He trained as a barrister and worked at a top firm in The Temple with a Second class law degree when they don’t give you the time of day if you don’t have a first class degree with honours = Suspicious Also a Band Promoter with no bands promoted coinciding with his disappearance for a year = with his handlers for a deep dive into Blair check Sheepfarm have their own platform as not YT friendly you’ll have to scroll down to the bottom of their podcasts.
If diversity is indeed strength, then why all the complaints about colonisation? It was just adding diversity to places that were suffering from homogeny.
@@corky8280 Yes, the hypocrites only want diversity for Europe and the UK. Not for Africa or Asia. If the British people are erased, that will reduce diversity on a global scale; but you don't hear any concerns about that.
The court is truly deserving of contempt. The judiciary needs to be held to account for political activism from the bench and the destruction of the rule of law.
Incidentally more than three girls were stabbed , three died. That is a common belief promoted by the biased media that the supposedly unbiased judge read so as to claim that “everyone knows”
It wasn't a judgement, it was a woke sermon. What she said was opinion, maybe a callous one, but an opinion. She didn't say do XYZ, she said you can do XYZ "for all I care". Contrast this to what Ricky Jones said, which was a direct incitement to violence. His sentence should be longer but you already know it won't be.
I agree, the rider "for all I care..." is important because it shows it is not an incitement. She did not say "Everyone get out there snd attack this hotel..." or some such.
@@tomvalentine4928Yes. It was seen by a grand total of four people before she deleted It. Nick Knowles walks free for his dog - whistling for violence. You know why don't you? Because he's a lefty. Two tier policing. Two tier justice. Two tier Britain.
Exactly, even though she did type out the words, she could have convinced a jury that those words weren’t meant to be taken literally, I’m looking forward to the Ricky Jones court case in January, he’s pleaded not guilty, and I bet he’ll convince the jury he didn’t literally mean what he said.
@@-DC- yes unless you can provide official proof she was given full and independent legal advice she was advised by the duty solicitor ie the states paid for solicitor
@@-DC- Er, well yes - if you had listened to the video it is in the very first paragraph of the Judge's summing up. She pled guilty. No one does that without advice.
The phrase "for all I care" indicates an opinion not a directive. She should have pleaded NOT guilty. I doubt it would have even gone to court, because the CPS knows a jury would almost certainly not convict.
The trouble is it is likely that she was advised/guided into doing so in order to avoid a severe sentence (which is precisely what she got anyway). I have also read reports that various individuals similarly accused were told that if they opted to plead innocent they'd be remanded in custody until their case came to trial which could take many months, only to face the prospect of a much longer sentence as they hadn't pleaded guilty. For doing nothing more than writing a stupid internet post (which, if read properly, doesn't actually amount to incitement) they were (quite rightly imho) probably expecting to get a quick slap on the wrist rather than find themselves sentenced to YEARS in prison.
Exactly, jury trials are our protection from authoritarian and bigotted judges. Why on earth did she not jump at that opportunity? Maybe it would have been expensive and have required her to sell her house. It can't be that difficult to act for oneself in court, thus saving hundreds of thousands of pounds. It's not rocket science. What did she have to lose?
@@CharlesWhite-j4f"What did she have to lose?" Please read my post, above. Months on remand and the likelihood of a much longer sentence if found guilty - it's my suspicion that she was, in effect, coerced into pleading guilty.
Sadly true......Simon Webb from " History Debunked" said recently that of 40 Barristers called to the bat this year in the UK, 37 were Muslim. In 20 years it will be from this cohort that Judges are chosen. God help Britain........your Government won't. Les Griffiths
@@grahamthacker6498 I take your point, I said that because he could be Scottish. I googled his image, he looks native to these Islands. But, yeah, I know, "British" nowadays means "Pakistani" in most cases
You are incredibly stupid you cannot incite people to commit crimes, if you do you are guilty of the crime. If she hadn't pleaded guilty she would have even longer sentence. Obviously the so called judge Inman, isn't really a judge otherwise he would know of the Bentley case.
@@keithapps These actions were not the result of the comments. They were the result of a spontaneous outburst of righteous anger due to the Southport murders. The reaction of outrage to the murders is a normal, correct human emotion, and there is something wrong with anyone who did not feel the same emotion that day. But Starmer says "how dare you object to the butchery or your children, you are a nazi and I will lock you up" . Starmer has declared war on the British people, I think he will regret that.
If this is the case then the two Muslims at the airport attacks should be looking at a very long sentence up-to 20years. If true, British justice is to be served.
Why call the murder of three children by an immigrant in Southport an “event”. Yes judge, play it down, give the impression that the only crime was committed by that woman he jailed. Ffs !!
