The point about maximum demand is about what "could" be being drawn not what actually is being drawn. A house with 12 rooms would likely be calculated to have a maximum demand that is higher than a house with 6 rooms - but if both properties have the same number of occupants and same appliances the actual demand in that circumstance might be the same - but what if the owner of the 12 room house sells it to a large family - the actual demand would likely increase - the electrical installation must still be able to handle this safely. The demand calculations include lots of spare capacity for this reason - relying on actual usage isn't safe as actual usage changes with circumstances.
Thank you for this very useful video, it is much appreciated. I usually find myself working on multi dwelling units (MDUs) and I believe another video discussing how to calculate the after diversity maximum demand (ADMD) for MDUs would be very useful. I am sure that a lot of people would find it useful as well. Thanks again
Clicked on this as I was curious how it was done there. I teach Code at a local college for apprentices and we do load calculations for homes in a far different way, and the only reason we do it is to determine the electrical service size (main breaker to feed the home) A massive difference we have is ALL lighting and general use "sockets" are simply calculated based on the square meter area of the home (5000w per 90m2, than 1000w for every additional 90m2 or portion of), Ovens, electric heating, electric car chargers all have specific requirements afterwards we add any other load over 1500w at 25% demand if an electric oven has been accounted for. quick and simple.
If I am doing a new build I do this but if I am doing an EICR I often will state 100A if a 100A fuse is fitted, 80/80 etc. One it's not possible to monitor when carrying out an EICR for a duration long enough to simulate a true load and 2 because the majority of properties are now having Heat Pumps or EV Chargers or both fitted the majority of the time we're spiking to 96 Amps in detached and semi detached properties. When designing from scratch I was taught 5 watts/ft or 80 watts/meter rather than relying on arbitrary loads, sadly this calculation now comes in well under what I am actually finding during testing.
The Shelly 3EM can monitor three-phase current or single-phase current. The power supply for the device is on phase A. The newer Shelly PRO 3EM, on the other hand, is power supplied on phase C. The power clamp must be attached correctly. On the Shelly 3EM the arrow points from the fuses to the electricity meter. On the PRO 3EM the arrow points from the electricity meter to the fuses.
i think that it depends on if it's residential or commercial building in residential installations it's very rare that everything will be fully loaded it just depends on demand in commercial it's more likely that all the circuits are fully loaded especially in a production environment
Hi thank you for your fantastic video I was very confused about very Good explanation you are always helpful take care and God protected you and your family
As I’ve had a few issue’s now with AFDD’s “nuisance” tripping. Working as it should but certain items plugged in on one circuit don’t trip but on another circuit with some white goods, say fridge on once item plugged in the AFDD trips anywhere from 5-30secs. Should we (electricians) 1st fix to European radial circuits as AFDD’s were designed for said Euro circuits in the first place.
30W per LED point is definitely still massively excessive, I'd say 10W. Anyway, I am in Australia, for a residential house, its not even worth calculating, because maximum demand by limitation is easier, every distributor wants a 63A main switch on a 100A fused supply. You can easily exceed 63A for fairly lengthy periods without an issue. If you need more, you will be looking at a three phase install anyway.
@@geniusmarcsays2434 I have 68 downlighters at 5W and 2 double panels in the garage at 75W each. The total load on both lighting circuits including extractor fans, floodlights and what have you is 1110W lol
When I was in the trade many years ago, I discussed this with the NICEIC inspector, who said that the electricity boards, who had far more experience, rated domestic installations at 6 watts per square foot - far easier, and more accurate.
Very good video but could you explain or do another showing how you calculate diversity on a 3 phase board please when 3 phase and single phase circuits are in the DB. Thanks
Interesting - in NZ, we calculate sockets based on the number of sockets, at least GPOs, with allowances for sockets dedicated for specific tasks, eg in ceiling for lights, to be treated as lights. That way, 10 sockets is calculated the same whether they are all on 1 circuit or 10 circuits.
Very important to get the figures correct for a whole premise load as you don't want a burning smell as you shake hands with the Customer after completing your install
That's not going to happen is it. The DNO slaps in a supply and that's it really. It doesn't matter if you install 100ccts you've got the main fuse and that's that.
Just watched a video on TH-cam where the sparky is calculating max demand as wanting to install a car charger (haven’t most got load management now) and he applied diversity as per table A2 but then applied the 40% rule after this except for the highest load 🤷🏼♂️. Is this an approved method? I thought it was one or the other.
Interesting take on the subject. The guidance is to reach a max demand for the property, not for your living arrangements. Add an EV and a heat pump which is the direction of travel and you will see that demand is a critical calc.
