California "Mag Ban” Ban Duncan v. Bonta Gets Major Setback From
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 18 ต.ค. 2024
- Just happening today we have a new development in Duncan v. Bonta which is a challenge to California's "semi auto" ban. Following the recent Supreme Court decision, AG Bonta's DOJ sent a letter to the 9th circuit which will undoubtably have a negative impact on the outcome of Duncan.
Check out Attorneys on Retainer for yourself, and use code CJTV during sign up to save 50 your individual signup fee. tribelink.co/C...
Constitution Book - amzn.to/3KgRkSk
Social Media
INSTAGRAM - / thedailyshooter76
Check out my Merch, Shirts, Mugs and More!
teespring.com/...
NOTICE: I am "NOT" a lawyer, and this should not be considered legal advice. These are my opinions.
(DISCLAIMER: This post may contain paid advertisements or affiliate links. What is an affiliate link? It means that if you click on one of the product links, Copper Jacket TV will receive a small commission at no extra cost to you. This helps support the channel and allows awesome future content. Thank you for the support!
DO NOT try anything you see in this video at home. All work should be performed by a trained professional. Disclaimer: These videos are strictly for educational and entertainment purposes only. Imitation or the use of anything demonstrated in my videos is done AT YOUR OWN RISK.. These videos are free to watch and if anyone attempts to charge for this video notify us immediately.
As a Californian turned texan i can say the tyranny going on over there is disgusting
Keeps getting worse. But if u stayed we could have used your vote.
Agreed!!!
Illinois is the same, newsom and pigster are having hold my beer competition
There are only 49 states , California is not one of them.
Texas might go blue this year , good luck
The 9th was only stalling. They made their minds years ago during the first round. This is just procedural.
exactly
@@CaliforniaDecline the stark honest truth!!!
Thanks SCOTUS for not reprimanding an inferior court who gives your rulings the finger because they don’t care about “proper procedure.” Weak.
SCOTUS did reprimand them the 1st time around, & by the wording in the Rahimi case they are getting pretty pissed at the lower courts & government> What to the Chevron Doctrine case ruling comes out, both lower courts & government are going to take a beating.
🎯
We are never getting our standard magazines back. They are gone forever. That's what happens when we let them take our rights away.
People like you are the problem. You can’t lose your rights, they cannot be taken. Read the constitution. Actually read it. Imagine that document being fought for, before it even existed. That is what it means to be American.
Exactly, makes me laugh at all the 🤡s who seriously think we can still vote our way out of this and those who still rely on the courts.
We will continue to lose more rights until people wake tf up.
Nah, it's going away. All these unconstitutional anti-2A laws are going away.
It will just take time.
This has nothing to do with magazines though. Common use for lawful purposes still stands.
That’s why you stop following the law and buy them illegally. Thanks to the 2019 freedom week, it’s pretty much impossible to enforce the mag ban as long as you buy mags that don’t have time stamps or at least destroy the time stamps.
Your right about the 9th circuit. They suck.
I feel bad for California citizens who are being denied their Constitutional Rights as American Citizens 😢
They voted for the very people who are taking their rights.
Being denied rights because they vote democrat over and over again!!!
@@jimmydtaylor2 Not all of them but the liberals outnumber them.
@@jimmydtaylor2 I get what you said, I am man who believes in the American Dream for every Citizen of the United States Of America (specifically all the Patriots in Commifornia)
@@jimmydtaylor2Do you normies still think voting in real? What did you ask Santa for lil buddy?
I left California 30 years ago because it was already completely screwed!!! I couldn't imagine trying to live there now!!! Another great video!!!
Nothing is ever going to change government is not on our side
Not in the blue states.
@@aquariumdude7829 Not in any state. We need to take control of our country from the Government.
@@markdavis-oi6om Much easier to do in the red states. The blue states are Democrat fiefdoms now.
@@markdavis-oi6omhow? Tell me how we are supposed to take back from the gov? If u have a plan, I will stand beside you, but if u don't actually have an action plan, then you should just stay quiet like the rest of us.
@@manofthepeople2165 Mass noncompliance is always the answer.
It is puzzling why people are flipping out when they know damn well even if the Supreme Court came out and said any and all semi-auto bans and magazine capacity limitations are unconstitutional the 9th Circuit would still ignore the ruling.