Nobody, he will be protected by the Establishment whose bidding he is carrying out. I always thought that the judiciary and government were to be kept separate; you know what thought did.
Never plead guilty, duty solicitors and even your own paid council will often advise this but the instant you do you are at the mercy of any judge that is a political activist, far better to try and get a jury and hope there are decent types in this.
as someone commented recently, "the process is the punishment" - the courts are so full, the police and other state organs so disorganised (they always claim underfunding) and hopeless that one could be held in limbo for years, whether metaphorically or actually. Psychologically it's easier for people to know what their future holds, the more so in a modern society with an extreme need to plan ahead and with long and binding contracts to fulfill - yet the courts seem to be arrogant, oblivious or aloof on this point and on so many others.
@@fredmercury1314 the ineptitude and corruption I have seen with my own eyes (and can prove but police won't touch it, indeed are complicit) in English courts is so extreme I left the UK. it's had it, sadly. I can't say I gloat about it, having friends and family there, it's darned sad to see a nation sinking. Once the police and courts are politically controlled (and they are) it's the end of any culture/country. I cannot begin to imagine there was a fair trial as incompetence reigns in the courts from top to bottom. Poor lady, for a comment made in sheer momentary shock and removed voluntarily, with no real capacity to commit a crime she didn't actually threaten to carry out, nor 'mens rea' shown that I can see...
If you think it is bad now. The horror that awaits the younger generation, trying not to be side lined into obscurity is terrifying. As Simon Webb pointed out on his "History debunked" YT channel, the list of people called to the bar was recently published. Nearly all the names were Muslim. Which means that in 20 years, we could be looking at a judiciary that is 80% Muslim. Can anyone spot the problem this may create? Does anyone else feel this is problematic in a nominally Christian country?
Saying 'for all I care' is just making a theoretical statement. That's not inciting anyone or telling them to do anything. "You can go and ………………. for all I care" is again just expressing you don't care if that person does that. Her mistake was to plead guilty (no doubt coerced). She should have taken it to a jury trial rather than let a Starmer minion far left activist judge decide her fate.
Well said, Guy. Moreover you showed admirable restraint given the obvious intensity of feeling that that judgement and its issuer engender in ALL OF US. If wish for him to ‘get his’, if you know what I mean.
@@jaystevens1965 I agree with you. That's how I understood it and said so as I was watching the video. If, as it appears, the judge was referring to the Southport stabbings then there's no reason why he shouldn't refer to them as tragic.
It is certainly revelatory. Who has advised these accused people? When will appeals against these ludicrous sentences begin? These are similar to the ludicrous sentences (fines) for so called covid breaches. 2 tier you know whatting.
Yep... advised to plead guilty for (an expected) smack on the wrist but end up in jail... Wonder how things had gone if she'd resisted arrest and bust a coppers face?
This sentence is insane. The judge should be in prison. Someone should start a campaign to get her released. No justice in the UK. She gave her opinion, and the judge gave him, yet she got three years.
Good video. I had not seen the full tweet shown in this judgment, only the parts about hotels and the last sentence in media reports. It's sickening to see someone punished so harshly for merely for losing her temper at the absurd regime we live under, expressing herself poorly but then even deleting the offending tweet. Not someone who is looking to stir up a riot, just someone who has had enough. Maybe she should have plead not guilty, I don't know if there was enough to argue over intent there. Real problem here is the laws themselves, more so than the judge. I await to see what defence arguments are brought in the Ricky Jones case for him to try and weasel out of what he said on camera.
The Southport 'incident' was not a tragedy, it was an atrocity, an outrage, a massacre. And the trial of the individual being held is going to be very interesting indeed. Assuming we are allowed to know all of it.
I`m pretty sure that these people were all threatened that they would be remanded in custody awaiting a trial date if they pleaded not guilty. Giving them very little choice . To me this is borderline illegal in itself.......Scandalous.
What this judgement achieves to my mind is to further the distrust I have towards State authority in Britain, not that there is much left anyway. As for the strength of our society, well it is not helped by the divisive nature of large numbers of people who do not respect the nation they have come too. Her words are a reflection of the anger raised by the consequences of government policy, those who should be jailed sit in parliament.
She's entitled to her opinion we require more people to stand up and express how they feel about the shambles this country is in, no matter what the issue
This is the style of writing that most of us partake in on social media but to see a judge “of a certain age” write like this is worrisome, is he not educated?
Those words she wrote were, in the minds of normal people, hyperbole. They let out of jail violent criminals to imprison people venting their emotions.
I would think the notorious Judge Jeffreys would slot in to the modern judiciary with little trouble. Interesting that the Monmouth rebellion was popular with the common people but the establishment won over as always and the retribution was savage, merciless and brutal under Jeffreys' control. Only the punishments change but the attitudes of the ruling clique are immutable.
