I will teach my kids to never enter your country. With all the hatred towards the different, hatred towards indifference, hatred towards opposing political parties and hatred towards each other. The only thing you people seem to love is guns and money. At least the kids got to see it all on tv for the past year!
I thought our current Prime minister having done "Brown Face" in the past was pretty wacky. Meanwhile the U.S. just has this constant stream of insanity it feels like.
I'm from Utah and the Utah Republican party is a bit strange. Utah basically has a one party system where the Republican party reigns supreme. Because of this moderates, democrats, and independents are incentivized to register as Republican and vote in Republican primary elections. In my opinion which is totally based on anecdotal evidence, a coalition of moderate Republicans, independents, and democrats tend to pick the most moderate Republican. You may be asking how to explain Mike Lee. Well Mike Lee became the Republican Senate nominee when Utah was using a caucus system that discourages political participation except for participation from very conservative Republicans. This observation is not based on hard evidence, but rather my own anecdotes.
Read Exit, Voice and Loyalty by Albert Hirschman. A Yale professor said this short book explained everything in society and the best book ever in the social science. I also recommend Colin Woodard' s American Nations. Your anecdotes is unsurprising and that book may explained the weirdness of American politics. If you eant hard evidence, I think you can find it there sort of. The first one is the concept behind them. Edit: evidence.
South Carolina is heading that way. We've had Republican absolute control for almost 30 years, now, and the Democratic party has slowly shrunk and withered away. There are a number of "Republicans" in our General Assembly, who would not be in other circumstances.
@@carolinian2009 I want to recommend another book I've just finished "The Speechwriter" by Barton Swaim, a speechwriter for Mark Sanford, the previous SC governor who won 4 terms. It was very eye-opening to see how things are run in the inside. He said basically the entire fight over policies did not amount to much more than words. One of my favorite takeaways is that due to small government, only one guy in the whole administration actually knew what impact the policies may actually have.
Meanwhile a GOP senator is going on holidays while their own state is in a state of emergency. But hey, it's fine, he voted pro Trump. Politics in the USA is pretty f*cked up these days.
@Doso777... honestly... please tell me you're kidding... Lori Lightfoot, Gavin Newsom, Eric Garcetti, Nancy Pelosi etc ALL broke lockdown rules why lecturing people about the importance of staying at home. Seriously the hypocrisy and stupidity of the left never fails to amaze me. At least Ted Cruz didn't go on holidays while advocating locking people in their homes
Do you remember John McCain and Mitt Romney were the two Republicans who went up against Barrack Obama in the general election for presidency? (4 years apart)
tbf, john mccain was the guy that was often like "don't talk like shit about obama, his opinion is wrong, but the person is actually cool" when people are throwing around allegations about obama not being american and things like that, mccain was still on obama's side
I was a worker on mccains pres campaign... that year he his votes in Congress showed him for the fake republican that he was and I did not end up voting for him in the end, dispite all the hard work i had done for him. Actions speak louder than words.
It should really saw something that the GOP has essentially booted neoconservatives from the party in addition to many liberal conservatives, with the remaining ones staying in hopes that the populist faction eventually simmers down. I highly doubt that that's going to happen anytime soon.
There's might be petitions in your state. There's one in MI. It got brought to the house floor a few years back but as long as Republicans hold our house and senate i doubt it's going anywhere.. But yay for Alaska!
I love this news outlet. You dont seem to lean left or right. Sort or right down the middle of the road. Little opinion, if any. All facts. Equal time to each side of the argument and easy to digest in this ever evolving, concerningly biased media ecosystem. Keep up the hard work. Thank you.
@@patathatapon I agree ... but basically all YT channels that do news that aren't news media outlets like Fox News have a left bias, be it minor like TLDR and NBC or strong like BBC and CNN.
@@michaelbyron1166 You know, like ~5 years ago I would have been a hundred percent certain, that this is a joke (not a bad one at that if I may say). But nowadays I absolutely can't be and that is driving me ever so closer to insanity
Ultimately the voters will decide on the validity of the censures. 2022 elections will be interesting. Especially if grumpy trumpy inserts himself into the matter.
This past four years has really shown how much Americans truly love their country and sadly that number of people who truly love their country is very low. It's sad too to see how people are putting their emotions and the love of one person over their duty to country! I for one am glad that we live in this day and age of the internet we have never before had records this vast of people who are willing to put themselves over their country there's no hiding your true feelings there's no hiding how truly patriotic you are there's been a line drawn in the sand!
@@tavernburner3066 the problem is that you are still getting yelled at for expressing your opinion.... heck, some of the republicans are getting yelled at for things they didn't even do. Eventually this could escalate from censuring to censoring. Better nip the problem at the bud.
His mob has power. The solution? Break the mob. Show them the kindness of demonstrating how truly worthless they are. America as we knew it is finished. A new course is being charted and only the winners of the coming conflict will get to decide what gets hung above court as law and who gets hung outside it as traitors.
When you look at House turnover, have you looked at actual numbers. I recall that incumbency in the House is actually a lot stronger than in the Senate. It seems counterintuitive, but I believe the numbers show that incumbent House members get re-elected at a greater rate than the Senate. I think that number is like 98%. That’s why there was a huge push for terms limits back in 1994. And perhaps my numbers are off since the GOP screwed with redistricting in the 1990s and early 2000s. My theory being that by creating more and more safe Republican districts, the GOP unwittingly wound up giving more power to the radical Tea Party wing of the party, which made it easier for moderate to liberal Republicans to lose in the primaries. But, when it comes to the general election, and when you look at incumbent party, you find that there is far LESS turnover in the House than in the Senate, even if that seems counterintuitive based on the 2 year terms for House members.
