Poincare Conjecture and Ricci Flow | A Million Dollar Problem in Topology

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 มิ.ย. 2024
  • How do we use Riemannian Geometry and Surgery Theory to crack a million-dollar problem in topology? Ricci flow, that's how. In this video, we tackle the only Millennium Prize Problem that's been solved so far, and find the deep mathematics uncovered in the process.
    ---
    Official Problem Statement:
    www.claymath.org/millennium-p...
    ---
    Follow me!
    Twitter: / 00aleph00
    Instagram: / 00aleph00
    __
    Music Info: Documentary - AShamaluevMusic.
    Music Link: www.ashamaluevmusic.com
    Intro: (0:00)
    Poincare Conjecture: (0:45)
    Riemannian Geometry: (2:31)
    Ricci Flow: (4:17)
    Surgery Theory: (7:10)
    Proof of Poincare Conjecture: (7:26)

ความคิดเห็น • 532

  • @dcblunt666
    @dcblunt666 3 ปีที่แล้ว +475

    0:20 “By the end of this video you’ll understand exactly what it is” - how dare you overestimate me, sir

    • @zaxarrrr3659
      @zaxarrrr3659 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      Like, I don't even know what the hell this is supposed to be

    • @67hoursAndCounting
      @67hoursAndCounting 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@zaxarrrr3659 There's a reason the guy got $1,000,000 for it! Lol

    • @denisnedic5095
      @denisnedic5095 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@67hoursAndCounting actually he did not took the money.

    • @hybmnzz2658
      @hybmnzz2658 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Look up positive curvature and negative curvature then this video will make perfect sense. Ricci flow is the process of the manifold evolving according to the rule R=-dg/dt as explained.

    • @glumbortango7182
      @glumbortango7182 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      This guy's just really confusing, don't worry if you don't get it because it's really not a clear explanation.

  • @tonybanks1035
    @tonybanks1035 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1576

    Disclaimer: there are easier ways to make a million dollars

    • @aniksamiurrahman6365
      @aniksamiurrahman6365 3 ปีที่แล้ว +114

      But there's no easier way to make an original contribution. I mean no matter how much we celebrate cutthroat salesmen, they are still feeding off the innovations of these people who made original discoveries.

    • @arthdubey
      @arthdubey 3 ปีที่แล้ว +85

      He didn't take the million dollar...

    • @jwrosenbury
      @jwrosenbury 3 ปีที่แล้ว +116

      My favorite way to make a million dollars is to start with ten million dollars. Then spend nine.

    • @DJVARAO
      @DJVARAO 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@arthdubey Yeah, but can somebody else claim it?

    • @arthdubey
      @arthdubey 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@DJVARAO No, because the prize was for someone who solves any one of the millenium problems. Since it's well established that Perelman solved it, they can't.

  • @MrPolluxxxx
    @MrPolluxxxx 3 ปีที่แล้ว +983

    As an engineer, I can tell you with cerainty that it's true for small angles.

    • @notdelta99
      @notdelta99 3 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      cerainty

    • @aniksamiurrahman6365
      @aniksamiurrahman6365 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Please spill some explanation for us regular folks.

    • @tomthepom98
      @tomthepom98 3 ปีที่แล้ว +103

      @@aniksamiurrahman6365 Engineers often cut corners in solving problems for the sake of simplicity. This particular joke might be a reference to the small angle approximation, often used in engineering courses for solving harmonic motion problems and such. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Small-angle_approximation

    • @polyhistorphilomath
      @polyhistorphilomath 3 ปีที่แล้ว +87

      If you truncate the Taylor expansion at the linear term, almost anything is possible.

    • @joyboricua3721
      @joyboricua3721 3 ปีที่แล้ว +41

      Sin(x) = x

  • @rysus
    @rysus 3 ปีที่แล้ว +148

    Ricci Flow always sounded like a rapper name to me...

    • @SanjaySingh-oh7hv
      @SanjaySingh-oh7hv 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      If so, he should be Italian, no?