But that demand calculation must be re-done when introducing large energy consumers that are only installed officially by competent persons...! Determining a demand that is far higher than practically needed increases costs in a way that's not necessary. the difference might be a property needing 3 phase or not. Actual use must factor into the equation or, as this video highlights, homes would need +100 amp incommers which in the UK at least is unlikely to be possible without significant additional costs... and all for an overzealous demand calculation... If additional high current consumers are introduced, then sure the demand calc should be reconsidered... Catering for tomorrow's' theoretical needs is today's expense; and it's a luxury most consumers would prefer not to indulge in...
When Calculating the maximum demand for UK Power networks for 4 properties I used the 2nd method, only to be told by UK Power Networks that they work off 2kw Per Property, your 39A equates to roughly 9KW 🤔🤔
I think it used to be a stipulation of western power that the 100/40% method be employed. I’ve not been able to find it on their site. Is this still the case & does anyone have a link?
Great video. What it shows is that the maximum demand as shown needs quite a bit of updating. In a commercial premises I rewired there are 20 circuits. - each treatment room has a radial circuit - the lighting is separated across 4 circuits - emergency is on its own. - alarm - cctv - fire alarm Etc etc. on max demand traditionally it’s a huge amount, but in reality is nowhere near that and is far better for the customer because it offers better continuity of service in the event of a fault. And when testing in the future it’s easier to work around.
Brilliant information chaps. Im sure historically I have not been too far of declaring an installations max demand on an EIC certificate. Next video, could you provide details of a portable version of a data logging device, as I would use for sure.....a device such as this, if affordable and accurate too, would help me sleep better at night.............;)
When I first started did maximum demand once for a rewire on a 4 bed house, 4 rings, electric shower, electric cooker etc. Came out at like 96A, the fuse was only a 60A, called up DNO and asked them to upgrade the head to 100A, a specialist came out, I explained my maximum calculation via BS7671, the response was: "Nah its fine, we don't use that, tell you what if you ever blow the main fuse tell the guy that comes out that I said you can upgrade it to 80A, it will be fine".... What a waste of time..
Perhaps, but the practical application of experience is still a valuable commodity often overlooked in today's 'over educated', but mostly theory based electricians world...
@@dougle03 Yep exactly this, although I created 4 rings, Kitchen, Utility, upstairs and downstairs, originally it had just one ring for the whole house which had been fine for 60yrs, even though I increased the number of circuits does not mean I actually increased the load.
Being able to use an alternative method if approved by a competent electrical design engineer is great, but how many people consult a competent electrical design engineer when adding an EV charger, which probably the most important time to be charging maximum demand?
Even at that demand on the first calculation, the header fuse would take a ridiculous amount of time to blow. ~100,000 seconds according to the big brown book.
Easy, we have 150% PV, And over 400% groups. My primary rail is limited to 40A per building while mid day 80A would be available. The 80A can flow, but never will there flow 80A on any rail here due to the way I've centered both solar-pv and grid supply.
I think people underestimate just how much power 100a really is. You need to be doing something pretty abnormal to get anywhere close in a normal home.
Take the 39A he measured here, add 32-40A for an EV charger (his peak was just after getting home from work, so exactly when you would expect the car to be charging if you haven't set it to charge off peak) and maybe you jump in the shower while your partner is cooking dinner and suddenly you are getting very close to 100A. EV chargers change the calculation enormously.
Completely glossed over the fact that in one table for diversity for cooking appliance states, take first 10A and 30% of remaining current wheres the other table states, take 10A and 30% full load of appliance. Can anyone clear this up?
@@efixx car charger (32A), Storage heater (10A), then the dishwasher, washing machine and tumble dryer (since replaced with a less inefficient model) all managed to spike at the same time. Along with the baseload of fridge/freezer and network gear. Note that other than the storage heater … there is no water or space heating. Heat pump definitely on the cards though. But nowadays most people should be able to look at smart meter data for an absolute peak, and a typical peak over the last n years.
@@JohnR31415 Plunge electric pricing is introducing all sorts of unusual loads into the average domestic electric arrangements. I've heard stories of people causing their main fuse to blow trying to use as much as possible during a plunge pricing event (Negative import rates for those that don't know)...
@@efixx Someone getting an electric shower while someone else is cooking a meal on an electric hob while the EV charges would easily get well past 63A.
Pro tip for calculation: lights -ignore. IT -ignore. -smoke -ignore. Number of socket circuits - ignore. Walk around the house and find all appliances that can create significant heat (at least 1000W) and will run for at least 30 minutes. Multiply by 10. Done.
