1) repo - basically a platform which makes it easier for both the contributor and the maintainer 2) contributor - the guy who changes the code 3) PRs - pull request; the thing which contributors send to make their changes 4) committer - evaluates the PRs + implement it if good 5) foundation - when a project becomes too big, it is named a foundation 6) lawyer/os license - the set of rules which state how the code can be distributed, used, modified n stuff - most commonly used = GPL (general public license): it guarantees 4 freedoms (freedom to run, study, share and modify) 7) village/community - when a project becomes somewhat big, then the contributors, committers etc collectively are known as the community *how do i start? --> just do some bug fixes
What happens if you are the open source and applications are outputed via to prevent you or infiltrating your systems or finding infomation? How to fix?
that sounds great, how does one begin to go about finding bugs? I have used beta software in the past and those typically have ways to report bugs that are found. is this what you would recommend or are there other methods of bug hunting?
Patent law covers computer software, not copy right. You do not copy write a wheel. Machine code. Machine. Patent law provides for free or low cost technology, they expire or owners can charge little or nothing. Creating open source however, has relied on copy right law, which is a no no. It has violated copy right law, which provides unconditional transformative copy writes, a power Congress reserved, to create more, not free intellectual property. So then open source is one of two things, patentable, or not. If not, it is free anyway. If it is patentable, but you do not patent it, that is called patent abandonment of your 'discovery'. We can also go to the most basic levels of patent law and say a cpu unit and hardware are so general purpose, that software can not be patentable since there is no other way to run the machine, but by eventually duplicating the code of others, even if working independently. I have no way of knowing that can or will happen. The results of ignoring these concepts has damaged economies, as software not being run through a patent office, has cost people time and money trying to run machines with broken drivers, software and bugs. AI? AI now stands for Automated Intellectual property theft? Where are the foot notes depicting source data? You know, like when you did a paper in college, you have to provide source material? This is exactly why I loudly complained when Google began scraping web pages, instead of just exposing robot page data or customer provided copy. So why should I or you create content, knowing hundreds or thousands will just index it and add it to their portfolio? This is why Word Press became so popular? You could easily scrape content of another site, apply a new theme, and voila, Jersey Boy on Social Security has a blog on Yoga, a real expert? And you felt like crap trying to fix his plugin he spent some money on, hoping to make a couple hundred extra bucks to supplement his income, and knowing he had no prayer running with a group faster at creating new content then he could? Lets not talk about the lady who figured out how to feel good with yoga, she was stupid enough to share? Horrors. I don't know how these people sleep at night. That part of the industry makes the rest of you look bad?
This comment kind of went off in the middle, but you definitely can copyright software in many countries. It usually falls under the Literary category. See for example 17§101 in the US code.
How do i fix it if i am a open souce being abused? Please tell me how all i found out was i am an experient used for this apache...i found me being a application on those sites how to stop it?
None of what he said means much... it might just be the mechanics of a few big projects... the real goods is the legal stuff with the licensing agreements...
Whoops! Here's an excerpt from Wikipedia: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Stallman "[Stallman] campaigns for software to be distributed in such a manner that its users have the freedom to use, study, distribute, and modify that software. Software that ensures these freedoms is termed free software. Stallman launched the GNU Project, founded the Free Software Foundation in October 1985, developed the GNU Compiler Collection and GNU Emacs, and wrote the GNU General Public License."
He's really good at writing backwards.
No wait! He wrote normal and they flipped the vid!
@@muchless So that's why his wedding ring is on his right hand....
@@nickhuynh6321 these are 200iq observations over here
1) repo - basically a platform which makes it easier for both the contributor and the maintainer
2) contributor - the guy who changes the code
3) PRs - pull request; the thing which contributors send to make their changes
4) committer - evaluates the PRs + implement it if good
5) foundation - when a project becomes too big, it is named a foundation
6) lawyer/os license - the set of rules which state how the code can be distributed, used, modified n stuff
- most commonly used = GPL (general public license): it guarantees 4 freedoms (freedom to run, study, share and modify)
7) village/community - when a project becomes somewhat big, then the contributors, committers etc collectively are known as the community
*how do i start? --> just do some bug fixes
Thanks bro !
