Leather Jacket Disappeared at the Club! | Part 1

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 64

  • @cheyenneod
    @cheyenneod 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +124

    100% the club’s fault.
    nobody stole it, their own workers gave it to someone else without actually checking the tag. thats on them, not her.

  • @DIDYOUSEETHAT172
    @DIDYOUSEETHAT172 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +75

    1:29 LMAO! I think the defendant just lost. The sign lists everything, EXCEPT GIVEN AWAY TO WRONG PATRON!

    • @PureAloha78
      @PureAloha78 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      Exactly!

  • @martinboyle9163
    @martinboyle9163 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +63

    You can't offer a coat check or a valet service and absolve yourself of responsibility.
    It doesn't work that way.

    • @caseyking0917
      @caseyking0917 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      The sign is standard legalese for any number of situations.

    • @bobrange4773
      @bobrange4773 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

      Once, I mailed my daughter a check in a nearby town. She didn't receive it and had to leave to return to college (from Virginia to Michigan) after Christmas break. I had to put a stop payment on it. I had to sign a paper that basically said, we'll take your money to stop the payment but if we accidentally cash it you're responsible. I questioned the manager, she said, it doesn't say that. I read it to her, she said let me call you back. She did and told me it was an "industry standard". I also had to pay to wire the money. That check never did surface.

  • @JohnWilliamsGTS
    @JohnWilliamsGTS 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +37

    You can't use a disclaimer to avoid negligent conduct.

  • @croach2194
    @croach2194 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +58

    It sounds to me as if the sign refers to objects that are in the coats. Their employees do need to give people the correct coat and they did not.

    • @best_t1me
      @best_t1me 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Yes i think so it's just for that so they don't be responsible for that because some people don't even have money or anything in the coat but they claim it it's in their to make money and sue the owner of the store or clubs whatever and honestly if i had a store i would put up that sign as well

    • @WondersNeverCease
      @WondersNeverCease 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

      No lol. That’s not how that works. Objects in the coats 😂

  • @jeffreyclinard2002
    @jeffreyclinard2002 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +37

    Negligence. That isn’t on the sign.

  • @musicjunkie274
    @musicjunkie274 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +18

    Even with that sign, if somebody, for example, went to the coat check area when the attendant wasn't there and stole coats, they're still responsible. It's like putting up a sign saying "not responsible for underage people drinking"
    Signs don't absolve you of stuff like this

  • @Izinaima
    @Izinaima 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +9

    They sound like an advertisement for the club when it’s not about the coat. 😂

  • @-WillAlone-
    @-WillAlone- 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +13

    Not lost or stolen,.... Given away.

  • @EvilAzn3000
    @EvilAzn3000 5 วันที่ผ่านมา +6

    That sign was pointless. The coat wasn't lost, stolen, or forgotten due to customers. The club themselves gave it away

  • @florencemclaughlin3606
    @florencemclaughlin3606 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +24

    OMG! Johnny Love! I frequently visited his establishment. He was at my bachelorette party at a bar. He was huge in SF, but I never left a coat or anything behind.

  • @truegrit7697
    @truegrit7697 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +104

    Here's a tip - two actually. If you have a $1000 coat, don't check it at a night club, and don't take your eyes off it. Duh.

    • @arthurcharlesstewart4617
      @arthurcharlesstewart4617 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +19

      Well actually Fine dining restaurants, country clubs n yes bars have coat checks. And many carry insurance on lost items.

    • @honcianoportfolio
      @honcianoportfolio 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

      I can think of better things than spending it on a coat.

    • @Mscldrew
      @Mscldrew 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +5

      This looks like it was filmed in the mid 90’ that same coat would be $2-3000 now.
      That’s why people buy high end leather and fur coats, to wear them out and show them off. Of course it depends on the establishment but a high end club, theatre, bar, hotel, it’s the management and the management’s staff that are responsible for keeping an eagle eye on the guests coats, not the guest.
      It’s not a ‘free service’ either, it’s included with the cost of the service, that’s who you’re marketing to, that’s the type of person you want to attract to your establishment, many people easily spending a thousand or more on dinner, drinks, show tickets

    • @shendisackett
      @shendisackett 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

      I would never have taken a really expensive coat to be put in a coat check. There were always people upset at clubs because things were missing. I think here in the UK the signs were different and said something along the lines of items are left at owners risk.

  • @noelledilisio-johnson6603
    @noelledilisio-johnson6603 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +51

    Frequent there and occasionally are two separate meanings‼️🤔

    • @paulfrels3590
      @paulfrels3590 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      My Exact thoughts!!!!! 😂

    • @LHS427
      @LHS427 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +16

      “Frequent” is a synonym for “visit” so her statement isn’t contradictory.