@@lua-nya Yes 2 computers in my property are running on 1200watt power supplies but they're only normally running at 1000 watts each when their users are gaming. For 6 hours straight. Computers should be included.
look at electrical clothes dryers they cause all kinds problems i will presume car chargers are next but i saw a video off car charger with power monitoring that can reduce power use it uses ct coils on mains and only charges when power use is down
Ah calculating MD... my least favourite topic 😅 I recently was asked to come up with a figure for an install at a luxury leisure park, it has multiple 400A 3ph origins and I was going to be working on one of these. I started on the 225A sub-main feeding the site of the install and came to a figure of 75A spare after 2 days. When I mention that I have to carry out the same calculations for every sub-main on the origin I was told they were going to remove a 36kW heater from the spec and just go ahead blindly
Remember folks, its best (past knowledge) guess. Who knows that someone might shove a kettle on the same time as the oven is on and a 9kw shower is running.
A high power (> 10 kW) electric shower uses more than that. (OK, it only runs for a few minutes at a time). Add in cookers, immersion heaters,, heat pumps and electric car charging and we are heading for values about double that.
ok, but it will be out of date at some point or will only offer technically specific information, predominantly applying to each level of electrical position. Designer/installer/Inspector or all 3. I think the book you desire would be twice as big as an old argos catalogue......;)
Either method is inaccurate, Would much rather itemise each circuit with expected loads, add 20% headroom to give total load per circuit. You would then add an estimate diversity factor % to each circuit based on modest use and go from there. This seems like a more realistic calculation but would take longer to number crunch. For that reason I've got a template spreadsheet ready.
Hmm, a very basic assessment and overview, given that most new household loads have significant Power Factors (meaning low); induction hobs, led lamps, heat pump compressors, EV charge points, to name a few, so therefore circuits need to be matched according to the PF adjusted current values, so a PF of 0.5 will require conductors to be sized at double the normal rating. I’m surprised the guidance makes little reference to PF adjustments in load currents, it seems to be somewhat out-of-date or written by people who don’t understand the topic or how modern property loads are evolving.
EV chargers (the actual charger is actually in the car, the charge point is just a fancy socket) have active power factor correction which gives it a power factor of 0.95+. This is the same for other things with significant load that also have switch mode power supplies such as your TV, laptop, pc, high power LED supplies, PV inverters, battery chargers etc. I’m pretty sure at least some heat pumps have this too
Regulations ensure there are very few high power devices with low power factor, even a crappy power factor cheap gu10 is still less than the old halogen lamp.
@@TheAviation101 eVSE’s have OF correction, I think your way off subject there. All compressors have non-unity PF. The EV charger will not have a unity PF, tend the Renault Clio as an example, it won’t start charging until the PF is above 0.8 and yet there are countless examples of where it won’t start charging, indicating that typical house loads are a cumulatively PF. Whatever, even modest PF values below unity should be taken into account even at 0.9 the actual load current t will be 10% higher, still whether do I know!
@@G6EJD I’m talking about the charger itself, not the house. Given it has active circuitry to correct the power factor (of the charger, not the house), the Renault Clio has a power factor of 0.96
If I use any of these methods on my own home the numbers are just bonkers. How can any methodology proposed by these (almost historic) documents be credible when they can end up overstating maximum demand by multiples of what the actual typical values are? Looking back this year I can find 8 kW as my peak load... for the whole house... in one 30 minute period. I have a double CU and a sub-panel CU and loads of circuits (20+ I think). Realistically the peak load for me is when exporting power at around 9.5 kWh - under 40 Amps at my supply voltage. I feel no need to count the over-provisioned wall sockets or the number of lamps. Add in the modern reality of the dishwasher, washing machine etc timed to run in the early hours (to take advantage of cheap rates) the 'latest' guides are just swept into irrelevancy.
Is it really acceptable for the main fuse to blow out just because it’s unlikely that you’d turn on the shower put a pan on all four hobs and crank both ovens, turn on the kettle and flick on the toaster and washing machine. Maybe you don’t do that, but the next person in your house might.
@@edc1569factor in the tripping curve on a BS1361 100A incomer is such that a 200A load passing through that fuse will take just over 30 minutes to trip. None of those loads with the exception of a constantly running water heater, eg the shower, will run at full power for more than 5-10 minutes before starting to cycle, or turn off having completed it's task.
