Y1 38) Supply Side Policies (Interventionist and Market Based) - With Evaluation

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 6 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น •

  • @finlaygregory6633
    @finlaygregory6633 ปีที่แล้ว +434

    Bros a literal supply side policy for education

    • @olafgustav6810
      @olafgustav6810 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      He isn’t a policy buddy

    • @nupurpria3602
      @nupurpria3602 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

      Well for eco students he is coz they come here to be productive and increase their knowledge capacity so he is in a way policy 😂😂😂😂😂😂

    • @dolphiner1376
      @dolphiner1376 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I needed a good non bias kinda view to form an opinion

    • @opsgreen5216
      @opsgreen5216 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      the word literal suggests that this is a normative statement and so is biased

  • @Ezphi
    @Ezphi 2 ปีที่แล้ว +348

    bro is a living legend

    • @master4755
      @master4755 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      i cancelled the like to keep it at 69 :D

  • @krishkodali1841
    @krishkodali1841 2 ปีที่แล้ว +216

    Ive watched around 8 hours of your videos today and I still feel like hour one, ready to go and excited to learn. I appreciate you Dal!

    • @gregg6077
      @gregg6077 2 ปีที่แล้ว +107

      did you not reach negative marginal utility

    • @krishkodali1841
      @krishkodali1841 2 ปีที่แล้ว +122

      @@gregg6077 the utility of dal's videos is forever maximized my friend

    • @master4755
      @master4755 2 ปีที่แล้ว +34

      @@krishkodali1841 law of increasing marginal utility :)

    • @saaromessi4343
      @saaromessi4343 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Awee Krish u cutie pie

    • @krishkodali1841
      @krishkodali1841 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@saaromessi4343 Saar❤️😍🤩

  • @МаксимР-я1у
    @МаксимР-я1у ปีที่แล้ว +12

    thank you man, just because of you I have passed my exams. I managed to not study at all then watch your videos and become homo economicus god. Love you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @MarkQub
    @MarkQub 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    your videos are absolutely LEGENDARY

  • @ric6383
    @ric6383 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Well done EconplusDal.

  • @abubakkkaridrees9603
    @abubakkkaridrees9603 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    You are literally a gem!

  • @embrey7021
    @embrey7021 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Also you can evaluate whether deflation will occur in the economy if you have used that as a advantage of an SSP. For example with interventionist SSP's AD will increase due to rising government spending therefore meaning the LRAS shift will not cause deflation

  • @jakepeto2496
    @jakepeto2496 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    loving the new outro mate

  • @Eskushow
    @Eskushow 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Amazingly with those 10:36 second explained very well ..............and I learn so much out of it . Thank you

  • @tomh383
    @tomh383 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Econdaddy 👑

  • @naomihepworth1642
    @naomihepworth1642 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Brilliant vid. Shocked by the terminology ‘negative stakeholder impacts’ 😱😱😱😱
    Distressing for someone who has studied more psychology than economics!
    I’d have gone with ‘human cost’ at least.
    So we’ll explained tho.

    • @sitkhaa
      @sitkhaa ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Stakeholder also includes the government, producers and other economic agents which is why they're all summarized as "stakeholders". It's not meant to be derogatory

  • @rahimshahzad2431
    @rahimshahzad2431 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Living legend saving our asses

  • @Josh-ud1vr
    @Josh-ud1vr 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Bro is just writing essays for us

  • @nelsonwang9706
    @nelsonwang9706 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Thank you so much!! Saved my exam lol

  • @ea1766
    @ea1766 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    My bro 💪🏾

  • @LiLBunny69
    @LiLBunny69 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    dedicating whatever grade i get (hopefully good) to him😎

  • @polace9843
    @polace9843 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    coldd 🥶

  • @BritishRifleman
    @BritishRifleman 2 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    How does someone dislike this?

    • @umarhc
      @umarhc 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      they don't

  • @user-jx8xf2pk5c
    @user-jx8xf2pk5c 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Could you do a video on supply-side policies and the macroeconomic objectives? Your videos are amazing. Thanks so much!

  • @janenelisafreitas6071
    @janenelisafreitas6071 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    You are brilliant

  • @kevingyamfi3246
    @kevingyamfi3246 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Dal the king

  • @ahmedabdi9950
    @ahmedabdi9950 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Legend!!

