FreeCAD FEM Tutorial - Getting a result

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 22 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 51

  • @josegegas
    @josegegas 3 ปีที่แล้ว +72

    Something important when doing FEA is the size of the mesh elements. If the mesh elements are too big, the FEA results cannot be trusted, If the mesh elements are too small, the time to solve the simulation will be too long. So in order to trust or have some confidence that a real part will behave and deform as in the simulation, you have first to so a "convergence annalysis", in which you will find out the propper size for the mesh elements. The shape of the mesh elements is also important. Also, since you mention you used this for PLA parts, I assume you are 3D printing them. The phisiscal properties of 3D printed parts are very different from those of the material itself, so some times is hard to trust FEA for 3D printed parts. 3D printed parts are very un-isotropic, meaning that their mechanical properties change with space. When I did FEA for PLA 3D printed parts I selected a safety factor of 10 and a yield strenght 75% of that of pure PLA. This was te only way to get results consistent with the lab experiments... Hope this helps...

    • @snazzyengineering
      @snazzyengineering 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I saw his mesh, and I died a bit inside. There should be a mesh inflation region near the rib so there's less artificial diffusion around it. Currently it shows that there are no stress concentration regions around the rib, which is physically incorrect.

    • @ecoidea100
      @ecoidea100 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You have to make mesh size sequence to study the influence of the mesh, but that mesh seems very good to me for the kind physics studied.

    • @daniel.blackbeard
      @daniel.blackbeard ปีที่แล้ว

      assuming the 3d printed shape is solid and not filled with air, isn't there something like annealing?

    • @mathcodeprint
      @mathcodeprint  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I know this comment is really old. Sorry I almost killed you :), I was really just trying to show how to get A result, I know nothing about FEM or FEA, should've made that clearer. Glad there are folks here smarter and more experienced than me.

    • @wdavis6814
      @wdavis6814 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Very interesting write up. Helpful to know you ran experiments to validate the meshing choices. Thanks for the help!

  • @Quackersssssss
    @Quackersssssss 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Thanks for sharing that, I also have tried to get FEM results but gave up long before you did.

  • @RaduM1
    @RaduM1 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Great video! If you want to see the displacement more exaggerated (for smaller objects) you can increase the max value below the displacement slider (eg. from 100 to 1000).

  • @simulation_free
    @simulation_free 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    great job!this example help me understand the routine of simulation using FreeCAD. Thank you very much.

  • @ThereAreNoFacts
    @ThereAreNoFacts 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Appreciated the explanation - kind thanks!

  • @marcinjakubowski6010
    @marcinjakubowski6010 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Very nice, looks useful for basic analysis. Note also you have a rerun starting at 10:17.

  • @Jose-tw9bl
    @Jose-tw9bl 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    thanks for the video!

  • @mecanizadosgrela7380
    @mecanizadosgrela7380 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for video.

  • @morganallen2272
    @morganallen2272 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Cool! I started exploring the FEM WB a couple weeks ago while designing laser cut flextures. I didn't get to the point of getting anything truly useful but was nice to get a feel for the WB. Hopefully will revisit if/when I have laser cutter access again. *sigh*

    • @mathcodeprint
      @mathcodeprint  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I'll cross my fingers for ya.

  • @phillipcarder2177
    @phillipcarder2177 ปีที่แล้ว

    I couldn't see anyone commenting on this so hopefully, someone hasn't already given a solution. I suspect the reason the deformation/displacement not showing on the finished solver is that the force in the ConstriantForce parameter was only set to 1N and this isn't enough to show any deformation, even at a factor of 100.

  • @SyrinityNet
    @SyrinityNet 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    gmesh and calculix are now included in freecad by default i think

    • @mathcodeprint
      @mathcodeprint  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's awesome if true, they where a bit fiddly to install.

  • @dcpires
    @dcpires 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    You helped me a lot!!

  • @tuli1954
    @tuli1954 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hello, very usefull video
    Question: can one clean up CAD in Freecad?