I don't find the high incumbancy in the House all that counterintuitive.... Senate races are a bigger deal, because there are fewer of them, therefore the opposition always makes some effort. Also, you can't gerrymander to make safe senate seats; state boundaries are where they are.
I’m glad the GOP and trump are gonna fight because that means Dems can easily win more Rep. races and senate races and even more presidencies. I’m so happy that Trump’s legacy is one of failure and havoc
@@sharkiboi8167 The interesting q is what will a radicalised republican party do to Democrats? If the traditional establishment republicans and their voters abandon ship and the party is left to the trump bloc, will they start their own party, potentially drawing "never trump" voters from the dems? Or would they join/caucus with democrats, dragging the party further right?
@@cormacdonnelly365 The thing is that Trump will undoubtedly will either take over the GOP with reactionary white politics (trumpism) or create his own "Patriot Party". In either case the traditional republican (about 20% of the Republican party) will not follow Trump, we saw this in the 2020 election. Too many 2016 Trump voters voted for Biden in 2020, this is a main factor that costed Trump the presidency. And due to the Dem-Rep party split in the US being roughly 45%-45% (the rest of the country is independent 10%) that means that a loss of 20% of their fan-base the Republican party under Trump or the Patriot Party will undoubtedly not win in Congress and Presidency. Also in states like Alaska, Wyoming, and Utah there's way too many traditional republican and not Trumpian republicans, this leaves space for a traditionally conservative 3rd party and that will break the "Conservative wing" of US partisan politics
@@sharkiboi8167 Mmm, either way the republican party is going to be in civil war at least until the next presidential race and barring divine intervention I dont see a figure emerging with the same ability to rally voters like Trump had in 2016
@@sharkiboi8167 I’ll look forward to having a Democrat monolith that regulates and taxes people into oblivion. What’s strange is that I did realize how far left the Overton window has shifted. It’s pretty frustrating that limited government, freedom of speech, and gun rights have become far right ideals.
Georgia showed that it is possible for a controversial voting rights law at the state level to capture the attention of the national news cycle for more than one week.
I think the politicians should be held accountable for their promises as well as take mental health courses to make sure they aren't resisting or promoting propaganda. We deserve better.
You mentioned in your TLDR Daily. But please do a full video on the Texas Power Grid failure. It was a horrific scene last week across the state, and we finding out that they found out about these issues for at least decade that this could happen.
It's not happening to the Dems just yet. But they're likely going to start slouching into 1970s Swedish socialism (the type even Sweden had to back away from!) before any of their senior party leaders can do anything about it.
@@eksortso The original comment implies that it will happen. Honestly, I agree with them. Democrats will begin destroying themselves eventually, although very slowly. Note that I don't like the Republican party at all.
Maybe we'll see a new political reorganization; it's happened last time in the late 60' if I remember, with Reagan or something.. Not American, so I don't know if a three-party system could even exist before the two biggest split the third between themselves; but maybe - The trumpists and extreme-conservatives on one side - The moderates of both the democrats and republicans on the center - Some kind of US-styke "New New Left" coalition between various progressives, greens and other independent to make a third party. The one in the middle could have members voting with either edge and trying to make comprises for the good of the people. Btw @Dave Ostroske, I searched what you meant by evoking Sweden but I don't really found anything of notable, could you explain to me the meaning of your saying ?
@@Victor-el3ul us elections as currently structured are extremely hostile to third parties. Most states use a first past the post voting system, so moderate amounts of people voting third party tends to lead to their least favorite main party getting the seat. A few states like Georgia, Louisiana and apparently now Alaska use some form of runoff elections, which is better, but the big 2 still have the advantage of being the big 2.
@@Victor-el3ul Sure. There was a period of time when Sweden's social spending reached a tremendous height. A state like Sweden, which is open and efficient about its spending, could only keep those levels up for awhile before retracting them. Many famous Swedes, including ingmar Bergman, were quoted at the time about their heights of socialism, usually positively of course. Modern American socialists like Bernie Sanders point to Sweden as a model to follow, and their own proposals, which far exceed Sweden's policies in the 70s, would choke the U.S. economy with its massively bloated and deficit-spending federal government (IMHO).
TLDR news, i think you're promotion is wrong. There's simply no way for a person/organization to be free of bias (unbiased), the difference is that media can choose to report objectively (choosing to focus on the event that happen) or opinionated (choosing to speak of their bias) and none of these is wrong or bad by any mean. It's just people mistakenly thought that anything opinionated is bad even though it's impossible to not make an opinion when you witness an event or obtain the information from somewhere and by default mean that every media is biased in the first place......
If State level republicans do keep moving further right, then it's only a matter of time until that trickles in to Washington. This seems like a death sentence to the old GOP
i love how where i'm from, "state" politics differ so much from our country's politics it's normal for our parliamentarians to "betray" their party line because it may not get them reelected where they come from. things like national parks... the right doesn't care as much about them, unless they're from the state with a national park, at which point it's not green to protect the parks, but conservative.
You think by now both parties will try change the voting system for a mutilple system. Also for the people who hoping for the Republican party to split to let you know a one party system is not going to work for America in the long-run.
Requiring photo ID, which minorities are less likely to have. Putting up more barriers to registering to vote, which is likely to affect minorities more. Reducing the number of polling stations in deprived areas meaning that people living there have to travel further and queue for longer, while making it harder to get a postal vote. Some states have been arbitrarily purging the voter rolls of anyone with a _similar_ name to a convicted felon where the name _sounds_ black, despite an abundance of evidence that they were different people.
