Obscura Ascendancy X-Spells - New Capenna Standard - MTG Arena

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 86

  • @agni772
    @agni772 2 ปีที่แล้ว +56

    Definitely one of the more interesting builds. Even then, it doesn’t come across as powerful, but still highly entertaining and the reason why I subscribe to your channel.

    • @conglomeratebeatmakers1078
      @conglomeratebeatmakers1078 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I like it but it’s very weak in this meta

    • @agni772
      @agni772 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@conglomeratebeatmakers1078 for sure it is not a tier 1 deck. But I saw this card as a puzzle that I did not see a viable answer to. Legends build is the closest thing to a viable answer I have seen.

  • @IamCorrosive
    @IamCorrosive 2 ปีที่แล้ว +54

    This deck highlights your skill so well. Targeting your own spirit to get to your 5 drop was genius. Every match had some amazing plays just like that. Really appreciate your videos, thank you! Keep up the great work!!!

    • @LegenVD
      @LegenVD  2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Glad you enjoyed!

    • @alexanderlepes4626
      @alexanderlepes4626 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I echo the sentiment about your clean play style

    • @Zamerux
      @Zamerux 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Always a treat watching him play!

  • @joaquintristan4373
    @joaquintristan4373 2 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    You’ve outdone yourself today, I think this is one of the most creative decks I’ve seen

  • @CyberBuster93
    @CyberBuster93 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I've said it before and I'll say it again, you're definitely one of the TOP interesting deck creators out there man. Awesomely amazing!

  • @Legov7
    @Legov7 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Really satisfying to see you win this first game where the opponent didn't do anything besides drawing and removing.

  • @geronimoG
    @geronimoG 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Hey LVD. Have you ever considered to expand your ratings of the deck in the end? Like adding more categories. For example, fun, consistency, cost-effective, complexity, competitive, etc. could be some categories. You could rate this categories up to ten magikarps, which would add a fitting touch to your channel. It is just an idea. What is the opinion of the community about that?

    • @svalk666
      @svalk666 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I THINK I SPEAK FOR ALL LVD FANS (AND ESPECIALLY PATRONS) WHEN I SAY YES!!! GREAT FUCKING IDEA 💕

    • @LegenVD
      @LegenVD  2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Used to do it for Magic Online decks, although the categories tend to be very subjective and some decks are really difficult to compare on a rating scale.

  • @RooZvonBooZ
    @RooZvonBooZ 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Taking a little break from Magic, but still watching these videos! Thanks for still making them and who knows.... maybe I'll return to Arena if the economy gets an overhaul.

  • @Sophtym211
    @Sophtym211 2 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    If there's anyone that could make the Esper ascendancy work it's gotta be LVD

    • @erosbronzo6518
      @erosbronzo6518 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      I pulled it during prerelease, I was quite happy until I finished reading it. Needless to say that I ended up not using it, but I knew LVD would eventually find a way

    • @PvtSkittles656
      @PvtSkittles656 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      If you're looking for more inspiration, Covertgoblue has a fun list for it as well with a similar idea using X spells.

    • @MrRiordain
      @MrRiordain 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@PvtSkittles656 I like the guy but the "commentary" is a little bit "aggresive".

    • @PvtSkittles656
      @PvtSkittles656 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MrRiordain Yeah I could see how some would see it that way. Either way he's got a list that's also going at this concept with a different mindset and I believe his gameplay insights are sound and thoughtful similar to LVD

  • @thebfunk5228
    @thebfunk5228 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The deck is supercool but the gameplay is the real mvp here. I'd love to see LVD playing some off-meta decks on competitive environments like those GPlike tourneys that are currently going on. Great vid as always!

  • @Bluecho4
    @Bluecho4 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Personally, I think my initial assessment of this card is still accurate. Interesting, but requires jumping through too many hoops to make it worth including, let alone building a whole deck around.
    The real issue is: are there not better 3 mana cards in Esper that are more effective, while being way easier to make work?
    Let's compare this to a different Ascendancy card we saw in this very video: Brokers Ascendancy. It doesn't require you to have a bunch of specific mana values of cards to function. It just works. It just gives you value, every turn, automatically, so long as you've got creatures on the field. That card does way more, more reliably, for its three color combination, than Obscura Ascendancy does for its three color combination.

    • @westleysong4094
      @westleysong4094 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      No one’s arguing that obscura ascendancy is a good card

  • @Xgya2000
    @Xgya2000 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Part of me wants to use counter manipulation shenanigans with this Ascendency.
    It would probably just look like win-more than anything, but I play Magic for two reasons, and the first one, preventing other players from playing Magic, has not made me any friends, while my unconditional love for janky wincons DID.
    Edit: also have to say I LOVE the tiny edits about tiny plays you found out you could have done afterwards.
    Preemptive TH-cam comment XD

  • @SpadaBelformaOfficial
    @SpadaBelformaOfficial 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Lol thank you LVD, drafted 4 of these because no other players wanted them and can finally put them to good use!