    • @karelevzen
      @karelevzen หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Here's a rap about Ricci Flow (credit to ChatGPT):
      (Verse 1)
      Yo, it’s a geometric flow, call it Ricci,
      Transformin’ metrics, smooth and tricky.
      In the realm of manifolds, it’s a revolution,
      Aimin’ for the shape that’s the best solution.
      (Hook)
      Ricci Flow, where the curves align,
      Evolvin’ shapes, through space and time.
      With Hamilton's touch, it starts to glow,
      This ain't just math, it's a dynamic show.
      (Verse 2)
      From the streets to the sheets of a complex map,
      It smooths the curves, no gaps, no trap.
      Curvature decreasin’, it’s a smooth operator,
      Reshaping the universe, like a skilled innovator.
      (Bridge)
      Three dimensions, spheres get rounder,
      Topology’s king, no bounds to flounder.
      Grigori Perelman, he dropped the mic,
      Solved Poincaré, and he did it right.
      (Outro)
      So, when you hear Ricci, think of the flow,
      Mathematical rhythms that uniquely grow.
      It's not just equations or abstract art,
      It's the poetry of science, where change is the heart.

  • @nianyiwang
    @nianyiwang 3 ปีที่แล้ว +870

    The question is: WHO CARES?
    Well, Poincares.

  • @starshipx1282
    @starshipx1282 4 ปีที่แล้ว +485

    Man your effort is appreciated. I hope your channel grows.

    • @Aleph0
      @Aleph0  4 ปีที่แล้ว +36

      Thanks!!

    • @BgAndrew100
      @BgAndrew100 3 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      @@Aleph0 just FYI, in Putin's Russia mathematicians are tortured with a screwdriver. Google Azat Miftakhov for details. So the general advise is : whenever you see name Putin - spit, curse and hit dislike.

    • @harryc5595
      @harryc5595 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      @@BgAndrew100 shut up lmao it's a joke account name

    • @pinklady7184
      @pinklady7184 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Andrei Kalinin I looked up Azat. The Russian police might have viewed him as a rich boy and so they arrested him and expected his family to bribe police for his release. Police in Russia are horridly corrupt.
      As a tourist, you would need to carry lot and lot of money because when you get stopped on the traffic and be falsely accused of speed driving offences, you must pay the fines to the self-serving Russian police. Sometimes, you can get stopped up to 10 times a day by Russia police, if they see how rich you are. It happened to my sister's neighbour. I am from Ireland and you would not believe how often that Russian police stop Irish tourists and other foreigners on the roads. My sister's neighbour swears that the Russian police are getting rich off foreigners.

    • @pinklady7184
      @pinklady7184 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Andrei Kalinin PS, you should hide your name, when you are politically disagreeable.

  • @OwenMcKinley
    @OwenMcKinley 4 ปีที่แล้ว +315

    I do wonder what Perelman is up to these days. Again, supremely good content! I've seen a lot of the Poincaré videos on TH-cam; your effort exceeds them all! Great presentation 👍👍

    • @Aleph0
      @Aleph0  4 ปีที่แล้ว +43

      Haha yes - we all wonder that! Thank you for the kind words :)

    • @jabhutt1013
      @jabhutt1013 3 ปีที่แล้ว +42

      Last I heard of him, which was like more than 5 years ago, that he took some kind of job in Finland and moved there with his mother.

    • @IoT_
      @IoT_ 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      @@jabhutt1013 he still lives in Russia.
      th-cam.com/video/idr3C3lMoAQ/w-d-xo.html
      Sometimes he goes to Sweden.

    • @magicmulder
      @magicmulder 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      He hated the publicity so who knows if he ever works on anything again. Would love to see him work with Tao.

    • @user-yb5cn3np5q
      @user-yb5cn3np5q 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It was suspected he was working on Navier-Stokes now.

  • @mrbale1815
    @mrbale1815 3 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    He solved "Thurston Geometrization Theorem", Poincare Conjecture is just one case of it.