@@remijr123imadog2 I would legislate to stop the states from doing that. Right now, Georgia is undertaking the most blatant attempts at voter suppression in a bid to take the state back to the days when black people's votes only counted as ⅗ of a vote. If they can't count their votes as being worth less then they'll find ways to stop ⅖ of them from voting. Legislation *must* be passed at federal level to make this illegal.
My question would be "who is electing the state officials"? If they are elected by the party, rather than the populace (like a primary) then it makes sense that they would be more radical. The Republican voting base is pro-trump while the state voting base is anti-trump.
My thoughts? USA politics are not only getting more politically polarized but "bipolarized" you are with certain group or against certain group... or become passive and cynical. So it becomes Dems vs Reps in DC, then conservative Dems/Reps vs progresive Dems/Reps, then too-progresive dems/reps vs not-enough-progresive-dems/reps, etc.
I would like to criticize one part, as a right wing populist i would prefer that term instead of "white identity politics" it wouldnt make sense for that type of politics to appeal to more minorities in 2020 then usualy for the republicans
Can we please call those who want to go backwards ("MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN") "regressive" and not "reactionary" as they're actually opposed to progressivism?
I think the gap between the state parties and the federal party has a lot to do with why the Tea Party came to power around 2012 in the first place. Going back to 1994, Newt Gingrich and Dick Army were tired of the Republicans being a permanent minority party. They began a campaign to capture more state legislatures with the eye towards creating a more permanent power base for the Republicans in the House by engaging in radical redistricting. Now gerrymandering has long history in US politics, but not on the scale that Gingrich and Army implemented. They created numerous “safe” districts for Republicans, often bucking the state’s demographic distribution. This empowered the more radical wing of the party. This also motivated the more radical wing to get more involved at the state and local levels and essentially capture the party apparatus there. This created a feedback loop, which kept giving the radical wing more and more power. But this is also bucking the country’s demographic trend. At the heart of the matter is race. Caucasians will lose majority status by about 2048. This terrifies the uneducated white voters who make up the core of the Republican base. Seeing the possibility that they will lose power permanently in a few decades, they are more motivated to get involved at the state and local levels. And they are more motivated to pursue policies and tactics that are anti-democratic in nature (eg, redistricting, harsher voting standards, relying on the electoral college), but which buffer their power base from the big demographic shift (hence why Republicans oppose immigration). But I don’t think the state and local party apparatus reflect the views of the party in the aggregate. I think the average Republican is not a radical as that, at least for now. One of the unforeseen (or unanticipated) problems is that the radicalization of the Republican Party is causing the level headed Republicans to leave. It started just before Trump. But after Trump was nominated, you saw the beginnings of the more educated and sophisticated Republicans leaving the party - not becoming Democrats, but realizing that there is no place for them in what the Republican Party has become. In the end, this is not sustainable. Within the next 20 years, either the party will split, or you will have a growing number of inactive Republicans who vote Democratic, but still call themselves Republicans out of nostalgia for the Reagan/Bush 41 era.
Gerrymandering of constituencies/districts/precincts (mainly along racial lines by GOP legislatures but the Dems do it too) has resulted in a huge shift to the right amongst GOP candidates. To get a nomination in a conservative area now, you need to be the conservativiest conservative that ever conservated. Until laws are passed to combat gerrymandering, both sides will continue to be forced to espouse the most extreme views possible within their parties' range of beliefs.
No one is in great danger of losing the election, U.S. residents are not known for their political memory, and Alaska recently went through a referendum on " Ranked-Choice Voting," which will help Lisa win because Democrats, independents, Greens, Liberals and more center-right Republicans would wanted her more than a Trump-backed candidate
The real question is, will there be a split in the GOP between the Trump wing of the party and the traditionalists that leads to the formation of a new conservative or nationalist party? If so, what will that mean for the political landscape going forward?
This video is very obviously biased against the local Republicans. I totally agree that they're ridiculous and extremist, but it does go against your stated goals.
3:43 When you start censure a widow for defending her dead husband, you gotta think about whether or not you are the good guys still. That's a new low for american politics, and they've gotten pretty low in the past, in both parties.
If you really want to see the issue with local media in the US, you need to zero in on the massive consolidation by the likes of the Sinclair Broadcast Group and how they're handling local and national issues these days.
So the House is there to represent the people in each State and the Senat exists to represent State government... but shouldn't the State government already represent the people of the state? So the Senate is representing representatives...? Seems kind of useless to me.
Also.. it is hard to have much sympathy for the 'traditional' republican party since in the 80s the current crop turned on the 'traditional' republicans and reshaped the party into the religiously minded one it is today. So yeah, we have been here before. 40 years ago there was a divide between 'national' republicans and 'state' republicans, and we got the 'Regan Revolution' which centred on white rural christian identity politics, in no small part driven by declining rural economies and fear of 'busing'. So we are seeing history repeat itself because the group currently in power left a roadmap for how to kick them out and replace them with more radical counterparts. And back then, it was again the media that played a role... isolated rural whites being exposed to minorities on TV for the first time and feeling the existential dread of not being the only Americans.
I don't know about you, but I'm quite tired of trump, trumpists and the political bickering of parties. What say we have some actual news on the US channel, for a change?
Shoutout to Alaska for implementing a democratic voting system! Electing multiple parties via ranked-choice voting is such an improvement that should get nationwide attention! This is the only way to stop the toxic partisanship, especially on the Right, that is tearing the US apart.
God, I hope trump runs again as a separate party, a delicious republican party schism. It's also awesome seeing the wrath of McCain from beyond the grave. It's like when Garth Tyrrell wore Renly's armour at the battle of the blackwater
If Republicans want to win the 2024 election, the best they can do is to distance themselves as far as possible from Trump. But the more time passes, the more it looks like Trump represented exactly what the GOP stands for.