If you use the second method....and add in a small shower you are still over 100Amps...so that way is useless too. And ... a car charger...etc...is a no go! In an attempt to make properties less dangerous (falls etc...) and less inconvenient for the occupant (when a fuse trips) the demand of the property has not increased by adding circuits, it is the same as previously... So...the cure....bang the whole house on one ring...all the lights on one radial...count the 100% water heater shower as the new 40%...And the cooker???? welll#.... If the people who claim to give guidance on this subject cannot decide ...??? Maximum demand is, and always has been, an engineering judgement call. The problem with the video..is, as it states...needs to be calculated by a competent designer...so how many sparks out there have the City and Guils 2396 ( or eqiv) design qualification to prove competence???...and if you do not have this and your demand is high according to the calculations suggested...how will you stand when it all goes pear shaped and you are stood in a court explaning how the place burnt down...because the powers that write this GUIDENCE and swerved the responsibility by saying YOU must be competent to do maximum demand... I intend to phone the NIC and Napit etc....and ask how many of their members are out in the field...supported by them...who are incompetent (qualification wise) and are signing off work. Also how many teachers of this subject have the design qualification??? How many jobs out there have an incorrerct max demand figure on their cert...??? perfomed by an incompetent ( qualification wise) sparky following guidence from people who cannot decide on the correct guidence??? The only real way is to monitor useage over time ( as in video)....so we better equip ourselves with several monitors to leave on various different jobs for a week or so, so we can record an accurate measurment of max demand, for any certs issued...and proof of our calculations with evidence of results obtained.
This video makes very little sense. You talk about *maximum* demand (what you might have to contend with when *all* the high-current devices are on), so you have the capability of supplying them without failure (wiring and fusing). But then you're calculating some kind of average (assuming that not everything is on, or not running at full current). It's certainly NOT a given that someone won't be using an instant heating electric shower while someone else is using the electric stove and one or more hotplates, and electric room heaters are in use around the property. Not to mention that electric ovens of the old design, with simple resistive elements, are either using full current or next to none, as the thermostat cycles, rather than some variable power output inverter. They don't use variable amounts of current, when the heater is on, depending on what temperature you've set them to. If you *are* calculating *maximum* demand, then actually do so. Calculate the highest current that could reasonably be in use at the same time (the shower in use and the stove, a couple of hotplates, one or more room heaters). The average is, of course, going to be lower - the stove is on a thermostat, likewise for room heaters, which individually switch on and off at various times unrelated to each other. But they *can* all be on at full power at the same time. Overall, your electrical system needs to be able to cope with that (fusing and wiring). Our house failed in design to cope with real world situations, such as electric fan heaters running in two bedrooms (incidentally, that's already higher than the fuse rating for the sockets circuit), plus an electric kettle boiling, and the microwave oven at the same time. At some moment everything was drawing full current, and the fuse went. This is a 1965 house, with all wall sockets on one radial going around the house, on a 16 amp fuse. Yes, real fuses - and I prefer them, breakers can fail to break, a fuse wire *is* going to blow. And I don't hold truck with any arguments that some dimwit could put something other than one strand of the correct fuse wire in it. That isn't going to happen here. Anyway, people do force breakers on, and breaker switch parts can weld together, or simply fail to release. Properly wired fuses fail "safe," they don't not blow. But the house was never designed well. All the sockets on one fuse, and a house with no central heating. Of course you're going to run electric heaters in bedrooms, unless you like wrapping up like an Antarctic explorer to try and keep warm, while still breathing in chilly damp air. And most portable electric heaters are very high current devices. Power requirement calculations that aren't based on reality lead to this kind of stupid electrical design happening.
Doing my AM2 in 3 weeks, so brushing up on as much info as possible. Efixx are the greatest! Thanks guys
Thanks Matthew, best of luck!
Good luck...
The point about maximum demand is about what "could" be being drawn not what actually is being drawn. A house with 12 rooms would likely be calculated to have a maximum demand that is higher than a house with 6 rooms - but if both properties have the same number of occupants and same appliances the actual demand in that circumstance might be the same - but what if the owner of the 12 room house sells it to a large family - the actual demand would likely increase - the electrical installation must still be able to handle this safely. The demand calculations include lots of spare capacity for this reason - relying on actual usage isn't safe as actual usage changes with circumstances.
Thank you for this very useful video, it is much appreciated. I usually find myself working on multi dwelling units (MDUs) and I believe another video discussing how to calculate the after diversity maximum demand (ADMD) for MDUs would be very useful. I am sure that a lot of people would find it useful as well. Thanks again
Also I've been told by DNO workers if sticker says 100amps, the standard is a 80 amp fuse and stickers not always correct
100a is the rating for the fuse carrier it could have a 60a fuse in
Clicked on this as I was curious how it was done there. I teach Code at a local college for apprentices and we do load calculations for homes in a far different way, and the only reason we do it is to determine the electrical service size (main breaker to feed the home) A massive difference we have is ALL lighting and general use "sockets" are simply calculated based on the square meter area of the home (5000w per 90m2, than 1000w for every additional 90m2 or portion of), Ovens, electric heating, electric car chargers all have specific requirements afterwards we add any other load over 1500w at 25% demand if an electric oven has been accounted for. quick and simple.