  • @ghostjokes5226
    @ghostjokes5226 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I know this has nothing to do with Arena but this video inspired me to brew a Zur the Enchanter EDH deck based around Obscura Ascendency, comboing with Arcane Adaptation since I can fetch both with my commander. Props to you LVD!

    • @LegenVD
      @LegenVD  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sounds great!

  • @cheesie49
    @cheesie49 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Just saw this video, it's a really clever way to make a card that's on the weaker side have a lot more versatility

  • @Burlesco1920
    @Burlesco1920 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I was trying this kind of deck for a week now, and I noticed that you also need the Chaplain of Alms to use it as a target and cancel it with its ward, besides, its a good earlier blocker. Also, 2 Hallowed Haunting as a way to suddenly create a massive spirit. To follow up, 4 spirits with disturb(enchantments): 2 Dorothea and 2 Brine Comber. The professor was an interesting addition from Legend. Gotta try it. For my 5 mana choice, /I use Kaya, feels like it has a good synergy overall. I really wanna see ppl figuring out this one, is so challenging!

  • @angelogabriel6862
    @angelogabriel6862 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Incredible skills! Can't stress this point enough. This deck in the hands of over 90% of magic players would be just losses.
    Keep it up!

  • @CyberBuster93
    @CyberBuster93 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    That match 2 was wild! Love seeing land destruction decks take fat L's. Awesome job man!

  • @masterkrist5017
    @masterkrist5017 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I absolutely love x mana spells! Like yesterday days video with bootleggers stash (even tho it wasn’t that theme, but just the ramp + crackle with power)
    Love your videos Luca, keep it up 👍

  • @yoshipopolsku6560
    @yoshipopolsku6560 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I

  • @AtrociousNightmare
    @AtrociousNightmare 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    That was amazing to watch. Such a clever deck.

  • @dal741130
    @dal741130 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    You did it great job
    It's very difficult to have a deck with this enchantment
    Nice deck and nice play.

    • @LegenVD
      @LegenVD  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Glad you enjoyed it!

  • @edgarlim21
    @edgarlim21 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    We love you luca!

  • @arenahacks4836
    @arenahacks4836 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Cool deck! The X costs are definitely necessary in a deck like this!

  • @kevincastner4541
    @kevincastner4541 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    54:37 how did you pull up your sideboard? Thanks

    • @LegenVD
      @LegenVD  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Select your library, then you can switch to sideboard.

    • @kevincastner4541
      @kevincastner4541 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@LegenVD thanks brother

  • @kv83
    @kv83 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    At @24:00 you could've just kept up the Vanishing Verse for meathook massacre and then cast it when the trigger was on the stack

    • @LegenVD
      @LegenVD  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Mentioned it at 24:50, the main issue is still losing the Spirits from casting Vanishing Verse

  • @soybomb777
    @soybomb777 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Such a galaxy brain deck. I love it

  • @telanos2492
    @telanos2492 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Did you have any thoughts on whether Obscura Ascendency could be made to synergise with Hallowed Haunting?

    • @LegenVD
      @LegenVD  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      It crossed my mind, but would require more Enchantments that cost X.

  • @RealShanShan
    @RealShanShan 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I tried a version with more disturb creatures and a enchantment/spirit theme with Kathilda as a threat that is scary enough on its own. Not good enough to beat meta decks consistently but close, and still tons of fun 😁

  • @shepherdsgamingrun
    @shepherdsgamingrun 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Would this work better in Explorer where you have access to Stonecoil Serpent and Ugin's Construct?

    • @LegenVD
      @LegenVD  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The competition is also much tougher, so not necessarily.

  • @hunteractual4030
    @hunteractual4030 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    At 17:47, shouldn't Dennick have made a clue token? Nice deck btw!

    • @LegenVD
      @LegenVD  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Confirmed with a Judge and it's working as intended. They cited rule 603.6c.
      Leaves-the-battlefield abilities trigger when a permanent moves from the battlefield to another zone, or when a phased-in permanent leaves the game because its owner leaves the game. These are written as, but aren't limited to, "When [this object] leaves the battlefield, . . ." or "Whenever [something] is put into a graveyard from the battlefield, . . . ."
      603.10.) An ability that attempts to do something to the card that left the battlefield checks for it only in the first zone that it went to. An ability that triggers when a card is put into a certain zone "from anywhere" is never treated as a leaves-the-battlefield ability, even if an object is put into that zone from the battlefield.

  • @BusinessCat88
    @BusinessCat88 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Since when did x count for whatever you paid for CMC/mana value? I thought x was 0...

    • @LegenVD
      @LegenVD  2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      It depends on whether it's on the stack or not. When an object with X in the mana cost is on the stack, X equals whatever value was chosen for it when it was put on the stack. In any other zone, X equals 0.