Trump would win the 2024 election what the hell are you talking about. Populism is here to stay, get ready for our governments to start respecting the wishes of the people.
I am worried at the rise of the divide between local state politicians and the national representatives. We are going to see a split of the GOP party between trump loyalists and traditional republicans and it seems to me the local state politicians are taking trumps side. While this is great for democrats, I cannot agree with a party that gathers around the idea of one person being the answer to all their problems.
@@jeffkoehne4852 I don't quite understand your comment. It was all about trump of the state GOP wouldn't be censuring the republican senators that voted to convict. And trans people playing sports isnt really a high ranking issue of things I care about during an international pandemic and economy crash
@@MegaFubar123 As far as the virus,the republican run states have the same ratio of sick people as democrat run states....the Republican states have no lockdowns.
@@MegaFubar123 Also two hospital ships were sent one to California, one to new York..Both were turned away by the Governors..with the saying Trump set them,we don't want them.
I think the idea that the US is some monolithic Nation-State with a conventional country Identity needs to be critiqued. Honestly the US in our current political climate acts more like a True Federation of small pseudo-Nation States. DC can claim to be the seat of National government and have true Sovereign Authority. But when California 's economy on course to some $4 Trillion GDP, legislation in California well directly and indirectly affect economics and politics to neighboring states and countries like Mexico and Pacific Countries that trade with California's large Port cities. Its like in the the name we use the UNITED STATES of America, The FEDERAL government of the UNITED STATES. Someone once told me you could describe the US a country that is really just a Federation of smaller "countries" in a trench coat made of stars and stripes. And to be fair they are kind of right. So I get it non-US people like this crap is very complicated and to be honest most US people don't understand why we still do this stuff either.
Hope there is a party split, maybe america will get ranked choice voting then. (Progressives and socialists wish to break with the Democrats but mostly aren't due to the Republican party being the sole winner in that situation)
So.. "unity by insulting everyone around you" vs "get rich by giving all your money to the wealthy". At least the latter isn't poised to start a second civil war.
may I point out how ironical is that the side condemning the other one for "cancel culture" is doing the same to their own senators?
and no, the term "cancel culture" has been used so much that it can mean anything, don't go writing "uh, but this time is different".
Yes, and it's just as moronic now as it's on other occasions.
The crazies and the tangerine loser don’t understand irony
A politician losing his job for his political opinion is not "cancel culture" its literally his job, if an avarage worked does, it is
McCarthyism part 2 electric boogaloo
I can't even imagine how insane this looks to someone from another country.
Well, pretty insane 😄
Like when Superman decides to start ruling by fear
I will teach my kids to never enter your country. With all the hatred towards the different, hatred towards indifference, hatred towards opposing political parties and hatred towards each other. The only thing you people seem to love is guns and money. At least the kids got to see it all on tv for the past year!
I thought our current Prime minister having done "Brown Face" in the past was pretty wacky. Meanwhile the U.S. just has this constant stream of insanity it feels like.
LMAOOOOO America is nuts from here
i just wantet to say: as an european, american politics is fun in the same way watching a carcrash is fun. its... interesting
and fear some of it may be coming to our shores
As an European?
It's a slow-motion train wreck that just keeps going forever.
As a Europoor I have to admit, this years season finale was the best TV i've ever whitnessed.
I'm from Utah and the Utah Republican party is a bit strange. Utah basically has a one party system where the Republican party reigns supreme. Because of this moderates, democrats, and independents are incentivized to register as Republican and vote in Republican primary elections.
In my opinion which is totally based on anecdotal evidence, a coalition of moderate Republicans, independents, and democrats tend to pick the most moderate Republican.
You may be asking how to explain Mike Lee. Well Mike Lee became the Republican Senate nominee when Utah was using a caucus system that discourages political participation except for participation from very conservative Republicans.
This observation is not based on hard evidence, but rather my own anecdotes.
Replace the word Republicans with Democrats and you just described California's one-party state.
Read Exit, Voice and Loyalty by Albert Hirschman. A Yale professor said this short book explained everything in society and the best book ever in the social science. I also recommend Colin Woodard' s American Nations. Your anecdotes is unsurprising and that book may explained the weirdness of American politics. If you eant hard evidence, I think you can find it there sort of. The first one is the concept behind them.
Edit: evidence.
South Carolina is heading that way. We've had Republican absolute control for almost 30 years, now, and the Democratic party has slowly shrunk and withered away. There are a number of "Republicans" in our General Assembly, who would not be in other circumstances.
Ben Bullock actually quite the opposite, SC is set to be competitive by 2032
@@carolinian2009 I want to recommend another book I've just finished "The Speechwriter" by Barton Swaim, a speechwriter for Mark Sanford, the previous SC governor who won 4 terms. It was very eye-opening to see how things are run in the inside. He said basically the entire fight over policies did not amount to much more than words. One of my favorite takeaways is that due to small government, only one guy in the whole administration actually knew what impact the policies may actually have.
Meanwhile a GOP senator is going on holidays while their own state is in a state of emergency. But hey, it's fine, he voted pro Trump. Politics in the USA is pretty f*cked up these days.
true both sides have bad politicians.
someone asking Ted Cruz: "when will you have morality?"
Ted Cruz: "when hell freeze..."
someone: "well, I guess that prove that Texas isn't hell..."
@Doso777... honestly... please tell me you're kidding... Lori Lightfoot, Gavin Newsom, Eric Garcetti, Nancy Pelosi etc ALL broke lockdown rules why lecturing people about the importance of staying at home. Seriously the hypocrisy and stupidity of the left never fails to amaze me. At least Ted Cruz didn't go on holidays while advocating locking people in their homes
But but but, the left.
Compare with Cuomo who cause the nursury Covid deaths. Media selective cover-up.
