In no particular order, I think. The moment she said that proposed aircraft were included, I thought, "So some that that will never exist... whatever."
Not sure about the order, but I liked the information. The B-21 will replace the B2, but the B1B is a way different machine. I would put the bone above some others that were listed. The b1b is similar to the aardvark. Fast and capable of low approach. The B-2/21 are stealth high and slow approach. Stealth and supersonic don't agree.
It's amazing how other countries copy American designs the only real stand out is the Russian bear with the turbo props ( really cool design ) other then that it's all American especially the stealth bomber s ( world war two copy of the German Horten) great post !
Wait so does that mean we are allowed to say if not for American lend-lease and the allied aerial destruction of German industry that the USSR would have lost WW2, since the Russians are always lying about their strength?
That’s because an upgraded B-52J is. They did throw Russia a bone though by listing the fictional PAK DA bomber in the number two slot. Ha ha that’s a good one putting it in front of the Chinese H-20 which unlike the PAK DA will at least be built.
In no particular order, I think. The moment she said that proposed aircraft were included, I thought, "So some that that will never exist... whatever."
why add "proposed bombers" to the list? might as well include concept drawings and the Millenium Falcon. Kowtowing to the Russian and Chinese audience
Not sure about the order, but I liked the information. The B-21 will replace the B2, but the B1B is a way different machine. I would put the bone above some others that were listed. The b1b is similar to the aardvark. Fast and capable of low approach. The B-2/21 are stealth high and slow approach. Stealth and supersonic don't agree.
👍👍👍
💜
It's amazing how other countries copy American designs the only real stand out is the Russian bear with the turbo props ( really cool design ) other then that it's all American especially the stealth bomber s ( world war two copy of the German Horten) great post !
You're dead wrong about the Horton. Northrop first flew a test flying wing in 1942 and the Ho 229 had its glide test vehicle first go up in 1944
@TravelerZ24 sorry about that I meant first jet powered flying lol
Please increase your this jets engine power please sir please
Any one who gives Russia any credit other than lies about there strength is just wrong
Wait so does that mean we are allowed to say if not for American lend-lease and the allied aerial destruction of German industry that the USSR would have lost WW2, since the Russians are always lying about their strength?
Judging by the war in Ukraine, Russia is lying to the whole world with its propaganda.
YOU'RE COMPLETELY 😎, MAN😅🤣😂
Russian military hardware are already proven in ukrain battle field countering western nato military hardware 😁😁😁
@@zosimoromero3475 That Russian propaganda you communist
B-21 will have a cloaking device similar to the Romulans and Klingons. And a makeup vanity station aft of the cockpit for female crew. 😉
Tupolev just copies every American bomber that comes out but makes a version worse every s I n g l e time
B1 is better then b52 but b1 retired nukes
Pretty sure the B1 is the only plane that can't carry nuclear weapons based on a treaty or something?
Son: Can we have the B-2 bomber at home
Mom: we already have it at home
Meanwhile the B-2 bomber at home: 6:16
Why do you include bombers that are not 'in the world today'?
❤😂😂😂🎉🎉🎉😢😮😮😅
2:35 So if you said that’s Russian one. Then, why can I see Ukrainian emblem on the tail?
Ukraine used it too.
Ukraine still has a few.
hi
China's H-6 is not even close to an advanced bomber. The Russians retired it decades ago.
Your propaganda is appreciated.
Gde Vam je Duh Misurija? 😂
Shit
I like how the B52 is still more modern than anything out of Russia 😂
Dude, it’s just another modification for this flying train. It was used since 60’s
That’s because an upgraded B-52J is. They did throw Russia a bone though by listing the fictional PAK DA bomber in the number two slot. Ha ha that’s a good one putting it in front of the Chinese H-20 which unlike the PAK DA will at least be built.
@@John-ed8ye It will perform at least as well as the T-14 Armata tank.