The line that ends 'for all I care' - is not a directive, as such, is it - it's not telling someone to do it, is it? It's saying (using hyperbole, I believe) - that if it were done, the writer would not care. As such - I don't think it's a credible and targetted incitement - with any realistic chance of anyone performing the action based partly, or wholly, on this person's words.
"For all I care" suggests a tweet written in anger rather than with intent to incite. What we don't know is if she knew she was pleading guilty to incitement or whether she understood by 'guilty' the fact that she wrote the tweet. Three years for that is insane and I hope she, like other political prisoners, will be eventually compensated. It all smacks of draconian measures 'to encourage the crew' rather than justice.
Then there was Judge Salmon handing down some unusually harsh sentences to the Teds arrested at Notting Hill in the late 1950s. Salmon's family was originally So lo mon.
Could somebody please set up a petition against this cretinous judgement? Why were no mitigating circumstances considered? The most obvious being the matter that criminals guilty of far worse and more impactful crimes tend to have their sentences suspended where there is no previous offence, for example. Secondly, what is the legal precedent for people being given custodial sentences for a tweet? Would she be aware that what she was tweeting might constitute a crime punishable by a 31 months prison sentence? Might she have been acting under duress? At which point we might need to consider whether this judge has sufficient understanding of the human condition to understand why she may have been so outraged that she wrote something so intemperate. How much more of this do they think we'll take?
@@-DC-You clearly know nothing or you would be actively recommending the jailing of Nick Lowles and Ricky Jones for doing the exact same thing. Are you going to call for their jailings?
Thanks for this video, and for putting into words what my gut is telling me, but I couldn't express. BTW, when did it become a crime to "not care" as her tweet said? Poor girl had some really bad defence council!
who's going to quote her and face arrest? She did make a foolish and extreme comment but it has to be said that people do such things when very upset - people with no capacity or intent to carry out what they say in a moment to fear and worry. Indeed she took it down 3 hours after commenting online of her own volition so it was hardly meant. THAT is the crux of what is wrong with the judgement, plus that other people from other cultures do far, far worse on a daily basis - deed rather than word and often NOTHING happens to them.
@gurglejug627 'intent to stir up racial hatred' what crap. I was actually warning ppl at the time not to repeat the suspect fake news that was being spread by bad actors. I assume she linked the attack to Muslims which wasn't an unreasonable assumption anyway
There should be swift and appropriate consequences for this judge's appalling bigotry. He should never be allowed to hold a legal position again. Maybe our Monarch should voice an opinion in defence of his subjects, too.
Go to trial with a jury, I been on jury service, people on the jury truly came from all different backgrounds and all took it seriously, trust the jury, they will see through the BS
This is deliberate oppression of speech . Imagine no one was told the speed limit on a road, but if you exceeded that unknown speed limit you would be imprisoned. How fast would everyone travel along that road ? .
I know it won't help Lucy at this stage, but we must get the message out there about the concept of "JURY NULLIFICATION", whereby a juror may find a defendant NOT guilty if he/she considers the law to be unjust, even if the defendant DID appear beyond reasonable doubt to have broken the law.
@Salamis.-330 indeed. But I don't think the word 'very' needs to be included with the word tragic. The word tragic has all the gravitas it needs; it is a synonym for 'the worst thing to happen'. The three girls murdered was tragic. Lucy Connelly getting two and half years - 3 years (while the same judge sentenced a baby killer; he killed a baby in an R.T.A. while under the influence) is a tragic miscarriage of justice.
It's regrettable that none of these cases has been defended, I appreciate that it's easier for someone like me , at a distance, to say that, but, if they were vigorously contested, with the support of someone like the Free Speech Union, then activist judges wouldn't be given free rein, Just looking at the early wording, ie her intention, I doubt very much that it was her intention to stir up racial hatred. It wouldn't have taken much of a defending barrister to argue that, rather than to stir up racial hatred, that it was her intention to draw attention to the severe problems arising out of mass immigration. At no point in her "tweet" did she refer to a "race". In view of the fact that we've had Albanians and many other East European nationalities making their way here illegally and who are also being housed in these hostels, then her tweet wasn't race focused. So, to me, she's been sent down on a charge which is patently erroneous.
well people now see that pleading guilty if you are not a useless nasty lefty bigot has been a terrible decision and nobody should ever do it unless you are a labour councillor
Poor woman, shame on our ‘justice’ system. And what will that Labour councillor that spouted / incited violence (cut throat gesture) get I wonder?…yet to be heard in court. We will see.
![ตีสิบเดย์ [FULL] | เปิดใจ "อาจารย์ เบียร์ ฅนตื่นธรรม" นักสนทนาธรรมสายดุดัน!](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/vqaBI_mnoDk/mqdefault.jpg)
The country is FUCKED there's some words for you
Totally and utterly.