Do you remember John McCain and Mitt Romney were the two Republicans who went up against Barrack Obama in the general election for presidency? (4 years apart)
Yes, I do remember that.
tbf, john mccain was the guy that was often like "don't talk like shit about obama, his opinion is wrong, but the person is actually cool"
when people are throwing around allegations about obama not being american and things like that, mccain was still on obama's side
As I was a kid ...barely. Forgot McCain even existed until recently and have no memories of him,I do remember seeing romney
I was a worker on mccains pres campaign... that year he his votes in Congress showed him for the fake republican that he was and I did not end up voting for him in the end, dispite all the hard work i had done for him. Actions speak louder than words.
It should really saw something that the GOP has essentially booted neoconservatives from the party in addition to many liberal conservatives, with the remaining ones staying in hopes that the populist faction eventually simmers down.
I highly doubt that that's going to happen anytime soon.
As a very frustrated American, I am thankful that you are one of the few remaining analytical news sources available.
Alaska has changed to All party primary and will use rank choice voting? Please let this catch on with every other state!
There's might be petitions in your state. There's one in MI. It got brought to the house floor a few years back but as long as Republicans hold our house and senate i doubt it's going anywhere..
But yay for Alaska!
I love this news outlet. You dont seem to lean left or right. Sort or right down the middle of the road. Little opinion, if any. All facts. Equal time to each side of the argument and easy to digest in this ever evolving, concerningly biased media ecosystem. Keep up the hard work. Thank you.
I suspect they lean a little left, but even then they do their best to keep that out of the coverage they are trying to do.
They have a teeeny tiny tilt towards the Left but for most of it they r good🙏
@@dhruvparapurath7967 I personally think that sometimes it’s better to bias sometimes
@@patathatapon I agree ... but basically all YT channels that do news that aren't news media outlets like Fox News have a left bias, be it minor like TLDR and NBC or strong like BBC and CNN.
Being that they are based in the UK there will be a slight left bias I admit, but they are the most centrist I have come across since 2016.
America needs to get rid of their two party system yesterday
That is exactly what Trump and the GOP were trying to do .... better luck next time.
@@michaelbyron1166 You know, like ~5 years ago I would have been a hundred percent certain, that this is a joke (not a bad one at that if I may say). But nowadays I absolutely can't be and that is driving me ever so closer to insanity
There's no "The Left" in the U.S., just The Right & The Right+
Ultimately the voters will decide on the validity of the censures. 2022 elections will be interesting. Especially if grumpy trumpy inserts himself into the matter.
This past four years has really shown how much Americans truly love their country and sadly that number of people who truly love their country is very low. It's sad too to see how people are putting their emotions and the love of one person over their duty to country! I for one am glad that we live in this day and age of the internet we have never before had records this vast of people who are willing to put themselves over their country there's no hiding your true feelings there's no hiding how truly patriotic you are there's been a line drawn in the sand!
WAIT! Conservatives are trying to silence the free speech of other conservatives?! Hypocrisy know no bounds, huh?
Censure in this context is just finger wagging. No ones free speech has been breached.
@@tavernburner3066 I don't think you know what censuring means.
@@novastar6112 please watch the video. 5:21 to be exact.
@@tavernburner3066 the problem is that you are still getting yelled at for expressing your opinion.... heck, some of the republicans are getting yelled at for things they didn't even do.
Eventually this could escalate from censuring to censoring. Better nip the problem at the bud.
@@novastar6112 elaborate :what is the force that causes the decent down the slope.
Seems familiar. Moderate Tories who pointed out the damage Brexit would do were treated similarly and were eventually deselected.
Trump: has no power.
GOP: *ALL HAIL THE ORANGE*
Senators: but he’s evil
GOP:
His mob has power.
The solution? Break the mob. Show them the kindness of demonstrating how truly worthless they are.
America as we knew it is finished. A new course is being charted and only the winners of the coming conflict will get to decide what gets hung above court as law and who gets hung outside it as traitors.
Sounds like cancel culture to me
Yea until you realize a Censure does nothing
@@BooleanDev but... something something free speech!!!
Daniel Newville um, yes, it does. Keep deluding yourself tho
@@dylancoykendall554 then convince me
GOP: we don’t cancel others
7 guys: Trump was kinda cringe
GOP: >:(
"Trump is the dam, not the river!"
- Michael Malice
When you look at House turnover, have you looked at actual numbers. I recall that incumbency in the House is actually a lot stronger than in the Senate. It seems counterintuitive, but I believe the numbers show that incumbent House members get re-elected at a greater rate than the Senate. I think that number is like 98%. That’s why there was a huge push for terms limits back in 1994. And perhaps my numbers are off since the GOP screwed with redistricting in the 1990s and early 2000s. My theory being that by creating more and more safe Republican districts, the GOP unwittingly wound up giving more power to the radical Tea Party wing of the party, which made it easier for moderate to liberal Republicans to lose in the primaries. But, when it comes to the general election, and when you look at incumbent party, you find that there is far LESS turnover in the House than in the Senate, even if that seems counterintuitive based on the 2 year terms for House members.
I don't find the high incumbancy in the House all that counterintuitive.... Senate races are a bigger deal, because there are fewer of them, therefore the opposition always makes some effort. Also, you can't gerrymander to make safe senate seats; state boundaries are where they are.
Based populists are getting elected
I always thought that, in those days I can't see nothing in the news but propaganda. You proved me wrong.
Thank you!
I just don’t think the majority of Republican Party members are fond of establishment senators. They’ll be primaried, Trumpism is here to stay.