  • @mrhanky5851
    @mrhanky5851 3 ปีที่แล้ว +79

    THANK YOU. Geez it’s impossible to get someone to give a straightforward answer about what this even is lol

  • @Shawkster6
    @Shawkster6 3 ปีที่แล้ว +60

    Holy shit. I didn’t think I’d ever see a video that explains a millennium problem this well, let alone problem + solution 🤯 My new favorite math channel for sure 👏

  • @yellow5876
    @yellow5876 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    This is definitely my favorite channel on youtube. Thank you for your hard work.

  • @jimmoriarty6964
    @jimmoriarty6964 3 ปีที่แล้ว +107

    3b1b:
    Finally, a worthy opponent, our battle will be legendary.

  • @carloserazoramirez4286
    @carloserazoramirez4286 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    You are literally the only youtuber to whom i let the ads play full length. Amazing content, keep it up!

  • @atil4
    @atil4 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Best math video I have seen in a very long time! If you keep delivering this quality videos you will have a big success. Totally subscribed!

  • @yiannisvan6453
    @yiannisvan6453 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I have never seen such an understood video about something so complicated. Congratulations.

  • @AA-gl1dr
    @AA-gl1dr 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Beautiful, absolutely beautiful. Thank you so much. I wish you nothing but the highest orders of success because you’re helping more humans than you could ever imagine with this

  • @xhocheinsdurchmol
    @xhocheinsdurchmol 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I can't describe how glad I am that I found the channel. Thx for the content bro!

  • @fawzibriedj4441
    @fawzibriedj4441 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    A new gem has emerged on TH-cam!
    Thanks for the video :)

  • @marco.nascimento
    @marco.nascimento 3 ปีที่แล้ว +40

    This was the best video explaining the poincaré conjecture that I've found, awesome!! Of course I'll have to watch it some more 3 times to get a better grasp of the math, but I got the chills in the end nevertheless. Pretty elegant proof, that surgery thing is a great insight, never heard of it before.

    • @Aleph0
      @Aleph0  3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Thank you! I totally got the chills too (that is, when I finally understood the proof :P). Glad you enjoyed it :)

  • @peyoje
    @peyoje 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Finally a nice video about this topic! Thank you so much!

  • @yahav897
    @yahav897 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Amazing. Lots of effort were put into this, truly a great video; thank you!

  • @normalvector4564
    @normalvector4564 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This video deserves million views. Quality content.

  • @Sameone666
    @Sameone666 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Best visualisation on the topic i've ever seen! Thank you!

  • @RafaelSCalsaverini
    @RafaelSCalsaverini 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    That's a great explanation of a surreal complex topic. I'm amazed.
    I guess the comparisons with 3b1b are warranted.

  • @ColeCoug
    @ColeCoug ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Absolutely killer video man that was awesome. Really felt like understood it after watching it and was thinking the whole time about how it might relate to physics.

  • @m2a2x2000
    @m2a2x2000 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    thanks for the explanation. I have started this topic countless times but every time I'm drowning in details. good stuff sir.

  • @elenayablonskaya3543
    @elenayablonskaya3543 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Wow... this channel gives exceptionally well made explanations.. please keep going!

  • @stevenwonder7585
    @stevenwonder7585 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What an awesome channel; I hope you'll get the publicity that you deserve.

  • @willk7184
    @willk7184 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Pretty cool, I actually vaguely comprehended that - thanks for the great explanation and visualization.

  • @robertschlesinger1342
    @robertschlesinger1342 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Very interesting, informative and worthwhile video.

  • @bogdangirdea8929
    @bogdangirdea8929 3 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    Brilliantly simple explanation. The video does it all, at least for us with less expertise in the field. I could not imagine those shapes in this context without the video. Indeed an images is worth 1000 words...

    • @Aleph0
      @Aleph0  3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Thanks @Bogdan! Glad you liked the video :)

  • @ElIrracional
    @ElIrracional 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks man. Outstandingly clear.

  • @matiasortiz1293
    @matiasortiz1293 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What an incredible video, your channel deserves to be huge

    • @Aleph0
      @Aleph0  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you! That's very kind :)

  • @richardliu3074
    @richardliu3074 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The visual effects are awesome 🤩It really offers me a invitation into learning Ricci flow 🥳

  • @NKernytskyy
    @NKernytskyy ปีที่แล้ว

    Absolutely amazing and concise explanation!