    • @shaneclark5022
      @shaneclark5022 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Thank you captain thesaurus

    • @rosieposie6521
      @rosieposie6521 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      The same as FREE QUENT. AND FREQUENT ARE TWO DIFFERENT MEANINGS OF THE SAME WORD WHICH IS WHY THEY ARE PRONOUNCED DIFFERENTLY AND YOU AMERICANS WOULD KNOW IF YOU SPOKE CORRECT AND CLEAR ENGLISH.

    • @katherineduke3232
      @katherineduke3232 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Glad you said it so I don't have too 😂😂😅😅

  • @LV2UXO77
    @LV2UXO77 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +7

    If they're so busy every night bringing in money, then pay her the price she paid for her coat that they lost.

  • @mstkblulady
    @mstkblulady 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +5

    It’s their responsibility when they provide a coat check employee!

  • @alanalumlockcardinez9772
    @alanalumlockcardinez9772 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +5

    Imagine some dishonest person took a coat that wasn't theirs

  • @unclejoshtruescarystories
    @unclejoshtruescarystories 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +7

    "I frequent occasionally." Uh, what?

    • @susanam.826
      @susanam.826 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

      It means, "I go there occasionally" (it's the verb "to frequent").

  • @whismerify
    @whismerify 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +6

    I wouldn’t bring a 1k coat to a nightclub prob would dress a little down but whatever they still lost it

  • @JadeRuri-e1d
    @JadeRuri-e1d 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

    Defendant is playing dumb

  • @JahazielJones
    @JahazielJones 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +10

    My favorite judge

  • @zainy11
    @zainy11 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +20

    don't coat check a $1000 coat

  • @127cherryblossom
    @127cherryblossom 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    In the clurb we all friends

  • @inezarevalo535
    @inezarevalo535 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    They're still in business. Just looked it up. Lol

  • @brayster1979
    @brayster1979 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    Great policy 😂 what a moron

  • @purgatoriprytania5382
    @purgatoriprytania5382 12 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

    The jacket wasn't lost, stolen, or left behind. Easy case.

  • @TheDon2933
    @TheDon2933 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

    In regards to the $100,000 that was stolen from me using my Capital one Credit card. It was spent on Marijuana and then illegally distributed.

  • @scottmcwave9479
    @scottmcwave9479 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    Johnny Love’s

  • @LeviAaronx
    @LeviAaronx 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

    “I frequent there, occasionally “ isn’t that contradictory

    • @viron6734
      @viron6734 2 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Yes, she was looking for a fancy way of saying 'go' but chose the wrong word.

  • @latroletteeeee
    @latroletteeeee 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

    HAIR IS OK TO GO DANCING THE BOOGIE BOOGIE.

  • @sjc3480
    @sjc3480 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    She told myself.

  • @mimiseeyou
    @mimiseeyou 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +7

    Don’t make me dig for part 2. Why can’t y’all put the next episode in the description? Smh team Judy!
    Update: well I can’t find it but I’m sure she left it at her own risk, but because he offered, he paid half the value.

    • @27Killermike
      @27Killermike 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +13

      Just wait for them upload it. Gosh

    • @idellekell
      @idellekell 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +7

      They upload one at a time. Give it 30 minutes 😂

  • @ThePreservedOnes7
    @ThePreservedOnes7 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Ain't nothing fun about a club

  • @AlienLeadership
    @AlienLeadership 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

    AVP 👽
    ...it shouldn't have been much / ... just "K-goerge made a bomb 💣 threat yesterday /

  • @sevibomhower-lk7rp
    @sevibomhower-lk7rp 6 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    who tf spends a 1000$ bucks on a stupid coat

    • @elabuterin7150
      @elabuterin7150 6 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      This episode is from the 80’s I assume? $1000?
      Girl if I spent that much I would wear it all night 🤣!

    • @brendajustin6019
      @brendajustin6019 4 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Your five coats you brought for 200 ea totals a thousand dollars. She chose one hood coat versus five mediocre coats. The establishment lost her foot. Pay the lady.😢

    • @sevibomhower-lk7rp
      @sevibomhower-lk7rp 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

      😂😂😂😂

  • @PENNAZL
    @PENNAZL 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

    Meeoooowww

  • @TheDon2933
    @TheDon2933 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Every time I ate Sloppy joes the food weird occurrences and harassment happened.

  • @kyoto32001
    @kyoto32001 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    plaintiff is a liar. noone spends $1000 on a coat.

    • @jpbaley2016
      @jpbaley2016 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +7

      You are naive. Women buy handbags that are over $1000. Fur and leather can be very expensive. No one needs to spend that. It’s solely to feed their own ego.

  • @TheDon2933
    @TheDon2933 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Civil Law; my queen that went by the name Paget Brewster and my otha Queen that went by the name Taylor from Meet Me room were broken and entered illegally.

  • @CanadianBisdak
    @CanadianBisdak 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

    They should be responsible for it cos it was trusted to them.