I’m glad the GOP and trump are gonna fight because that means Dems can easily win more Rep. races and senate races and even more presidencies. I’m so happy that Trump’s legacy is one of failure and havoc
@@sharkiboi8167 The interesting q is what will a radicalised republican party do to Democrats? If the traditional establishment republicans and their voters abandon ship and the party is left to the trump bloc, will they start their own party, potentially drawing "never trump" voters from the dems? Or would they join/caucus with democrats, dragging the party further right?
@@cormacdonnelly365 The thing is that Trump will undoubtedly will either take over the GOP with reactionary white politics (trumpism) or create his own "Patriot Party". In either case the traditional republican (about 20% of the Republican party) will not follow Trump, we saw this in the 2020 election. Too many 2016 Trump voters voted for Biden in 2020, this is a main factor that costed Trump the presidency. And due to the Dem-Rep party split in the US being roughly 45%-45% (the rest of the country is independent 10%) that means that a loss of 20% of their fan-base the Republican party under Trump or the Patriot Party will undoubtedly not win in Congress and Presidency. Also in states like Alaska, Wyoming, and Utah there's way too many traditional republican and not Trumpian republicans, this leaves space for a traditionally conservative 3rd party and that will break the "Conservative wing" of US partisan politics
@@sharkiboi8167 Mmm, either way the republican party is going to be in civil war at least until the next presidential race and barring divine intervention I dont see a figure emerging with the same ability to rally voters like Trump had in 2016
@@sharkiboi8167 I’ll look forward to having a Democrat monolith that regulates and taxes people into oblivion. What’s strange is that I did realize how far left the Overton window has shifted. It’s pretty frustrating that limited government, freedom of speech, and gun rights have become far right ideals.
Georgia showed that it is possible for a controversial voting rights law at the state level to capture the attention of the national news cycle for more than one week.
CENSURE IS THE GROWN UP EQUIVALENT OF YOUR TEACHER SENDING A LETTER TO YOUR PARENTS
@Ojisan Derosuke tru, I'm just stealing this beautiful TLDR comment suggestion
I think the politicians should be held accountable for their promises as well as take mental health courses to make sure they aren't resisting or promoting propaganda. We deserve better.
You mentioned in your TLDR Daily. But please do a full video on the Texas Power Grid failure. It was a horrific scene last week across the state, and we finding out that they found out about these issues for at least decade that this could happen.
rip the GOP (1854-2021)
This is groupthink right here.
Explain
Lol the parties are destroying themselves
It's not happening to the Dems just yet. But they're likely going to start slouching into 1970s Swedish socialism (the type even Sweden had to back away from!) before any of their senior party leaders can do anything about it.
@@eksortso The original comment implies that it will happen. Honestly, I agree with them. Democrats will begin destroying themselves eventually, although very slowly. Note that I don't like the Republican party at all.
Maybe we'll see a new political reorganization; it's happened last time in the late 60' if I remember, with Reagan or something..
Not American, so I don't know if a three-party system could even exist before the two biggest split the third between themselves; but maybe
- The trumpists and extreme-conservatives on one side
- The moderates of both the democrats and republicans on the center
- Some kind of US-styke "New New Left" coalition between various progressives, greens and other independent to make a third party.
The one in the middle could have members voting with either edge and trying to make comprises for the good of the people.
Btw @Dave Ostroske, I searched what you meant by evoking Sweden but I don't really found anything of notable, could you explain to me the meaning of your saying ?
@@Victor-el3ul us elections as currently structured are extremely hostile to third parties. Most states use a first past the post voting system, so moderate amounts of people voting third party tends to lead to their least favorite main party getting the seat. A few states like Georgia, Louisiana and apparently now Alaska use some form of runoff elections, which is better, but the big 2 still have the advantage of being the big 2.
@@Victor-el3ul Sure. There was a period of time when Sweden's social spending reached a tremendous height. A state like Sweden, which is open and efficient about its spending, could only keep those levels up for awhile before retracting them. Many famous Swedes, including ingmar Bergman, were quoted at the time about their heights of socialism, usually positively of course. Modern American socialists like Bernie Sanders point to Sweden as a model to follow, and their own proposals, which far exceed Sweden's policies in the 70s, would choke the U.S. economy with its massively bloated and deficit-spending federal government (IMHO).
Thanx
Short and to the point
to censur? to censor? Always thought it was the latter :D
TLDR news, i think you're promotion is wrong. There's simply no way for a person/organization to be free of bias (unbiased), the difference is that media can choose to report objectively (choosing to focus on the event that happen) or opinionated (choosing to speak of their bias) and none of these is wrong or bad by any mean. It's just people mistakenly thought that anything opinionated is bad even though it's impossible to not make an opinion when you witness an event or obtain the information from somewhere and by default mean that every media is biased in the first place......
If State level republicans do keep moving further right, then it's only a matter of time until that trickles in to Washington. This seems like a death sentence to the old GOP
i love how where i'm from, "state" politics differ so much from our country's politics it's normal for our parliamentarians to "betray" their party line because it may not get them reelected where they come from.
things like national parks... the right doesn't care as much about them, unless they're from the state with a national park, at which point it's not green to protect the parks, but conservative.
I’m a registered Republican….. and I really really reeeaaaallly want the party to just move on from Trump already.
You think by now both parties will try change the voting system for a mutilple system. Also for the people who hoping for the Republican party to split to let you know a one party system is not going to work for America in the long-run.
Don't worry the Libertarian Party will get the chance to shine.
@@RmcBlueSky The Libertarian party is on the decline. Plus they can't produce serious candidates to run in a higher government.
It's finally starting to be about being on the side of doing the right thing, instead of the "Trump and Trumper" movie we can't get out of.
I’m just wondering what state legislation is making it harder for minority’s to vote?
Requiring photo ID, which minorities are less likely to have.