That’s right mate
Sold down the river by the political class.
@Eric-qm5xw not sold down the river by the political class ,destroyed by the people that keep voting for it .
Cattle trucked 😅
Such a coincidence that the current P.M. is a former DPP. This shames our legal system.
Tony Blair was a barrister too. His nickname was Miranda, the nearest moon to Uranus.
He trained as a barrister and worked at a top firm in The Temple with a Second class law degree when they don’t give you the time of day if you don’t have a first class degree with honours = Suspicious Also a Band Promoter with no bands promoted coinciding with his disappearance for a year = with his handlers for a deep dive into Blair check Sheepfarm have their own platform as not YT friendly you’ll have to scroll down to the bottom of their podcasts.
And he openly declared "Substantive sentences" would be handed down and the courts complied. Jail for Starmer and the Judges.
Didn’t he sometimes’trade’ as Charles Lynton!
Starmer was handed the DPP job because he is a Blair stooge.
No strengh in diversity , that’s blindingly obvious.
If diversity is indeed strength, then why all the complaints about colonisation? It was just adding diversity to places that were suffering from homogeny.
@@corky8280 Yes, the hypocrites only want diversity for Europe and the UK. Not for Africa or Asia. If the British people are erased, that will reduce diversity on a global scale; but you don't hear any concerns about that.
@@corky8280True
We don't have diversity. We have polarisation.
@@harrynking777 With non integrations by those who come here uninvited, hence very big problems ahead, if we have already not got them.
Apparently this poor lady lost a child due to the incompetence of an immigrant doctor.
And ?
@@-DC-question?
@@-DC- And It (rightly or wrongly) may have influenced her actions.
You don't get to suggest burning people alive regardless of opinion on Immigration.
A few immigrant doctors
The court is truly deserving of contempt. The judiciary needs to be held to account for political activism from the bench and the destruction of the rule of law.
Incidentally more than three girls were stabbed , three died. That is a common belief promoted by the biased media that the supposedly unbiased judge read so as to claim that “everyone knows”
You really need to do more research the Judgement was completely inline with UK Law.
@@-DC- It is. But the law is wrong of course
as should the government be held to account for wrecking an entire justice system.
Never,never,never plead guilty!
It wasn't a judgement, it was a woke sermon. What she said was opinion, maybe a callous one, but an opinion. She didn't say do XYZ, she said you can do XYZ "for all I care". Contrast this to what Ricky Jones said, which was a direct incitement to violence. His sentence should be longer but you already know it won't be.
I agree, the rider "for all I care..." is important because it shows it is not an incitement. She did not say "Everyone get out there snd attack this hotel..." or some such.
Exactly. A misrepresentation, I'd say. There are many things I don't care if other people do.
Wasn't Ricky's sentence suspended?
She pleaded guilty so it was said in court, 'You pleaded guilty to intentionally ...' !
@@tomvalentine4928Yes. It was seen by a grand total of four people before she deleted It. Nick Knowles walks free for his dog - whistling for violence. You know why don't you? Because he's a lefty.
Two tier policing.
Two tier justice.
Two tier Britain.
Your country is circling the drain.
When the justice system breaks down we are truly fcked
we are truly fcked
When illegals are welcome with a red carpet the system is broken.
If you can't do the time then don't do the crime.
@@keithapps What crime?
@@keithapps Is that you judge Inman?
She should never have been advised to plead guilty -
You know that happened do you?
Exactly, even though she did type out the words, she could have convinced a jury that those words weren’t meant to be taken literally, I’m looking forward to the Ricky Jones court case in January, he’s pleaded not guilty, and I bet he’ll convince the jury he didn’t literally mean what he said.
@@-DC- yes unless you can provide official proof she was given full and independent legal advice she was advised by the duty solicitor ie the states paid for solicitor
Brow beaten and convinced to plead guilty as they all seem to have been
@@-DC- Er, well yes - if you had listened to the video it is in the very first paragraph of the Judge's summing up. She pled guilty. No one does that without advice.
The phrase "for all I care" indicates an opinion not a directive. She should have pleaded NOT guilty. I doubt it would have even gone to court, because the CPS knows a jury would almost certainly not convict.
And that was the crucial phrase. Semantics matter. It was not even close to incitement.
The trouble is it is likely that she was advised/guided into doing so in order to avoid a severe sentence (which is precisely what she got anyway). I have also read reports that various individuals similarly accused were told that if they opted to plead innocent they'd be remanded in custody until their case came to trial which could take many months, only to face the prospect of a much longer sentence as they hadn't pleaded guilty. For doing nothing more than writing a stupid internet post (which, if read properly, doesn't actually amount to incitement) they were (quite rightly imho) probably expecting to get a quick slap on the wrist rather than find themselves sentenced to YEARS in prison.