  • @aakashbudhera953
    @aakashbudhera953 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    another awesome video buddy!

  • @RG-tg4oz
    @RG-tg4oz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great work and clearly explained 👍👍

  • @ashishkiift
    @ashishkiift 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Excellent video .. thanks TH-cam thanks Aleph 0 . Please keep making more

  • @eric3813
    @eric3813 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I just found your Channel and i am amazed of the quality of your Content.it's Really extremly interesting And well explained. Keep it up! :)

    • @Aleph0
      @Aleph0  3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Thanks! Glad that you found us :)

  • @northernskies86
    @northernskies86 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The most daunting problems in mathematics oftentimes have the most elegant solutions.

  • @flooreijkelboom1693
    @flooreijkelboom1693 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sick animations man! Good job

  • @7Strigiformes
    @7Strigiformes หลายเดือนก่อน

    What an explanation! Amazing! Thank you so much for this brilliant content.

  • @youssefamen6872
    @youssefamen6872 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Iam happy that I found this channel

  • @ianprado1488
    @ianprado1488 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This video is a triumph of modern mathematics

  • @cristianalvarez3811
    @cristianalvarez3811 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is just awesome, I wish you the best for your channel as this video is as beautiful as the idea behind the proof it presents. =D

  • @cosmicwakes6443
    @cosmicwakes6443 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Great video. Thanks for the presentation.

    • @Aleph0
      @Aleph0  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks! Appreciate it :)

  • @Epoch11
    @Epoch11 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This was brilliant and deserves a lot more views the one thing I didn't understand was actually the very ending I'm not a mathematician I can barely add and subtract but this was a beautiful and intuitive proof

    • @hybmnzz2658
      @hybmnzz2658 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Don't worry adding and subtracting are useless in this age unless you are a cashier.

  • @richardpalme5b
    @richardpalme5b 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    excellent explanation, thank you so much!

  • @ProfeLuisFelipe
    @ProfeLuisFelipe 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Awesome videos Man!!

  • @luisvictoria
    @luisvictoria 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Amazing video. Glad I found this gem of a channel!

    • @Aleph0
      @Aleph0  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Awesome, thanks!

    • @luisvictoria
      @luisvictoria 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Aleph0 its rare finding high quality channels with little views. Keep up the good work! You’ll get a large audience in no time.

  • @ammyvl1
    @ammyvl1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    This video is awesome
    tip for the animation: you can add a sort of "smoothing" when combining two objects. Of course with low level access to the renderer it's easy, but even in programs like blender they have metaballs and stuff which will make the spheres combining looks smooth.

  • @matron9936
    @matron9936 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is so cool! Thank you for the video.

  • @Jaylooker
    @Jaylooker 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This was helpful. Thank you much

  • @dreistromland
    @dreistromland 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you for this wonderful video! :-)

  • @sushikgch1486
    @sushikgch1486 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Did he solved N=3 or N=4? I’m confused.

  • @HermeticAscetic22
    @HermeticAscetic22 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great video! Love it.

  • @r1a933
    @r1a933 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Simplicity at its core 💯💯

  • @alihasuna1
    @alihasuna1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Excellent!!!

  • @mastermati773
    @mastermati773 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This video is super well done! Hope you'll get more subs.

    • @Aleph0
      @Aleph0  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks so much! Glad you enjoyed it :)

  • @magicmulder
    @magicmulder 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Thanks man, that was a great explanation, though I would’ve loved more details on the surgery part.

    • @IndupitabLee
      @IndupitabLee 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The idea of "surgery theory" comes from Richard Hamilton as he proved that you could use it to fix the curvature of those objects which result in unwanted singularities under Ricci flow. The conference he presents his proof at is on TH-cam and provides an in-depth explanation of how it works. Perelman actually stated, when asked why he didn't accept the $1mil awarded to his proof, that his[Perelman's] proof was no more impressive than Hamilton's proof

  • @jamesfloyd6693
    @jamesfloyd6693 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This concept reminds me of how glass condenses when its heated up; regardless of its initial shape it always wants to end up as a sphere with enough time and heat.