Putting up more barriers to registering to vote, which is likely to affect minorities more.
Reducing the number of polling stations in deprived areas meaning that people living there have to travel further and queue for longer, while making it harder to get a postal vote.
Some states have been arbitrarily purging the voter rolls of anyone with a _similar_ name to a convicted felon where the name _sounds_ black, despite an abundance of evidence that they were different people.
@@stevieinselby okay what would you do to fix the people?
Problem
@@remijr123imadog2 I would legislate to stop the states from doing that. Right now, Georgia is undertaking the most blatant attempts at voter suppression in a bid to take the state back to the days when black people's votes only counted as ⅗ of a vote. If they can't count their votes as being worth less then they'll find ways to stop ⅖ of them from voting. Legislation *must* be passed at federal level to make this illegal.
@@stevieinselby okay you didn’t really answer it your just said I’d stop it. But how? Give example. I honestly want to know
My question would be "who is electing the state officials"?
If they are elected by the party, rather than the populace (like a primary) then it makes sense that they would be more radical. The Republican voting base is pro-trump while the state voting base is anti-trump.
My thoughts? USA politics are not only getting more politically polarized but "bipolarized" you are with certain group or against certain group... or become passive and cynical. So it becomes Dems vs Reps in DC, then conservative Dems/Reps vs progresive Dems/Reps, then too-progresive dems/reps vs not-enough-progresive-dems/reps, etc.
Not so interested in signing up for 1 pin. I love to collect full sets like those sold in the store.
I would like to criticize one part, as a right wing populist i would prefer that term instead of "white identity politics" it wouldnt make sense for that type of politics to appeal to more minorities in 2020 then usualy for the republicans
One can only hope that calculations of others will eventually better lives of all.
Can we please call those who want to go backwards ("MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN") "regressive" and not "reactionary" as they're actually opposed to progressivism?
Wait, Doug Ducey was censured just because he admitted Trump lost?
Are the Americans really getting that petty.
I think the gap between the state parties and the federal party has a lot to do with why the Tea Party came to power around 2012 in the first place. Going back to 1994, Newt Gingrich and Dick Army were tired of the Republicans being a permanent minority party. They began a campaign to capture more state legislatures with the eye towards creating a more permanent power base for the Republicans in the House by engaging in radical redistricting. Now gerrymandering has long history in US politics, but not on the scale that Gingrich and Army implemented. They created numerous “safe” districts for Republicans, often bucking the state’s demographic distribution. This empowered the more radical wing of the party. This also motivated the more radical wing to get more involved at the state and local levels and essentially capture the party apparatus there. This created a feedback loop, which kept giving the radical wing more and more power. But this is also bucking the country’s demographic trend. At the heart of the matter is race. Caucasians will lose majority status by about 2048. This terrifies the uneducated white voters who make up the core of the Republican base. Seeing the possibility that they will lose power permanently in a few decades, they are more motivated to get involved at the state and local levels. And they are more motivated to pursue policies and tactics that are anti-democratic in nature (eg, redistricting, harsher voting standards, relying on the electoral college), but which buffer their power base from the big demographic shift (hence why Republicans oppose immigration). But I don’t think the state and local party apparatus reflect the views of the party in the aggregate. I think the average Republican is not a radical as that, at least for now. One of the unforeseen (or unanticipated) problems is that the radicalization of the Republican Party is causing the level headed Republicans to leave. It started just before Trump. But after Trump was nominated, you saw the beginnings of the more educated and sophisticated Republicans leaving the party - not becoming Democrats, but realizing that there is no place for them in what the Republican Party has become. In the end, this is not sustainable. Within the next 20 years, either the party will split, or you will have a growing number of inactive Republicans who vote Democratic, but still call themselves Republicans out of nostalgia for the Reagan/Bush 41 era.
Mussolini and Hitler called it betrayal too
Great video!
This could be the budget to have those big shifts in policy. So many opportunities to redress!
It's good u have sources in this one. Also the last TLDR EU video needs to have the sources cited.
Who's ready to see a repeat of the election of 1912 with a split republican party
Gerrymandering of constituencies/districts/precincts (mainly along racial lines by GOP legislatures but the Dems do it too) has resulted in a huge shift to the right amongst GOP candidates. To get a nomination in a conservative area now, you need to be the conservativiest conservative that ever conservated. Until laws are passed to combat gerrymandering, both sides will continue to be forced to espouse the most extreme views possible within their parties' range of beliefs.
Do I get to choose which pin to get when I back you on Patreon?
I don't see the need to censure. Every single one of them are dead men walking in a GOP primary. It's like beating a man that's already down.
No one is in great danger of losing the election, U.S. residents are not known for their political memory, and Alaska recently went through a referendum on " Ranked-Choice Voting," which will help Lisa win because Democrats, independents, Greens, Liberals and more center-right Republicans would wanted her more than a Trump-backed candidate
The real question is, will there be a split in the GOP between the Trump wing of the party and the traditionalists that leads to the formation of a new conservative or nationalist party? If so, what will that mean for the political landscape going forward?
Make the traitors walk the plank.
If the GOP splits, then that is one step closer to a multiparty system
That wouldn’t be a bad thing
This video is very obviously biased against the local Republicans. I totally agree that they're ridiculous and extremist, but it does go against your stated goals.
You sppitin fax
Not a Republican, but I agree with this.
At this point , they should be independent and caucasus with democrats
5:21 the amount of people in this comment section who failed to watch this part of the video is truly outstanding. Cognitive dissents at it’s finest.
3:43 When you start censure a widow for defending her dead husband, you gotta think about whether or not you are the good guys still. That's a new low for american politics, and they've gotten pretty low in the past, in both parties.