My question is, if something is a constitutional right, how can a court take this right away legally? How come nobody and nothing is in place to prevent this from happening. I feel like it is time humans in every country, not just the state of California need to start self governing themselves again and simply ignore all these repressive laws. We the people of this earth don’t need a handful of corrupt people who think they can tell us what’s best for us or what we can and cannot do. We only need laws that control that nobody hurt others in any way, form or shape and that’s it. These are the only laws or rules a society needs to make civilized living possible. Everything else is oppressive and straight tyrannical.
@@Bastard_Operator_From_Hell IMO, even though the Founders greatly understood human behavior, they still believed that there would be enough honorable and moral people in government to prevent what is happening from happening. Unfortunately, even with the seperation of powers it can't overcome the amount of corruption that has metastasized into all branches and levels of government.
This was the most damaging paragraph in the rahimi decision. Now courts can be subjective with historical analog laws. And tell me left wing courts won't be extremely subjective. This was awful.......
Thank the lawyers for screwing everything up and JUDGES TO
Just like that old saying: if you really want to screw things up, get a politician or a lawyer
I can't believe SCOTUS did it again! They are there to serve the Constitution as it is written! Not to subject our rights to interpretation. "AS IT IS WRITTEN LET IT BE DONE!!"
Believe it. It's not going to change.
@@aquariumdude7829 To be sure. It would take something almost cataclysmic to affect change and if we can avoid total annihilation, perhaps. Remember, there were those in the colonies that said the same words as yourself, right before the American Revolution.
I told you "they" would do this! Another 100 years of bs lawsuits.
Yep.
Wow it’s almost like they planned this all along 🤦♂️
Roughly 1 in 8 Americans live in California. Let that sink in. 39 million people having their rights infringed.
I hate what they have done to California and can't wait to leave
I left and have no regrets.
Well remember why you left and dont vote for the exact same people and policies of where you just left from its madness !
@@double-eagle-dave
I’m pretty sure the people watching this channel that left CA are not going elsewhere to change it. It’s the crazies that left and think they’ll just vote the same and be good.
My family moved out of Cali over 10 years ago, I'm stuck here until I get full retirement salary in 4 more years unfortunately 😔
These people talk too much!! The second amendment is crystal clear....period.
That's what happens when you have a system with a lot of bureaucracy.
Agreed!
And we the people take it in the bung hole. Where are the 3 percent?
They don't care....Period.
Todays episode on Copper Jacket TV: more time wasted and and the courts pulling word salads out of their asses.
Thanks for keeping us all up to date with these cases! Really appreciate your hard work.
Does everyone In the courts in California wear clown makeup and giant shoes and carry a rubber chicken with them ??
Pretty much, and their shirts will most likely be a rainbow tie dye style 😂
@@FIGGY65 LMAO
They have replaced the rubber chickens with other rainbow-colored phallic rubber items
The only way to fix California is for people who want change to actually get involved in politics and change the system.
The supreme court said “text, history, and tradition” in Bruen and then came out with “well.. we didn’t mean it has to be only text, history, and tradition.” in this case.
Useless court.
Time for SCOTUS to throw it out.
Non of the California's bullshyt surprises me
I am already with AOR. The so-called conservative Supreme Court screwed us all again.
What’s my property is mine, NOT THE BLOODY GOVERNMENT
There will always be a setback...
Learned a long time ago, "Bad cases create bad case law."
It does not matter what any court has to say, California lawmakers and courts will do whatever California lawmakers and courts want to do.
Bingo! 😊
Constitution? What Constitution?😂😂😂😂
@@backfromthedead553 Lol! True! Unfortunately, the Constitution has about as much meaning now as "Mad Magazine!" Only unlike "Mad," it doesn't make me laugh! 😆
@@backfromthedead553 Now, when Dems and Rinos quote it, it sounds like they're mocking me!
Sad that they have to twist words and go to such extreme lengths to get their way!!
The 9th will kick this back down to the district court and tell judge Benitez to apply the Rahimi decision.
The same stalling tactics that they have been using.
Even if SCOTUS decides that another state’s ban is unconstitutional, they will still kick the cases back down to district to stall,
The only way this is going to change is vote the Dems out in CA.
Benitez needs to continue applying Bruen, not the slap in the face lesser standard of Rahimi.
