I can't remember... this was a "portfolio" shoot so we really did the most with favours - only paid for people's expenses + equipment instead of time. I think it cost around the $4-5k (AUD) mark but that was with the camera crew and cinematographer, make up artist, stylist, models, sound designer + myself (directing + editing) not getting their time compensated for. We ended up shooting 2.5 rolls of film and had to reshoot for an extra half day, since one the models couldn't make the 2nd day of shooting!
Thank you! The DoP shot 6fps and we slowed down the captured footage in post. I think we wanted an open shutter for longer motion trails, but the Aaton XTR needed its own tool to do that
Fantastic grade, but I'm about 100% certain this isn't shot on film unless you printed it onto 16mm film. I don't think that's the case either. Correct me if I'm wrong.
Interesting! What part of the grade makes you say that? The DP shot it on an Aaton with some Canon Suzuki Zooms - there's some BTS pics on my website if you're curious!
@@LuisCampbell The rolling shutter is the big giveaway at the start, though it's unrelated to the grade. The problem I'm seeing with the grade though, are the highlights. They're not remotely as soft as film highlights tend to be (especially on light fixtures), halation being a big contributor to this. This effect is more pronounced on 16mm and 8mm, less on 35mm and 65mm. It's either that, or I'm losing my mind.
@@maslue90 I think you're just mistaken because of the shape of the windows. If you compare it to when the train is no longer blurry in that 2nd shot, you see the edges of the windows are slanted either due to the shape of the car or the windows themselves. The highlights would clip if you clip them in the grade, as well. Vision stocks handle a tremendous amount of overexposure, it might actually get rather dense before the highlights would soften. Just guessing!
@@ivereadthesequel I believe you're right. Though, I'm still on the fence about the way highlights are behaving. It's a bit odd from everything I've seen and tested. But just because I haven't seen it do that before doesn't mean it can't.
![ทุกครั้งที่หลับตา (Lucid Dream) - AYLA's [ Official MV ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/4i1OBAQyv58/mqdefault.jpg)
Incredible
❤
Me encantó 💙
Woooow
Love this.....nice work
Amazing.
This was beautiful! Amazing job!
beautiful
Incredibe wow
insanely did
thats nice
Amazing! how much budget did the whole project cost roughly? im very curious if i could afford this type of art. thank you for the inspiration ❤
I can't remember... this was a "portfolio" shoot so we really did the most with favours - only paid for people's expenses + equipment instead of time. I think it cost around the $4-5k (AUD) mark but that was with the camera crew and cinematographer, make up artist, stylist, models, sound designer + myself (directing + editing) not getting their time compensated for. We ended up shooting 2.5 rolls of film and had to reshoot for an extra half day, since one the models couldn't make the 2nd day of shooting!
I love this video! how did you get the choppy effect on 0:03 ?
Thank you! The DoP shot 6fps and we slowed down the captured footage in post. I think we wanted an open shutter for longer motion trails, but the Aaton XTR needed its own tool to do that
Fantastic grade, but I'm about 100% certain this isn't shot on film unless you printed it onto 16mm film. I don't think that's the case either. Correct me if I'm wrong.
Interesting! What part of the grade makes you say that? The DP shot it on an Aaton with some Canon Suzuki Zooms - there's some BTS pics on my website if you're curious!
@@LuisCampbell The rolling shutter is the big giveaway at the start, though it's unrelated to the grade. The problem I'm seeing with the grade though, are the highlights. They're not remotely as soft as film highlights tend to be (especially on light fixtures), halation being a big contributor to this. This effect is more pronounced on 16mm and 8mm, less on 35mm and 65mm. It's either that, or I'm losing my mind.
What does that mean Kobe Bryant?
@@maslue90 I think you're just mistaken because of the shape of the windows. If you compare it to when the train is no longer blurry in that 2nd shot, you see the edges of the windows are slanted either due to the shape of the car or the windows themselves. The highlights would clip if you clip them in the grade, as well. Vision stocks handle a tremendous amount of overexposure, it might actually get rather dense before the highlights would soften. Just guessing!
@@ivereadthesequel I believe you're right. Though, I'm still on the fence about the way highlights are behaving. It's a bit odd from everything I've seen and tested. But just because I haven't seen it do that before doesn't mean it can't.