Brouwer's fixed point theorem

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 53

  • @AalapShah12297
    @AalapShah12297 5 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    I love it when people make intuitive explanations for theorems like these. True, it's not a rigorous proof, but it is more useful if you want to actually understand a concept and connect it to what you already know (like the intermediate value theorem in this case).

  • @Onoesmahpie
    @Onoesmahpie 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I enjoyed the vector animations, they were very well done. However, I'm worried the assumption you make at 3:45-4:15 is incorrect. In particular, there is no guarantee that we may trace a continuous path of vertical vectors (or, transform continuously between the vertical vectors) in the manner you show, for arbitrary functions satisfying the BFT hypotheses.
    Indeed, any curve we trace from the 'leftward mapping' to the 'rightward mapping' vectors must contain a point which maps vertically, as the IVT immediately shows. But, there is no guarantee that we can trace a (continuous) curve, comprised of such points, with endpoints mapping in opposite directions; it is *not* in general true that to any point 'x' which maps vertically, a sequence of points that map vertically and that converge to 'x' can be found on subsequent curves connecting the left and right pointing vectors.
    In other words, there is no guarantee that, e.g., an initial curve of downward mapping points will not suddenly terminate in your construction.

  • @cycklist
    @cycklist 5 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I've always loved this theorem ❤️

    • @stemcell7200
      @stemcell7200  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah it's an interesting one!

    • @qltcn
      @qltcn 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Banach fixed point theorem is better imo

  • @peterhofer8998
    @peterhofer8998 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That is a thorougly and very clear explanation. Thank you so much 🙂

  • @70ME3E
    @70ME3E 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    great job!
    I think it's a crime not to teach Maths concept like this in the first iteration. Only later can the formulas come.

  • @butterbutter
    @butterbutter 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    you ate with the animation and explanation

  • @TGMResearch
    @TGMResearch 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Now that's a different cup of tea. Kudos for my fellow country man Bertus Brouwer, and for your video. Love it.

  • @ultimateo621
    @ultimateo621 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    This is a great video

  • @julianocamargo6674
    @julianocamargo6674 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wonderful explanation but I think in the tea cup example the fixed point is only valid for a given time. Every time will have some fixed point. The fixed point will appear to be moving, like the eye of the hurricane.

  • @pythonanimalia
    @pythonanimalia 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Didn't understand it on text. Now i do. Thanks.

  • @matts8249
    @matts8249 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The fixed point in a circle reminds me of a hurricane eye. I wonder if there is a correlation?

  • @c8adec
    @c8adec 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Such a cool explanation, i love it!

  • @RazMathias
    @RazMathias ปีที่แล้ว

    Beautiful!

  • @faizanhilal4705
    @faizanhilal4705 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    great vedio.keep it up
    btw,,which software did you used

    • @stemcell7200
      @stemcell7200  5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thanks! The software is manim, same as in 3blue1brown

  • @karolinadrabent2088
    @karolinadrabent2088 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    You got me lost at the moment you drew that line(orange and blue) on a circle. Why is it that curvy? Is it random? and also what does this line represent?

  • @PedroTricking
    @PedroTricking 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    0:39 That's a weird analogy, mixing feels like a pretty discontinuous map. In fact for point particles the probability that that happens is zero but eh, now I'm being overly picky tbh. I think Brouwer did think about this from observing that one point in the coffee (as ripples pass around) is always perfectly still? Something like that.
    I really liekd the video. Subbed!

  • @Patapom3
    @Patapom3 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great demonstration!

    • @stemcell7200
      @stemcell7200  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks!

    • @hyperduality2838
      @hyperduality2838 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@stemcell7200 Fixed points = duality!
      Photons, light, null rays or the electro-magnetic field = fixed points!
      Y = X.
      ct = x where c = 1 implies t = x.
      Y is equal to X, Y is the same, similar, equivalent or dual to X.
      Y is dual to X!
      Photons or light are dual, electro is dual to magnetic!
      All mathematical equations are dual!
      f(x) = ct = x, Brouwer's fixed point theorem proves that null rays or light are dual!
      Duality creates reality!
      The velocity of light is the same and equal for all observers hence fixed points conform to a principle of objective democracy.
      "Always two there are" -- Yoda.