  • @alvinlam7998
    @alvinlam7998 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    amazing stuff

  • @memetaldemir1205
    @memetaldemir1205 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    big up dal uno

  • @jaymehta4226
    @jaymehta4226 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    if someone could send me the link for the contractionary monetary and fiscal policy videos, it would be much appreciated

    • @blacksnow8070
      @blacksnow8070 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Same I dont think he made those videos

  • @tvatv1530
    @tvatv1530 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank you

  • @thedogsaidmiaw_123
    @thedogsaidmiaw_123 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thank u i love you

  • @snappy_one9120
    @snappy_one9120 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    can you explain why the supply curve is vertical?

    • @mattimakadsi
      @mattimakadsi 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Its the classical theory rather than the Keynesian theory. Classical economists believe that in the long term, the economy is always at full capacity and therefore always at full employment.

  • @milochamlatte
    @milochamlatte 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Love your videos! However, isn't subsidies to promote investment to firms are free market supply side policies? As you cannot force firms to perform invest actions

  • @akshitamodi8222
    @akshitamodi8222 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Awesome videos! Quick question: Can you also use a positive output gap diagram to show an increase in productive potential of the economy when using supplly-side policy measures?

    • @mariskaa_
      @mariskaa_ 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I think so

  • @anindadatta164
    @anindadatta164 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Can import duty reduction be considered as market related supply side policy, as the entire global supply is available to a single country at a reasonable price, thus effectively making the supply line of that product parallel to the GDP axis(X-axis).

    • @norahalex7804
      @norahalex7804 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes this falls under trade liberalisation point

  • @timbo8262
    @timbo8262 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Loving the content man, Great help, Legend. One question though, at the start of the video about achieving macro economic objectives, if long term rates of inflation decrease resulting in a stronger exchange rate wouldn't that make exports more expensive making them less competitive on the world market? You could argue this would fail to improve the B.O.P as demand for exports would fall and demand for imports would rise as they become cheaper.
    Don't fully understand that part.

    • @toddtaylor5282
      @toddtaylor5282 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      With deflation, workers can not argue for higher wages and hence do not feel as wealthy and therefore do not suck in imports from abroad, decreasing the value of imports. Also, our exports become more competitive for foreign countries and hence the value generated from exports increases significantly, giving an improvement in the BOP.

  • @olivermccourt1226
    @olivermccourt1226 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Unreal stuff

  • @snappy_one9120
    @snappy_one9120 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Doesnt a increase in the LRAS automaticly also lead to an increase in demand (bcs of more jobs) and hence inflation?

    • @MCart1215
      @MCart1215 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      you can show the demand increasing, but there is no inflation as the increased supply pushes the price level down anyway. So in the end, you can show the economy operating at higher RGDP at the same price level.

  • @arjunsinha3841
    @arjunsinha3841 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The goat

  • @diadaryanani1956
    @diadaryanani1956 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love u g💗💗

  • @zhetinggu4300
    @zhetinggu4300 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    legend!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @frankayling8370
    @frankayling8370 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The 🐐

  • @nikilkila467
    @nikilkila467 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    🐐🐐

  • @crazy_szn8553
    @crazy_szn8553 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Cheers dal

  • @MohamedOsmanHafeez
    @MohamedOsmanHafeez 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Isn't lower income tax a demand-side policy. It increases disposable income, making demand for goods services bigger. How does that increase productive potential?
    It makes sense for lower corporation tax to increase productivity

  • @barclaymorgan2169
    @barclaymorgan2169 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    please can you explain how tax reform is not interventionist because the government surely is the one who changes it? cheers

    • @ella_mcgov2013
      @ella_mcgov2013 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Because they remove goverment intervention technically the goverment intervenes but with all market based reforms the goverment has to remove control

    • @iw_has_gone
      @iw_has_gone 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      as you learn in micro, generally the free market will most efficiently allocate resources. market based policies are based on that assumption, the idea that reduced taxes will encourage people to spend their money in the most rational way possible. interventionist policies assume market forces alone cannot allocate these resources efficiently therefore the government must implement policies to correct any market failure - essentially correcting positive externalities in consumption