Exactly, jury trials are our protection from authoritarian and bigotted judges. Why on earth did she not jump at that opportunity? Maybe it would have been expensive and have required her to sell her house. It can't be that difficult to act for oneself in court, thus saving hundreds of thousands of pounds. It's not rocket science. What did she have to lose?
@@CharlesWhite-j4f"What did she have to lose?" Please read my post, above. Months on remand and the likelihood of a much longer sentence if found guilty - it's my suspicion that she was, in effect, coerced into pleading guilty.
@@siras2 That was her choice. Cowardice never pays.
Sir, if the current numbers being called to the Bar continue we will have 90% of our Judges from South Asia
or Muslim within 20 years!
And we shall all dance to their tune .
Simon Webb said this recently.
@@bumscoria Yes he did👍
Sadly true......Simon Webb from " History Debunked" said recently that of 40 Barristers called to the bat this year in the UK, 37 were Muslim. In 20 years it will be from this cohort that Judges are chosen. God help Britain........your Government won't.
Les Griffiths
Ban any Muslim judges? Clearly there impartiality is dangerously compromised by their religious beliefs?
The name of the judge says everything.
Melbourne Inman? Looks white British to me. What did you infer from his name?
@@CharlesWhite-j4f ENGLISH, get it right.
@@grahamthacker6498 I take your point, I said that because he could be Scottish. I googled his image, he looks native to these Islands. But, yeah, I know, "British" nowadays means "Pakistani" in most cases
I thorght JEWISH.@@CharlesWhite-j4f
Disgusting
You wouldn't say that if it was your home or your family they were setting fire to.
@@keithapps What a bin outside
@@keithapps no you wouldnt but you wouldn't sentace to 3 years for saying something nasty....even after they pleaded guilty.
You are incredibly stupid you cannot incite people to commit crimes, if you do you are guilty of the crime. If she hadn't pleaded guilty she would have even longer sentence. Obviously the so called judge Inman, isn't really a judge otherwise he would know of the Bentley case.
@@keithapps These actions were not the result of the comments. They were the result of a spontaneous outburst of righteous anger due to the Southport murders. The reaction of outrage to the murders is a normal, correct human emotion, and there is something wrong with anyone who did not feel the same emotion that day. But Starmer says "how dare you object to the butchery or your children, you are a nazi and I will lock you up" . Starmer has declared war on the British people, I think he will regret that.
If this is the case then the two Muslims at the airport attacks should be looking at a very long sentence up-to 20years. If true, British justice is to be served.
In most countries they would of been shot
It appears that true British justice is a thing of the past, a common theme of our current predicament.
Don't be silly, they're not white.
Lol
Totally agree.
Political sentence.......free her now.
Why call the murder of three children by an immigrant in Southport an “event”. Yes judge, play it down, give the impression that the only crime was committed by that woman he jailed. Ffs !!
More insanity the judge needs to be brought to the people’s justice
This is therefore an illegal judgement. It is not without prejudice.
She is a political prisoner. We all know it. I'd better not say what I want to happen to the judge with the comedy name.
Judge followed UK Law to the letter if you bothered to do any research maybe you should really Protest That !
@@-DC-One need not research logic, common sense and humanity - unless one is incapable of moral and rational thought processes, as some clearly are.
@@-DC- _So did the NAZIs._
@@-DC- Cobblers.
@@-DC- No, the Judge didn't. The defendant gave an opinion. That is not an incitement to violence.
Who will be investigating and questioning the competence and bigotry of this fool?
Nobody, he will be protected by the Establishment whose bidding he is carrying out.
I always thought that the judiciary and government were to be kept separate; you know what thought did.
Never plead guilty, duty solicitors and even your own paid council will often advise this but the instant you do you are at the mercy of any judge that is a political activist, far better to try and get a jury and hope there are decent types in this.
as someone commented recently, "the process is the punishment" - the courts are so full, the police and other state organs so disorganised (they always claim underfunding) and hopeless that one could be held in limbo for years, whether metaphorically or actually. Psychologically it's easier for people to know what their future holds, the more so in a modern society with an extreme need to plan ahead and with long and binding contracts to fulfill - yet the courts seem to be arrogant, oblivious or aloof on this point and on so many others.
@@gurglejug627 If I were her, I would know what my future holds: No conviction by a jury of my peers.
