Swordfish alternate ending
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 14 มี.ค. 2016
- The DVD version contains an alternate ending wherein Ginger is told in the bank that the account is already almost empty, alluding to the possibility that Stanley has played one final trick on them and taken the money himself. When Ginger tells Gabriel about this, he takes it in stride and asks her to join him on a trip to Istanbul. In a companion scene to the alternate ending, Stanley is shown on a trip with his daughter in a brand new RV. While eating at a diner, Stanley is shown transferring billions of dollars to various charities before continuing his trip.
Nice ending. But I prefer the original ending from this. Gabriel is an anti-hero, not really a villain. And he did what he did because he was following a mission which he believes in his heart is right. Stanley on his part got a happy ending with his daughter with him. And I like to think that he still has that 10 million dollars that Gabriel paid him for the job.
The original ending is better. I like that the bad guy wins, but the hero still lives happily ever after. It's far more interesting.
Agreed...!
Agreed. This ending would've bombed, bringing the entire work of the movie to nothing.
I'm not sure but this ending fits the movie much more, "Not everything ends the way you think it should, besides audiences love happy endings" and that's what this whole thing was setting up. He does all this horrible shit to steal the money to start his own Blackcell to fight terrorists because horrible stuff leads to the greater good, but the ending was supposed to be Stanley realizing he was tricked, then seeking out the money that won't be hidden because Gabriel thinks that Stanley believes that both of them are dead when he put it all together with the "houdini" flashback scene.
So the greater good is achieved by Stanley donating it all to charity that was gonna be used to fight more wars and "kill terrorist" when Gabriel could be insane and decide "everyone is a terrorist" with how he killed the Senator because he decided he was a traitor because he tried to kill Gabriel for attracting too much attention from the FBI. But this ending is weak in the sense Gabriel just seems to give up and want to live a life free of his burden which doesn't fit character at all.
Agreee.... but this one looks more Fun... 😊👍
Someone, either the law or the bad guys, would find Stanley to try to get the money and punish and kill him (and his daughter) for stealing it.
Even if Stanley kept none of it he still stole it and the money paid to him was illegal income.
This would have been huge plot hole.
The intro refers to lack of realism in movies.
It is more realistic that huge sums of cash would be used to finance ultra secret agendas both good and bad.
*BANKER:* All of it?
*GINGER:* yes.
*BANKER:* All 500 dollars?
*GINGER:* HUH?!
The best thing about the alternate ending
I love this movie so much as always!!!
2:24 that was probably one of the worst Hollywood kisses ever...
I don't even think they touched at all, she looked kinda confused as to why he kissed air lol
of course travolta would eventually hunt stan down. what was he thinking
Gabriel was never a bad guy
Someone, either the law or the bad guys, would find Stanley to try to get the money and punish and kill him (and his daughter) for stealing it.
Even if Stanley kept none of it he still stole it and the money paid to him was illegal income.
This would have been huge plot hole.
The intro refers to lack of realism in movies.
It is more realistic that huge sums of cash would be used to finance ultra secret agendas both good and bad.
Wow, that would have sucked. Glad I saw the original ending.
Stan kept the money, Gabriel went to Istanbul and life is good... isn't it? 😁😁😁😁😁
Stan left his dog in the truck with the windows up 😳
No I like the movie ending much better
I like the original ending where real terrorists get killed.. It all makes sense for all these misdirections. Bad guy wins, good guy lives happily ever after
I bet half of those charities are corrupted. He also didn't drink his latte
love this movie
Swordfish Monte Carlo - Michael Stevenson's Love her Carmen Sandiego
Brilliant! Stan got the last laugh!
Wow. I don't understand, if there is a script, why they are modifying it? On the other hand it is amazing even the actors don't know what kind of movie they are acting.
Nothing it was it seems and by any means necessary. That was the movie core themes are.
Too damn long, the theatrical ending was the right choice. The part where Travolta talks about movies yet again is especially grating
Hello come and see my reaction to full movie of SWORDFISH movie if you like it make sure you subscribe that would be awesome hope you enjoy the video!!!
Video full movie reaction video is here
th-cam.com/video/V1ZONYOCC3c/w-d-xo.html&app=desktop
I'd agree with you on the pacing especially with the speech that explains the punchline, but the theatrical ending is rather inept and emotionally hollow.
Movie ending is way better
So Wolverine stole all the money
While Storm & Howard Saint lost the money
what will happen in Istanbul?
All that money stan stole is in instabul.
i remember seeing instanul on the banks computer back then when stan used that worm
I am very surprised by this alternate ending. In this ending, Stanley and his daughter leaves the dog in the Suburban while they are in the desert.
In the original version, they didn't show the dog in the Suburban.
I wonder why?
better ending for sure.
Geez, they left Scrappy in the truck with the windows up during their whole meal? (or maybe they left the truck running and just locked the doors).
In any case, I also like this ending much better. But, as we know in real life - usually the bad guys win.