  • @harryhardy5063
    @harryhardy5063 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Can’t believe my exam is in an hour

    • @javyroo9405
      @javyroo9405 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Why did u revise macro for a micro test mate 😂

    • @harryhardy5063
      @harryhardy5063 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@javyroo9405 Supply-Side Policies can be used in macro because they increase the supply of goods which will lead to economic growth but they can also be used in micro-economic policies because they aim at making markets and industries operate more efficiently and contribute to increasing levels of growth of real national output.
      That’s what I’ve been taught by my teacher but I’m no economist aha 🤣

    • @_ProjectHadassah
      @_ProjectHadassah 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      real 💀

  • @af7758
    @af7758 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Bro by watching your videos the ppc has shifted outwards as labour has become more productive

  • @JK-vm7yo
    @JK-vm7yo 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The question is will i be able to revise all three policies in 4 days hmm

    • @umarhc
      @umarhc 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      yes

    • @JK-vm7yo
      @JK-vm7yo 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@umarhc I did- this shit is piss and my exam went ok tbf

    • @umarhc
      @umarhc 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@JK-vm7yo Congrats what exam board u with?

    • @JK-vm7yo
      @JK-vm7yo 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@umarhc Im in year 12 and with AQA

    • @umarhc
      @umarhc 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@JK-vm7yo ohh it was a mock. Mine is the real ones happening rn. U seem to be doing the right thing just stay consistent and you'll be great next year.

  • @kavishkumar9
    @kavishkumar9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why would SSP not be used in a recession?

    • @stefanprokopiev8483
      @stefanprokopiev8483 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Because in a recession you are trying to get the economy running and you want inflation; these supply side policies are mainly for preventing inflation once the economy is booming, therefore, you need to divert attention to expansionary demand side policies

  • @jasraaj_9483
    @jasraaj_9483 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thnx vikkstar

    • @simranbhogal9355
      @simranbhogal9355 ปีที่แล้ว

      bruv he looks identical to Vik 😂😭

  • @Major-kc9uj
    @Major-kc9uj 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    🙏🏽🙏🏽

  • @elliotwebb4194
    @elliotwebb4194 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    EconGOATdal

  • @fincroll1854
    @fincroll1854 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    up the dal

  • @jaspermbinjama941
    @jaspermbinjama941 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What is lras?

    • @BontleMokgatlha
      @BontleMokgatlha 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Long Run Aggregate Supply

  • @zainramzan2246
    @zainramzan2246 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    goat

  • @danielgilsousastb2657
    @danielgilsousastb2657 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    mf simply clutching up my econ IB score

  • @elspethkatiebella
    @elspethkatiebella 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    DalDalDalDalDalDalDalDalDalDalDalDalDalDalDalDalDalDalDalDalDalDalDalDal

  • @jowanpeckrugby3221
    @jowanpeckrugby3221 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    1st comment 🤪🤪

  • @happyzhang5218
    @happyzhang5218 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    👍👍👍👍👍👍👏👏👏👏👏👏💖💖💖💖💖💖

  • @rohanoruganti3805
    @rohanoruganti3805 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    W

  • @mika1204
    @mika1204 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    let him cook

    • @AneleDube-b7y
      @AneleDube-b7y 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Let him cook what? Pls don't write nonsensical things here because that's really annoying. Here's helping us for crying out loud yet you are saying this nonsense. I can't stand your nonsense.

    • @mika1204
      @mika1204 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@AneleDube-b7y bro restarted

    • @HapNinja
      @HapNinja 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@AneleDube-b7y tf

  • @SEJl_
    @SEJl_ ปีที่แล้ว

    I WILL increase the GDP of your country Dal.

  • @bencroll9073
    @bencroll9073 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    why is tax reform considered a market based policy when tax rates are controlled by the government, does that not mean they are interventionist. econplusdal i have a shrine of you in my house

    • @MCart1215
      @MCart1215 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Reducing taxes is market based as it allocates more money into the market and less into the government - INCREASING tax is interventionist as it does the opposite

  • @archee2364
    @archee2364 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you

  • @jamescavan9187
    @jamescavan9187 ปีที่แล้ว

    🐐🐐🐐