@@fredmercury1314 the ineptitude and corruption I have seen with my own eyes (and can prove but police won't touch it, indeed are complicit) in English courts is so extreme I left the UK. it's had it, sadly. I can't say I gloat about it, having friends and family there, it's darned sad to see a nation sinking. Once the police and courts are politically controlled (and they are) it's the end of any culture/country. I cannot begin to imagine there was a fair trial as incompetence reigns in the courts from top to bottom. Poor lady, for a comment made in sheer momentary shock and removed voluntarily, with no real capacity to commit a crime she didn't actually threaten to carry out, nor 'mens rea' shown that I can see...
If you think it is bad now. The horror that awaits the younger generation, trying not to be side lined into obscurity is terrifying. As Simon Webb pointed out on his "History debunked" YT channel, the list of people called to the bar was recently published. Nearly all the names were Muslim. Which means that in 20 years, we could be looking at a judiciary that is 80% Muslim.
Can anyone spot the problem this may create? Does anyone else feel this is problematic in a nominally Christian country?
The judge should be the one in jail.
Commissar Inman
The clue is in the name.
@@jimbo-yv5jh every fckn time
@@jimbo-yv5jhJohn Inman - Mr Humphries
Saying 'for all I care' is just making a theoretical statement. That's not inciting anyone or telling them to do anything. "You can go and ………………. for all I care" is again just expressing you don't care if that person does that. Her mistake was to plead guilty (no doubt coerced). She should have taken it to a jury trial rather than let a Starmer minion far left activist judge decide her fate.
She is apparently planning to appeal her sentence.
Good job, excellent analysis.
Excellent and fully justified rant at Judge Judgmental.
Well said, Guy. Moreover you showed admirable restraint given the obvious intensity of feeling that that judgement and its issuer engender in ALL OF US.
If wish for him to ‘get his’, if you know what I mean.
Breath of fresh air at a time when we are being suffocated.
The sentence is a disgrace
Should be reviewed and suspended
She should not be in prison
I think that most people would regard the murder of three children as "very tragic". "Nobody died?" Three children died.
The judge was referring to the protests afterwards, not to the murders of the British girls
@@onlyme54637 Don't think he was but to the murders: "...arising from civil unrest following the very tragic events in Southport..."
@@jaystevens1965 I agree with you. That's how I understood it and said so as I was watching the video. If, as it appears, the judge was referring to the Southport stabbings then there's no reason why he shouldn't refer to them as tragic.
Yes they did.but not on the day of the protests.
@@nevisscot7697 But the judge referenced the day of the attack NOT the day of the protest.
She's literally been gulagged. Does anyone know what prison she's in?
She literally got treated exactly as expected under standing UK law.
@@-DC-you're getting boring pal.
@@johnriggs4929its a bot
Activist judge, how very polite. I can think of better descriptions.
here are the letters not in the proper order TCNU
Free this lady !!!
It is certainly revelatory. Who has advised these accused people? When will appeals against these ludicrous sentences begin? These are similar to the ludicrous sentences (fines) for so called covid breaches. 2 tier you know whatting.
Yep... advised to plead guilty for (an expected) smack on the wrist but end up in jail... Wonder how things had gone if she'd resisted arrest and bust a coppers face?
This sentence is insane. The judge should be in prison. Someone should start a campaign to get her released. No justice in the UK. She gave her opinion, and the judge gave him, yet she got three years.
I noticed that Nick Lowles of Hope not hate, did not get nicked for his two tweets.
She should never have pleaded guilty regardless of what they did to her.
It's the return of Judge Jeffries
Good video. I had not seen the full tweet shown in this judgment, only the parts about hotels and the last sentence in media reports. It's sickening to see someone punished so harshly for merely for losing her temper at the absurd regime we live under, expressing herself poorly but then even deleting the offending tweet. Not someone who is looking to stir up a riot, just someone who has had enough. Maybe she should have plead not guilty, I don't know if there was enough to argue over intent there. Real problem here is the laws themselves, more so than the judge. I await to see what defence arguments are brought in the Ricky Jones case for him to try and weasel out of what he said on camera.
A travesty of justice.
The Southport 'incident' was not a tragedy, it was an atrocity, an outrage, a massacre.
And the trial of the individual being held is going to be very interesting indeed. Assuming we are allowed to know all of it.
Why did Huw Edwards not go to prison? Why have they let out early a man who shook his baby to death to make room for Lucy Connolly and Julie Sweeney?
Keep the good work up very nice logic 👍
ABSOLUTELY NO RIGHT TO BE A JUDGE
If you can't _prove_ a post caused violence, you shouldn't be able to prosecute.
I`m pretty sure that these people were all threatened that they would be remanded in custody awaiting a trial date if they pleaded not guilty.
Giving them very little choice .
