Clean Energy Generated By Power of the Waves

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 ม.ค. 2023
  • #shorts This power station is so functional to get clean energy by utilizing the power of waves.
    Join our TH-cam channel by clicking here: bit.ly/3asNo2n
    Find us on Instagram: bit.ly/3PM21xW
    Find us on Facebook: bit.ly/3t2Huvb
    Find us on Twitter: bit.ly/3wQfXzA
    Find us on TikTok: bit.ly/3wNsBOu
    Get the latest stories: interestingengineering.com/
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 25

  • @AK-ru3sg
    @AK-ru3sg 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Wonder if it's slightly more restricted in any way being attached at one side to something, compared to a bouy that's floatinig (relatively) freely.

  • @eugenes9751
    @eugenes9751 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    The cost to benefit ratio of this technology is wildly impractical.

    • @xondeez757
      @xondeez757 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      its not about cost, even if its net negative it still provides a basic human need. think of it this way, if it was possible to power a whole city's electricity if they built something but return of investment is 100 years, its still a good idea to do it because its 100% clean energy. roads are super expensive but we still build it because everyone needs it even rural people.

    • @Reotha
      @Reotha 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@xondeez757 energy capacity factor also contributes mate and for this technologyits very poor. If a country or company spends so much money on this but only get 28% of the energy, then it's a loss. This is one of the reasons why it hasn't been wildly explored by developed countries.

    • @markw8324
      @markw8324 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@xondeez757 energy cost is much more related to the amount of energy expended to make something vs what it makes in its lifetime then an economic cost (though the two are related obviously). If something has bad energy cost it means it produces very little or even a net negative amount of energy vs the energy expended just to make one. It doesnt help society.

  • @johnphillipadams3060
    @johnphillipadams3060 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    That needs to be put out triple time everyday until a better source is found.

  • @sourenajalali814
    @sourenajalali814 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What is the name of this converter?

  • @kloakovalimonada
    @kloakovalimonada ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Good but the amount must be minuscule, isn't it?

    • @franklinchinquee8762
      @franklinchinquee8762 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Yes for each motion. But if it's a continuous frequency, it will add up to a vast amount. That's like having a single penny, almost worthless. But having a million, very valuable!

    • @eugenes9751
      @eugenes9751 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@franklinchinquee8762 No, no. That's not even remotely how any of this works. The only thing that matters is the ROI, and on a technology like this, there is no ROI, period. It will always cost more money to build/maintain "wave energy equipment" than it will ever be capable of returning. This is equivalent to lighting cash on fire.

    • @franklinchinquee8762
      @franklinchinquee8762 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@eugenes9751 The original concern was the miniscule amount of electricity that would be produced, not ROI. A reasonable person at a glance, looking at the generation could easily make such a conclusion. But to infer the pros & cons of ROI, would definitely be more tedious, requiring detailed accounting information.

    • @eugenes9751
      @eugenes9751 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@franklinchinquee8762 If the product you're using loses you money, you will never use it. Period.

    • @franklinchinquee8762
      @franklinchinquee8762 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@eugenes9751 Never? Come on! Private capital always seek maximization of profits. But if it's public, the aim is the maximization of utility of its citizens. Anyway you are straying from the original concern - the at a glance empirical observation that the wave generator wasn't up to the task to provide sufficient electricity.

  • @AlmightyRecoveredAddict187
    @AlmightyRecoveredAddict187 ปีที่แล้ว

    ocean power technologies?

  • @christinegracejohn
    @christinegracejohn ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow

  • @timbentley3536
    @timbentley3536 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    that machine generating electricity is about as practical as walking around the world to cross the street.

  • @abbadubenzwin5157
    @abbadubenzwin5157 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Studying a model of changing systems... such as human movements... does not predict movement

  • @Dimaz42
    @Dimaz42 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I wonder how it works? coz we usually use kinetic energy to spin a turbine, but couldn't figure this one out 🤔
    edit: ok the floaters are connected to hydraulic pistons to turn the generators

  • @muhammadajisaputra3428
    @muhammadajisaputra3428 ปีที่แล้ว

    Apa ini peredam ombak

  • @that90sguy77
    @that90sguy77 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How will that silly contraption response to load fluctuations. The only practical clean energy scheme is nuclear energy.

    • @vincentleone1833
      @vincentleone1833 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If you create a floating city, these would help stabilize in rough sea conditions by powering the same city.