Yeah I agree, better ending, this is definitely what they were leading up to with bad things=the greater good with Stanley taking all the money that was stolen and innocent people killed for, and donated it to "The Greater Good", especially with how Stanley can hack into anything and he already knows both Ginger and Gabriel are alive so he knows the money is still reachable in a certain amount of time before they move it.
I always found Swordfish to be very nihilistic and not in a clever way but in a childish sort of way, but this ending made this film have more of a "point" and wasn't very nihilistic at all with Stanley doing what he believes is the Greater Good vs Gabriels idea of it, both of them used a bank robbery where innocent people died to fund something they believed in, the difference in this ending is Stanley didn't use the money to kill more innocent people as Gabriel kills the terrorist at the end on a crowded boat with innocent people on it.
How did the normal version end? I have only seen this one.
th-cam.com/video/yJ5JdiqOQKM/w-d-xo.html
Exactly the same except instead of her not getting the money at the bank, she divides it to each account evenly, returns to him on the boat and they ride off happily-ever-after... until a news broadcast describes and shows a terrorist's yacht blowing up, the boat they were riding towards.
@@Lucifronz The boat scene was added on after, to imply they're killing terrorists using the money, not that they attended a party and died.
me gustó más este final
What’s in Istanbul? Other than just a whole lot of Turks, $500 would equal about YTL9,501,036,314.36 with the current rate of exchange.
Sequel.
Either ending was a good set up for a sequel.
The first one is better because Gabriel would have had the funds to do anything.
stupid end
How about Cuba
What!? WHAT! WHAAATDAAFFFF.. THEFUKK??????
NO EXPLOSIONS!?
@rrrgh, arggHhHHHH, ARRGH!!!!!!!!
It's ok i guess.
THEFUKK!!!!??????????
Welcome to İstanbul 😹
I like the original ending better
I would have gone for this ending. The other one was good but they should've had a scene with Stan taking custody of his daughter.
Her parents died, that scene's not needed.
Well Stan got custody of his daughter in both endings, so I'm not sure if it was really needed to show more of that
I'm not sure but this ending fits the movie much more, "Not everything ends the way you think it should, besides audiences love happy endings" and that's what this whole thing was setting up. He does all this horrible shit to steal the money to start his own Blackcell to fight terrorists because horrible stuff leads to the greater good, but the ending was supposed to be Stanley realizing he was tricked, then seeking out the money that won't be hidden because he thinks that Stanley thinks that both of them are dead when he puts it all together with the "houdini" flashback.
So donating it all to charity, he used this whole horrible act to lead to good, which is a lesson Stanley teaches Travolta after he teaches him the lesson on "The Greater Good" and this is also a loopback to how Stanley leaked that the FBI were monitoring people's emails. But where THIS ending loses me is Travola just being "cool" and decides to sort of be free of his burden when we're shown the exact opposite of him being a true believer but I guess the director wanted him to be exhausted with fighting but it doesn't come off that way at all, he just seems "oh well, guess I'll stop believing in my cause, let's go and enjoy Instanbul!" whereas him finding out that the guy on the boat is a billionaire and him and Ginger instead of blowing it up, stop the sequence and
decide to start "watching" him implying they'll start another operation to steal billions of dollars.
No this is just a typical boring movie ending. I like the original ending much more
another cliche ending, original is more believable. too many people do not realize there is no light without darkness, there is no good without evil.
I think if this was the original ending the movie would've been 10x better
The ending they kept made more sense (where the israeli blows up the saudis boat) Rememeber Israel warned us about 911 too.
The ending had nothing to do with nationality. Not entirely sure what it was about, but most likely he was taking down a terrorist (he was in the same port riding in the direction of the boat just before it blew up). He's a terrorist himself, but he has a code of ethics and motivation for taking down terrorists who threaten the US.
And this movie came out in 2001...which means it was filmed before 9/11...which explains why they didn't use this gratuitous ending...
Hello come and see my reaction to full movie of SWORDFISH movie if you like it make sure you subscribe that would be awesome hope you enjoy the video!!!
Video full movie reaction video is here
th-cam.com/video/V1ZONYOCC3c/w-d-xo.html&app=desktop
That sucked unless they were aiming for a sequel.
this is much better. bad guys can't win
Well He isn't really bad guy.
+caragio He kills innocent people to accomplish his goals, his "higher purpose" so-to-speak. He's a terrorist just like the kind he hunts down, believing his cause is just.
He's a really bad guy. That's the whole point of the movie.
What a wonderful fantasy you must live in
Sorry for replying in a 2 year old comment.
He is not a bad guy.... The whole Gabriel Shear thing was a deception in order for him to get the money so he can have his own war on terrorists.
The point was to fool even Stan cause had Stan known the truth he would probably end up talking to the feds.
John Travolta and Halle Berry's characters were probably black ops agents who wanted to take matters about terrorism into their own hands
The only good thing about this movie is hugh jackman
Ummmmmm....Halle Berry's tits...???