To me this is borderline illegal in itself.......Scandalous.
thats the old bill for you anything for an easy life even if it is lying
she should be free , its disgusting , 1984
What this judgement achieves to my mind is to further the distrust I have towards State authority in Britain, not that there is much left anyway. As for the strength of our society, well it is not helped by the divisive nature of large numbers of people who do not respect the nation they have come too. Her words are a reflection of the anger raised by the consequences of government policy, those who should be jailed sit in parliament.
She's entitled to her opinion we require more people to stand up and express how they feel about the shambles this country is in, no matter what the issue
Not if your opinion is encouraging mass murder via arson are you absolutely insane ?
@@-DC- She didn't.
Inman... checks early life...every time.
They've been told by people at the very top to hand down heavy handed sentences for politically motivated reasons in exchange for future promotions.
get to the point it was stammer and he was gloating and aroused when he said it outside number 10 downing st
Well said!
Just say no to the quran 😮
Worse than Izal.
It's almost as if the police, judiciary, political class, media and civil service had a Common Purpose.
Well said - they infiltrated the police and judiciary years ago.
They have, its masonic atheism.
Ok... if Conelly deserves 3 years for what she did, then ricky jones deserves AT LEAST triple that. His case will be heard in january. I'll wait....
This is the style of writing that most of us partake in on social media but to see a judge “of a certain age” write like this is worrisome, is he not educated?
Those words she wrote were, in the minds of normal people, hyperbole. They let out of jail violent criminals to imprison people venting their emotions.
I would think the notorious Judge Jeffreys would slot in to the modern judiciary with little trouble. Interesting that the Monmouth rebellion was popular with the common people but the establishment won over as always and the retribution was savage, merciless and brutal under Jeffreys' control. Only the punishments change but the attitudes of the ruling clique are immutable.
She should not have pleaded guilty. She was innocent of the concocted 'offence'.
Judges all too often consider themselves to be superior to all of us peasants.
The line that ends 'for all I care' - is not a directive, as such, is it - it's not telling someone to do it, is it? It's saying (using hyperbole, I believe) - that if it were done, the writer would not care. As such - I don't think it's a credible and targetted incitement - with any realistic chance of anyone performing the action based partly, or wholly, on this person's words.
I can say with 100% certainty that no one would do it just because Lucy said she wouldn't care if they did.
Obviously you cannot speak for 70 Million People .
@@-DC- I'm not speaking for them.
By now most of the population must have heard Ricky Jones, he was on the news. And no one acted on what he said.
Brilliant analysis. The piss poor quality of this statement says a lot more about this bigoted cretin judge, than about Lucy. God help us.
Very well reasoned and presented. All points made/raised worthy of commendation. Precise parsing/dissecting of relevant words/phrasing. Thank you
"For all I care" suggests a tweet written in anger rather than with intent to incite. What we don't know is if she knew she was pleading guilty to incitement or whether she understood by 'guilty' the fact that she wrote the tweet. Three years for that is insane and I hope she, like other political prisoners, will be eventually compensated. It all smacks of draconian measures 'to encourage the crew' rather than justice.
I SEEM TO REMEMBER A JUDGE IN THE 1930S BY THE NAME OF ROLAND FREILSLER DOES HE RING ANY BELL'S
Then there was Judge Salmon handing down some unusually harsh sentences to the Teds arrested at Notting Hill in the late 1950s. Salmon's family was originally So lo mon.
NO but quasimodo did
Wonderful, wonderful summary. I thought the same regarding that self-satisfied pompous prig of a so called judge.
might posterity ponder the name Melbourne Inman - his bewigged brutality and harshness to wonder at . . .
Come across that judge before and he is brutal with anything to do with far right opinions or racist comments on the media.
So he's basically an anglophobic racist then...
Could somebody please set up a petition against this cretinous judgement? Why were no mitigating circumstances considered? The most obvious being the matter that criminals guilty of far worse and more impactful crimes tend to have their sentences suspended where there is no previous offence, for example. Secondly, what is the legal precedent for people being given custodial sentences for a tweet? Would she be aware that what she was tweeting might constitute a crime punishable by a 31 months prison sentence? Might she have been acting under duress? At which point we might need to consider whether this judge has sufficient understanding of the human condition to understand why she may have been so outraged that she wrote something so intemperate. How much more of this do they think we'll take?
What about the stirring up racial hatred with the pro Hamas marches every week. They don't appear to bother with those.
Showing solidarity for Palestinians equates to support for a proscribed organisation does it?
When "voicing an opinion" becomes Civil Unrest !!! 😠🏴
No calling for mass murder does.
@@-DC- Sorry if I've upset your feelings ............... WAAAAAAAH WAAAAAAAAAAAAH ! 🤣🏴
@@johnbowkett80Sorry if UK Law upsets you.
