Adventures in the Belgian Ardennes - Wildlife photography and tracking
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 18 เม.ย. 2024
- We are finding amazing tracks & sign in the Begian Ardennes. I am there with my son for both tracking and wildlife photography. Join us on our adventure!
For more information about Weylin Tracking, please visit weylintracking.eu/
Hey Jerome, it's so good to see you again! It looks like you and your son had a great day and adventure! Thanks for sharing your day out with us and lots of great information as well. Greg
Thanks Greg! I plan to make more, but the channel is struggling a bit because of the switch to more tracking content....soon more!
Really nice to watch this video this morning in my work coffee break! Awesome to see Thijs is also into wildlife and tracking too :)
Thanks Geoff! How are you doing? It's been some time ago we were in Scotland. Starting to miss it... :)
@@weylintracking-worldwide we're doing well thanks - second baby coming in the summer so busy preparing (and trying to get a few trips away in before that too!)
Oh wow, you are going to be busy again Geoff!
@@weylintracking-worldwide Yup! More chaos :D
Your son has a wonderful trainer !! 😊
We're having loads of fun together :D Thanks Klaus!
You must be so proud of your son. I hope mine grows up to so love wildlife. For a lightweight lens, do consider the new 300 F2.8 GM - it is absolutely incredible, so lightweight and pin sharp with or without teleconverters. Since getting in March has become my favourite lens.
Yes, Thijs is doing awesome! Very curious to see what he will gro into later in life :)
I have been thinking about it. But the difference in focal lenght compared to my 400mm f/2.8 is so low that it feels so weird to buy that one. If I did not had the 400mm, I think I wouldve bought it already. The 100-400 is also a leight weight lens with a little more compositing possibilities. How do you compare the 300mm against the 100400? I guess the 300mm has a lot more bokeh :)
@@weylintracking-worldwide The 300 has bokeh near the 400 (which I also own), but what it has over the 100-400 (which I traded to buy the 300) is the much better low light ability, being more comfortable in the hand (the balance near to camera makes it feel lighter than the 100-400), better optics, faster autofocus and most of all for me flexibility, I have either a 300 F2.8, 420 F4 (with 1.4x teleconverter) or 600 F5.6 (with 2x) as required and I really can't see any drop in image quality with the teleconverters on this lens. I now use the 300 nearly all the time when mobile, only using the 400 stationary like when in a hide, or shooting from a vehicle.
@@Jonathantuba the f/2.8 would be brilliant during darker hours and in the woods for sure... I might go for it, but I have been investing in good glass so much already. It also sorta feels like I should be happy with what I have now, as it is kinda ridiculous to see what I own while it is only partially providing income. 90% of what I photograph or put on video I could do with a RX10 as well...
But that is how I feel now. Tonight I watch a few YT vids on the 300mm and I might think entirely differently, haha.