If I am doing a new build I do this but if I am doing an EICR I often will state 100A if a 100A fuse is fitted, 80/80 etc. One it's not possible to monitor when carrying out an EICR for a duration long enough to simulate a true load and 2 because the majority of properties are now having Heat Pumps or EV Chargers or both fitted the majority of the time we're spiking to 96 Amps in detached and semi detached properties. When designing from scratch I was taught 5 watts/ft or 80 watts/meter rather than relying on arbitrary loads, sadly this calculation now comes in well under what I am actually finding during testing.
The Shelly 3EM can monitor three-phase current or single-phase current. The power supply for the device is on phase A.
The newer Shelly PRO 3EM, on the other hand, is power supplied on phase C.
The power clamp must be attached correctly.
On the Shelly 3EM the arrow points from the fuses to the electricity meter.
On the PRO 3EM the arrow points from the electricity meter to the fuses.
i think that it depends on if it's residential or commercial building
in residential installations it's very rare that everything will be fully loaded it just depends on demand
in commercial it's more likely that all the circuits are fully loaded especially in a production environment
Hi thank you for your fantastic video I was very confused about very Good explanation you are always helpful take care and God protected you and your family
As I’ve had a few issue’s now with AFDD’s “nuisance” tripping. Working as it should but certain items plugged in on one circuit don’t trip but on another circuit with some white goods, say fridge on once item plugged in the AFDD trips anywhere from 5-30secs. Should we (electricians) 1st fix to European radial circuits as AFDD’s were designed for said Euro circuits in the first place.
When calculating maximum demand should we include the mcb supplying surge protective device?
Nope
30W per LED point is definitely still massively excessive, I'd say 10W. Anyway, I am in Australia, for a residential house, its not even worth calculating, because maximum demand by limitation is easier, every distributor wants a 63A main switch on a 100A fused supply. You can easily exceed 63A for fairly lengthy periods without an issue. If you need more, you will be looking at a three phase install anyway.
how 30 watt per led is too much? the big leds i have are 38 and smallest is 10
@@geniusmarcsays2434 I have 68 downlighters at 5W and 2 double panels in the garage at 75W each. The total load on both lighting circuits including extractor fans, floodlights and what have you is 1110W lol
I have always used the second method in this video, and was even told by an NICEIC inspector that this was the preferred method
It seems to give a more reasonable result in the example home in the video.
When I was in the trade many years ago, I discussed this with the NICEIC inspector, who said that the electricity boards, who had far more experience, rated domestic installations at 6 watts per square foot - far easier, and more accurate.
it's amusing the 5A is still allowed for the socket outlet on a cooker control unit.... that was for a 1200w kettle back in the 50s!
Very good video but could you explain or do another showing how you calculate diversity on a 3 phase board please when 3 phase and single phase circuits are in the DB. Thanks
Interesting - in NZ, we calculate sockets based on the number of sockets, at least GPOs, with allowances for sockets dedicated for specific tasks, eg in ceiling for lights, to be treated as lights. That way, 10 sockets is calculated the same whether they are all on 1 circuit or 10 circuits.
Very important to get the figures correct for a whole premise load as you don't want a burning smell as you shake hands with the Customer after completing your install
True, true.
Provided all load devices are appropriate to this should not happen. Nuisance tripping is more likely...
That's not going to happen is it. The DNO slaps in a supply and that's it really. It doesn't matter if you install 100ccts you've got the main fuse and that's that.
Just watched a video on TH-cam where the sparky is calculating max demand as wanting to install a car charger (haven’t most got load management now) and he applied diversity as per table A2 but then applied the 40% rule after this except for the highest load 🤷🏼♂️. Is this an approved method? I thought it was one or the other.
Interesting take on the subject. The guidance is to reach a max demand for the property, not for your living arrangements. Add an EV and a heat pump which is the direction of travel and you will see that demand is a critical calc.
But that demand calculation must be re-done when introducing large energy consumers that are only installed officially by competent persons...! Determining a demand that is far higher than practically needed increases costs in a way that's not necessary. the difference might be a property needing 3 phase or not. Actual use must factor into the equation or, as this video highlights, homes would need +100 amp incommers which in the UK at least is unlikely to be possible without significant additional costs... and all for an overzealous demand calculation...
If additional high current consumers are introduced, then sure the demand calc should be reconsidered... Catering for tomorrow's' theoretical needs is today's expense; and it's a luxury most consumers would prefer not to indulge in...
When Calculating the maximum demand for UK Power networks for 4 properties I used the 2nd method, only to be told by UK Power Networks that they work off 2kw Per Property, your 39A equates to roughly 9KW 🤔🤔
I think it used to be a stipulation of western power that the 100/40% method be employed. I’ve not been able to find it on their site. Is this still the case & does anyone have a link?
