Nonlinear Tennis™ Masterclass Pt.1: Concepts of the Natural Game

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 17

  • @xupac1379
    @xupac1379 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    wooow. esoteric science applied to tennis. holy cow.

  • @Shaunsweeney-Kubach71
    @Shaunsweeney-Kubach71 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I am going to work really hard to make sure that I try this system and I am going to let my subscribers know what a great Coach you are. Thank you so much for simplifying this process my friend.

  • @PNWJenya
    @PNWJenya หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Very happy to see this study material made available, thanks!

    • @JackBroudy
      @JackBroudy  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      More to come.

  • @galdricm
    @galdricm 23 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Very helpful content! It’s like observing the nature to play natural.
    Is the 45 degree always in relation to the net or baseline or in relation to the incoming ball trajectory?

  • @serwhit2490
    @serwhit2490 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I like flow, figure 8, sign wave, whip

  • @Shaunsweeney-Kubach71
    @Shaunsweeney-Kubach71 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    This is amazing Coach! Thank you my friend!

    • @JackBroudy
      @JackBroudy  หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@Shaunsweeney-Kubach71 thank you. More to come. 🎾💪👊🏼

  • @JTReef
    @JTReef หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Tennis is 100 percent a rotational sport. The 45 degree contact is a great reference point. I would say on the pro tour when players are making contact with the ball, their dominate shoulder is slightly ahead or even with their non dominant shoulder on their FH strokes. So belly button facing the net pretty much in most cases I’ve noticed from slow motion footage.
    You’re right, stroke mechanics are definitely not linear. The figure 8 is a natural motion IMO. Make sense to me.

  • @Biff420NoScope
    @Biff420NoScope หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Just curious, is there any footage on the internet with you actually hitting a ball?

    • @JackBroudy
      @JackBroudy  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Biff420NoScope sure when I get time I’ll send you some. Tennis players like to show off you know that 😉🎾💪👊🏼

    • @lhslguevara
      @lhslguevara หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I'd also like to see a competitive game by Jack. There are 54 videos and not a single one of him rallying or playing a point, or showing an example of his system during a game.

    • @peacemsnger
      @peacemsnger หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Good question. Tennis is not just talking theory, but putting to test via action, to feel the application of all those hypotheses, and actually seeing the results.

    • @normanashbrooke3345
      @normanashbrooke3345 11 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I had the opportunity to watch Jack’s methods in action a few years ago. I watched Jack’s student, Warren Wood, win the Southern California Open Men’s Singles Championships. In the final, Warren defeated an ATP pro who had been ranked in the top 200 in the world. I watched Warren’s technique carefully, and everything Jack described from the 45 degree line to the core driven swings could be seen in Warren’s game. I have spoken to Warren about Jack, and Warren was very complementary about Jack’s teaching methods. Warren is a thin young man whose game closely resembles Jannik Sinner.

  • @serwhit2490
    @serwhit2490 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Covex, concave, bump, digital, centered. Confusing

  • @serwhit2490
    @serwhit2490 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Your terminology is terrible for me and most likely also for others