    • @erosbronzo6518
      @erosbronzo6518 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      That means if you cast the meathook massacre paying 4 mana it's 4 cmc only on the stack, so you can counter it with disdainful stroke, but once it's on the battlefield it's 2 cmc

  • @spacekrill
    @spacekrill 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    17:48 Shouldn't Dennick give you a Clue from Professor dying?

    • @LegenVD
      @LegenVD  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Apparently it doesn't, confirmed it with a judge. They cited rule 603.6c.
      Leaves-the-battlefield abilities trigger when a permanent moves from the battlefield to another zone, or when a phased-in permanent leaves the game because its owner leaves the game. These are written as, but aren't limited to, "When [this object] leaves the battlefield, . . ." or "Whenever [something] is put into a graveyard from the battlefield, . . . ."
      603.10.) An ability that attempts to do something to the card that left the battlefield checks for it only in the first zone that it went to. An ability that triggers when a card is put into a certain zone "from anywhere" is never treated as a leaves-the-battlefield ability, even if an object is put into that zone from the battlefield.

  • @spacekrill
    @spacekrill 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Imagine a four-color build with Imminent Doom squeezed in :P

  • @rodrigodiana1774
    @rodrigodiana1774 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    that's literally magic!

  • @eq2lornick
    @eq2lornick 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If your opponent wins with Ascendancy then they earned that win!

  • @BaronVonCount
    @BaronVonCount 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Seems like it would be a great home for Blot out the sky

    • @LegenVD
      @LegenVD  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      If only they were spirits!

  • @amarauk9687
    @amarauk9687 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Making an historic/explorer version of this deck is probably a little easier... Those formats are a lot faster but you have access to stuff like thoughtseize (so you don't have to kill your own stuff) and also stuff like soul diviner (or the spirit that proliferates on combat dmg) that helps you "control" the n° of counters on the ascendancy

  • @Asian_Caleb
    @Asian_Caleb 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Lvd you’re the best man

  • @Alpha_0408
    @Alpha_0408 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love how you can build an powerfull deck around such underrated card ! Do you plan making a video around Reservoir Kraken or Fish tokens in general ? Could be really funny 😂🐠

    • @LegenVD
      @LegenVD  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Included it in my Fight Rigging deck!

  • @geronimo8159
    @geronimo8159 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    It took my some time to understand this card, I have to admit 😅

  • @CopieRightGaming
    @CopieRightGaming 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    As so often, amazing build! I was experimenting with second spell creatures and some X spells to get more spirits and meet the requirements for the 5 counters. It was never in a spot to handle the current played decks but its very fun to play! I like Your build much more, You have some control elements that could make it very playable in Standard! How is Your honest opinion, will will be over 50% WR on the ladder?

    • @Orudaiken
      @Orudaiken 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Depends on what rank you are aiming for. I think this would hit a 50% against starter decks with minimal upgrades.

  • @bradleyhauf312
    @bradleyhauf312 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Any ideas for better offer?

  • @zunarcorporation1117
    @zunarcorporation1117 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Pretty sure the 1st match looks like arcane bombardment.That's what happens with the deck, stall stall stall till you find the card, but it's already too late. LOL Not a fun card to play multiple times.

  • @erosbronzo6518
    @erosbronzo6518 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sick

  • @DopeyDopes
    @DopeyDopes 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    finally solved

  • @RealityDysfunction
    @RealityDysfunction 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Not enough spirit generation IMO. A board wipe would cripple you.

  • @emildegas4213
    @emildegas4213 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Jesus Christ dude I wonder how your brain works, I wish I had your brewing skills so I could make my godamned counterburn take off

  • @KevinM491
    @KevinM491 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    i dunno man, i feel like you put "actually works" in the title when it doesnt really work that often. lol. been wanting to see a build with this though.

    • @LegenVD
      @LegenVD  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Works more consistently than other versions I've seen online!

  • @yonahgreene
    @yonahgreene 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    13:10 lol sorry I gotta call you out “opponent probably holding a fist full of removal” Umm have you seen your own hand?….

  • @captaindc
    @captaindc 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yo

  • @pppppffffffmmmmmmmnn
    @pppppffffffmmmmmmmnn 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Game 1 opponents deck really didn't do anything

    • @LegenVD
      @LegenVD  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yet they did so much!

  • @jeremiahthompson117
    @jeremiahthompson117 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    How about you stop playing so passive, and play to win with attacking your opponent. You play so safe all the time, its better to watch grass grow.

  • @dontaccoll
    @dontaccoll 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    i always thought that esper ascendancy isnt for standard, but also too slow for older formats, so, dunno. this games are cherry picked for good entertainment, i dont recommend anyone to try this at home because you're gonna delete the deck after the first 3 losses.
    The idea is potentially awesome, if a janky format was available i'd have played this

  • @theaeskey2502
    @theaeskey2502 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    1st