Great video. What it shows is that the maximum demand as shown needs quite a bit of updating.
In a commercial premises I rewired there are 20 circuits.
- each treatment room has a radial circuit
- the lighting is separated across 4 circuits
- emergency is on its own.
- alarm
- cctv
- fire alarm
Etc etc. on max demand traditionally it’s a huge amount, but in reality is nowhere near that and is far better for the customer because it offers better continuity of service in the event of a fault.
And when testing in the future it’s easier to work around.
Brilliant information chaps. Im sure historically I have not been too far of declaring an installations max demand on an EIC certificate.
Next video, could you provide details of a portable version of a data logging device, as I would use for sure.....a device such as this, if affordable and accurate too, would help me sleep better at night.............;)
What data logger did you use as I was thinking of getting the PEL 51 but over £1200
Unsure how 82.66 A max demand was arrived at in the final Max demand calculation? I cant seem to quite get to that figure.
When I first started did maximum demand once for a rewire on a 4 bed house, 4 rings, electric shower, electric cooker etc. Came out at like 96A, the fuse was only a 60A, called up DNO and asked them to upgrade the head to 100A, a specialist came out, I explained my maximum calculation via BS7671, the response was: "Nah its fine, we don't use that, tell you what if you ever blow the main fuse tell the guy that comes out that I said you can upgrade it to 80A, it will be fine"....
What a waste of time..
Perhaps, but the practical application of experience is still a valuable commodity often overlooked in today's 'over educated', but mostly theory based electricians world...
@@dougle03 Yep exactly this, although I created 4 rings, Kitchen, Utility, upstairs and downstairs, originally it had just one ring for the whole house which had been fine for 60yrs, even though I increased the number of circuits does not mean I actually increased the load.
Exactly its bloody stupid how many fuses are blowing out there
What about adding two electric car chargers to the installation…. Extra 14.4 kw - 62.6 Amps ??
I’m assuming the garage radial is in 4mm since 2.5 can only carry 27amps clipped direct and therefore shouldn’t be on a 32amp mcb or rcbo
Next column- 'A2 Radial'.....
@@ef7480 27A max, and then add any insulation or grouping. Just stick with the 4mm.
@@007floppyboy ?
@@ef7480 "Next column- 'A2 Radial'....."?
@@007floppyboy -table in OSG refering to your comment and originally my response to original comment.
Being able to use an alternative method if approved by a competent electrical design engineer is great, but how many people consult a competent electrical design engineer when adding an EV charger, which probably the most important time to be charging maximum demand?
Even at that demand on the first calculation, the header fuse would take a ridiculous amount of time to blow. ~100,000 seconds according to the big brown book.
Easy, we have 150% PV, And over 400% groups.
My primary rail is limited to 40A per building while mid day 80A would be available.
The 80A can flow, but never will there flow 80A on any rail here due to the way I've centered both solar-pv and grid supply.
This topic is very important, please more calculation topics
I think people underestimate just how much power 100a really is. You need to be doing something pretty abnormal to get anywhere close in a normal home.
🌱🪴🌱
Take the 39A he measured here, add 32-40A for an EV charger (his peak was just after getting home from work, so exactly when you would expect the car to be charging if you haven't set it to charge off peak) and maybe you jump in the shower while your partner is cooking dinner and suddenly you are getting very close to 100A. EV chargers change the calculation enormously.
Yes, I do.
Completely glossed over the fact that in one table for diversity for cooking appliance states, take first 10A and 30% of remaining current wheres the other table states, take 10A and 30% full load of appliance. Can anyone clear this up?
I’ve managed 63A averaged over a half hour… that was an interesting night…
Dare we ask what you were up to? 🤔 Keep in mind it's a family show! 😂
@@efixx car charger (32A), Storage heater (10A), then the dishwasher, washing machine and tumble dryer (since replaced with a less inefficient model) all managed to spike at the same time.
Along with the baseload of fridge/freezer and network gear.
Note that other than the storage heater … there is no water or space heating. Heat pump definitely on the cards though.
But nowadays most people should be able to look at smart meter data for an absolute peak, and a typical peak over the last n years.
@@JohnR31415That's basically the same as he was getting plus the EV charger (39A+32A would be 71A). EV chargers change everything.
@@JohnR31415 Plunge electric pricing is introducing all sorts of unusual loads into the average domestic electric arrangements. I've heard stories of people causing their main fuse to blow trying to use as much as possible during a plunge pricing event (Negative import rates for those that don't know)...
@@efixx Someone getting an electric shower while someone else is cooking a meal on an electric hob while the EV charges would easily get well past 63A.