You can't fix a corrupt broken system, using the same system, you abolish it and create a new system. New California State. The 51 state. Paul Preston. Share and support!
Yet they conveniently ignored the language in Kavanaugh's concurrence...
TY Cooper Jacket for all your 2A News ❤️🤍💙
How is this any different from the way they misinterpreted Bruen and applied it. This was to be expected. Same fight different day. No matter what the case or decision they’re going to continue to do this. There is no magic way to fix this. It will have to be chipped at one legal case at the time.
They're just trying to string everything along long enough that people just give up, lay down and accept being violated. It's their MO.
Lie down, not lay down.
This is why not every 2A case needs to go to SCOTUS.
Nothing is going to change in CA until these cases go directly to the big supreme court.
Nothing will change there either.
We need to sue our government
I still can’t believe the amount of people think California will ever change. Even if they lose they will still do as they please.
Hopefully Sherrif Bianco runs for CA governor, wins, and helps us out. FGN and FJB.
Not going to make a difference if we don't support any true for the people governor get rid of the special interest that controls CA legislature.
@@PR-zz6xl You lost me because your sentence is not properly written. Not trying to bash you but what are you saying?
Thank you
When will we get an official ruling about the high capacity magazine ban?
Never.
@@aquariumdude7829 lmao it seems like it
@@Valley710 The Hotel California never changes! 😂
Never! Just get what you need and live the way your supposed to.
I wish they can hurry up so it can go to the Supreme Court
Nothing will happen
Supreme court will kick it back down to the lower courts, it will be ruled unconstitutional again, 9th circus will grant an emergency stay. It will go round and round forever. Nothing is going to happen
@@cops312 True but ????
Where nothing will change as usual.
Absolutely Disgusting!!, WRONG....and then.....
Fixed! Sorry. Only took me about 20 hours to realize I put the wrong title on this video lol.
Voting for this man!
It might be a blessing if the 9th circuit makes a decision and we finally get the SCOTUS to take it up!
yet Chief Justice Roberts says "not limited to muskets and sabers"
Bonta is applying Astro-Lube preparing to give it to California.
Thank you very much for keeping us updated.
🇺🇸🇺🇸 Trump 2024🇺🇸🇺🇸
Supreme Court has no appetite for 2A cases and it’s sickening
It feels like we had Heller, then Bruen, but now SCOTUS seems determined to shut down everything else.
Darn !!!
This MUST go back down to the lower traffic courts for another 3 year review !!!!
My favorite part is when you said we can appeal
Great Report. Thank You
I was in high school in 2019 during Freedom Week and wasnt even into guns, i wish i could have grabbed a mag during freedom week 😓😓
I'm still laughing at the ignorance of implementing an 11% tax on ammo and firearms. I can drive 4 hours to vegas, 4 hours to Bullhead, or 5 hours to Phoenix and load up on ammo. No id needed. Go to Brass Pro Shop in vegas and you'll see Ca. license plates in the parking lot and people from Cali buying ammo....same with Bullhead. All the state js trying to do it make it too difficult to afford guns and ammo. There should be a class action lawsuit for over taxation against the state of Ca.
Great video
Scotus failed to address what temporary meant a month, 6 months, 1 year, ten years or even longer!
Bonta is a weasel.
as we go around on the Carousel…. the shall not be infringed Amendment is the only one that’s being infringed…LGB….FRB and FGN
Thanks for the video
Remember this when Gov Newsom runs for President
Wasn't aware the types of weapons one could carry were ruled on or discussed in Rahimi.
Exactly what they are looking to doo Definitely, but that's my opinion I'll let the courts decide otherwise 😮
Isnt it maddening how quick they are in referencing Rahimi yet the case has been in the court for years.
So much for due process and "innocent until proven guilty
Pretty sure they knew what the courts said but as long as they can play this shell game they will
🤬 Newsom & his lover Bonta!
I suspect the optics around Raihimi mattered more than the actual law when it came to this decision, unfortunately.
Unfortunately, you're right. The Ninth wild go hog wild with those phrases (as will every other circuit) until SCOTUS rules on another 2A case and puts explicit limits on the Rahimi decision. One step forward, two steps back...