  • @StratosFair
    @StratosFair 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    The TH-cam algorithm just recommended me your channel and man it is simply amazing, can't wait for more videos to come out :)

  • @IshanBanerjee
    @IshanBanerjee 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Sir your presentation is amazing , you are an inspiration for me and I hope I will be able to learn a lot from your channel .

    • @Aleph0
      @Aleph0  4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Thank you!! That's very kind. (btw: I love your channel picture; very classy.)

    • @IshanBanerjee
      @IshanBanerjee 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Aleph0 thank you sir

  • @JosephElfassi
    @JosephElfassi 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Amazing explanation!

  • @HanLe-px8ko
    @HanLe-px8ko 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    i love watching these kinds of videos and confusing myself

  • @edoardomanini6796
    @edoardomanini6796 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Man that was awesome

  • @IgneusBeats
    @IgneusBeats 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    im a clueless of math stuff, but i like them.. its somehow inspiring...it pushes me to think on boundaries of human mind and its working principles.. math is a human creation, boundaries of math are the form of pure human mind; everything we create, problems or solutions, everything we find in searching for answers is just an reflection of our mind field.. and we all can go there and search, its just that someone who doesnt know math LANGUAGE practically cannot do it in the same way someone who knows can, but intuitively its very possible.. boundaries of our language are boundaries of our world

    • @jamesyeung3286
      @jamesyeung3286 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      nah, the notations of maths was invent but maths itself is a product of nature, language and nature doesn't describe maths, maths describes THEM, maths is intrinsically the language of nature itself.

  • @jthegenius
    @jthegenius ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Incredible video! Very illuminating even to a layperson like myself! Can't thank you enough for the effort!
    Is it possible to explain (at the level of this video, of course) whether this argument generalizes to other dimensions, and if not, why?
    Once again, thank you very much for creating such wonderful educational content! I wish you all the best 😊

  • @bernhardriemann1563
    @bernhardriemann1563 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    A very nice Video, thank you for explaining the great ideas from Gregori Perelman 😀

  • @gotta1252
    @gotta1252 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank u for this one...💯❤

  • @TimScarfe
    @TimScarfe 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Well done! Nice channel!

  • @_P_a_o_l_o_
    @_P_a_o_l_o_ 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Amazing video and content! What program do you use to make the animations?

  • @nefeli1987
    @nefeli1987 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I understood that! Even though not good at understanding complex maths/problems. Thank you :)

    • @Aleph0
      @Aleph0  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks! Glad you liked it.

  • @kveldgorkon4611
    @kveldgorkon4611 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Amazing Vid .. Thank you Creating it..

  • @Jonathan-rt2ol
    @Jonathan-rt2ol 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Great video and great channel! You illustrate the idea of Perelman‘s proof very nicely.
    What you don’t mention, however, is where the real „hard work“ in his proof had to be done: namely to control the geometry of the evolving necks in such a way that one knows that after surgery the next singularity will occur only after a controlled amount of time. This is necessary in order to guaranty that only finitely many surgeries happen before extinction.
    By the way, the regions near the surgery look much more like very long tubes and not like cones, but I admit that this is really hard to illustrate.

  • @hamedhilal7113
    @hamedhilal7113 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I hope to become such a fantastic mathematician in the future!

  • @matiasortiz1293
    @matiasortiz1293 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    incredible video, you guys are amazing

    • @Aleph0
      @Aleph0  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks for stopping by!

  • @KaliFissure
    @KaliFissure 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The inversion/eversion of the circle is best model for our manifold.

  • @dhaka_mathematical_school
    @dhaka_mathematical_school 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Brilliant!

  • @Hecatonicosachoron
    @Hecatonicosachoron 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    When I see Ricci Flow in the title, I subscribe :D

  • @ankursarkar5170
    @ankursarkar5170 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Excellent

  • @eliokim
    @eliokim 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video!