Pro tip for calculation: lights -ignore. IT -ignore. -smoke -ignore. Number of socket circuits - ignore. Walk around the house and find all appliances that can create significant heat (at least 1000W) and will run for at least 30 minutes. Multiply by 10. Done.
But I've seen some places with well over 1kW computers.
@@lua-nya Residential.
@@lua-nya Yes 2 computers in my property are running on 1200watt power supplies but they're only normally running at 1000 watts each when their users are gaming. For 6 hours straight. Computers should be included.
Quicker still just put max demand the same as the cut out fuse.
@@effervescence5664 If such computer is found. Ok. More than 99% of households do not have such PCs.
Finally, i still ignore those recommendations. 30W LEDs😅
Nice sir❤
look at electrical clothes dryers they cause all kinds problems i will presume car chargers are next but i saw a video off car charger with power monitoring that can reduce power use it uses ct coils on mains and only charges when power use is down
Ah calculating MD... my least favourite topic 😅
I recently was asked to come up with a figure for an install at a luxury leisure park, it has multiple 400A 3ph origins and I was going to be working on one of these. I started on the 225A sub-main feeding the site of the install and came to a figure of 75A spare after 2 days. When I mention that I have to carry out the same calculations for every sub-main on the origin I was told they were going to remove a 36kW heater from the spec and just go ahead blindly
I do this every day.
Caravan parks are more challenging to work out max demand than any other installation.
Remember folks, its best (past knowledge) guess.
Who knows that someone might shove a kettle on the same time as the oven is on and a 9kw shower is running.
I remember the old electricity boards used to say 40A was what the average house was as a maximum demand.
A high power (> 10 kW) electric shower uses more than that. (OK, it only runs for a few minutes at a time). Add in cookers, immersion heaters,, heat pumps and electric car charging and we are heading for values about double that.
@@roberthuntley1090 I did mention that old electricity boards so don't know now but the supply still was 60,80 or 100 A
Common method used by Housing Associations just looks at breakers: largest cct +40% of all other cct's. Quick and dirty.
Could we solve this with one book that givesyou all the info you need.
ok, but it will be out of date at some point or will only offer technically specific information, predominantly applying to each level of electrical position. Designer/installer/Inspector or all 3. I think the book you desire would be twice as big as an old argos catalogue......;)
Either method is inaccurate, Would much rather itemise each circuit with expected loads, add 20% headroom to give total load per circuit. You would then add an estimate diversity factor % to each circuit based on modest use and go from there. This seems like a more realistic calculation but would take longer to number crunch. For that reason I've got a template spreadsheet ready.
Add mcbs x 0.4
Hmm, a very basic assessment and overview, given that most new household loads have significant Power Factors (meaning low); induction hobs, led lamps, heat pump compressors, EV charge points, to name a few, so therefore circuits need to be matched according to the PF adjusted current values, so a PF of 0.5 will require conductors to be sized at double the normal rating. I’m surprised the guidance makes little reference to PF adjustments in load currents, it seems to be somewhat out-of-date or written by people who don’t understand the topic or how modern property loads are evolving.
EV chargers (the actual charger is actually in the car, the charge point is just a fancy socket) have active power factor correction which gives it a power factor of 0.95+. This is the same for other things with significant load that also have switch mode power supplies such as your TV, laptop, pc, high power LED supplies, PV inverters, battery chargers etc. I’m pretty sure at least some heat pumps have this too
Regulations ensure there are very few high power devices with low power factor, even a crappy power factor cheap gu10 is still less than the old halogen lamp.
@@TheAviation101 eVSE’s have OF correction, I think your way off subject there. All compressors have non-unity PF.
The EV charger will not have a unity PF, tend the Renault Clio as an example, it won’t start charging until the PF is above 0.8 and yet there are countless examples of where it won’t start charging, indicating that typical house loads are a cumulatively PF. Whatever, even modest PF values below unity should be taken into account even at 0.9 the actual load current t will be 10% higher, still whether do I know!
@@G6EJD I’m talking about the charger itself, not the house. Given it has active circuitry to correct the power factor (of the charger, not the house), the Renault Clio has a power factor of 0.96
How do you measure power factor?
If I use any of these methods on my own home the numbers are just bonkers. How can any methodology proposed by these (almost historic) documents be credible when they can end up overstating maximum demand by multiples of what the actual typical values are?
Looking back this year I can find 8 kW as my peak load... for the whole house... in one 30 minute period. I have a double CU and a sub-panel CU and loads of circuits (20+ I think).
Realistically the peak load for me is when exporting power at around 9.5 kWh - under 40 Amps at my supply voltage. I feel no need to count the over-provisioned wall sockets or the number of lamps. Add in the modern reality of the dishwasher, washing machine etc timed to run in the early hours (to take advantage of cheap rates) the 'latest' guides are just swept into irrelevancy.