The Ninth Circus would have decided mag and “assault weapons” bans constitutional in the absence of Rahimi. If it gets off the dime and makes a decision, the case will get to the Supreme Court sooner rather than later.
Appeal them all
All of that language was in the Bruen ruling. The SCOTUS did NOT in any way expand the timeframe of history to be looked at to establish a historical tradition.
Ya can’t beat the ones that make the rules.
The founders of this country did.
Defeatist mentality.
@@oo7-ro6buA very different people under very different circumstances a long, long time ago. I bet even they were amazed it worked!
Especially when they keep changing the rules.
@@aquariumdude7829 you should read their writings. You will be surprised.
I’m shocked…
Now, SCOTUS will have to reconcile Rahimi and Bruen.
Hey sir, I know in your recent video you spoke how the SCOTUS said the law didn't have to be "trapped in amber" or the regulation be exactly similar but did they say anything about the constitutionality of the regulation
LOL. Lets wait another 2 to 4 years. Oh well
2 to 4 years? This has been going on since 2017 and the AWB dates back to 1989
@@mrxmrp8795 2A SCOTUS cases are in its infancy. The first major case to be heard before the US Supreme Court was in 2007 with the Heller v. DC decision in 2008. There were a few in between Heller & Bruen, but it was Bruen (2022) that really set the gold standard for 2A cases. All Supreme Court cases build off one another, like bricks in a wall. It will take some time to build up this wall against the anti-2A community.
But it IS BEING BUILT.
More like 20-40. 😂🤣
Go figure….more delays and setbacks
Bogus fallacy. THat was a case about a criminal involved in criminal behavior firing a gun with no justification endangering multiple others.
First and foremost, They can only take the rights you allow them to take. The SCOTUS has ruled that arms in common use for lawful purposes CANNOT be banned. The SCOTUS needs to go to the proctologist then rule on these unconstitutional bans.
Exactly. That should be the page 1 response to the court.
They won't.
What?! Did you say that you do NOT have a crystal ball... And just why not young man? Now you go out and either buy, steal, beg or borrow a crystal ball. No more excuses like that 😮😮😅😅😊
They're banned in California. All of ours are made out of recycled plastic.
Bruen isn't the only relevant case to decide 2A cases. Heller covers arms ban cases as does Caetano.
Nobody cares though. That's just the reality. Bruen and Heller are just legal mumbo-jumbo!
Bruen and Heller are just legal mumbo-jumbo. The Dems don't care.
The big issue the SCOTUS ruling offered was it gave not a single example of an actual historical instance as evidence. Thomas was the only justice who was correct. There is no historical instances of such law/s dating back to 1791. If a subject is deemed a 'credible threat' then that subject needs to be jailed. So how is the 9th going to lose? Simple. The Rahimi decision the court also made very clear and stated the following... the 2nd amendment is not limited to only those arms that were in existence at the time of founding.
You know it. I know it. The 9th circuit is going to uphold the large capacity ban.
Things were looking so good, now we're back to repeated screwing by the 9th... :(
Anyone else thinking the ninth is gonna delay delay delay, and even if scotus says these bans are unconstitutional, will still rule in favor of CA bs?
If Laws were made to keep United States slaves slaves, then is judgement against rehiemi following laws to keep slaves and slavery is actually abolished in the United States Constitution?
The people do nothing
We want freedom week now what we want
Well that cheered me up,,,,,,,,,,,,,not
If the 9th decides it it moves it closer to the SCOTUS
SCOTUS messed up
Isn't Duncan the magazine capacity lawsuit??? 🤔🤔🤔
Yes it is. It’s been in the court system since 2017.
The 9th Court of Appeals is a political body, not really a court. Take a case, where the Supreme Court’ said it was k for a judge to temporarily restrict a potentially violent person from having access to guns, into somehow restricting 30 round magazines from 40 million people.
Historical Analogs. The new Chevron Deference. We haven't even got rid of Chevron Deference yet.
8/9 SCOTUS justices are federalists first and "textualists/originalists" second (if at all).
In Rahimi there is a TON of language that actually helps our case. I wonder why Bonta omitted that.
SCOTUS clearly stated that 2A applies to weapons even those that didn’t exist back in 1791. It a much more powerful argument then what Bonta brought up - and I don’t think that Bruen methodology is any sort of danger.
Again, there is no historical analogue for mag bans - or AWBs