  • @wpegley
    @wpegley 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thx

  • @qzorn4440
    @qzorn4440 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    wonderful, wonderful "lawrence welk".. gee, does the freecad folks make training videos they really should? also, what about freecad-19 is it ready? thanks for all your work ...:)

  • @sridharnaiik1389
    @sridharnaiik1389 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for the video. Can you please make a video in FEM analysis for assembly?

  • @ameliabuns4058
    @ameliabuns4058 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I wish there was a software that did proper analysis for 3d printed objects on the Z axis

  • @Miniellipse
    @Miniellipse 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for this. FYI: at the end, your video repeats again. If you can get the part deflection visualization to work that would be great.

    • @mathcodeprint
      @mathcodeprint  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks. So embarrassing. Recoded after error :(, I am planning another on the deflection.

  • @f6201747
    @f6201747 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    what is the meaning of max stress on the fixed boundary (compare the max stress on structure)in FEM simulation?

  • @CoopKeith1
    @CoopKeith1 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Do you know how to get results off of multipart meshes?

  • @francescostefanini1274
    @francescostefanini1274 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video. Thanks. How do you apply an elastic constraint?

  • @dilwynlalaouna
    @dilwynlalaouna 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The last 3 minutes of the video are a repeat of an earlier part... feels like a video editing mistake (or mispate). Thanks fir the explanations though, it makes it easy and understandable.

    • @mathcodeprint
      @mathcodeprint  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It was a mistake. I thought I mentioned it in the description. Sorry bout that.

  • @ameliabuns4058
    @ameliabuns4058 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    *it might be easier if you're a fem person*
    I was confused thinking about that for a good minute before i realized you mean finite element method not fem as in feminine person xD

  • @uwotm8018
    @uwotm8018 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey do you know how to refine the mesh around certain features/edges at all? For example I want to model a beam with a hole and find the stress right at the edge of the hole, how can I have more, smaller elements right near the hole without needing to make all of the cells smaller?
    Cheers

  • @joec732
    @joec732 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm missing how you get the actual result values at locations around the model. There's not even a legend that shows up next to the contour plot.

  • @XWSshow
    @XWSshow 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hello and thanks for the tutoriel! Is it possible in FreeCAD to define a rotation speed? I would really appreciate an answer, thank you

    • @mathcodeprint
      @mathcodeprint  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      You can use the View Turntable in the Tools menu

    • @wartburgritter
      @wartburgritter 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Do you mean a centrifugal force? Yes this is possible. There is even an example analysis included in FreeCAD FEM. cheers bernd from FreeCAD FEM

  • @vitalijjurt8107
    @vitalijjurt8107 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Didnt get how to change forces value?

    • @mathcodeprint
      @mathcodeprint  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I dont think I showed changing the forces value. But if you click on the ForceConstraint in the history tree, there is a parameter for the amount of force.

    • @vitalijjurt8107
      @vitalijjurt8107 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mathcodeprint OK, gotcha

  • @chepecarlo
    @chepecarlo 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Firs comments :) super cool :D

    • @mathcodeprint
      @mathcodeprint  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You rock!

    • @ajarivas72
      @ajarivas72 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@mathcodeprint
      You rock too.

  • @johnvlahidis_google
    @johnvlahidis_google 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    dump

  • @TheGroundskeeper
    @TheGroundskeeper 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    6:00 by the way, you need other things installed that weren't mentioned AND don't come standard in freecad AND have difficult windows install AND remains completely unaddressed. thumbs down, wasted 7 minutes

    • @mathcodeprint
      @mathcodeprint  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Only 7 minutes? I probably used up 7 hours trying to figure this thing out. I thought I linked the two additional libraries needed. But, yes I didn't want the video to be overly long/complex. I run :Linux so I can only really talk to that. Those two libaries "Calculix" and "gmsh" install with two commands. I feel your pain tho' I am sure windows is not anywhere near that simple.

    • @Nick-ye5kk
      @Nick-ye5kk 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Worked just fine in my version on Windows - I did build it myself from the source, maybe that helped.

    • @wartburgritter
      @wartburgritter 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      On windows nothing needs to be installed. All is included. On Linux one needs to install gmsh and calculix. Takes less than a minute on Debian based distributions. My recomendation is. If you not succeed just ask on FreeCAD FEM forum for help. cheers bernd