Is it really acceptable for the main fuse to blow out just because it’s unlikely that you’d turn on the shower put a pan on all four hobs and crank both ovens, turn on the kettle and flick on the toaster and washing machine. Maybe you don’t do that, but the next person in your house might.
@@edc1569factor in the tripping curve on a BS1361 100A incomer is such that a 200A load passing through that fuse will take just over 30 minutes to trip.
None of those loads with the exception of a constantly running water heater, eg the shower, will run at full power for more than 5-10 minutes before starting to cycle, or turn off having completed it's task.
Exporting power at 9.5kWh?
Peak power of 8kW in 30 minutes?
Hmmmm
If you use the second method....and add in a small shower you are still over 100Amps...so that way is useless too.
And ... a car charger...etc...is a no go!
In an attempt to make properties less dangerous (falls etc...) and less inconvenient for the occupant (when a fuse trips) the demand of the property has not increased by adding circuits, it is the same as previously...
So...the cure....bang the whole house on one ring...all the lights on one radial...count the 100% water heater shower as the new 40%...And the cooker???? welll#....
If the people who claim to give guidance on this subject cannot decide ...???
Maximum demand is, and always has been, an engineering judgement call. The problem with the video..is, as it states...needs to be calculated by a competent designer...so how many sparks out there have the City and Guils 2396 ( or eqiv) design qualification to prove competence???...and if you do not have this and your demand is high according to the calculations suggested...how will you stand when it all goes pear shaped and you are stood in a court explaning how the place burnt down...because the powers that write this GUIDENCE and swerved the responsibility by saying YOU must be competent to do maximum demand...
I intend to phone the NIC and Napit etc....and ask how many of their members are out in the field...supported by them...who are incompetent (qualification wise) and are signing off work.
Also how many teachers of this subject have the design qualification???
How many jobs out there have an incorrerct max demand figure on their cert...??? perfomed by an incompetent ( qualification wise) sparky following guidence from people who cannot decide on the correct guidence???
The only real way is to monitor useage over time ( as in video)....so we better equip ourselves with several monitors to leave on various different jobs for a week or so, so we can record an accurate measurment of max demand, for any certs issued...and proof of our calculations with evidence of results obtained.
🙏🙏🙏
Maximum demand = Make it up as you go along. Or what would you like it to be? 😂
Yaaay first comment!
Well done you! 😃
what about an EV on top of this.
Load management via CTs etc to manage ev load when the rest of the property is using power.
This video makes very little sense. You talk about *maximum* demand (what you might have to contend with when *all* the high-current devices are on), so you have the capability of supplying them without failure (wiring and fusing). But then you're calculating some kind of average (assuming that not everything is on, or not running at full current).
It's certainly NOT a given that someone won't be using an instant heating electric shower while someone else is using the electric stove and one or more hotplates, and electric room heaters are in use around the property. Not to mention that electric ovens of the old design, with simple resistive elements, are either using full current or next to none, as the thermostat cycles, rather than some variable power output inverter. They don't use variable amounts of current, when the heater is on, depending on what temperature you've set them to.
If you *are* calculating *maximum* demand, then actually do so. Calculate the highest current that could reasonably be in use at the same time (the shower in use and the stove, a couple of hotplates, one or more room heaters).
The average is, of course, going to be lower - the stove is on a thermostat, likewise for room heaters, which individually switch on and off at various times unrelated to each other. But they *can* all be on at full power at the same time. Overall, your electrical system needs to be able to cope with that (fusing and wiring).
Our house failed in design to cope with real world situations, such as electric fan heaters running in two bedrooms (incidentally, that's already higher than the fuse rating for the sockets circuit), plus an electric kettle boiling, and the microwave oven at the same time. At some moment everything was drawing full current, and the fuse went.
This is a 1965 house, with all wall sockets on one radial going around the house, on a 16 amp fuse. Yes, real fuses - and I prefer them, breakers can fail to break, a fuse wire *is* going to blow. And I don't hold truck with any arguments that some dimwit could put something other than one strand of the correct fuse wire in it. That isn't going to happen here. Anyway, people do force breakers on, and breaker switch parts can weld together, or simply fail to release. Properly wired fuses fail "safe," they don't not blow.
But the house was never designed well. All the sockets on one fuse, and a house with no central heating. Of course you're going to run electric heaters in bedrooms, unless you like wrapping up like an Antarctic explorer to try and keep warm, while still breathing in chilly damp air. And most portable electric heaters are very high current devices. Power requirement calculations that aren't based on reality lead to this kind of stupid electrical design happening.