Excellent explanation. I love open source.
Thanks for saving me the time to watch another 10 videos to get the idea.
I ❤️ OPEN SOURCE! Nicely explained. Thanks for sharing.
Thanks for the video, this was great content on OPEN source 👌
Loved the explanation!
Thats really good! Thanks for your explanation!
Good explanation. Sadly ironic given IBM's attempt to bring Rhel back into proprietary control.
Really good video. Thank you
Great explanation on OSS ecosystem!
Stellar explanation!
Thank You
What happens if you are the open source and applications are outputed via to prevent you or infiltrating your systems or finding infomation? How to fix?
that sounds great, how does one begin to go about finding bugs? I have used beta software in the past and those typically have ways to report bugs that are found. is this what you would recommend or are there other methods of bug hunting?
What do you mean by Beta?
Patent law covers computer software, not copy right. You do not copy write a wheel. Machine code. Machine.
Patent law provides for free or low cost technology, they expire or owners can charge little or nothing.
Creating open source however, has relied on copy right law, which is a no no. It has violated copy right law, which provides unconditional transformative copy writes, a power Congress reserved, to create more, not free intellectual property.
So then open source is one of two things, patentable, or not. If not, it is free anyway. If it is patentable, but you do not patent it, that is called patent abandonment of your 'discovery'.
We can also go to the most basic levels of patent law and say a cpu unit and hardware are so general purpose, that software can not be patentable since there is no other way to run the machine, but by eventually duplicating the code of others, even if working independently.
I have no way of knowing that can or will happen. The results of ignoring these concepts has damaged economies, as software not being run through a patent office, has cost people time and money trying to run machines with broken drivers, software and bugs.
AI? AI now stands for Automated Intellectual property theft? Where are the foot notes depicting source data? You know, like when you did a paper in college, you have to provide source material?
This is exactly why I loudly complained when Google began scraping web pages, instead of just exposing robot page data or customer provided copy.
So why should I or you create content, knowing hundreds or thousands will just index it and add it to their portfolio?
This is why Word Press became so popular? You could easily scrape content of another site, apply a new theme, and voila, Jersey Boy on Social Security has a blog on Yoga, a real expert?
And you felt like crap trying to fix his plugin he spent some money on, hoping to make a couple hundred extra bucks to supplement his income, and knowing he had no prayer running with a group faster at creating new content then he could?
Lets not talk about the lady who figured out how to feel good with yoga, she was stupid enough to share? Horrors. I don't know how these people sleep at night.
That part of the industry makes the rest of you look bad?
This comment kind of went off in the middle, but you definitely can copyright software in many countries. It usually falls under the Literary category. See for example 17§101 in the US code.
How do i fix it if i am a open souce being abused? Please tell me how all i found out was i am an experient used for this apache...i found me being a application on those sites how to stop it?
Please, what's the name of this board he's writing on?
Glass.
open source is controlled by big tech, they sponsor what they need, open source devs give away their work for free to big companies
Contributor focus!
what is the difference between open source and free software ? 😅
None of what he said means much... it might just be the mechanics of a few big projects... the real goods is the legal stuff with the licensing agreements...
Not one single mention of Stallman.
Shame IBM... Shame...
This isn't a history lesson 😂
Whoops! Here's an excerpt from Wikipedia: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Stallman
"[Stallman] campaigns for software to be distributed in such a manner that its users have the freedom to use, study, distribute, and modify that software. Software that ensures these freedoms is termed free software. Stallman launched the GNU Project, founded the Free Software Foundation in October 1985, developed the GNU Compiler Collection and GNU Emacs, and wrote the GNU General Public License."
Richard Stallman is a legend :) He is also funny.
134
But how to earn money 💰💵 from free software?
That is a great question.. Maybe we should learn e-commerce to make money from Open-source software
I'm pretty sure a good reason I have my job is because of working in and with open source.
RedHead earning money by support. Some are also earning through donation, through feature development etc.
Another example is comma ai. The code is open source, how they train the model is closed and they selling the hardware.
Some dudes doesnt code, dudes cant code make a problem, a problem make a job, a job make money 😅
I still don't get it 😢
You are not alone
what exactly?