This is an obvious consequence of disassociation between will of the constituents vs. interest of career politicians.
I can tell by the comments how even handed this platform is... Last time I'll be here.
Well.. TLDR independent and unbiased, yet fails to mention British Cyprus as a British Oversea Territory? Fishy..
If you really want to see the issue with local media in the US, you need to zero in on the massive consolidation by the likes of the Sinclair Broadcast Group and how they're handling local and national issues these days.
Good
Trump was so good at dividing the country he could even divide his own party! Nice!
So the House is there to represent the people in each State and the Senat exists to represent State government... but shouldn't the State government already represent the people of the state? So the Senate is representing representatives...? Seems kind of useless to me.
Censueing is soooo scary!
Too long
Also.. it is hard to have much sympathy for the 'traditional' republican party since in the 80s the current crop turned on the 'traditional' republicans and reshaped the party into the religiously minded one it is today. So yeah, we have been here before. 40 years ago there was a divide between 'national' republicans and 'state' republicans, and we got the 'Regan Revolution' which centred on white rural christian identity politics, in no small part driven by declining rural economies and fear of 'busing'. So we are seeing history repeat itself because the group currently in power left a roadmap for how to kick them out and replace them with more radical counterparts. And back then, it was again the media that played a role... isolated rural whites being exposed to minorities on TV for the first time and feeling the existential dread of not being the only Americans.
8:09 stopping black people from voting is not comparable to banning the 1619 project. In any way.
I know like wtf
That wasn't a comparison. They were just citing examples.
please tell me ben sass of Nebraska introduces himself as "ben sassnebras"
I don't know about you, but I'm quite tired of trump, trumpists and the political bickering of parties.
What say we have some actual news on the US channel, for a change?
Never. The one thing Americans should truly care about is Jewish space lasers.
From this side of the Atlantic it's nice watching an empire implode rather than just being the implodee every time
@@Dardobul I know it’s hilarious that it’s not the UK this time
Some local Republican party hacks decided to censure their senators. That'll go on their permanent record.
Meh.
Good on them. Just wish they could kick out the 7 republican senators
Insurrection is a strong word riot would be a better fit. I hope you do better next time.
Shoutout to Alaska for implementing a democratic voting system! Electing multiple parties via ranked-choice voting is such an improvement that should get nationwide attention! This is the only way to stop the toxic partisanship, especially on the Right, that is tearing the US apart.
The left is the reason why we are so divided. Shut up and let us fix our countries which you guys destroyed
Wait. What is the censure they are doing? And isn't that basically unconsitutional?
There is a mistake in the video description: Trumpism not Trumism...
Do you really think you are unbiased?
you rock
God, I hope trump runs again as a separate party, a delicious republican party schism.
It's also awesome seeing the wrath of McCain from beyond the grave. It's like when Garth Tyrrell wore Renly's armour at the battle of the blackwater
This is rhetorical surely
If Republicans want to win the 2024 election, the best they can do is to distance themselves as far as possible from Trump. But the more time passes, the more it looks like Trump represented exactly what the GOP stands for.
Trump would win the 2024 election what the hell are you talking about.
Populism is here to stay, get ready for our governments to start respecting the wishes of the people.
I am worried at the rise of the divide between local state politicians and the national representatives. We are going to see a split of the GOP party between trump loyalists and traditional republicans and it seems to me the local state politicians are taking trumps side. While this is great for democrats, I cannot agree with a party that gathers around the idea of one person being the answer to all their problems.
It was never about Trump...we now have boys dressed as girls playing girls sports.
@@jeffkoehne4852 I don't quite understand your comment. It was all about trump of the state GOP wouldn't be censuring the republican senators that voted to convict. And trans people playing sports isnt really a high ranking issue of things I care about during an international pandemic and economy crash
@@MegaFubar123 As far as the virus,the republican run states have the same ratio of sick people as democrat run states....the Republican states have no lockdowns.
@@MegaFubar123 Also two hospital ships were sent one to California, one to new York..Both were turned away by the Governors..with the saying Trump set them,we don't want them.
lisa murkowski be lookin like ymza from emperors new groove
8:44 aged well
"censure" no censor
Donald Trump: Civil War
I hope they keep doing it and lose a few more seats. Then we won't have to deal with Joe Manchin anymore.
It's all about damage control.
I think the idea that the US is some monolithic Nation-State with a conventional country Identity needs to be critiqued. Honestly the US in our current political climate acts more like a True Federation of small pseudo-Nation States. DC can claim to be the seat of National government and have true Sovereign Authority. But when California 's economy on course to some $4 Trillion GDP, legislation in California well directly and indirectly affect economics and politics to neighboring states and countries like Mexico and Pacific Countries that trade with California's large Port cities.
Its like in the the name we use the UNITED STATES of America, The FEDERAL government of the UNITED STATES.
Someone once told me you could describe the US a country that is really just a Federation of smaller "countries" in a trench coat made of stars and stripes. And to be fair they are kind of right.
So I get it non-US people like this crap is very complicated and to be honest most US people don't understand why we still do this stuff either.
You can't break crazy.
Punished for speaking up?
All three of them are liars from Arizona
interesting to watch this now cheney lost her leadership post now. it appears the sentiment has filtered upwards.
Hope there is a party split, maybe america will get ranked choice voting then. (Progressives and socialists wish to break with the Democrats but mostly aren't due to the Republican party being the sole winner in that situation)
The Democratic party isn't nearly as divided or fanatical as the Republican party.
Its populism vs neo conservatism
So.. "unity by insulting everyone around you" vs "get rich by giving all your money to the wealthy".
At least the latter isn't poised to start a second civil war.
The flags results
Make rational thinking cool again
Trump: how about *NO*