    • @hyperduality2838
      @hyperduality2838 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@stemcell7200 Duality implies the following:-
      What is dual to entropy?
      Syntropy (prediction) is dual to increasing entropy -- the 4th law of thermodynamics!
      "Through imagination and reason we turn experience into foresight (prediction)" -- Spinoza describing syntropy.
      Teleological physics (syntropy) is dual to non-teleological physics (entropy).
      Randomness (entropy) is dual to order (syntropy, predictability).
      Great video!

  • @jesusomarfrancofranco9742
    @jesusomarfrancofranco9742 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    You have nice videos!
    How do you make your animations?
    They look very good

  • @mathWKT
    @mathWKT 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    this is beautiful . thank you

  • @kadblue2000
    @kadblue2000 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is a neat theorem

    • @stemcell7200
      @stemcell7200  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I find in interesting how intuitive it is in 2d (maps) but not in 3d (tea)

  • @david21686
    @david21686 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What software do you use to make these videos?

    • @stemcell7200
      @stemcell7200  5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      This video was done with something called manim

    • @nadiyayasmeen3928
      @nadiyayasmeen3928 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@stemcell7200 3b1b's library?

  • @lakkshsharma6420
    @lakkshsharma6420 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice explanation

  • @mjmj6041
    @mjmj6041 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Stem cell ?

  • @PS3benimeni
    @PS3benimeni 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    very well explained!

  • @rockforlight
    @rockforlight 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    What are the prerequisites for this video? I don't understand. “Points that stay the same after some transformation…” how can a point stay the same after being transformed?

    • @Onoesmahpie
      @Onoesmahpie 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      f(x)=x is the identity map, yet it is a transformation.

  • @jackdigilov4949
    @jackdigilov4949 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video, but I don’t understand why a vector that goes after the one pointing up can’t just point down. In 1D I when a line is tilted right the next one can just tilt left to the previous point.

    • @alejandroesquivelcordero6970
      @alejandroesquivelcordero6970 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      They do that but at the fixed point, that's why the surface must be continous so the transition from up to down is gradual

  • @Grentanksmog
    @Grentanksmog 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice explanation! I am making rn the video about this theorem with manim too, but I am going to present the proof with the help of homology functor

  • @aryankumarprasad1574
    @aryankumarprasad1574 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Brilliant

  • @alejandroesquivelcordero6970
    @alejandroesquivelcordero6970 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    In another video a guy said that shaking the coffee would violate the theorem, is that true? why?

    • @Onoesmahpie
      @Onoesmahpie 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Stirring can be approximated as a continuous transformation (of coffee molecules' positions) from the original volume into itself, at least if it is stirred very gently. Shaking is neither continuous nor volume preserving.

  • @gaurangagarwal3243
    @gaurangagarwal3243 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Just wow for this .

  • @malicksoumare370
    @malicksoumare370 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love topology

  • @besmafadlia1498
    @besmafadlia1498 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks

  • @hyperduality2838
    @hyperduality2838 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Photons, light, null rays or the electro-magnetic field = fixed points!
    Y = X.
    ct = x where c = 1 implies t = x.
    Y is equal to X, Y is the same, similar, equivalent or dual to X.
    Y is dual to X!
    Photons or light are dual, electro is dual to magnetic!
    All mathematical equations are dual!
    f(x) = ct = x, Brouwer's fixed point theorem proves that null rays or light are dual!
    Duality creates reality!
    The velocity of light is the same and equal for all observers hence fixed points conform to a principle of objective democracy.
    "Always two there are" -- Yoda.

  • @ChristianConspirator
    @ChristianConspirator ปีที่แล้ว

    Pretty sure the coffee doesn't work though

    • @oldcowbb
      @oldcowbb 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      how so

    • @ChristianConspirator
      @ChristianConspirator 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Because it's a three dimensional fluid with independent molecules that have no reason to stay where they are. The theorem works in three dimensions for sure, just not with something like coffee.

  • @eansengchang6840
    @eansengchang6840 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    first