们的无人机世界第，一天生产1,500,000架，那个时候就感觉坦克也不是那么重要了😂
weeeh! 😅
Let the DPRC build up as much as they want, its not like the US is worried about other countries having Navies, after all the Soviets had a semi-global navy for years, above and under the oceans. The question really comes down to political and operational maturity. They sniff us, we sniff them and nothing more comes of it. It usually comes down to moments of when someone flexes their military ego a little too much and don't know how to respond appropriately (or not at all). I think that is what worries some people when they see a country building up their military so quickly. No experience.
是不是都无所谓，我们知道无论现在是不是，过不了几个月，他总会是的
等到一切运作好了，自然会把官方的消息放出来
我们只需要等，让别人猜是不是就好了
别人关心也好，不关心也罢，那个玩意放在那里，钢铁制造的真实总比人的嘴制造的新闻更靠谱一些
不过有个事情也挺好玩的，这J36是谁发明的，就算叫也不会叫J36。J36序号上J35冲突了，命名逻辑上和J16冲突了。
后面随着战斗机研发能力的提升，新战斗机出现会越来越快，应该会有一个合理的命名方式，不会就直接随随便便的就弄一个J36出来，J35的命名已经很奇怪了，大概率一开始想叫J30，后来感觉有点不合适，叫的J31，可能最后发展情况比预期的好，于是弄了一个J35的编号。要不然其实就应该叫J32了。
要是他和J35有比较直接的关系，比如是J35的深度改进型，不适宜还叫作J35，才会叫J36。
如果从战斗轰炸机的角度出发，应该接续JH7的编号，叫JH17，哪怕叫JH37也比J36合适。须知JH7的7的序号，其实主要来自他的H部分，也就是轰炸机的编号，JH7项目一开始叫H7。
反正西方媒体还是比较有想象力的，编号都给安排上了。要我说干脆一点，就叫J100和J200。或者学学英特尔的故事，叫J6-1100
你学过中文吧，你福建两个字发音很正哦
Pretty sure he is from Taiwan.
USA paparazzing everyone 😂 don’t you have better things to do like clean up skid row 😂
卧槽，这家伙上贴吧的？😂
台湾人.
博主本身就是台湾人，逛内网很正常。
航吧的?
When they build 15 or 20 more of these carriers, along with a deep sea fleet, I'll be impressed. One carrier will never tip the balance.
Can't see anything except a handful of low res green pixels and black/grey pixels on my phone lol.
Can't even tell if the carrier is real or some rc model. Especially these days when AI is so easy to make an everyone can use photoshop, better to be a skeptic..
It’s not like you can just hop on Google earth and see all 3 aircraft carriers in china…..
Good for you keep thinking like this
Highly doubt that it is a aircraft launch picture. Simply look at the wake, or should I say lack thereof, which indicates a vessel doing only a few knots. The water was very flat, so therefore there would have been not that much wind of the deck either. I cannot believe that photo analysis guys missed this basic stuff. And Touch and Go's with little wind over the deck is rather useless for informational basis for China. Doing a touch and go on a stable vessel practically dead in the water will not be of any value overall to train or gain information. Information, like effects of wind over the deck causes some rather interesting air flow issues. There is a rather significant downdraft aft of the ship at speed, sometimes the island creates some rather interesting issues also. Since this vessel is fossil fueled, remember that the stack discharge is hot and less dense, will it have an effect on the airflow over the flight deck. This would appear to be a Show the Flag fluff photo op, rather than a real-world test and evaluation.
The Vessel is floated with great Pomp
Thwn launched with great pride
& One fine day the vessel Cracs in Secracy
Ford？
不要怕，假的都是假的
I'm skeedred !!
First
🤡
Soon to be last.
About time they built a catapult, and it took them 2 "generations" to build a naval fighter with vertical takeoff and landing? Shame. China can't even build semi conductors, let alone a true 6th generation fighter.
不会吧，都二十一世纪了 还有国家没有自己的空间站 弹射航母，六代机吗？
不会吧，世界上只有国家连自己的空间站都没有吗？😅
不会吧，世界上真有国家生产的汽车，连发展中国家生产的汽车都比不上吧😅
哈哈哈好搞笑快乐教育真棒
Looks like I baited some pink bots today 😂😂😂
Why you funny westerns always overreact to the fishing boats? Tell me why?
OMG, Fisherman boat with AliExpress quality in sea trial catching blue fin tuna 😂
希望你们的政客相信你的观点，拜托了。
Right ? Totally nothing to worry about ...
copy copy copy copy copy
How caaan it lauch? Doesn't it haave cracked deck?😅😅
Is not an Aircraft dummy. It’s a LEGO toy 😂😂😂 You don’t have to worry at all. 😂😂😂