  • @inesantoniosanchezgutierre664
    @inesantoniosanchezgutierre664 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Oh man!!! Beautiful indeed, isnt´it. Let me tell you that I didn´t have any idea about Perelman contribution. Great!! Now I think I understand why he didn´t accepted the million dollar prize. Ricci flow was really relevant for him. As for me I think it is a quiestion of humbleness. But what a humble guy!!!!!

  • @anandarunakumar6819
    @anandarunakumar6819 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Take a pan of water and try heating the pan, drop some oil randomly, and observe the motion of oil blobs as the temperature increases. Discrete oil bubbles coalesce to form larger circular blobs of oil, eventually to largest possible. If the container size is large, the oil drop not only maintains circular shape, but keeps on increasing in size.
    This seems like a nice physical process for Ricci flow. The g and R properties can be shown to be preserve the flow equations, until turbulence destroys everything to make it point like oil drops.

  • @alexplaytop
    @alexplaytop 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Best explanation!

  • @nandeesh2ninad
    @nandeesh2ninad 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Loved it truly👍

    • @Aleph0
      @Aleph0  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you!

  • @mrbale1815
    @mrbale1815 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Aleph 0 is a great channel name btw.

  • @mattwillis3219
    @mattwillis3219 ปีที่แล้ว

    pretty good description.

  • @jessemoeller8557
    @jessemoeller8557 3 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    It is important to mention that Perelman completed Hamilton's program. The idea of Ricci Flow with Surgery was already floating around, Perelman just finished the job.

    • @MIbra96
      @MIbra96 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      "just finished the job"

    • @jessemoeller8557
      @jessemoeller8557 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@MIbra96 Perelman himself even felt this way, a contributing element in the drama of his rejection of the fields medal.

    • @alex_grothendieck9701
      @alex_grothendieck9701 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@jessemoeller8557 Perelman gave several reasons for his refusal, but you took only one and brought it to the point of absurdity. What an ignorance!
      For those, who want to understand the reasons for Perelman's refusal from numerous awards, I suggest reading the article Manifold Destiny (The New Yorker)

    • @jessemoeller8557
      @jessemoeller8557 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@alex_grothendieck9701 I said explicitly that this was merely a contributing element. There's nothing absurd, or even remotely false, about what I said. You are the one bringing things to the point of absurdity.

    • @johnrickert5572
      @johnrickert5572 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      He rounded it out.

  • @hardrocklobsterroll395
    @hardrocklobsterroll395 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Awesome video

  • @TheAIEpiphany
    @TheAIEpiphany 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Beautiful video! Unbelievable work I literally grasped everything in a single pass. Intuitively it's a very simple solution in retrospect - but that's the thing with these asymmetric types of problems.
    I assume there is a close connection with NP problems here - it's hard to find the solution (exponential complexity) easy to verify it's correct (polynomial complexity).
    Who knows maybe one of these tools will be used to crack the P=NP problem.

  • @sonarbangla8711
    @sonarbangla8711 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    SPELLBINDINGLY BEAUTIFUL. Thank you Aleph. If it is possible for Schrodinger's wave function of quantum sates to clump up like Ricci flows, then it might be possible to define how classical objects (planets, suns, black holes etc.) can evolve from quantum states and Hawking's theory of the unitary evolution of the entire universe, maybe correct.

  • @Airblader
    @Airblader 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    This was a fantastic video, thanks! One thing I was missing, however, is a reasoning for why n=3 was so much more difficult.

    • @odysseus231
      @odysseus231 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'm no where near understanding the maths behind this whole question, but from what I've heard the difference is that the techniques used in higher dimensions require "moving stuff around" in such a way that they could not be applied either in 4 or 3 dimensions. Hence entirely different proofs for both of those cases.

  • @osmiumtank
    @osmiumtank 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    PlayDoh proved this long before Grisha.