@@-DC- WAAAAAAAAAAAH WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH . 🤣😅😂🏴
@@-DC-You clearly know nothing or you would be actively recommending the jailing of Nick Lowles and Ricky Jones for doing the exact same thing. Are you going to call for their jailings?
Thanks for this video, and for putting into words what my gut is telling me, but I couldn't express.
BTW, when did it become a crime to "not care" as her tweet said?
Poor girl had some really bad defence council!
probably the judges son or daughter
Hearing the twisted left wing activist junk makes me sick - so dropped out of video.
Same.
No one can tell me what she even said
who's going to quote her and face arrest? She did make a foolish and extreme comment but it has to be said that people do such things when very upset - people with no capacity or intent to carry out what they say in a moment to fear and worry. Indeed she took it down 3 hours after commenting online of her own volition so it was hardly meant. THAT is the crux of what is wrong with the judgement, plus that other people from other cultures do far, far worse on a daily basis - deed rather than word and often NOTHING happens to them.
@gurglejug627 'intent to stir up racial hatred' what crap. I was actually warning ppl at the time not to repeat the suspect fake news that was being spread by bad actors. I assume she linked the attack to Muslims which wasn't an unreasonable assumption anyway
7:05
By order of the State: Emotional outbursts are no longer allowed.
Thank you Maestro. Very sad state of affairs indeed
There should be swift and appropriate consequences for this judge's appalling bigotry. He should never be allowed to hold a legal position again. Maybe our Monarch should voice an opinion in defence of his subjects, too.
The judge spouting biased ball locks me thinks
Judge followed UK Law to the Letter if you bothered to do any actual research.
@@-DC- If you've else to spout but drivel, just give it a rest!
I will no longer be judged by "Judges" who demonstrably show no common sense. Will you?
This judge should be held accountable for destroying the life of that poor lady. A travesty of justice.
War is Peace. Ignorance is Strength. Freedom is Slavery.
Go to trial with a jury, I been on jury service, people on the jury truly came from all different backgrounds and all took it seriously, trust the jury, they will see through the BS
This is deliberate oppression of speech .
Imagine no one was told the speed limit on a road, but if you exceeded that unknown speed limit you would be imprisoned.
How fast would everyone travel along that road ? .
I know it won't help Lucy at this stage, but we must get the message out there about the concept of "JURY NULLIFICATION", whereby a juror may find a defendant NOT guilty if he/she considers the law to be unjust, even if the defendant DID appear beyond reasonable doubt to have broken the law.
‘ very’ tragic. My English teacher would have marked be down for such laziness.
Very tragic - a bin got set on fire ..
@Salamis.-330 indeed. But I don't think the word 'very' needs to be included with the word tragic. The word tragic has all the gravitas it needs; it is a synonym for 'the worst thing to happen'.
The three girls murdered was tragic.
Lucy Connelly getting two and half years - 3 years (while the same judge sentenced a baby killer; he killed a baby in an R.T.A. while under the influence) is a tragic miscarriage of justice.
The last government had many years to sort out the judiciary and bring them to heel .
politics in this country is rotten to the core with lawyers
Very well said 👏
Political prisoners.
Very good breakdown of this flawed, biased and political ‘judgement’. Pawn judge, a woke, politically correct & controlled agent of tyranny.
the judge did not sentance her he was just doing as he was told to by them
We have to reclaim or culture and reform our politics.
cutting edge analysis - well done
And total. bs
It's regrettable that none of these cases has been defended, I appreciate that it's easier for someone like me , at a distance, to say that, but, if they were vigorously contested, with the support of someone like the Free Speech Union, then activist judges wouldn't be given free rein, Just looking at the early wording, ie her intention, I doubt very much that it was her intention to stir up racial hatred. It wouldn't have taken much of a defending barrister to argue that, rather than to stir up racial hatred, that it was her intention to draw attention to the severe problems arising out of mass immigration. At no point in her "tweet" did she refer to a "race". In view of the fact that we've had Albanians and many other East European nationalities making their way here illegally and who are also being housed in these hostels, then her tweet wasn't race focused. So, to me, she's been sent down on a charge which is patently erroneous.
well people now see that pleading guilty if you are not a useless nasty lefty bigot has been a terrible decision and nobody should ever do it unless you are a labour councillor
Poor woman, shame on our ‘justice’ system. And what will that Labour councillor that spouted / incited violence (cut throat gesture) get I wonder?…yet to be heard in court. We will see.
she was a bit drunk may be and just let go with out thinking blimey we all say things we dont mean where are we going with this .
When he said, "tragic events", he would have been refering to the 3 little girls on the 29th of July.
What can be done . Honest question because this has boiled my piss , it’s so unfair.
Anyone know if the labour councillor who incited violence by slitting throats of protesters is getting the same court treatment?