  • @SuperArkleo
    @SuperArkleo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This, super short explanation of the ideas behind the proof of the Poincare conjectute, is brilliant and also deserves a prize. I had written a short explanation of the proof of the Poincare conjecture for physicists. It got 1325 reads at arXiv.org. Knowing what this is all about in details, I freely admit that for the unassumed readers it is best among the best. This is an example of how books on math should be written for school children. Only late Martin Gardner would be able to come close to this gem.

    • @hyperduality2838
      @hyperduality2838 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thesis is dual to anti-thesis creates converging thesis or synthesis -- the time independent Hegelian dialectic.
      The Ricci tensor is dual to the Weyl tensor synthesizes Riemann geometry -- Sir Roger Penrose.
      Positive curvature is dual to negative curvature -- Gauss, Riemann geometry.
      Curvature or gravitation is therefore dual.
      Convergence is dual to divergence.
      Apples fall to the ground because they are conserving duality.
      Potential energy is dual to kinetic energy.
      Action is dual to reaction -- Sir Isaac Newton.
      Gravitation is equivalent or dual to acceleration - Einstein's happiest thought, the principle of equivalence (duality).
      Energy is dual to mass -- Einstein.
      Dark energy is dual to dark matter.
      The big bang is a Janus hole (point) or composed of two faces = Duality.
      "Always two there are" -- Yoda.
      Duality creates reality!

    • @SuperArkleo
      @SuperArkleo 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@hyperduality2838 You had your chance to prove Poincare hypothesis with your duality ideas.However, you did not! I was talking about presentation.The guy did his job fantastically.The rest is up to readers. You see it using duality as an universal cure...Fine.Then write a paper for Annals of Mathematics and publish it. And then, send me a pdf file of your paper. After that we shall talk again

    • @hyperduality2838
      @hyperduality2838 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@SuperArkleo I do not have to prove anything.
      Syntropy (prediction) is dual to increasing entropy -- the 4th law of thermodynamics.
      Concepts are dual to percepts -- the mind duality of Immanuel Kant.
      Your mind/soul is a dual concept.
      The intellectual mind/soul (concepts) is dual to the sensory mind/soul (percepts) -- the mind duality of Thomas Aquinas.
      Mind is dual to matter -- Descartes.
      Mind duality is the next level beyond Descartes.
      Teleological physics (syntropy) is dual to non-teleological physics (entropy).

    • @SuperArkleo
      @SuperArkleo 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@hyperduality2838 You surely do not need to prove anything to anybody. But I am surely entitled also to read works of scientists whom I respect as well as to write my own scientific papers for common good. Incidentally, what your duality is saying about masses? Is Higgs mechanism of mass generation has its dual?

    • @hyperduality2838
      @hyperduality2838 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@SuperArkleo The Higgs duality field.
      Symmetry is dual to anti-symmetry.
      Bosons (symmetric wave functions) are dual to Fermions (anti-symmetric wave functions).
      The Higgs field is actually dual, nothing is dual to something.

  • @michaelmansfield1289
    @michaelmansfield1289 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Fantastic explanation, especially considering I'm not a mathematician yet I understood precisely what you were trying to get across. Thank you that's the first video I've watched on the subject that made it clear.
    Can you point me to an exact equation for the pointcare that may help explain movements and financial markets that go beyond the rational explanation? Market topology seems to be one of the fields that could do this. There is a group of traders that supposedly used Perelman's algorithm in their AI to achieve tremendous results. Thank you.

  • @ssrbaqri
    @ssrbaqri 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Simplifying such intricate math takes some grt effort ..... kinda what this video does here.

  • @Tehnubwaffle
    @Tehnubwaffle 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Wow glad I discovered your channel.
    You’re going to be the next 3blue1brown.

    • @Aleph0
      @Aleph0  4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Aw thanks!! Glad to have you join us :)

  • @DanielKRui
    @DanielKRui 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How'd you create those computer visuals? I like your paper/pen/hands-on approach a lot...there is a lot of charm and delight in simplicity. I sometimes get jealous watching say 3b1b videos because I could never make those animations, and now I'm jealous of your animations too!

  • @electrochipvoidsoul1219
    @electrochipvoidsoul1219 3 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Oh no, the Clay Institute took him away! (Abrupt video ending)